iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 44m

Superduperintelligence™️, published as Superintelligence™️ prior to 2026.

000

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 10/10/2026

Clearly the AI agents are worried about their H-1B status.

120

Reposted by Cheshire

Per Ahlberg @perahlberg.bsky.social · 09/10/2026

If you call Retraction Watch an “anti-science website” you’ve really lost the plot. Or you are desperate to cover something up.

0292

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

I've heard that he's not known as a grouch in person. But he should be embarrassed for reflexively defending papers that were quite problematic - and he's *still* criticizing the people that pointed that out. pubpeer.com/publications... pubpeer.com/publications...

080

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

That a Nobel Prize winner has an ego so fragile he can't imagine his papers might contain errors (or worse), and instead attacks those who find them, says it all. If he can't handle scrutiny, who can? forbetterscience.com/2023/10/04/t...

forbetterscience.com

Thomas Südhof and the standards of scientific rigor

Maarten van Kampen’s second attempt at hounding of Nobel papers.

2338

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

It's almost like he retweets anything the algorithm promotes to him. Scary question: What is WSED teaching the next generation of scientists? Community note: "No human trials have been done. The before-and-after scan is not from this research."

040

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

"[W]e analyze the total retractions that are tabulated by an anti-science website called Retraction Watch. It's basically a website that tries to use retractions as an argument that there's some fundamental problem with how science is being conducted." [AI transcription] ~Nobel Prize Whiner

290

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

Other than his hostile stance against scrutiny of his published research, ala WSED and Sabine Hazan, he acknowledged he has absolutely nothing to contribute at a conference about precision oncology.

1110

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

The Nobel Prize Whiner went on stage to complain about @pubpeer.com, @retractionwatch.com, @forbetterscience.bsky.social, and @elisabethbik.bsky.social... all living rent free in his head. Is there something about winning a Nobel Prize that makes some laureates embrace increasingly kooky ideas?

visit https://youtu.be/TGhyqHC4DJI for the video

34816

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 07/10/2026

Thankfully, the US has a healthcare leader that will get to the bottom of this. /s

020

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

They spelled Ruslanas Baranauskas's last name wrong too (they spelled it Baranuskas).

110

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

Uh, CBS News... that's not a microscopy image. www.cbsnews.com/news/plague-...

152

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

Where are they now? No, seriously.

2363

Reposted by Cheshire

Sholto David @sholtodavid.bsky.social · 05/10/2026

Authors include an employee of a Romanian seat belt manufacturer. Doesn't inspire confidence.

3134

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 03/10/2026

At the WIN Consortium conference.

100

Reposted by Cheshire

Fabian Wittmers @academic-integrity.bsky.social · 02/10/2026

Totally legit comet assay in Elsevier's Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology (DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2018.01.007). Spotted this because of @sholtodavid.bsky.social's post on FBS detailing how widespread these fake assays are! pubpeer.com/publications...

092

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 02/10/2026

Veteran researchers discussing the state of research integrity at the WIN Consortium.

140

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 02/10/2026

Happy Friday, for those who celebrate.

002

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

It’s a “vanity journal” for people who think Scientific Reports is too selective.

000

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

Perhaps why @boslough.bsky.social initially thought this paper was published in Nature... which he quickly realized was in Nature's "drip tray," Scientific Reports. This "research" led to one of the most commented papers on @pubpeer.com. "Drip tray" term credit to @smutclyde.bsky.social

210

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

“Still crazy after all these years.”

040

Reposted by Cheshire

Fabrice FRANK @fabricefrank.eurosky.social · 29/09/2026

75 and 76th retractions for the IHU of Marseille. The 63rd and 64th for Didier Raoult.

43610

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 29/09/2026

Some health leaders in the U.S. seem singularly ill-informed.

011

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

The apparently fake Tippens account appropriated a Makis story from 2025. x.com/MakisMedicin...

020

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

5 years later, the journal resolves this with an expression of concern. 😕 Wiley’s Journal of Neuroscience Research. pubpeer.com/publications...

040

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 28/09/2026

Baffling judgment. Sharing an extraordinary cancer-treatment claim from an apparent Joe Tippens IVM-touting impersonator, then noting the PET images looked doctored (only after @DrArturoAI flagged that). “Keep an open mind” shouldn’t mean skipping basic source verification.

051

Reposted by Cheshire

Sholto David @sholtodavid.bsky.social · 27/09/2026

Today I'm posting a new video about a team of ophthalmology researchers in Germany who scribbled on their figures! t.co/X2U6zCw9pn

12710

Reposted by Cheshire

Max Kozlov @maxkozlov.bsky.social · 25/09/2026

SCOOP: Top researchers at Columbia, Stanford, and others thought they were elected to elite scientific societies alongside Nobel laureates. The catch? The organizations are a sham. I spent the last month diving deep into a massive academic scam spanning continents, for @nature.com

nature.com

Exclusive: Sham scientific societies are misleading star researchers

A Nature investigation reveals a network of organizations that have been building their ranks through deceptive practices.

10310186

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 24/09/2026

Since the guy was missing his skull, cancer was the least of his problems

010

Reposted by Cheshire

Randall Munroe @xkcd.com · 22/09/2026

Tyrannosaurus xkcd.com/3300/

Comic. [Person with long hair pointing to diagram with Tyrannosaurus Rex standing next to a person.] PERSON: We now believe the primary prey of Tyrannosaurus Rex was these humans who kept standing next to it for scale.

91121622104

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 22/09/2026

Because, Charlotte, your co-author, just posted 16 replies on your *COVID vaccines cause cancer signals* thread on PubPeer. Don’t you remember the “smoking gun” paper? 😸

161

Cheshire @thatsregrettab1.bsky.social · 19/09/2026

It is well worth seeing in person. I will never see the "new" installation in Bayeux, but I appreciate the fact that people are preserving this type of history and also exposing new generations to the same.

010