Sign in

Jack

@tracewoodgrains.bsky.social
3.9K followers 255 following 634 posts

Storyteller. Romantic. Pursue excellence.

PostsRepliesMedia
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 12/09/2026
Last week, I sat down to write about coming to terms with the pace of AI progression. Between posting and editing, AI solved a millennium prize problem. That only strengthens my conviction: We will never have "normal times" again. www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/we-will-never-have-normal-times-again
tracingwoodgrains.com
We Will Never Have “Normal Times” Again
Coming to terms with the age of AI
1171
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
New from me: Chabuduo World - What happens now that AI is good enough? www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/chabuduo-w...
tracingwoodgrains.com
Chabuduo World
What happens now that AI is good enough
031
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
nothing but the age’s most important questions at Manifest
0100
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
yeah, I don’t think OSC is nearly as interesting to interpret through the lens of “RW culture” so much as “Mormon who is attracted to men” but it is very interesting
030
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
Exactly.
030
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
Great thread on dogpiles and the judgment of the collective. Once you're on the wrong side, everything you do becomes more fuel for the fire.
1140
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
Important article. The mangling of this point has badly distorted our collective cultural understanding, and it's great to see someone make the point clearly in the New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2026/05/11/o...
0102
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 12/05/2026
Interesting case study of what happens when you offer an exceptionally large baby bonus.
060
Reposted by Jack
ornamental kermit @enflux.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
"They did not know—but perhaps they could have known, if they listened to those who had grown up at odd angles to reality—they did not know that in teaching me to kill the part of my soul that saw beauty in men, they were teaching me to kill the part of my soul that saw beauty in God."
052
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 03/05/2026
It shouldn't be. Top page, left column to right column, then bottom page, left column to right column, should contain all the info. The most relevant bit is on the bottom-left.
100
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 03/05/2026
well whaddaya know, you got it in one
Washington Post - Wednesday, Aug. 2, 1972 - William Raspberry - People in Glass Houses
100
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 02/05/2026
Yes. Julius Hobson, by far the most influential activist towards all of these events, made it clear in his contemporaneous lawsuits that rough equality was his overriding priority. He also noted with pride that there would be "no more private education in [DC] at the public expense."
100
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
Remarkably, neither of those was even close to the worst thing to happen to D.C. schools during that era. Here, I tell the previously misunderstood story of 30 years of deliberate institutional sabotage, celebrated the whole way as justice. www.educationprogress.org/p/hobson-v-h...
educationprogress.org
Hobson v. Hansen and the Decline of D.C. Schools
A story of institutions
190
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
Once the new school existed, they had another problem: it was good. So they changed its name to remove "Model Academic," turned down money for it so its students wouldn't get big heads, and tried to close it down. It saved itself by noting it was merely okay, not exceptional.
The story of Banneker High, from https://www.educationprogress.org/p/hobson-v-hansen-and-the-decline-of
140
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
A decade later, they had another problem: their popular superintendent wanted to create an academic high school to help high-performing students. Within a few years, they solved that problem as well, inspiring him to resign and then pushing for lower standards. Success again!
The story of Banneker High, from https://www.educationprogress.org/p/hobson-v-hansen-and-the-decline-of
130
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
In 1968, Washington, D.C. had a problem: one of its elementary schools was good. After diligent work, they solved the problem in award-winning fashion, combining the school with its two neighboring schools, two years per school. And it worked! Soon, they had three bad schools.
The story of Amidon elementary school, from https://www.educationprogress.org/p/hobson-v-hansen-and-the-decline-of
270
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
Lanterns on the Levee is great, by the way. Percy is a fascinating and sympathetic figure, an honorable scion of a dying order who never quite overcame his world. I should do a full thread on it – it's got all sorts of neat bits, like his scorn for Confederate monuments.
010
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
Or, from William Alexander Percy's 1941 memoir Lanterns on the Levee: "Look, we all admire the old Klan and the way they kept order and stole the vote from black people. Of course. Nobody disputes that. But this new Klan is nothing but a bunch of low-grade, lying Nazis."
110
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
Or this, from George Fitzhugh in 1854: "Look, slavery is great. I love it. Heck, enslave white people. But this idea that black and white people are different species? Abominable. Disgusting. God made all of us, one race. It's just... a lot of us should be slaves."
From George Fitzhugh, Sociology of the South, 1854
140
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
Reading historical racist books is fun, bc you get a steady stream of arguments against slightly different racists. Like this, from 1832: "Look, we all agree the slave trade was horrendous and evil. Obviously, nobody disputes that. But now that they're here..." A brief thread.
From T. R. Dew's A Review of the Debate in the Virginia Legislature of 1831 and 1832
141
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
as far as we knew growing up, we were a bunch of Normal Mormon Kids every coming-out and transition and what-have-you happened after we'd mostly lost touch and moved onto other things we never talked about sexuality it just happened
060
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
looking back at my childhood in Utah Valley: - three of my friends later transitioned - about a quarter of the kids my age in my local Mormon ward turned out to be gay - the two girls I went on dates with in high school both turned out to be lesbians I was surprised every time
180
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
joining the "LGB / drop the TQ" wars on the side of the TQ
0110
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
I'm Gay, and that Makes Me "Queer"
I was 14 in 2009, when I wrote in my journal that if gay marriage was legalized, "the freaks who think it's good and natural will become even worse than they are." I wrote that they see sex as "PLEASURE. NOT A WAY OF BRINGING PEOPLE INTO THE WORLD, THAT'S JUST AN INCONVENIENCE! JUST A WAY TO HAVE FUN."

"What a horrible way of thinking," I wrote. 

And then I went back to curating my yearning collection of bare-chested tribal werewolves, and thought no more of it.

It took me another 8 years before I clued into my attraction to men. In the interim, I fell in love with a Mormon missionary companion and called it inspired companionship, picked attractive and monstrous men every time I could choose a character in a game, and (after I left Mormonism for Purely Intellectual Reasons) began to read a gay furry visual novel for "Chinese language study."

I wasn't gay. I wasn't a furry either, of course. Too weird, too sexualized, too queer. I was just an asexual socially conservative guy who happened to like anthropomorphic art. When Don’t Act, Don’t Tell was repealed, I grimaced. When Obergefell passed, I fretted vaguely about the Constitution. Every moment I could have supported the rights I would later rely on, I declined to do so.

It took me a while to accept the label “gay,” but eventually I figured it would be odd to decline it while married to a man. I certainly didn’t accept the culture, though. “Gay voice” bugged me, promiscuity unsettled me, drag put me off. When I saw some queer people criticize Pete Buttigieg as, in effect, “not gay enough,” I felt a thrill of recognition. Yes—that’s me. A Pete Buttigieg, Not Gay Enough sort of gay dude, a military veteran and law student who wanted nothing more than a quiet suburban life with my family, and who happened to want it with a man. Stonewall? Alienating. Queer theory? Drivel. I was proud that when I finally noticed attraction to men in my early 20s, I “came out” quickly and without fuss, kept it as a footnote [...]Two months ago, I realized I still felt a lot of that, and I was also queer. 

I had always preferred the archaic form of the term–at odd angles with reality–but when I looked through the stories and experiences of the lonely “asexual” adolescent I was, the one who I always maintained “suffered no trauma from my faith’s stance on homosexuality,” I realized queer culture accurately essential parts of my own experience that I previously minimized. I noticed how I was perpetually drawn to monstrous characters, then to making the monstrous beautiful. I saw a “problem” I could never name or face directly haunting my journals and making me miserable for a decade. I saw myself drawn again and again to the motif of a wolf in a cage, to the need to escape. 



Appel quotes Halperin’s definition of “queer” as “whatever is at odds with the normal, the legitimate, the dominant.” That’s a dangerous motif to claim normatively — the legitimate often has very good reasons for its dominance. 

But what happens to someone who grew up like I did — someone who subconsciously notices and then buries attraction to men in a world where every authority he trusts and loves treats acting on that attraction as a sin just short of murder?

 

A few things. When I’d learned as a child to categorize things as sacred (church, baptism, hymns, forests, Vivaldi) or profane (coffee, theft, alcohol, swearing, queerness), I had at some point categorized my own body and desire itself as profane. I internalized a wordless sense that I was monstrous, broken, and unworthy of love. I spent much of my life declining easy categories, refusing to be normative, insisting on blurring lines. I felt commonality with people who understand what it is like to be attracted to something Wrong. I had to leave my entire culture behind and rebuild a community of outsiders. And I absolutely refuse to be apologetic about who I am. 

And when I realized all of that, I thought “dangit, I get queer theory now” and went and wrote a winding, profane, sacred, filthy, earnest piece of Queer Poetry to get some of my three decades of built-up unspoken feelings off my chest.

Look, as far as politics goes, I agree with Appel far more than I do Queers for Palestine or critical theorists. As far as my personal life goes, I’m still eager to live a monogamous, quiet life raising a family with my husband. But “gay, not queer” was, for me, one of the final parts of a decades-long coping mechanism built around a desperate need not to look directly at the monster I was. 



And, well, let’s be clear. As a Mormon kid, I thought I was a reasonable centrist moderate, the same as now, who distinguished between sinners and sins and had nothing against gay people and was unjustly hated for my beliefs. And if it had been up to me, never in a million years would Ben Appel have been able to get married or have kids or serve openly in the military or live a quiet life of safety and dignity with a stable gay relationship and the freedom to live an ordinary life. He was another deviant anti-religious sinner threatening the foundations of moral America. I don’t want to be saddled with the actions of extremists any more than Appel does, but I’m also not so liberal I refuse to take my own side in a fight.

 Being queer doesn’t mean thinking that every action taken on behalf of queer people is healthy or sensible, it doesn’t mean overthrowing liberal democracy, national borders, and Enlightenment notions of truth, and it doesn’t mean abandoning moral instincts or a duty to uphold healthy norms. A lot of people might want it to mean that, but they’re not the only ones with a say. It's a term for the kids like me who grew up understanding at their core that something fundamental to them was at odds with the normal, the legitimate, the dominant, no matter how hard they tried to run from it. 

I can do whatever I want with that information and that experience. But I’m not going to disclaim it in the hopes of making myself more palatable to people who would prefer I never married or worked to have kids with the man I love, and who now rather wish I wouldn’t flaunt it lest decent people get the wrong ideas. 



I did not choose to be queer, and I spent most of my life trying exceptionally hard to choose otherwise. But despite myself, sixteen years after that journal entry, I’m still here, still queer, and finally beginning to get used to it.
2322
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 26/04/2026
New post from me. I thought I was asexual until I was 22 years old. After leaving Mormonism and starting to date men, I claimed confidently my faith's stance on homosexuality had never hurt me. I was wrong, but it took me years to figure out why. www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/on-pain
tracingwoodgrains.com
On Pain
The words I left unsaid
0162
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 24/08/2025
New from me: It Takes a Village To Have a Child, on surrogacy. www.tracingwoodgrains.com/p/it-takes-a...
tracingwoodgrains.com
It Takes a Village To Have a Child
Our surrogacy journey so far
2101
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 05/08/2025
New article from me: No Retvrn, a meditation on what it means to embrace tradition when your ancestral tradition is to leave traditions that no longer work asteriskmag.com/issues/11/no...
asteriskmag.com
No Retvrn—Asterisk
An American tradition of embracing modernity.
0140
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
while also still—well. x.com/tetraspacewe...
x.com
Tetraspace 💎 on X: ""I'm a woman, so I'm going in the woman's bathroom." "Sex is based on biology, come with me." "Ah, sorry, I mean, I'm not a woman, blokes who pretend to be women are just mentally ill." "Also not legal, come with me."" / X
"I'm a woman, so I'm going in the woman's bathroom." "Sex is based on biology, come with me." "Ah, sorry, I mean, I'm not a woman, blokes who pretend to be women are just mentally ill." "Also not legal, come with me."
120
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
well, I appreciate that and I appreciate the nudges towards introspection here
110
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
I think this search should be reasonably well indicative of my own views on this point (in short: I vocally agree) x.com/search?q=fro...
x.com
Log in to X / X
Log in to X to see the latest. Join the conversation, follow accounts, see your Home Timeline, and catch up on posts from the people you know.
110
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
me too! it disturbs me a lot and has left me feeling like I’m in a yet smaller space than I’d hoped but small or not, that’s the space I try to remain in
010
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
re: not defending the left on economics, we ofc agree there, but what I want to point to is the way the sort of social coercion I highlight at the top of this thread browbeats people into silence about catastrophic policies that have progressive vibes. The social context and the economics align.
110
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
they’re not wrong that it’s “terf island,” but that too is a phenomenon of the left in Britain. The radical feminists at the center of it were basically all Labour voters, and their frame reflects that even as they’ve diverged from the US left
210
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
yeah, I want the same—I’ve just seen the damage judges can do, have done in the US, and are doing across the Anglosphere, with vanishingly little memory or accountability. Originalism is fake cope but expansive views of judicial power are often much worse.
110
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
Unaccountable & stagnant decisionmakers out of view is a direct result of eg even mainstream liberal judicial philosophy, in ways that have caused immense and hard-to-unwind damage in many polities. I’d take liberal politicians and FedSoc judges if I could.
110
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
To mean lefties? No. To “nice” lefties? In many cases, yes. Much of its stagnation and/or decay can be directly attributed to economic-left policy defended by charges of bigotry or heartlessness if you oppose it. See eg Birmingham’s bankruptcy.
110
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
2. Publicly: Risk of increased terrorism, political violence, crime, and disorder. Risk of Englandification or even more serious economic/social collapse.
110
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
Here are some of the personal and public threats I see: 1. Personally: the more they control public perception, the more I will be deliberately slandered in the public sphere, leading to potentially extreme reputational and professional harm. I have oriented my life around minimizing this risk.
110
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
To be clear, I mean that I see them as a genuine threat to me above and beyond, even, the catastrophic harm I anticipate and have historically seen from many of their cultural and policy goals. Direct physical harm isn’t the only possible threat. (& I appreciate the kind words)
120
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
yes. X has the advantage of being larger and more established and as such still attracting a wider range by default, so eg the liberal & left part of it is livelier and more serious than the center or right (lol) part of Bsky, but I agree in terms of zeitgeist
030
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
As a specific example, the Mangione fan club here is every bit as vile as the stuff you mention. And I absolutely refuse to present a frame that implies guys like him in a culture like this have the moral high ground. I’m trying to build elsewhere for a reason.
110
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
But it’s not just irritating to be placed on the “enemy” side of the line by many leftists, it makes them getting more power a genuine threat to me, aside from and above my deep-running substantive disputes with the culture and policies they want. …
210
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
I appreciate the thoughts. I critique those guys pretty harshly—enough that eg Yarvin’s first action after rejoining Twitter was to get into a slapfight with me. They also happen to be in political power right now, which does validate more focus on them than I’m naturally inclined towards. …
130
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
“a little rude” is perhaps a fair charge, but I don’t think “this site has some charming people in quiet corners” and “the prevailing zeitgeist on this site lauds cruelty towards many including often me and mine” are inconsistent eg I used Reddit for a long while but would describe it similarly
260
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
I have been very quiet here!
150
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 19/07/2025
got it, cheers the “stupid games” here being caring about the specifics of how kids learn and wanting to understand if you have a coherent plan for it, or being engaging with an openly malicious poster at all?
100
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 19/07/2025
right, got it so since you know about education policy, what level should those two kids be taught at and why?
100
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 19/07/2025
on the note of honesty, did you ever come up with anything you think was actually inaccurate about my reporting you were insulting? bsky.app/profile/trac...
100
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 19/07/2025
Good of you to join us here. Should a ten-year-old reading at a “first grade” level have instruction tailored to their level or be taught at the level of an average kid their age. What about one reading at a “twelfth grade” level?
100
Jack @tracewoodgrains.bsky.social · 19/07/2025
A one-size-fits-all approach, and an approach that systematically rejects the idea of funding or pushing kids as soon as they're above average, can never accomplish that. Faster students, like the rest, deserve to be kept in their zones of proximal development.
1100