Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 27/04/2026Il y a un autre problème je crois (mais je suis peut-être le seul à l'avoir) : les colloques de 2009 apparaissent d'abord et je ne vois pas de bouton pour trier à partir du plus récent comme avant. Ça ne s'affiche d'ailleurs pas dans un ordre chronologique strict. 100 1
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 12/03/2026Je provoque un peu mais je me demande s'il ne fallait pas conclure comme ça :) 200 2
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 17/11/2025J'ai survolé sa thèse—elle alterne entre des généralités (sans y apporter quoi que ce soit), quelques vagues notions juridiques sans rapport évident, et des divagations curieuses, le tout dans un anglais très confus. Par ex: 121 2
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 12/11/2025Quant à une desserte transversale par le Massif central il serait impossible de le faire en l'état actuel du réseau en moins de 8 heures (voire, je le crains, beaucoup plus). Même dans les années 80 il fallait 7h30 donc ce sera forcément plus aujourd'hui. 100 1
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 11/11/2025La fourragère aux couleurs de la croix de guerre 14-18 + les fourragères, portée sur un uniforme. Contrairement notamment aux médailles les fourragères sont décernées à un corps collectif plus ou moins grand. 000 0
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 05/11/2025I personally like to use the Légifrance « dossier législatif » as a starting point unless I'm looking for a specific document/the compte rendu (i.e. the Hansard). A link to it exists at the top of most acts and links to the Senate + Assembly pages as well as documents not easily found on either. 000 0
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 02/11/2025Re the bustitution this is what the current works-related disruption entails as of today (translation in the ALT text): 030 3
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 10/10/2025Puisque les comparaisons avec la IVe sont de retour, en cas de nouveau blocage du PLF[SS] cette année, rappelons qu'il existe bien une procédure conçue par MM. Debré et de Gaulle pour de pareilles circonstances : 010 1
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 12/08/2025Sup. Ct. R. 14(1)(a): "The questions ... expressed ... without unnecessary detail. The questions should be short and should not be argumentative or repetitive." The question: 110 1
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 11/07/2025There's an interactive panorama of a 787 simulator here: flightdecksolutions.com/our-fleet/B787 000 0
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 23/04/2025To the extent that we (France) interpret our equivalent of the Establishment Clause to ostracise Muslims, I don't think that most of that actually comes from the statute but from the right-wing political discourse. Statute translation in the alt text. 000 0
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 22/04/2025D'autant plus que la vraie citation est exactement ce qu'ils affirment ne serait pas ce qu'a dit la cour : 020 2
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 17/04/2025Ce n'est d'ailleurs pas le seul enseignement de la cour (traduction dans le texte ALT) : 120 2
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 10/04/2025I think 13 000 words refers to the *WHOLE* CFR part which defines plenty of different things, some of which are related to showers (like "hand-held showerhead") and others which have no obvious link at all (see the 4 consecutives examples) 160 6
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 03/04/2025Une petite question si je puis me permettre : L'île de la Réunion ne fait-elle pas partie du territoire douanier de l'UE ? 000 0
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 01/04/2025That's not quite what it says. It doesn't claim that she's breached someone else's human rights because of her embezzlement, but it does appear to view her political leadership as an *aggravating* circumstance. 1132 13
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 28/03/20252 notes: 1. Alt Text + Translation 2. Note that Libération is traditionally regarded as a left-leaning broadsheet. 060 6
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 20/03/2025I mean I think the idea of a video opinion is interesting (why not?), but doing it with (personal) guns everywhere makes me wonder if this statute may or may not be implicated. 000 0
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 27/02/2025Just to respond to that post because I think it's in the public interest to do so (entirely excusable mistake): In fairness that's normally how it's written in long form: "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and NORTHERN Ireland". Great Britain = Eng. + Wales + Scot.. UK = Great Britain + NI 240 4
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 27/02/2025Un message à destination de nos amis privatistes : 000 0
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 24/02/2025On en apprend tous les jours—je ne m'attendais pas à ce que Calais soit à la même distance de Strasbourg que Prague. Je me demande d'ailleurs si « certains Français » ne signifie pas en réalité « tous les Français sauf ceux qui sont allés vérifier sur une carte ». 130 3
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 19/02/2025Funny you should say that. I'm somewhat reminded of this turn of phrase from Lord Atkin. 020 2
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 14/02/2025DOJ attorneys may appear without PHV motion per SDNY's local rules. LCvR 1.3(l). As an aside, would anyone know why they offer special treatment for Connecticut and Vermont attorneys but not those of other states? www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/defaul... 010 1
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 13/02/2025Je me permets d'émettre un avis un brin divergent sur ce point. Je me demande s'il eût été plus judicieux d'occulter toute mention de sa qualité : 200 2
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 08/02/2025On peut se demander si Mme Lavalette gagnerait « à s’intéresser à l’article 10 de la DDHC », lequel n'interdit manifestement pas à une EC de s'opposer au tractage politique lors d'un de ses cours et de soulever, dans un but pédagogique, le caractère douteux de la politique qu'ils prônent... 042 4
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 27/01/2025Other sources would appear those that one though. These are figures from 2018 for the UK and Germany and 2020 French figures. 100 1
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 23/01/2025They're even citing authority that directly contradicts what they're saying (at most that supports restricting birthright citizenship for those on tourist visas). 0100 10
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 20/01/2025On dirait la salle des séances du Palais Bourbon. 000 0
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 20/01/2025Wait until you see his bio on the new website: www.whitehouse.gov/administrati... 151 5
Un Publiciste @unjuriste.eurosky.social · 19/12/2024In mind and need to find the exact version of it/a similar quote then it could work. E.g. this: 100 1
![Notes de bas de page, où il est écrit « the same plase [sic] » au lieu de « op cit » ou une autre référence normale.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:w55fgydezruvrujjh5p4mpxn/bafkreifh2hvjh64bkkr3p2t26tlpbr5paqeezb7nhcrvmreayw7oktuinu)
![Questions Presented / In Obergefell v. Hodges, “five lawyers closed the
debate,” and imposed “an act of will, not legal
judgment. The right it announce[d] had no basis in
the Constitution.” 576 U.S. 644, 687 (2015) (Roberts,
J., dissenting). “[T]the Court read a right to same-sex
marriage into the Fourteenth Amendment, even
though that right is found nowhere in the text.” Davis
v. Ermold, 141 S. Ct. 3, 3 (2020) (Thomas, J.,
Statement). As predicted at the time Obergefell was
decided, it “would threaten the religious liberty of
many Americans who believe that marriage is a
sacred institution between one man and one woman.”
Id. “As a result of this Court’s alteration of the
Constitution, Davis found herself with a choice
between her religious beliefs and her job. When she
chose to follow her faith . . . she was sued almost
immediately for violating the constitutional rights of
same-sex couples.” Id. And, after being sued, she was
thrown in jail for doing so and then faced a jury
verdict of $100,000 (plus $260,000 in attorney’s fees)
based solely on emotional distress damages for “hurt
feelings” with no actual damages in her individual
capacity because the lower courts held that she was
entitled to no First Amendment protection. If ever a
case deserved review, the first individual who was
thrown in jail post-Obergefell for seeking
accommodation for her religious beliefs should be it.
The Questions Presented are:
(1) Whether the First Amendment Free Exercise
Clause provides an affirmative defense to tort liability](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:w55fgydezruvrujjh5p4mpxn/bafkreiafxxtbvtttlvvllf66giaaqyotk6g3bp7d56bple5id2fnlwot5q)
![Article 1: "The Republic guarantees freedom of conscience. It protects the free exercise of religions subject only to the restrictions imposed herein in the interests of public order."
Article 2 para. 1: "The Republic shall not recognise nor defray nor subsidise any religion. In consequence, from the 1st of January following the promulgation of this Act, all appropriations of the State, and [local governments] for the exercise of religion are repealed."
Para 2: [Limited exceptions for chaplaincies]
Para 3: "Public religious organisations are abolished, subject to article 3 [transitional provisions]"](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:w55fgydezruvrujjh5p4mpxn/bafkreieizefurrjknpitihc32xxa2nh5hfdqvdhzwowirrme2pyxoo43bi)
![Traduction : « Nous nous accrochons encore à l'espoir qu'il n'est pas naïf de croire que nos bons camarades [ou confrères] de la branche exécutive perçoivent encore l'état de droit comme essentiel à l'esprit américain. Cette affaire constitue leur chance unique d'assumer cette valeur et de faire appel à ce qu'il y a de meilleur en nous pendant qu'il est encore temps de le faire. »](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:w55fgydezruvrujjh5p4mpxn/bafkreibgffkyo3teozsucwpotmjy5qbrs7wn6ile3sxdh2ec3sm44w42pu)
![Front page, of which 60% is dedicated to America, includes pictures of (from L to R) AOC, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, and Kamala Harris. The headline says "United States: Where Are the Democrats?" The lede reads "Faced with the Trump steamroller, the American left remains absent, With the exception of Bernie Sanders and Alexandria [sic] Ocasio-Cortez, who are leading the fight "against oligarchy"."](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:w55fgydezruvrujjh5p4mpxn/bafkreidc626zn6qysevutbu7myfyczlykase62om6cl7azadqj64pl52cq)
![Extract from Lord Atkin's dissent in Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206: "In this case I have listened to arguments which might have been addressed acceptably to the Court of King's Bench in the time of Charles I."](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:w55fgydezruvrujjh5p4mpxn/bafkreigadpfqmrwxk2btlhoo34blrhhvnj37ualv6obtdydpseh5vgzosa)
![Art. L.231-1-1 CJA : « [Les magistrats administratifs] ne peuvent se prévaloir, à l'appui d'une activité politique, de leur appartenance à la juridiction administrative. »](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:w55fgydezruvrujjh5p4mpxn/bafkreidh73umt67imvmzdxbjlp7y2r5uhpuofxh5xmjd66xr5kqkndxera)
![France—[Average dwelling size] has exceeded 90 m2 since the early 2000s: 92 m2 in 2020, compared with 82 m2 in 1984. (INSEE)](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:w55fgydezruvrujjh5p4mpxn/bafkreigktjf3h2puxgcupohmbfdg3s4pbfw3svdqzwb6uiuykq6l3idtyu)
![Extract from the Memorandum reading as follows:
[B]efore the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, Justice Story wrote: “Persons who are born in a country are generally deemed to be citizens and subjects of that country. A reasonable qualification of the rule would seem to be that it should not apply to the children of parents who were in itinere in the country, or who were abiding there for temporary purposes, as for health, or occasional business.” Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws § 48, at 48 (1834).](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:w55fgydezruvrujjh5p4mpxn/bafkreid67hhpbn732zhte3ic36iiivs6g4kbuewckt6k4awi72hwwx7foe)
![“[A dis]trict court, if it were able to shield its orders from appellate review merely by designating them as temporary restraining orders, rather than as preliminary injunctions, would have virtually unlimited authority over the parties in an injunctive proceeding” Sampson v. Murray, 415 U.S. 61, 86-87 (1974)](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:w55fgydezruvrujjh5p4mpxn/bafkreih2lmj2tzn6mbfoirurdiese3olfpr4ngba64u2kfgjfsnhhihpp4)