A court is once again reviewing President Donald Trump’s decision to deploy armed National Guard troops across the District, as federal appeals court judges on Wednesday questioned whether the president could use military forces to police the nation’s capital despite objections from its elected leaders. “It violates the law and the principles on which this country was founded to have the U.S. military policing the streets of any American community, including the District of Columbia,” D.C. Attorney General Brian L. Schwalb said following the hearing. The confrontation before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit comes more than a year after Trump ordered troops into Washington in August 2025, declaring a crime-fighting mission even as violent crime was declining. “For over a year, thousands of armed soldiers who are not from here and have limited law enforcement training have occupied our streets, spreading fear and confusion by patrolling near our schools, deploying next to ballot boxes, and marching through our neighborhoods,” Schwalb said. “This is not normal, or legal, and we cannot become numb to it.” During Wednesday’s hearing, the three-judge panel pressed Justice Department attorney Eric McArthur to explain the limits on presidential authority to deploy National Guard troops. Judge Cornelia T.L. Pillard questioned whether the administration’s interpretation effectively circumvented the Posse Comitatus Act, which limits the military’s involvement in domestic law enforcement. Judge Judith Rogers also questioned the scope of presidential power. “I think the limiting principle in our position is the president has to be calling out the guard in aid of the civil authorities,” McArthur responded. The administration argues that Trump’s authority over the D.C. National Guard permits deployment and that troops are helping protect federal property and support law enforcement. Schwalb’s lawsuit challenges three actions by the federal government. It alleges that the administration illegally deployed the D.C. National Guard for local law enforcement, brought troops from other states into Washington without the District’s consent, and asserted federal command over National Guard personnel who remained in state militia status. The lawsuit also seeks to protect the District’s self-governing authority under the Home Rule Act and to ensure that civilian policing remains in legally authorized hands. On Nov. 20, 2025, U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb ruled the deployment illegal and granted Schwalb’s request for a preliminary injunction. The appeals court temporarily stayed the order, allowing troops to remain as the administration challenged Cobb’s ruling. The deployment has continued, with about 2,900 troops remaining in Washington as of last week, according to an Associated Press report. The Defense Department has extended the mission through January 2029, and the federal government awarded a $292 million housing contract for personnel assigned to Joint Task Force-D.C. Outside the courthouse, protesters reportedly demanded an end to the military presence and questioned why Washington residents should endure prolonged military patrols in their neighborhoods. The appellate judges have not announced their decision. Their ruling could determine whether the president can continue to use National Guard troops for local law enforcement in Washington without the District’s consent. Schwalb maintained that the military presence has already persisted far too long. “It is long past time for this illegal deployment to end and for the National Guard to return to their homes, their families, and their regular jobs,” Schwalb said. ## **Join the _Washington Informer_ Family!** When my father, Dr. Calvin W. Rolark, founded this paper over 60 years ago, he envisioned more than just a newspaper—he dreamed of a platform to uplift our community with stories of triumph and resilience. His unwavering dedication to service shaped our mission, which remains steadfast: to serve, inform, and empower. **Today, providing free, fact-based local journalism is more challenging than ever, but the need has only grown.** **Your support is vital to sustaining this legacy.** _Publisher Denise Rolark-Barnes_ One-time $16 $26 $60 Other Donation amount $ Thanks for your contribution! Support Us Today

Watching a DVD of the French film alone in my room, I saw for the first time a character who moved through the world like I do

Leonard Peltier was imprisoned for 49 years before his sentence was commuted. A new Netflix documentary exposes the ‘corrupt’ system that allowed it to happen

The fate of Kilmar Abrego Garcia will again be argued in court on Tuesday when his legal team asks a federal judge to block his deportation to Liberia.

Satellite imagery shows further destruction of homes, businesses and places of worship since fragile ceasefire

Protesters gathered for a “Hands Around the Kennedy Center” rally to protest President Donald Trump’s handling of the arts center. CNN’s Sunlen Serfaty reports.

_photo byOlaf Zerbock_ “Dear PoPville, We are watching as Donald Trump destroys the most treasured and historic parts of our city. We couldn’t stop the destruction of the East Wing but we have to stop them from destroying the Kennedy Center. Imagine driving in from VA to DC and seeing a big hole where it used to be. Imagine never seeing the beautiful chandeliers in the opera house again or never being able to show them to your child for the first time. The Kennedy Center doesn’t just bring us the best of the arts, it brings our community together with an emphasis on free and accessible events. These are dark times, everything feels urgent, and we’re exhausted but we just cannot let them do this. **Hands around the Kennedy Center is Friday 6:30-8:00pm**. Let’s show up for our city.” Tom shares from around 1:30pm Thursday: “the Kennedy Center remains intact atm. No construction equipment, just a ghostly, dilapidated aura with fencing prohibiting even walkable, plaza entry.” Stay tuned.

Three openers and live band for Sheeran’s tour depart after removal of Macklemore over ‘free Palestine’ comments

As the first union of debtors our aim is to abolish debts and advocate for a transformation in the way public goods and services are distributed.

Who’s more likely to steal sweets from a child? According to science, it’s the rich. A study seemingly confirming our suspicions about the moral behaviour of the wealthy was one of the winners of the 2026 Ig Nobel prizes, which honour research that makes you laugh and then think. Science editor Ian Sample tells Madeleine Finlay what the researchers think could be behind the phenomenon, and they explore some of the other awards, including one for a surprising quality we look for in our friends and another for a biomechanical definition of kissing

Exclusive: Documents show officers from Maine to California worry Meta’s camera-equipped glasses will be used either to secretly record them or aid acts of terrorism

The bureau could be hiring "people with questionable backgrounds." The post FBI Now Allowing History of Bestiality Among New Recruits appeared first on Futurism.