Reposted by Tommaso SciortinoMike Lacher @mikelacher.bsky.social · 08/10/2026i rebooted minesweeper as a AAA shooter. loot boxes coming soon minesweeper.mikelacher.com 592073352
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 16hHeartily, did I laugh at your joke, fine sir. And also this too: out loud. 070
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 16hAt a meta level we are training these things to *infer* what we wanted from what we tell them, even if the thing we tell them isn't super clear. On that metric, sailing in circles is very much a failure to properly infer the user's intention. 100
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 17hEmo Philips just liked my comment so I feel special. 020
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 09/10/2026Automating the Langlands program would still be a big accomplishment. 020
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 08/10/2026She forbids me to post pictures of our two boys in public, but we are all pleased :D 040
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 08/10/2026Yes! My future wife's first message to me mentioned the retweet and asked what it was. 260
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 08/10/2026That is, the policies state the disclosure has to be in the contribution itself, not just "upon request". 120
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 08/10/2026Right now many scientific journals have policies requiring authors to divulge if they used AI. I think that's a reasonable policy. But it sounds like you disagree. 120
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 08/10/2026So you don't think authors should be required divulge that they use Generative AI? 220
Reposted by Tommaso Sciortinoconputer dipshit @davidcrespo.bsky.social · 08/10/2026new KRAZAMyoutube.comYou Are An Expert Software EngineerYouTube video by KRAZAM 3583
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 08/10/2026Human mathematicians also "stand on the shoulders of giants" so AI is not different in this regard. Could we have made similar progress by investing the money in human mathematicians? I doubt it. but even if we could have, I don't think it would be worth the money. 010
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 08/10/2026It was reasonable for people to have suspected this in the Navier Stokes proof but there are good reasons to doubt that now. But it can't explain most of these proofs. That's just cope. 120
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 08/10/2026I think the AI math proofs are good and cool. Like when MRIs allowed doctors to easily see what before they could only guess at. 130
Reposted by Tommaso Sciortinobryan newbold @bnewbold.net · 07/10/2026ah damn, RIP Margaret Hamilton. she took safety-critical software engineering seriously, and got people to the moon and back. news.mit.edu/2026/margare... 102143024708
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 08/10/2026True fact: On my OKCupid profile years ago I listed "Retweeted by Ta-Nehisi Coates" as one of my accomplishments. 1371
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 08/10/2026If this were me I'd be sure to drop this fact in every conversation. 1260
Reposted by Tommaso SciortinoKeith @mosheroperandi.bsky.social · 07/10/2026If your flavor scientists don't look like this, they aren't trying hard enough 02206
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 07/10/2026I love everything Mitchell and Webb ever made. Though I admit their latest series was the weakest one. 000
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 07/10/2026This sketch but they're talking about how stealing a bunch of unpublished math proofs is actually more expensive than just inventing AI good at math.youtube.comFaking The Moon Landing - Conspiracy TheoriesYouTube video by Giop Saus 140
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 07/10/2026We all trust Lean. It's a mechanist proof system. Therefore, the only thing you need to check is that the thing it proves is actually the same as the thing you care about. That does not leave much room for funny business. 010
Reposted by Tommaso Sciortinorev. howard arson @theophite.bsky.social · 07/10/2026instead of AI we should have invented books with wider margins so that our marvelous proofs could fit there 319715
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 07/10/2026Erecting giant monoliths over conservatism's grave with the message "This place is not a place of honor... no highly esteemed deed is commemorated here... nothing valued is here." 191
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 07/10/2026I agree with you. That said, OpenAI just published a proof that that there are no zeros with Re(s) > 11/12 so who knows what the future will bring. 000
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 07/10/2026I have not. I didn't realize he had any non-RWNJ works. 000
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 07/10/2026My pet theory was always that those suffering from asian glow can't get drunk and have to look elsewhere to get their kicks. That said, I wouldn't bet on it. 180
Reposted by Tommaso SciortinoBeijingPalmer @beijingpalmer.bsky.social · 07/10/2026legalizing gambling was the single biggest social disaster of the last decade, and that's a high bar to clear. 131161169
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 07/10/2026I finished #86 this morning. I'm not going to pretend that I followed all of it. But I'm getting the gist. 200
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 07/10/2026My advice for math nerds is to watch this youtube channel on the Riemann Zeta function (I've only watched the first 70 or so but it's amazing so far). You want to be up on this stuff in case the Riemann Hypothesis gets proved.youtube.comZeta ExplainedMath channel explaining the Riemann zeta function 181
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 07/10/2026OpenAI must be spending a fortune on the human mathematicians that are secretly the ones actually cranking out these proofs. 1140
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 06/10/2026My only complaint about the Swan Boy Animated Series is this: I want more of it! 030
Reposted by Tommaso SciortinoCoach Finstock @coachfinstock.bsky.social · 06/10/2026People forget that J6 was successful. Everyone who participated was let out of jail and the guy who perpetrated it is President again. There were no consequences. They have plenty of incentive to do a much bigger and worse version. 7453691290
Reposted by Tommaso SciortinoTommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 06/10/2026We grow ever closer to the day when every person, no matter how poor, can afford their own scheming vizier. 091
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 06/10/2026We grow ever closer to the day when every person, no matter how poor, can afford their own scheming vizier. 091
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 06/10/2026I'm legitimately curious how you determined that I am unable to see your evidence when you didn't go through the trouble of actually *presenting* any of it. 200
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 06/10/2026If that was the case, one way to find out would be for you to present any evidence whatsoever for your beliefs. 100
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 06/10/2026But anyways. It's very clear that you are deeply insecure about how you came to your weird beliefs and that you have no confidence in your ability to defend them. That's fine! Common even! 100
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 06/10/2026It's okay to just say that you believe in cosmopsychism because it was revealed to you during a hallucinogenic mushroom trip/epileptic fit/bout of mania. 300
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 06/10/2026You do? Well, that's too bad. There's a lot of evidence that is only found outside of scholarly articles, especially on topics like "What do I, Tommaso, personally believe?". 100
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 06/10/2026My evidence that I don't think the origin of knowledge "is book"? Well, I've observed myself over a period of many years, and the theory that I think the origin of knowledge "is book" is not consistent with those observations. 100
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 06/10/2026Booo! This is a repeat! Not even innovative. 110
Tommaso Sciortino @sciortino.bsky.social · 06/10/2026What an interesting and innovative way to avoid having to present evidence for your views. Let's see what you try next! 100