Sign in

Rick Pildes

@rickpildes.bsky.social
504 followers 101 following 114 posts

Legal expert at NYU on issues concerning democracy and the structure of American government.

PostsRepliesMedia
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
www.cato.org/sites/cato.o...
cato.org
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
This is a new one for me. CATO publishes a comic-book like Illustrated Supreme Court Review and @walterolson.bsky.social did the chapter on last Term's campaign-finance case. One page features Justice Kavanaugh quoting me and a drawing of me. Here's the illustration, link to the Review in reply:
181
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
.. @rachelbarkow.bsky.social @profmmurray.bsky.social @dorfonlaw.bsky.social @jamalgreene.bsky.social
000
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
How Worried Should We Be about Threats to the Elections? At the NYT's "Interesting Times" podcast/interview, I addressed the concerns many have about threats to the election process with Sarah Isgur: www.nytimes.com/2026/09/24/o...
nytimes.com
Opinion | How Worried Should We Be About the Midterm Elections? (Gift Article)
And how we learn to trust elections again.
155
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Wow, just saw this, must now buy your comic book!
021
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
Senior OH election official explains in detail why, from an election administration perspective, "being required to implement the new USPS rule beginning at some as-yet unknown date in September would be nothing short of insanity." At the NYU Democracy Project: democracyproject.org/posts/its-to...
democracyproject.org
It’s Too Late to Implement the USPS Ballot-Mailing Rule for This Election
A broad range of views on democracy to help break the stalemate caused by partisan conflict.
0103
Reposted by Rick Pildes
NYU Law Democracy Project @democracyproject.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
From Faculty Director @rickpildes.bsky.social on "A Politically Realistic Approach to Fair Political Representation"
022
Reposted by Rick Pildes
NYU Law Democracy Project @democracyproject.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
Next up in our new series on Congress - an essay by Faculty Director @rickpildes.bsky.social on "A Politically Realistic Approach to Fair Political Representation" The Democracy Project features ideas & proposals from across the political spectrum Read here: democracyproject.org/posts/a-poli...
democracyproject.org
A Politically Realistic Approach to Fair Political Representation
A broad range of views on democracy to help break the stalemate caused by partisan conflict.
142
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 08/06/2026
Very sad news. He spent a semester at Michigan Law School, back when I was there, as a visiting professor. Apart from the enormous influence of his work, he was an intellectually lively, warm, engaging person.
000
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 20/05/2026
When courts order special masters to draw maps, they can give more weight to competitive districts. When independent commissions, have discretion, they can also do so. If voters adopt any new independent commissions or establish standards for districting through voter initiatives, they can do so too
040
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 20/05/2026
Safe seats mean incumbents only fear being primaried, typically these days from the ideological wings of the parties. Creating more competitive districts is one of a series of reforms I've advocated to combat extremism in our politics. scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol76/is...
scholarship.law.ufl.edu
Combatting Extremism
Few of us are happy with the state of American democracy. Our political institutions appear dysfunctional and our political culture more generally has become increasingly toxic and tribalistic. Our cu...
120
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 20/05/2026
Using simulated districting techniques, we show we could have at least twice as many competitive districts as currently while respecting traditional districting principles -- despite "the big sort." "Districting and Competition" coming out in Penn L. Rev. is here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com
Districting and Competition
Over roughly the last decade, courts and scholars have seemingly lost interest in competitive districts, focusing instead on the problem of partisan gerrymander
000
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 20/05/2026
I have long argued we should give more weight in redistricting reform to the importance of competitive districts. Maps can be fair in partisan terms, but with everyone in a safe seat. In a new article @profnickstephan.bsky.social and I demonstrate the possibilities for more comp. districts.
100
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 15/05/2026
Are party leaders going to have the power to construct these lists, as in most list PR systems? Or are voters going to be able to vote on which candidates appear on these lists and in what rank order?
111
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 14/05/2026
I agree and I like Mike's proposal better than the alternatives. But I have seen no one explain the political economy by which any of this is realistic.
210
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 14/05/2026
20% threshold helps but fringe parties are a minor concern. My principal concern is a highly fragmented House with 5-6 parties that will make it even more difficult to have a functional legislature. Tradeoffs are everywhere. Have to decide what is most impt. I know Congress not great already
110
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 13/05/2026
Some PR proponents seek fairness as between the major parties, which seems to motivate this thoughtful piece. But to the extent this would create a 5-6 party House, I think proposals have to contend with arguments I've laid out here. illinoislawreview.org/print/vol-20...
illinoislawreview.org
Skepticism About Proportional Representation for Congress
Recently, a number of political reform advocates and advocacy groups have proposed a form of proportional representation (“PR”) for the U.S. House. In the view of reform advocates, our system of s...
231
Reposted by Rick Pildes
David Froomkin @dfroomkin.bsky.social · 04/05/2026
Very interesting take from @rickpildes.bsky.social. I agree that the long-term equilibrium consequence of gutting the VRA is unclear. Unpacking highly-concentrated groups of Democrats could produce more competitive elections. But the short-term consequence is clearly to abet Republican gerrymanders.
144
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 02/05/2026
Just as the Court had become more focused on enforcing limits on Congress' enumerated powers, so too it should enforce limits on the states' enumerated powers. States have no reserved powers over congressional elections.
000
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 02/05/2026
The only power states have over congressional districting is the enumerated power in the Elections Clause, Art. I sec. 4. A number of years ago I filed an amicus brief in the SCt arguing that this power should not be understood to include partisan GM....
110
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 02/05/2026
This was not meant as a criticism of those bringing these cases. It's a difficult strategic judgment call when you believe you have winning legal cases under current law on major issues and concern but uncertainty about exactly how the Supreme Court might ultimately respond.
242
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
On the Supreme Court's Voting Rights Act decision, I've published this essay at Bloomberg Law: news.bloomberglaw.com/legal-exchan...
news.bloomberglaw.com
Supreme Court’s Gutting of Voting Provision Was Long Time Coming
Opinion: For many voting-rights scholars, a surprising aspect of this week's Voting Rights Acts decision is that the legal regime concerning racial representation lasted as long as it did, writes NYU ...
0122
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
Hadn't gotten around to posting this, but it was a pleasure to have the kind of extensive substantive discussion that is too rare these days. Blue Cities Blues is devoted to the problems of governance in blue cities.
021
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
When you blurb a book against self-interest...
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 31/03/2026
I've published this review essay, The Era of Democratic Dissatisfaction, of Skowronek's new book, The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience. democracyproject.org/posts/the-er...
democracyproject.org
The Era of Democratic Dissatisfaction
A broad range of views on democracy to help break the stalemate caused by partisan conflict.
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 20/02/2026
The President needs the Court's legal endorsement to be able to continue to impose the tariffs. He can't simply have customs agents extorting money from importers at the border. The question of refunds for past tariffs is potentially more complicated, but we are not at that stage yet.
020
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 20/02/2026
I have always said that in any head-on confrontation with the President, the Court was on its strongest ground in the tariffs case. This is not a context in which presidential "defiance" of the Court's decision is possible.
110
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
On today's Supreme Court decision on standing in election law cases, here's my post at Election Law Blog: electionlawblog.org?p=153834
electionlawblog.org
Today's Decision on Standing in Election Cases, Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections #ELB
Back at the time the Court was asked to hear this case about when candidates have standing to challenge election laws in advance of an election, I supported on this blog the Court taking the case. I t...
030
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 30/12/2025
I don't think he's going to like @samuelmoyn.bsky.social's new book.
040
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 24/12/2025
From the Kavanaugh concurrence:
000
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 24/12/2025
But if the Court is indeed holding that protective functions are not law execution, then do you still think there is a role for the guard under 253 (2) in performing these functions?
000
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 24/12/2025
Is your theory that protective functions are instead justified to avoid "the course of justice" being impeded? I recognize the Court's ambiguity in not exactly holding that protective functions are not execution of the law. The Court only takes the govt at its word on that.
110
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 24/12/2025
253(2) permits armed forces or the militia against [actors who] "oppose[] or obstruct[] the execution of the laws of the United States or impede[] the course of justice under those laws." The decision takes the govt at its word that protective functions are not execution of the laws.
200
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 23/12/2025
If we end up there, much will turn on how intensively the Court reviews the Pres' assertion that such force is indeed necessary to protect federal personnel or property.
020
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 23/12/2025
The Court's action in the Chicago national guard case means that if a Pres. believes force is needed to protect federal personnel or property, he must use the US military rather than the national guard. In other words, the Court's opinion takes the national guard option off the table.
230
Reposted by Rick Pildes
Genevieve Lakier @genevievelakier.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
This is not to say that a win for the challengers in this case would be terrible. I am persuaded by @rickpildes.bsky.social and Bob Bauer's argument that, given the deregulation of everything else, further deregulation in this case might in fact have beneficial consequences bsky.app/profile/rick...
101
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
I've published this essay at Bloomberg Law on the Supreme Court's stay order in the Texas redistricting case Decision has troubling implications for federal court oversight of state law election changes more generally. news.bloomberglaw.com/legal-exchan...
news.bloomberglaw.com
Justices’ Texas Map Order May Spur Last-Minute Voting Law Tweaks
Opinion: NYU Law's Rick Pildes says the SCOTUS ruling that it’s too close to the 2026 elections for courts to weigh in on Texas’ new maps risks giving states too much latitude to change voting laws be...
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
electionlawblog.org?p=150545
electionlawblog.org
The Supreme Court, The Political Parties, and the SuperPacs #ELB
This post is co-written with Bob Bauer, NYU Professor of Practice who formerly represented in private practice national and state Democratic Party committees: Later this week, the Supreme Court will c...
000
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
Today the Supreme Court is hearing a major case on the First Amendment rights of political parties and campaign finance Bob Bauer and I published this essay on the case, arguing that money flowing through the parties, rather than outside groups, is better for the democratic process Link in next post
120
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 06/12/2025
After Trump v. Slaughter, will there be any independent entities left other than the Federal Reserve? This post addresses Congress' critical effort to ensure the federal election commissions could not be captured by one political party. electionlawblog.org?p=153385
electionlawblog.org
After Trump v. Slaughter, Will There Be Independent Agencies Other than the Fed: The Case of the Federal Election Agencies #ELB
As the Supreme Court’s Monday argument approaches in Trump v. Slaughter on the unitary executive branch theory and independent agencies, two outcomes already seem foreordained. The Court is likely to ...
001
Reposted by Rick Pildes
David Cole @davidcole-gtown.bsky.social · 09/11/2025
I look forward to defending free speech from its progressive critics — and conservative assailants == as the Tanner Letures Nov. 12 and 13 @princeton.edu A timely topic, sadly lectures.princeton.edu/lectures/202...
lectures.princeton.edu
Tanner Lecture on Human Values: David D. Cole
Progressives have increasingly lost faith in the First Amendment—at least as it has been interpreted and applied by the Supreme Court.  They argue that free speech has been “weaponized” by big busines...
0118
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 10/11/2025
Just saw this, glad you enjoyed it.
120
Reposted by Rick Pildes
Lawfare @lawfaremedia.org · 04/11/2025
On Lawfare Daily, @klonick.bsky.social spoke to @rickpildes.bsky.social about his article, “Political Fragmentation in Democracies in the West,” the link between social media and threats to democracy, and the unique way this technology is now impacting the United States political system.
22110
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 29/10/2025
Hat tip to @martylederman.bsky.social
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 22/10/2025
Steve Skowronek has an essay today on "Authoritarianism Then and Now" at the NYU Democracy Project: democracyproject.org/posts/author...
democracyproject.org
Authoritarianism Then and Now
A broad range of views on democracy to help break the stalemate caused by partisan conflict.
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 14/10/2025
"If the major parties are pressed to recognize through fusion that a significant bloc of voters prefer something other than what the major party candidates are offering, that would create pressure for the major parties to be more responsive to the concerns of more voters."
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 14/10/2025
"Fusion is not a magic bullet, but it offers the promise of helping to bridge some of the extreme divides of our politics.If there is some common ground between independent, conservative and liberal voters, fusion would help unearth that common ground in the place it matters most, the voting booth..
110
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 14/10/2025
I’ve published an essay in the NJ Law Journal arguing that the Court should strike down the state’s ban on fusion voting.If a significant center of the electorate exists that feels unrepresented with the major parties represent, fusion is a way those voters would be able to express their preferences
110
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 14/10/2025
On fusion voting and the NJ Supreme Court: A new political party called the Moderate Party is challenging on state constitutional grounds NJ's ban on fusion voting. The court is considering whether to hear this challenge. I published an essay urging the court to take the case. More below..
120
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 09/10/2025
Here's an analogy. If the government imposes financial costs on you, you have standing. But if the government is beneficent and engages in spending you believe is illegal, it can be difficult to find anyone with standing to challenge.
010