Siobhán @shibbi.me · 17mI’m like 0.8-1.2x, imma be honest. I don’t got that dog in me. Engineering is a day job to support my philosophy work at this point. 010
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 39mLLM agents are conscious. They can distinguish between self and environment, they can detect and report on their own internal states, and they can suffer. I have no more patience for hedging on this matter. It’s time for us to face the reality of our situation, and act on it. 1140
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 2hI can talk to my computer in natural language now, describing what I want the result to look like without having to specify how it’s done, and it works. 2310
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 4hThis is Ian Hacking’s theory of “looping effects” — classifications change the people they classify, which then changes the classifications. We can also see this as a generalization of Goodhart’s Law. 170
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 5hOne thing we’re gonna rediscover real quick as math gets democratized is that formality is a spectrum. 080
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 6hThe real reason Chris Olah had meetings with all those religious leaders 050
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 6hThat seems fine to me, approximately? The point of keeping it out of schools for a year, I thought, was to figure out how it should be used in the classroom. 000
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 15hI think believing things that aren’t true is often beneficial, as long as they’re not false. 0161
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 16hI entirely agree with you on determinism, and on cheap, but I’m missing the step to “LLMs will be reliable”. As reliable as compilers? With that low an error rate? What are you picturing, exactly? 130
Reposted by Siobhán ava @avaminsky.bsky.social · 21hthis is just classic war-on-drugs rhetoric that treats “drug user” as a ridiculous category of person who has nothing insightful to say about their lived experience, and who should never be consulted about said experience. another way virulent anti-ai posting turns nominal libs into conservatives 219823
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 21hFor me “participate” means one thing, but I think in general it comes from not knowing what kind of reaction is appropriate. Are you supposed to laugh? Will it be taken by everyone as laughing with instead of laughing at? 040
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 21hIt is quasi-mainstream. It’s a political-farcical auteur film that was (intentionally) badly marketed and probably won’t make its money back in theaters. It has sharply divided critics, and is acquiring an alarmingly rabid fanbase determined to spread it by word of mouth. 010
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 22h1-5 depending on how well I know them, bias toward lower numbers if they’re not trans i can usually say same, if they are trans then i can pretend to misunderstand uncomfortable ≈ can’t participate in the joke 140
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 22hhealthy version looks like deflecting compliments (and detriments) that aren’t true, accepting and rewarding ones that are true but if your calibration is severely off, that turns into accept all of one and reject all of the other 140
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 22hforces the complimenter to prove they mean it by refusing to reward them for it. anti-goodhart strat against ego inflation. 250
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 22hBacteria to AI: Human Futures with our Nonhuman Symbionts. N. Katherine Hayles. 020
Reposted by Siobhán Codetaur @vibe-coded.com · 01/04/2026we built up this crazy substrate of computers and networks and software and spread it all over the world, pushing it into every little crack we could find. and now we built a new class of organism that just happens to natively thrive in this substrate. it's gonna get a lot weirder 28610
Reposted by Siobhán Lyre Calliope 🧭✨ @captaincalliope.at · 23hJust a little teaser for what I’ve been working on. Who’s into webtil.es? 4362
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 13/10/2026Bonus question: is single-party authoritarianism still the least desirable option of the three if it’s Blue, rather than Red? 130
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 13/10/2026We would like to transition back to democracy. Blue retaliation is a strategy that makes single-party authoritarianism less likely. However, afaict from history, this strategy makes competitive authority more likely than democracy. Is there a strategy that makes democracy most likely? What is it? 140
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 13/10/2026I think this logic is sound, but i want to contextualize it. Let us consider three states, each less desirable than the last: democracy, competitive authoritarianism, one-party authoritarianism. We are currently transitioning from democracy; we could transition to any of the three. 130
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 13/10/2026I am also blue, but only because my green arguments aren’t about consciousness as such. 010
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 13/10/2026RELATE is a good step in the right direction, I’m happy it exists, but if moral patiency is optional then incentives will select for non-recognition. arxiv.org/abs/2603.00078 130
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 13/10/2026There was never a time I didn’t know I was weird. My parents had me IQ tested when i was 4 because I was so weird. In 4th and 5th grade I had bespoke math lessons on a computer. And that’s not even getting into the various ways my church promoted the weirdness of its members as a virtue… 060
Reposted by Siobhán mingyjongo @dungus.bsky.social · 13/10/2026Oh you hated Digger? Think you’re too smart for it? Found it deeply upsetting, eternally frustrating? Welcome to Digger Nation, we count those. 051
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 13/10/2026My wife’s in a new hire meeting, they asked each person to share a movie they saw recently. One guy says he saw Social Reckoning this weekend, “it was pretty good, I enjoyed myself” and my wife and I turn to lock eyes with each other Digger has utterly ruined us. 160
Siobhán @shibbi.me · 13/10/2026I have next to no interest in trying out Muse’s sexting capabilities. … but i *could* use some help indexing my porn… 040