Sign in

Sam Harper

@sbh4th.bsky.social
1.8K followers 208 following 51 posts

Professor, Epidemiologist, McGill University. Impact evaluation, health inequalities, reproducible research. 🚲🍳🍷🎸🏸👨‍💻 samharper.org

PostsRepliesMedia
Sam Harper @sbh4th.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
Happy to share a new paper on definitions (or lack thereof) for 'natural experiments'. In response to new guidance from the Medical Research Council (doi.org/10.1136/bmj-...). Lots to admire in that paper, not so much how natural experiments are defined. jech.bmj.com/cgi/rapidpdf...
jech.bmj.com
172
Reposted by Sam Harper
Vincent Arel-Bundock @vincentab.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
Big news! 🎉 𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚏𝚏𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚜 1.0.0 for #Rstats is out. It’s a big number and it feels like a big step. I wrote a blog on the challenges of interpreting statistical models, SPEED, cool new features, the future, and a 5 year package development and writing odyssey. arelbundock.com/posts/margin...
1642299
Reposted by Sam Harper
Don Moynihan @donmoyn.bsky.social · 02/09/2026
New from me: The academic summer discourse was dominated by the Arday case. Defenders of his accuser cited academic freedom. The Trump administration agreed, even as it and red state governments dismantle academic freedom at home in much more profound ways.🧵 donmoynihan.substack.com/p/which-stor...
donmoynihan.substack.com
Which stories about academia matter?
The Arday affair got more attention than systematic assaults on academic freedom
4260113
Reposted by Sam Harper
Don Moynihan @donmoyn.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
“Folks, do you hate seat belts?”
8690989
Reposted by Sam Harper
Hetan Shah @hetanshah.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
Thanks to @nature.com for covering our @britishacademy.bsky.social trial of partial randomisation in the allocation of our small research grants. As the piece says it seems to have helped diversify those who apply rather than rule themselves out of the process www.nature.com/articles/d41...
One of the most
closely watched of these experiments comes from the United Kingdom.
New peer-review trial lets grant applicants evaluate each other's proposals
In 2022, the British Academy, the national
organization for
the humanities and social sciences, began randomizing its Small Research Grants among all proposals that pass a quality threshold - a trial since extended to 2028.
The issue that the academy was trying to solve was not simply that the review board was overworked, but also that many researchers never applied at all. "Some were disqualifying themselves from even making an application, says Ken Emond, the academy's head of research funding,The programme's numbers quickly changed after implementing this system.
Applications nearly doubled, from 643 in 2022 to 1,257 in the 2025-26 round, and the pool broadened. The share of applications from Asian and Asian British researchers, for instance, climbed from 13% to 19%, and their share of awards went from 11% to 17%. Other factors played a part, Emond notes, but the results matched what supporters of this change had predicted.
A lottery also changes what a rejection means. Whereas the academy once gave no feedback at all, it can now tell applicants whether they fell short on quality or simply lost the draw. Some rejectees, Emond says, take their"passed the threshold" verdict as validation of their proposal when applying elsewhere.
12614
Sam Harper @sbh4th.bsky.social · 11/08/2026
Ahh, this makes me sad, since I think their platform really did a great job at making the posting of code and data easy, as well as organizing projects. Will be curious to see where folks migrate to (thoughts on Zenodo vs. Dataverse?), but grateful for everything that OSF accomplished.
030
Reposted by Sam Harper
Jeremy Labrecque @jeremylabrecque.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
Interested in doing a PhD with me in epidemiology on causal inference and triangulation? In beautiful Rotterdam no less. www.werkenbijerasmusmc.nl/en/vacancy/1... Pro tip: if you get to the interview stage, there WILL be a question about ice hockey
werkenbijerasmusmc.nl
Vacature: PhD student in epidemiology to develop and apply causal triangulation
Many key questions in epidemiology are fundamentally causal. Yet, we often have to rely on assumptions that cannot be directly verified to judge whether an observed association truly reflects causalit...
22724
Reposted by Sam Harper
Madhu Pai, MD, PhD @madhupai.bsky.social · 14/05/2026
My new essay in @economist.com Health Dividend Tuberculosis kills on a vast scale, but as foreign aid shrinks, countries with a high burden of TB stand to gain a lot by investing more to curb the disease and its heavy social cost impact.economist.com/health-socie...
impact.economist.com
Tuberculosis proves that investment in health pays off
Madhukar Pai of McGill University says tuberculosis kills on a vast scale, but as foreign aid shrinks, countries with a high burden of TB stand to gain a lot by investing more to curb the disease and ...
0146
Reposted by Sam Harper
Brendan Nyhan @brendannyhan.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
"[T]he new [CDC] uncertainty-based statement [on vaccines and autism] amplifies public uncertainty, reduces vaccination intentions, and increases endorsement of science denial strategies. www.science.org/doi/full/10....
2199
Reposted by Sam Harper
George Davey Smith @mendelrandom.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
If you're interested in the history and philosophy of randomization in all its forms I'm co-organising a *FREE* conference in glorious Bristol 2-3rd July wth the legendary Samir Okasha, registration is here www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/randomizat... If you think it looks interesting please advertise
eventbrite.co.uk
Randomization in Science, Society and Nature
Exploring the role of randomization across decision theory, clinical trials, politics, evolutionary biology and genetics
23824
Reposted by Sam Harper
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 16/04/2026
We are inviting applications for a two-year postdoctoral position in a collaborative meta-science project on the effectiveness of data and code sharing policies in research-performing organizations. www.tue.nl/en/working-a...
tue.nl
Postdoc In Meta-science
Personal type: Scientific staff
15265
Reposted by Sam Harper
Marisa Kabas @marisakabas.bsky.social · 14/04/2026
NEW—I got an exclusive excerpt from a USAID whistleblower's new book that made me gasp multiple times. It details Trump's dismantling of the humanitarian aid agency & his team/DOGE's shocking ignorance to public health. 'Into the Wood Chipper' by Nicholas Enrich is out tomorrow. Read excerpt here:
thehandbasket.co
Whistleblower says Trump officials thought USAID did 'just abortions,' asked for 'Barney-style' slides before gutting agency, per new book
Read an exclusive excerpt from Nicholas Enrich's "Into the Wood Chipper"
15096034148
Reposted by Sam Harper
Madhu Pai, MD, PhD @madhupai.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
Excited to get a signed copy of "The Race Variable" from my @mcgillspgh.bsky.social colleague, Jay Kaufman, a brilliant epidemiologist The book offers a clear and accessible guide to understanding the use and abuse of statistics on racial and ethnic disparities cup.columbia.edu/book/the-rac...
0164
Reposted by Sam Harper
RedruM @dorsalstream.bsky.social · 03/04/2026
The horse op-ed is an instant classic. I can't tell you how much joy this piece gives me. It should be taught in every introductory writing class in no small part because the horse arguments are so compelling. "I have noticed that human children get to eat cake. But I am bigger than the children."
I Work Very Hard, And I Would Like To Try Cake

By A Horse

Hello. I am a horse. I work very hard at my job of being a horse. When humans say move the heavy thing, I move the heavy thing. When humans sit on top of me and pull on my head, I carry them where they want to go. The main food the humans give me is hay and oats. But I am thinking it would be nice to have a different food.

I am thinking I would like to try cake.

Yes, yes. Cake. I know all about it. When humans eat cake, it is in glad times. It is the food for a celebration, such as when a woman becomes 47. I have seen cake on the Fourth of July. When humans have a cake, they stand around it and clap hands and smile and say happy birthday at each other. Sometimes there are beautiful markings on a cake, such as balloons or a pink shape.

Sometimes the top of a cake is on fire and a boy must blow on the fire with mouth wind. This is the scariest cake. I do not want this kind. But I will eat any other cake. Any cake that is not the fire cake that tries to kill the boy.

Please understand: I do not get money for doing work. I do not get to go inside the house. All I am either doing my horse job or standing in my pen or eating food off the floor. I always do these things. But I have never once gotten cake and I would like it very much.

I have noticed that human children get to eat cake. But I am bigger than the children. I am more helpful to the farm. Children do not move the heavy things like me or let anyone ride on them. And yet they get cake. Maybe the humans will realize this. Maybe they will say, "You  know who deserves cake? That horse. That horse whose back we are always on."

Every day I dream about what it will be like if I get to eat cake. Here is what will happen. First, I will walk to the cake and putt my nose at it like hrrfff to make and stomping my hooves to make sure it is not a snake. Then I will trot in a circle to show that I am a horse and I am large. After that, I will nuzzle the cake to …
266176826052
Sam Harper @sbh4th.bsky.social · 01/04/2026
Happy to have made a small contribution to this project. Look forward to reading more of the entire suite of papers.
020
Reposted by Sam Harper
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 01/04/2026
SCORE, a collaboration of 865 researchers, is now released as three papers in Nature, six preprints, and a lot of data (cos.io/score/). SCORE examined repeatability of findings from the social-behavioral sciences and tested whether human and automated methods could predict replicability.
cos.io
SCORE | Center for Open Science
SCORE shows that there is no shortcut to producing credible research findings, and there is no single indicator of trustworthiness. Research progress depends on transparency, rigor, and establishing r...
1190107
Reposted by Sam Harper
Jonathan Tonkin @jdtonkin.bsky.social · 11/03/2026
😱🤯 -- Just looked up the cost to go gold open access at Nature Eco Evo: US$12850! That's $21,600 NZD. That's the same cost as a Royal Society Master's Scholarship! This has gone too far. Absolutely bonkers.
86316
Reposted by Sam Harper
Darren Dahly @statsepi.bsky.social · 24/10/2024
So if you analyze data as part of your research, then your coding/scripting practices are of paramount importance! Because I assure you that we can and do get things wrong. jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
2163
Reposted by Sam Harper
Jacob T. Levy @jacobtlevy.bsky.social · 16/02/2026
Now posted ahead of print: "Conceptualizing Academic Freedom," forthcoming, Annual Review of Political Science. (Uncorrected proofs, so a few minor edits different from the version that will be published in June.) doi.org/10.1146/annu...
Abstract
Academic freedom is an unusual and complex set of norms and practices. It arises out of the combination of the corporate self-governance of medieval universities and the spirit of disciplinary scientific inquiry in modern research universities. It combines a principle of antiorthodoxy as to conclusions with the robust associational self-governance of scholarly communities whose members evaluate one another as participants in that shared enterprise. It has never been easily or wholly embraced by wider societies; today it is under wholesale attack. This article combines conceptual, normative, and historical analyses of academic freedom as a general norm with attention to conflicts over it in the mid-to-late 2010s and early 2020s. Some genuinely hard cases and questions tested the meaning of academic freedom and university values well before the current crisis.
620063
Reposted by Sam Harper
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (MPIDR) @mpidr.bsky.social · 09/02/2026
📢Job Offer‼️New Max Planck Research Group on Medical Demography Marcus Ebeling will lead the team starting on 1 July 2026. The research group will be based at the MPIDR in Rostock. Read an interview with Marcus on his future research here: www.demogr.mpg.de/go/rgmd (including link to job) #postdoc
Job opening for postdoctoral researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Demographic-Epidemiology.The Medical Demography research group explains its goals for studying disease progression and its effects on health and the population.We are looking for a PhD in demography, sociology, epidemiology, or related fields with experience in quantitative health data analysis.Apply now: The application deadline is March 22, 2026. For more information, visit www.demogr.mpg.de/go/jobs.
01920
Sam Harper @sbh4th.bsky.social · 20/01/2026
Enshittification comes to Pitchfork: "But to read unlimited reviews, see the reader scores, and comment yourself or read the comments of others, you’ll have to smash subscribe." pitchfork.com/news/a-new-e...
pitchfork.com
A New Era for Pitchfork: Introducing Reader Scores and Commenting
After 30 years, we’re expanding the role readers have in our music criticism and giving you full access to the reviews archive
020
Reposted by Sam Harper
Onisillos @onisillos.bsky.social · 19/01/2026
"The target was numbers, and quality was mentioned only in terms of a journal’s prestige, never the work itself." www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
I’m going to halve my publication output. You should consider slow science, too
If we don’t slow down, the research enterprise is going to crash, argues Adrian Barnett.
0187
Sam Harper @sbh4th.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
A new @mcgill.ca study led by me and Jill Baumgartner released by @heiresearch.bsky.social reports that China’s Clean Heating Policy, one of the largest #CleanEnergy policies yet implemented, reduced household coal use, improved air quality, and reduced blood pressure in rural Beijing.
100
Reposted by Sam Harper
The Guardian @theguardian.com · 13/01/2026
‘A bombshell’: doubt cast on discovery of microplastics throughout human body
theguardian.com
‘A bombshell’: doubt cast on discovery of microplastics throughout human body
Exclusive: Some scientists say many detections are most likely error, with one high-profile study called a ‘joke’ High-profile studies reporting the presence of microplastics throughout the human body have been thrown into doubt by scientists who say the discoveries are probably the result of contamination and false positives. One chemist called the concerns “a bombshell”. Studies claiming to have revealed micro and nanoplastics in the brain, testes, placentas, arteries and elsewhere were reported by media across the world, including the Guardian. There is no doubt that plastic pollution of the natural world is ubiquitous, and present in the food and drink we consume and the air we breathe. But the health damage potentially caused by microplastics and the chemicals they contain is unclear, and an explosion of research has taken off in this area in recent years. Continue reading...
75724
Reposted by Sam Harper
Juan Moreno-Cruz @jmorenocruz.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
It's happening! Canada launched two programs to recruit international researchers. Canada Impact+ Research Chairs (1 million/yr for 8 yrs +) Canada Impact+ Emerging Leaders. I will do my best to facilitate the process for those interested. Hit me up. www.canada.ca/en/impact-pl...
canada.ca
The Government of Canada introduces new programs for international researchers - Canada.ca
4197114
Reposted by Sam Harper
David Cole @davidcole-gtown.bsky.social · 09/11/2025
I look forward to defending free speech from its progressive critics — and conservative assailants == as the Tanner Letures Nov. 12 and 13 @princeton.edu A timely topic, sadly lectures.princeton.edu/lectures/202...
lectures.princeton.edu
Tanner Lecture on Human Values: David D. Cole
Progressives have increasingly lost faith in the First Amendment—at least as it has been interpreted and applied by the Supreme Court.  They argue that free speech has been “weaponized” by big busines...
0118
Reposted by Sam Harper
Mark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · 11/11/2025
We wrote the Strain on scientific publishing to highlight the problems of time & trust. With a fantastic group of co-authors, we present The Drain of Scientific Publishing: a 🧵 1/n Drain: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820 Strain: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/... Oligopoly: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
A table showing profit margins of major publishers. A snippet of text related to this table is below.

1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.A figure detailing the drain on researcher time.

1. The four-fold drain

1.2 Time
The number of papers published each year is growing faster than the scientific workforce,
with the number of papers per researcher almost doubling between 1996 and 2022 (Figure
1A). This reflects the fact that publishers’ commercial desire to publish (sell) more material
has aligned well with the competitive prestige culture in which publications help secure jobs,
grants, promotions, and awards. To the extent that this growth is driven by a pressure for
profit, rather than scholarly imperatives, it distorts the way researchers spend their time.
The publishing system depends on unpaid reviewer labour, estimated to be over 130 million
unpaid hours annually in 2020 alone (9). Researchers have complained about the demands of
peer-review for decades, but the scale of the problem is now worse, with editors reporting
widespread difficulties recruiting reviewers. The growth in publications involves not only the
authors’ time, but that of academic editors and reviewers who are dealing with so many
review demands.
Even more seriously, the imperative to produce ever more articles reshapes the nature of
scientific inquiry. Evidence across multiple fields shows that more papers result in
‘ossification’, not new ideas (10). It may seem paradoxical that more papers can slow
progress until one considers how it affects researchers’ time. While rewards remain tied to
volume, prestige, and impact of publications, researchers will be nudged away from riskier,
local, interdisciplinary, and long-term work. The result is a treadmill of constant activity with
limited progress whereas core scholarly practices – such as reading, reflecting and engaging
with others’ contributions – is de-prioritized. What looks like productivity often masks
intellectual exhaustion built on a demoralizing, narrowing scientific vision.A table of profit margins across industries. The section of text related to this table is below:

1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.The costs of inaction are plain: wasted public funds, lost researcher time, compromised
scientific integrity and eroded public trust. Today, the system rewards commercial publishers
first, and science second. Without bold action from the funders we risk continuing to pour
resources into a system that prioritizes profit over the advancement of scientific knowledge.
8644453
Reposted by Sam Harper
Research Professional News @resprofnews.bsky.social · 12/11/2025
Opinion: Chaos is coming for scholarly publishing. Buckling of commercial models alongside maturing of community-led efforts promises major shifts, says Caroline Edwards (@theblochian.bsky.social). www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-v...
researchprofessionalnews.com
Chaos is coming for scholarly publishing - Research Professional News
Buckling of commercial models alongside maturing of community-led efforts promises major shifts, says Caroline Edwards
03531
Reposted by Sam Harper
Alex Coppock @aecoppock.bsky.social · 27/10/2025
encountered this article by David Weimer from 1986 (cited by 7) with three good ideas for improving science that just a few short decades later, we've started to implement. Collective Delusion In The Social Sciences: Publishing Incentives For Empirical Abuse doi.org/10.1111/j.15...
title page of article:

There is a skeleton in the social science closet. Almost all of us have heard it rattled at one time or another.! Nevertheless, we collectively ignore it. Some ignore it because they do not think it is very scary: others because its putting to rest would require a major restructuring of our scholarly journals. Perhaps others even fear that admitting its existence would undermine belief in the empirical progress? the social sciences have apparently enjoyed since the widespread diffusion of statistical training and the ready availability of the computer.
I will argue that the
skeleton, the bias social science journals exhibit for publishing articles reporting statistically significant results, is dangerousThe results of statistical tests should not be submitted to or als until after articles have been accepted for publica-
tion..
would base their decisions on
theory under
discussions of the theory under consideration, the specific hypotheses to be tested, and the data sample to be used.?
This would divert attention from the final result to the a priori specification of hypotheses and the appropriateness of data and statistical technique for testing them. Unfortunate-ly, this approach would not work unless adopted by all the relevant journals. If a single journal adopted it, researchersAny journal that publishes an article with statistical models should be required (by the disciplines?) to provide a page of space to anyone who wants to report the results of applying the authors' models to different sets of data. This approach would provide a less biased sampling of research results. It would also allow us to better gauge the robustness of our theories.8 Some journals now provide some space for veri-fications; doing so should be standard editorial practice.Researchers should be required to submit a statement with
indicating
their articles indicating whether or not the model being presented is the one actually first estimated from the data.
A general description of statistical techniques would also be included in the submission. Is the presented model the first specification or is it the end product of stepwise regression or some other questionable data search? Where appropriate, the editor would affix a warning along the following lines next to results:
1135
Reposted by Sam Harper
George Davey Smith @mendelrandom.bsky.social · 24/10/2025
Fantastic opportunity to lead the Equity Lab @wellcometrust.bsky.social working with the legendary Jimmy Volmink, details here wellcome.wd3.myworkdayjobs.com/en-GB/Wellco... Please repost so as many as possible can see this great opportunity
wellcome.wd3.myworkdayjobs.com
Associate Director, Equity Lab
Salary: £120,800 Closing date: 9th November Contract type: Permanent Interview dates: 24th and 28th November The Wellcome Trust is a global charitable foundation. We improve health for everyone by fun...
048
Sam Harper @sbh4th.bsky.social · 29/09/2025
McGill's @healthsciences.mcgill.ca Jay Kaufman critiquing public health guidance that "promote the powerful ideological message that being normal or abnormal ultimately depends on one’s race. That premise should be regarded as the truly malignant pathology" lareviewofbooks.org/article/does...
lareviewofbooks.org
Does One Size Fit All? | Los Angeles Review of Books
In the 10th essay in the Legacies of Eugenics series, Jay S. Kaufman shows how the science of human body size is suffused with cultural assumptions.
010
Reposted by Sam Harper
Belfast Telegraph @belfasttelegraph.co.uk · 10/09/2025
Horrors of Trump detention centre: Lisburn man tells his story after arrest for 'looking like a Mexican' Lee Stinton was lifted by US immigration police on an American street — in an incident he compared to a kidnapping. Here, he tells us his story.
6722601435
Sam Harper @sbh4th.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
"Credit card perks for educated, usually urban professionals are being subsidized by people who have less. In other words, when you book a hotel room or enjoy entry to an airport lounge at no cost, poor consumers are ultimately footing the bill." www.nytimes.com/2023/03/04/o...
nytimes.com
Opinion | The Dirty Little Secret of Credit Card Rewards Programs (Published 2023)
010
Reposted by Sam Harper
Reese Richardson @reeserichardson.bsky.social · 04/08/2025
Today, our article "The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly" is finally published in PNAS. I hope that it proves to be a wake-up-call for the whole scientific community. reeserichardson.blog/2025/08/04/a...
reeserichardson.blog
A do-or-die moment for the scientific enterprise
Reflecting on our paper “The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly”
9348207
Sam Harper @sbh4th.bsky.social · 05/08/2025
What is going on here? Why does Aalborg (or Copenhagen, Montreal, San Diego, etc.) even need a zoo? www.nytimes.com/2025/08/04/s...
nytimes.com
A Zoo in Denmark Wants to Feed Your Pets to Its Predators
051
Reposted by Sam Harper
Adam Kucharski @adamjkucharski.bsky.social · 24/07/2025
Two PhD studentships available in real-time infectious disease modelling, jointly with LSHTM, Imperial and UKHSA. January 2026 start + 3.5 years of funding: www.lshtm.ac.uk/study/fees-a...
lshtm.ac.uk
PhD studentships in real-time infectious disease modelling | LSHTM
The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), Imperial College London and the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) are pleased to invite applications for two PhD studentships in real-time
11415
Sam Harper @sbh4th.bsky.social · 03/06/2025
🤔🤔🤔 www.nytimes.com/2025/06/02/w...
nytimes.com
That Cup of Coffee May Have a Longer-Term Perk
110
Reposted by Sam Harper
Carl T. Bergstrom @carlbergstrom.com · 30/05/2025
Gold standard science
nytimes.com
White House Health Report Included Fake Citations
851543328
Reposted by Sam Harper
Willem van Schaik @wvschaik.bsky.social · 25/05/2025
'Scientific conferences are leaving the US amid border fears' www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
Scientific conferences are leaving the US amid border fears
Some meetings have been put on hold in response to foreign researchers’ travel concerns.
28459177
Reposted by Sam Harper
Retraction Watch @retractionwatch.com · 25/05/2025
"In extremely rare move, Harvard revokes tenure and cuts ties with star business professor" Francesca Gino
wgbh.org
In extremely rare move, Harvard revokes tenure and cuts ties with star business professor
An internal investigation had found that Harvard Business School professor Francesca Gino’s research on why people lie and cheat was based on falsified data.
515045
Sam Harper @sbh4th.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
This report by ProPublica probably has more detailed description of methods than many *peer-reviewed* published papers. AND they shared their code! (github.com/propublica/t...)
github.com
GitHub - propublica/tx-pregnancy-loss-sepsis-analysis: A ProPublica analysis of sepsis in second-trimester pregnancy loss after Texas' near-total abortion ban went into effect
A ProPublica analysis of sepsis in second-trimester pregnancy loss after Texas' near-total abortion ban went into effect - propublica/tx-pregnancy-loss-sepsis-analysis
111
Reposted by Sam Harper
Jeremy Labrecque @jeremylabrecque.bsky.social · 02/05/2025
If you're looking for a post-doc in social health inequalities research and causal inference? Joost Oude-Groeniger and I have just such a position opening up. www.werkenbijerasmusmc.nl/en/vacancy/1...
werkenbijerasmusmc.nl
Vacature: Postdoc Preventing health inequalities by improving socioeconomic positions
Are you passionate about understanding how social policies shape health inequalities? Join us as a Postdoctoral Researcher and help uncover the true impact of policies aimed at improving socioeconomic...
22520
Reposted by Sam Harper
Madhu Pai, MD, PhD @madhupai.bsky.social · 28/04/2025
📣📣 We are looking for an Assistant Professor (tenure track) in the Department of Global and Public Health @mcgillspgh.bsky.social @healthsciences.mcgill.ca! mcgill.wd3.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/mcgill...
2141113
Reposted by Sam Harper
Ilya Kashnitsky @ikashnitsky.phd · 19/03/2025
💥José Manuel Aburto is seeking an early career colleague to join his forming team as a postdoc 🌿 JM is an exceptional mentor and friend. And now he is inviting a lucky colleague to join for an exciting ride. It's a highway to the frontier of demography. Catch this unique chance 🚀 lnkd.in/dBJyaF9p
José Manuel Aburto giving a presentation
12914
Sam Harper @sbh4th.bsky.social · 13/03/2025
Feels somewhat self-indulgent given the news cycle, but I want to take this moment to thank the anonymous students that sent a note of appreciation to me via @mcgill.ca 's 'Thank-a-Prof' program. These small gestures actually mean a lot and help keep us motivated to do more, better. Thank you!
040
Reposted by Sam Harper
Brent Toderian @brenttoderian.bsky.social · 18/02/2025
“They cut speed limits, changed street design, removed space for cars… Now it appears that work is paying off. Oslo & Helsinki are reaping the rewards of committed action on making their roads safer, reducing pedestrian fatalities to zero last year.” #VisionZero #SpeedKills #Oslo #Helsinki
theguardian.com
How Helsinki and Oslo cut pedestrian deaths to zero
After years of committed action, neither city recorded a single pedestrian fatality in 2019
9740188
Reposted by Sam Harper
Dan Goldhaber @cedr.bsky.social · 29/01/2025
New results from "The Nation's Report Card" just dropped and they are pretty bad. I got a sneak peek as a member of IES’s Standing Committee, so I had an extra day or so to ruminate about them. A few thoughts 👇 1/n
64637
Reposted by Sam Harper
Matthew Herper @matthewherper.bsky.social · 23/01/2025
FDA purges material on clinical trial diversity from its site, showing stakes of Trump DEI ban From me and @lizzylawrence.bsky.social www.statnews.com/2025/01/23/f...
statnews.com
FDA purges material on clinical trial diversity from its site, showing stakes of Trump DEI ban
Following the Trump administration's DEI ban, the FDA's move to scrub webpages has ensnared many pages focused on ensuring diversity in drug trials.
1415397
Sam Harper @sbh4th.bsky.social · 24/01/2025
There is just no going back from this. www.nytimes.com/2025/01/23/u...
nytimes.com
Violent Acts of Many Jan. 6 Rioters Pardoned by Trump Are Shown in Videos
President Trump pardoned men who violently attacked police officers on Jan. 6 along with nearly 1,600 other people who had been charged in connection with the riot. But his grant of clemency did not e...
010
Reposted by Sam Harper
Brendan Nyhan @brendannyhan.bsky.social · 24/01/2025
www.nytimes.com/2025/01/23/u... "dragged into the crowd ... attacked with a stun gun" "used an American flag to pummel another officer" "charged with using a baseball bat to beat officers" "swinging a metal flagpole at an officer" "attacked the police with a chair and chemical spray"
nytimes.com
Violent Acts of Many Jan. 6 Rioters Pardoned by Trump Are Shown in Videos
President Trump pardoned men who violently attacked police officers on Jan. 6 along with nearly 1,600 other people who had been charged in connection with the riot. But his grant of clemency did not e...
611040