ripzerai.bsky.social @ripzerai.bsky.social · 13/07/2026This is why DuckTales Helen of Troy is the most mythologically accurate Helen of Troy. 210816
ripzerai.bsky.social @ripzerai.bsky.social · 13/07/2026I especially liked the citation of Myers v. United States to show the two parties weren't adversarial. 0130
ripzerai.bsky.social @ripzerai.bsky.social · 13/07/2026I liked how the judge used a very recent "unitary executive" Supreme Court decision against Trump here. 000
ripzerai.bsky.social @ripzerai.bsky.social · 03/08/2025The spider part seems made up, anyways. www.practicalhomicide.com/Research/Mas... 010
ripzerai.bsky.social @ripzerai.bsky.social · 11/02/2024Flash's foes, they finish last (Too bad sometimes he's just too fast!) 1424
ripzerai.bsky.social @ripzerai.bsky.social · 03/01/2024His ancestor Nathaniel Wayne seems to have been a Puritan way back in 1640. 040
![President Trump is Chief of the Executive Branch, see U.S. CONST. Art. II, § 1 (the
“Vesting Clause”), and the Vesting Clause is the bedrock of his authority over that branch
of government. Id. Specifically, the Vesting Clause states that “The executive Power shall
be vested in a President of the United States of America.” Id.; see also Free Enter. Fund
v. Public Co. Acct. Oversight Bd., 561 U.S. 477, 496–97 (2010) (“[T]he President ‘cannot
delegate ultimate responsibility or the active obligation to supervise that goes with it,’
because Article II ‘makes a single President responsible for the actions of the Executive
Branch.’”) (citing Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 712–13, (1997)); Seila Law LLC v.
CFPB, 591 U.S. 197, 213 (2020) (“The entire executive Power belongs to the President
alone.”) (citation and quotation marks omitted). Indeed, just recently, the Supreme Court
cited Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52, 133 (1926) as a “landmark decision” and
“perhaps our best word on the subject” of whether the President could remove
subordinates in government service at will. Trump v. Slaughter, 609 U.S. __, slip op. at
16 (2026). Finding that he could, the majority ruled that “[s]ubordinates who exercise the
President’s power are subject to removal by him. Then, and only then, can they remain
accountable to the President, and the President to the people.” Id. at 36. “[T]hese officers
exercise the President’s power, not their own, and thus must be responsible to him.” Id.
at 35 (emphasis in original).](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:ywoud6ugvnpaovnhy2ni2c3u/bafkreic7h7ofklwf7lkdcv32esvjuquylzf2at42bqyvmptxaabvfyl5di)
