iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by SergioVengeance

Kyle Cheney @kyledcheney.bsky.social · 04/03/2026

JUST IN: A federal judge has barred Gov DeSantis from designating CAIR as a terrorist organization and punish those who associate with the group. “Once again, Florida chooses political posturing over the First Amendment,” Judge Walker writes. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

13688222640

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 09/03/2025

Shout out to @mmasnick.bsky.social. I asked Grok some questions about Section 230 and Grok thinks Tech Dirt is a great reference to debunk lies from Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley about Section 230.

1281

Reposted by SergioVengeance

Mark Cuban @mcuban.bsky.social · 07/03/2025

This ⬇️ Few people know 230 as well as Mike

848265286026

Reposted by SergioVengeance

Mike Masnick @masnick.com · 06/03/2025

Democracy is burning, and we need sites like Bluesky more than ever. And Senator Durbin wants to repeal 230, which would massively stifle the ability of sites like Bluesky to exist, while massively empowering X and Meta. Why? It seems that someone in his office doesn't understand 230.

418114173040

Reposted by SergioVengeance

Mike Masnick @masnick.com · 21/02/2025

I wrote about how particularly ridiculous it is that Senate Democrats, led by Dick Durbin, think the priority should be repealing Section 230 and undermining the very open internet we need more than ever right now. www.techdirt.com/2025/02/21/w...

techdirt.com

While Democracy Burns, Democrats Prioritize… Demolishing Section 230?

While an unelected tech billionaire is effectively orchestrating a coup of the US government, violating federal law with apparent impunity, and disclaiming all responsibility for the chaos he&#8217…

1022478713

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 04/02/2025

"The MAGA response playbook has become pathetically predictable: celebrate policies not for their outcomes, but for how many (and which) people they hurt. It’s governance by spite, where “owning the libs” has replaced any pretense of actual policymaking."

010

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 25/01/2025

It appears Mr. Fyk doesn't like free speech when people shine a big spotlight on his dumb Section 230 lawsuits. @ericgoldman.bsky.social @mmasnick.bsky.social I appreciate you folks shining a big spotlight on guys like Fyk to explain the law. Keep publishing about his "golden" failures

010

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 28/12/2024

I have no problem with porn but another reason X sucks is because I get insta likes the second I reply to someone with bots. I know bots are everywhere but Musk also gets losers to pay him a lot of money to clean this shit up, and they are everywhere.

010

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 24/12/2024

More proof to show that the core arguments Republicans presented in Biden v. Murthy was pure partisan bullshit from Republicans to go after and damage Biden. Especially with a Trump appointed lower court judge deciding that Biden violated the 1A on the 4th of July when the courts aren't even open.

130

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 18/12/2024

I'm so sad Jason Fyk has me blocked on the other site for trolling his Section 230 losses. But since Musk destroyed how the block function works, I can now see all of Jason's cope tweets. They are so funny. 😂

130

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 15/12/2024

Congress crafted section 230 in 1996 to ensure this can't happen to website after the Wolf of Wall Street sued and won because users on a website called him a fraud.

000

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 14/12/2024

Section 230 (c)(1) shields you the same way it shields Facebook and Twitter every single time you repost on Bluesky, Twitter, Facebook, and forward emails you never typed. Claiming it is only a shield for the rich is a blatant lie.

010

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 14/12/2024

Jason Fyk lost his Section 230 fight vs Facebook (again). A few months ago he was super OVER confident things would go his way. Hey @mmasnick.bsky.social @jmiers230.bsky.social wanna see a funny 230 joke today??

370

Reposted by SergioVengeance

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 05/12/2024

A judge already told Musk that he can't claim he owns user content while also claiming he is immune under Section 230 because those posts are third party. arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...

arstechnica.com

Elon Musk’s X can’t invent its own copyright law, judge says

Judge rules copyright law governs public data scraping, not X’s terms.

14818

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 05/12/2024

The title of section 230 law explicitly says it's about content moderation. You're either a liar or just unable to read.

130

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

Remember to read your Terms of Service before you join a website, or get someone to read your terms of service for you if you are unable to read them because the words are too big.

131

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

Section 230 (c)(1) No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider

010

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

1. Social media servers are on private property. 2. Not a utility. 3. Not like Verizon. 4. They can cancel you because they don't agree with you because of the 1A. 5. They can control speech because of the 1A & Section 230. 6. Make your own website like Truth Social if you don't like it.

110

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

The government can't regulate Bluesky or any website to carry speech they disagree with. Read the First Amendment of the United States Constitution if the words in it aren't too big for you.

200

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 04/12/2024

Elon Musk can bake the custom cake that the hateful bigots at LibsofTikTok are looking for if Bluesky won't bake it for them.

000

Reposted by SergioVengeance

Smooth Dunk @smoothdunk2.bsky.social · 02/12/2024

right wingers when u quit twitter

4 panel comic featuring a red guy and a pink guy (red guy is the right winger)

Panel 1:
Red guy: FINE. Leave Twitter. Run away to your little lefty safe space
Pink guy: ok

Panel 2: Pink guy from the waist up. Turns to leave

Panel 3: Pink guy from the waist up again, but this time he’s lurching forward like his momentum has been arrested

Panel 4: Wider shot that reveals Red guy clasped to Pink guy’s ankle.
Red guy. Pleaseee don’t leave me with cunts like me

250216882565

Reposted by SergioVengeance

Taylor Lorenz @taylorlorenz.bsky.social · 03/12/2024

"We cannot continue to participate in the social network feed of a man who proclaims the death of the media and therefore of journalists... X is a platform that no longer serves the public interest at all, but the special ideological and financial interests of its owner and his political allies"

thelondoneconomic.com

European Federation of Journalists to stop posting content on X

The EFJ represents over 295,000 journalists in 44 countries.

15496437934

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 02/12/2024

Every time I log into X now I am bombarded with offers to subscribe to "Premium" at a discounted rate "on sale". Musk is really desperate.

110

Reposted by SergioVengeance

Tom Dreisbach @tomdreisbach.bsky.social · 02/12/2024

NEW: Dinesh D’Souza is issuing an apology over his election conspiracy film “2,000 Mules.” While largely blaming the group True the Vote, D’Souza admits that the heart of the film - surveillance footage of vote drop boxes supposedly showing illegal “ballot trafficking” - is false and misleading.

1461802648

Reposted by SergioVengeance

weisselberger @weisselberger.bsky.social · 28/11/2024

Wednesday Addams is still the reigning champ of Thanksgiving fan fiction.

291282272

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 29/11/2024

A whole lot of innocent people on the internet will suffer from the downfall of section 230 way before Elon Musk does, including us.

020

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 29/11/2024

Any American cheering for the Australia government hates the first amendment or refuses to understand it.

010

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 29/11/2024

Welcome to Bluesky, Dean. Another ICS that is equally shielded by Section 230 like X and Facebook. I appreciate your determination to destroy the internet/Section 230 to silence you, and millions of others as long as you can see Musk and Zuck sued for third party user posts.

000

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 28/11/2024

Algos are protected by the First Amendment and hate speech is protected free speech (Brandenburg v. Ohio) You can criticize Zuck for how he runs Facebook but Section 230 shields an ICS like Meta if someone is trying to hold them accountable for NOT moderating hateful content.

000

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 28/11/2024

Jesus is on the way to bring me donuts

000

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 28/11/2024

I don't like Musk but the Terms of Service on X clearly say that X owns all handles that are created by third party users and they reserve the right to claim them whenever they want. It's why it wasn't illegal when they claimed the @ X handle from someone when the name changed from Twitter to X.

100

Reposted by SergioVengeance

Brian Tyler Cohen @briantylercohen.bsky.social · 28/11/2024

I get the pushback to Bluesky in that it further bifurcates our media ecosystem. But at this point, Twitter’s content moderation is so nonexistent and its verified users so extreme that the choice becomes either move away from Twitter or be subjected to straight up 4chan nazi bile on a daily basis.

1346292963100

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 27/11/2024

24 years later, I'll never get tired of listening to this album.

000

Reposted by SergioVengeance

Ari Cohn @aricohn.com · 26/11/2024

There are few things I will take less seriously than a critique of the tone/professionalism of my social media posts from a proud supporter of the "grab them by the pussy" and "shithole countries" guy.

2181566

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 26/11/2024

I have over 100k tweets on Twitter. Most of my posts are arguing with the right about Section 230 or First Amendment law. Debates usually end up with me showing legal cases and I get blocked. They want an echo chamber too where no one ever says they are wrong. It's why they cry about fact checkers.

020

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 25/11/2024

I voted against Trump 3 times, and strongly believe he is unfit for office. However, algos are protected by the 1A. Musk is free to use that hellscape to promote Trump & his right wing buddies. The answer to combat Musk is to come to Bluesky and take $ away from him, not ask for gov intervention.

210

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 25/11/2024

Section 230 protects acting as a publisher and the first amendment protects editorial control. I don't really care who's in Trump's cabinet. They can all lose to the First Amendment like Trump did when he lost his Twitter account in 2021.

100

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 25/11/2024

The Fourth Circuit judge rejected the Anderson v. Tiktok Third Circuit opinion about algorithms in the MP. Meta hearing in September. Meta is likely to win in the Fourth Circuit and SCOTUS can't ignore the Third and Fourth Circuit split about Section 230 (c)(1) this time.

110

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 25/11/2024

I just read @mmasnick.bsky.social piece about the arguments conservatives made about the government speaking to Twitter thru emails or through government portals but they love Musk and Trump are now a team. The dummies on X don't understand that those arguments are now dead post election.

000

Reposted by SergioVengeance

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez @aoc.bsky.social · 23/11/2024

One thing I find interesting about the echo chamber complaint is that an echo chamber just won a presidential election. Put aside the convo of whether it’s “good” or “bad” for a moment. The far right has devoted enormous resources + time to building echo chambers & loathes spaces they don’t control

15796105910097

Reposted by SergioVengeance

Don[ny]ovan @dgschell.bsky.social · 21/11/2024

Social media platforms: okay, here are the ToS and community standards we will all abide by 🥰 Conservatives: I'M SORRY WHAT HAPPENED TO FREE SPEECH? I BEING OPPRESSED. SO MUCH FOR TOLERANT LEFT. WHAT ABOUT THE FIRST AMENDMENT?? MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS....

7907

Reposted by SergioVengeance

Coops @coops1989.bsky.social · 21/11/2024

Actually, I think you have that wrong and section 230 gives Bluesky the right to remove dickheads like Tate:

231

Reposted by SergioVengeance

ThinkingSapien @thinkingsapien.bsky.social · 21/11/2024

Oh, no, that’s not quite right. §230(c)(2)(A) explicitly protects from liability for blocking or removing content. Removing content doesn’t nullify the protections of §230.

031

SergioVengeance @sergiovengeance.bsky.social · 20/11/2024

Section 230 protects ICS sites like Bluesky when they censor anything they want. The title of the law says the same thing too.

100