Peter_ryans @ryanbegley.bsky.social · 17/11/2025$100 thanks to your post @jamellebouie.net keep up the good work and keep the good posts coming 000
Reposted by Peter_ryansLee Johnson for US Senate @handle.invalid · 27/06/2025Lindsey Graham doesn't want you to know the name of his opponent but will try every last pathetic attempt to save his seat. My name is Lee Johnson. I am a Democrat running to retire Lindsey. If you are with me I need you to share this and follow my account. Let’s end this nightmare. 361281622
Reposted by Peter_ryansWren ☸️🪷🗽⚖️ @fiddledidi.bsky.social · 24/06/2025It would be a shame if these job ads received hundreds of bogus applications 011
Peter_ryans @ryanbegley.bsky.social · 24/06/2025And get paid $27 an hour to do so www.indeed.com/m/viewjob?jk...indeed.comArmed Security Transportation Officer/ Salisbury, MD - Salisbury, MD 21801 - Indeed.comParagon Professional Services 000
Peter_ryans @ryanbegley.bsky.social · 24/06/2025They’re making $27 an hour to do so www.indeed.com/m/viewjob?jk...indeed.comArmed Security Transportation Officer/ Salisbury, MD - Salisbury, MD 21801 - Indeed.comParagon Professional Services 000
Peter_ryans @ryanbegley.bsky.social · 24/06/2025$27 an hour to kidnap people while wearing masks and army fatigues www.indeed.com/m/viewjob?jk...indeed.comArmed Security Transportation Officer/ Salisbury, MD - Salisbury, MD 21801 - Indeed.comParagon Professional Services 030
Peter_ryans @ryanbegley.bsky.social · 24/06/2025The going rate to kidnap ppl off the streets of USA is currently $28.68 an hour… www.indeed.com/m/viewjob?jk...indeed.comArmed Security Transportation Officer/ Salisbury, MD - Salisbury, MD 21801 - Indeed.comParagon Professional Services 0269
Peter_ryans @ryanbegley.bsky.social · 24/06/2025$250M awarded to them in the last 12 months www.usaspending.gov/recipient/a2...usaspending.govUSAspending.gov 021
Peter_ryans @ryanbegley.bsky.social · 24/06/2025Here’s more beringstraits.rec.pro.ukg.net/BER1502BSNC/...beringstraits.rec.pro.ukg.net 000
Peter_ryans @ryanbegley.bsky.social · 23/06/2025So they’re going to release him while he awaits trial but then ice plans to pick him up again? And deport him again? 000
Reposted by Peter_ryansCeleste Pewter @celestepewter.bsky.social · 23/06/2025... but given the clear descent we're seeing into fascism? It's another sign. It's also another sign for critics to shut up, or they get called it from official channels too. That's why it's alarming as hell. 0302
Reposted by Peter_ryansemptywheel @emptywheel.bsky.social · 23/06/2025Does Stephen Miller Know Pam Bondi Is Harboring Criminal Aliens? www.emptywheel.net/2025/06/22/d...emptywheel.netDoes Stephen Miller Know Pam Bondi Is Harboring Criminal Aliens? - emptywheelPam Bondi may let the two guys who allegedly directed Kilmar Abrego Garcia to smuggle migrants out of prison and into the country so she can sustain a claim that Abrego Garcia is a terribly dangerous ... 20836259
Reposted by Peter_ryansPeter @notalawyer.bsky.social · 23/06/2025leftists are consistently labeled as out of touch extremists, but there isn’t a single prominent left position this unpopular 10097281620
Reposted by Peter_ryans𝙽𝚊𝚜𝚑 𝙸𝚜 𝙷𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝙵𝚘𝚛 𝙸𝚝 @nashishereforit.bsky.social · 22/06/2025He just dropped $280,000,000 worth of artillery in a war that’s not ours, but our grandparents have to live on Ramen noodles because America can’t afford Meals on Wheels anymore. Make it make sense. 11055008014585
Reposted by Peter_ryansMark Joseph Stern @mjsdc.bsky.social · 20/06/2025Justice Jackson taking on Gorsuch's "pure textualism" and arguing for a more holistic reading of Congress' handiwork—worth reading in full. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p... 12439511093
Reposted by Peter_ryansEvan Bernick, a finite mode with a smol hooman and a lorg floof @evanbernick.bsky.social · 22/06/2025this is as good as turning the Constitution off. If this is what congressional leaders are going to do when an executive just seizes power from the legislative branch, we do not have one. 602621738
![The majority’s contention that I reject “ ‘pure textualism’ [a]s insufficiently pliable to secure the result [I] seek,” ante, at 10, stems from an
unfortunate misunderstanding of the judicial role. Our interpretative
task is not to seek our own desired results (whatever they may be). And,
indeed, it is precisely because of this solemn duty that, in my view, it is
imperative that we interpret statutes consistent with all relevant indicia
of what Congress wanted, as best we can ascertain its intent. A methodology that includes consideration of Congress’s aims does exactly that—
and no more. By contrast, pure textualism’s refusal to try to understand
the text of a statute in the larger context of what Congress sought to
achieve turns the interpretive task into a potent weapon for advancing
judicial policy preferences. By “finding” answers in ambiguous text, and
not bothering to consider whether those answers align with other sources
of statutory meaning, pure textualists can easily disguise their own preferences as “textual” inevitabilities. So, really, far from being “insufficiently pliable,” I think pure textualism is incessantly malleable—that’s
its primary problem—and, indeed, it is certainly somehow always flexible enough to secure the majority’s desired outcome.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:6h7b2i6ttw3l4t7pvbvxdith/bafkreih3qdtlloz3yhggypbtwiveqdgzzfgapsnetvq7qsni7wfmyuovoi)
