Reposted by Sam HughesIan Mitchell @ianmitchell1.bsky.social · 25/02/2025UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer just cut the UK aid budget from 0.5% of GNI to 0.3% in 2027 to fund increases in defence spending. He says he’s making tough choices, but cutting funding for the world’s poorest people is the easiest—and cruellest—choice he could make (1/4) 22314
Reposted by Sam HughesCenter for Global Development @cgdev.org · 11/02/2025NEW: @ianmitchell1.bsky.social & @samhugh3s.bsky.social find a 1 year US aid freeze could trigger an economic shock of 1% of GNI in 23 economies—with 8 countries, incl. South Sudan, Somalia & Ethiopia, facing a devastating 3%+ hit. Which other countries could step up? www.cgdev.org/blog/which-c...cgdev.orgWhich Countries Are Most Exposed to US Aid Cuts; And What Other Providers Can DoWhile it is still unclear how long the current freeze on US foreign aid will last, and when and where it might resume, it seems the US, under the second Trump administration, may be ready to abandon i... 044
Reposted by Sam HughesLee Crawfurd @leecrawfurd.bsky.social · 16/01/2025Letting Asylum Seekers Work Is Not a “Pull Factor” - why do politicians get away with repeating the evidence-free argument? www.cgdev.org/blog/letting...cgdev.orgLetting Asylum Seekers Work Is Not a “Pull Factor”In many countries new asylum seekers are not allowed to work for a certain period of time after arriving. The UK has one of the longest such periods: 12 months. Many claim that letting asylum seekers ... 13816
Sam Hughes @samhugh3s.bsky.social · 09/01/2025Our new blog highlights how abnormal is the current Gov's policy of using the limited foreign aid budget to fund support for asylum seekers within the UK. Before 2014, nearly no UK asylum seeker support was funded via aid, even when it faced spikes in applicants similar to today's (eg around 2000). 111
Sam Hughes @samhugh3s.bsky.social · 13/12/2024"The Centre for Global Development (CGD), a think-tank, reckons that if Britain had classified asylum spending the same way in the 1990s and 2000s, and had spent as much as it does today per asylum-seeker, in some years the entire aid budget would have been swallowed up." 041