Sign in

steber2.bsky.social

@steber2.bsky.social
174 followers 85 following 1.5K posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by @steber2.bsky.social
Benjamin Lauderdale @benlauderdale.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
Exciting tax incentive for investing in solid gold toilets.
1774
Reposted by @steber2.bsky.social
Resolution Foundation @resolutionfoundation.org · 29/09/2026
Pensioner incomes had caught up with non-pensioner incomes BEFORE the triple lock was introduced, thanks to policies like Pension Credit. Find out more ➡️ buff.ly/FY93tV6
When the first Pensions Commission was in place, the typical pensioner had a lower income than the typical non-pensioner, but that has not been the case since 2011-12, as Figure 1 shows. And pensioners are now less likely to be in poverty than the rest of the population, and half as likely as children.
164
Reposted by @steber2.bsky.social
Survation. @survation.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Support outnumbers opposition in every age group, including those most affected: -> 55-64: 61% support, 16% oppose -> 65+: 55% support, 27% oppose 8/9
79226
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 29/09/2026
Labour proposes replacing the triple ratchet we currently have, with an actual triple lock. Excellent news. The next step is to allow non-pensioner benefits to catch up.
000
Reposted by @steber2.bsky.social
Resolution Foundation @resolutionfoundation.org · 29/09/2026
Over the past two decades, pensioner incomes have grown by 20 per cent, while those of working-age families have grown by just 7 per cent. Given these trends, surely it is time to include the Triple Lock in debates around stemming the growth in welfare spending? ➡️ buff.ly/FY93tV6
433
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 26/09/2026
Helpful context for Torsten's post: 1. Mean income (at all ages) in 23/24 was ~£725 pw for adult couples, after housing costs. 2. A state pension was £204 pp pw. 3. Most Brits want to save for housing costs via property, not pensions. 4. The remaining gap's likely explained by high not low earners.
000
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
A big win for all those over 65's with more than 12k p.a. of income they don't need to use now, but firmly plan to spend in its entirety within the next 3 or 4 years.
100
Reposted by @steber2.bsky.social
The Institute for Fiscal Studies @theifs.bsky.social · 25/10/2025
📊 #IFSSatStat: The OBR’s productivity forecast at the Budget will be a major driver of the fiscal outlook. Since 2010, however, those forecasts have been too optimistic – a downgrade is widely expected.
The OBR’s productivity forecasts have proved too optimistic since 2010
121
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 23/10/2025
This is one of the many issues caused by having a social safety net that's so much more generous after state pension age than before. Everyone wants access to the older-age benefits/tax rates ASAP.
111
Reposted by @steber2.bsky.social
Resolution Foundation @resolutionfoundation.org · 25/09/2025
Switching 2p from National Insurance to Income Tax could raise £6 billion while protecting workers’ pay packets. Here's what you need to know 👇 👇 👇
2185
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 16/09/2025
The most important takeaway from today's pay growth figures: the step-up in the generosity of benefits at state pension age is widening. Increasing both the financial impact of the state pension age review, and the pressure on it to pull up the drawbridge on younger generations.
100
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 13/09/2025
I wonder how many of these 7 million households would be receiving the benefits they're entitled to, if we stopped means testing them and raised income tax instead. www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
001
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 08/09/2025
The well-intentioned lie that pensions "tax relief" is a giveaway continues to cause harm. Pensions "tax relief" just means that those who save for a full retirement, don't face higher income taxes than someone who partially retires instead. Ideas to cut it would arbitrarily incentivise the latter.
011
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 05/09/2025
The Telegraph is correct, but for exactly the wrong reasons; the triple "lock" ratchet applied to pensioner benefits, by far the highest welfare cost, is indeed unsustainable.
000
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 30/08/2025
A lengthy post setting out what's wrong with current UK pensions, and what's needed to fix it. I don't agree with its suggestions on tax, but otherwise it hits the nail on the head, well worth reading!
010
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 10/08/2025
A neat illustration of why it's not a good idea for the state safety net to become much more generous at age 67.
000
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 27/07/2025
Good to see the risk for those on low incomes of oversaving for retirement being highlighted. Auto-enrolment should be set up so it's clear to people if they're likely to be in that bucket or not: if you're being auto-enrolled, it should be likely you're not in it. www.bbc.com/news/article...
bbc.com
Pensions: 'Why I'm one of millions of UK adults not paying in'
Almost half of UK adults do not pay into a private or workplace pension - some of them tell us why.
100
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
This is, by comparison, how likely the Office for National Statistics thinks it is that people will die by those ages. Not a new observation, but people do seem to underestimate how long they're going to live for. Interesting though that people have a good grasp of how likely they are to reach 100!
000
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 03/07/2025
A rare IFS report yesterday, in that I largely disagree with it. In particular, it: 1. Suggests a bigger gap between working age & pensioner benefits; 2. Say many will miss out on target replacement rates, but not who/why (AE seems sufficient, so opt-outs/self-employed?) ifs.org.uk/sites/defaul...
000
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 03/06/2025
The PLSA have announced their latest "retirement living standards", expenditure thresholds for "minimum", "moderate" & "comfortable" retirements. As always, they look very high: they'd make most people better off after retirement than before, likely over saving www.retirementlivingstandards.org.uk
210
Reposted by @steber2.bsky.social
Albert Weale @albertpweale.bsky.social · 11/04/2025
Very informative chart from Washington Post
17670182416
Reposted by @steber2.bsky.social
The Institute for Fiscal Studies @theifs.bsky.social · 18/03/2025
“The risk is that it’s precisely the individuals receiving health-related benefits that are least responsive to financial incentives to work, and perhaps most in need of extra financial support.” Read our full response here: ifs.org.uk/articles/ifs...
Quote from Tom Waters: "The increase in basic out-of-work support, while not very large, is the biggest permanent real terms rise since at least 1980. With it is promised even higher support in the period shortly after job loss in the form of contribution-based unemployment insurance. At the same time the health-related benefit system will be tightened, cut, and entitlement will no longer depend upon whether you can work or not. The hope is more employment and fewer people in the disability and incapacity benefit system. The risk is that it’s precisely the individuals receiving health-related benefits that are least responsive to financial incentives to work, and perhaps most in need of extra financial support."
062
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 17/03/2025
100% agree. Means testing: it's always a bad idea.
010
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 15/03/2025
One of these groups has their benefits "triple locked". The others are having their benefits cut. It still shocks me that we're actively widening this divide. www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
040
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 01/03/2025
The important thing being the terms on which those future claims are bought, and the extent to which they're adjusted later on if, in hindsight, those terms look to have been overly generous / penal.
020
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 21/02/2025
Really enjoyed this piece, on a fundamental truth that's (sadly) important to today's politics: taxing imports is the same thing as taxing exports.
While it is natural to frame this as some kind of struggle between foreign computer manufacturers and US computer manufacturers, it is more accurate to frame it as a struggle between US computer manufacturers and US soyabean farmers. Relatively efficient industries like soyabeans or crude oil will always tend to flourish, unless the government intervenes to tax their exports. Or introduce a tariff on imports — it’s all the same.
010
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 16/02/2025
If you want to compare the cost of living between countries, you can't use normal exchange rates: you need to use PPPs (Purchasing Power Parity exchange rates). PPPs are averages for entire countries: if you're interested in less well off (or more well off) people, turns out you need different PPPs
010
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 16/02/2025
I'm really glad this point is being made. Defined benefit pensions died in 2003, when they were retrospectively guaranteed. Very few people want to pay the costs of those guarantees, so very few people now have DB pensions. www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/40...
200
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 09/02/2025
Really like the focus here on starting with a view on the role of the state, and building from there.
010
Reposted by @steber2.bsky.social
Theo Sanderson @theo.io · 08/02/2025
I wondered why as a kid I never had tenderstem broccoli, but rather the fat stuff. TIL, it was only invented in the 90s, as a new hybrid, and is a registered trademark
4384
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 04/02/2025
Is responding to another country's import tariffs with your own import tariffs a purely political, rather than economic, response? Presumably encouraged by results like these ("tit for tat"'s very intuitive). Better to instead give export subsidies to affected sectors? www.imf.org/-/media/File...
imf.org
000
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 29/12/2024
Difficult to imagine the world view of those stuck in this swamp of nostalgia, inertia and complacency.
010
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 24/12/2024
I continue to be intrigued by 100% PPF levy proposals, and what restrictions its proponents suggest to get around the moral hazard issues. Taxpayers shouldn't be on the hook: a firm guarantee would be needed that Government will never financially assist the PPF. www.ft.com/content/2a0d...
000
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 28/10/2024
Bemused by these workers' demands for Boeing to write more final salary pension promises, as credit rating agencies warn of their debt being downgraded to junk status! Maybe now isn't the time to want to be paid in Boeing debt? (Photo copied from John Ralfe on X - x.com/JohnRalfe1/s...)
210
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 26/10/2024
The highlight of this fantastic thread is clearly MP's expenses being so high up the list people thing Government spends money on, but a shout out for state pensions being so low!
001
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 08/10/2024
With lots of rumours going round, if a hypothetical Chancellor must raise revenue via pension taxes, what are the best/worst options at a societal level? My tier list would be: S: Tax on inheritance A: NI treatment B: Cut tax free lump sum D: Cut AA E: Reintroduce LTA F-: Tax relief "reform"
000
steber2.bsky.social @steber2.bsky.social · 08/10/2024
Fantastic news! Multi (or no) employer, decumulation only collective pensions are the future we need, and the pension I want to invest in when I retire. Royal Mail's design is hopefully a stepping stone there. After years of change, 🤞 it performs well for members. www.pensionsage.com/pa/Royal-Mai...
pensionsage.com
Royal Mail launches UK's first CDC scheme
The Royal Mail Collective Plan launched today (7 October), in what has been highlighted as an “important milestone” for the UK pensions landscape
020
Reposted by @steber2.bsky.social
Ben Zaranko @benzaranko.bsky.social · 11/09/2024
My @theifs.bsky.social colleagues fighting the good fight on pensions tax relief. The new government might be tempted to cap up-front income tax relief for easy money (not least because they've ruled out almost everything else), but it's not a good idea. ifs.org.uk/articles/rai...
154