Sign in

Rick Pildes

@rickpildes.bsky.social
499 followers 101 following 114 posts

Legal expert at NYU on issues concerning democracy and the structure of American government.

PostsRepliesMedia
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
This is a new one for me. CATO publishes a comic-book like Illustrated Supreme Court Review and @walterolson.bsky.social did the chapter on last Term's campaign-finance case. One page features Justice Kavanaugh quoting me and a drawing of me. Here's the illustration, link to the Review in reply:
171
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
How Worried Should We Be about Threats to the Elections? At the NYT's "Interesting Times" podcast/interview, I addressed the concerns many have about threats to the election process with Sarah Isgur: www.nytimes.com/2026/09/24/o...
nytimes.com
Opinion | How Worried Should We Be About the Midterm Elections? (Gift Article)
And how we learn to trust elections again.
155
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
Wow, just saw this, must now buy your comic book!
021
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
Senior OH election official explains in detail why, from an election administration perspective, "being required to implement the new USPS rule beginning at some as-yet unknown date in September would be nothing short of insanity." At the NYU Democracy Project: democracyproject.org/posts/its-to...
democracyproject.org
It’s Too Late to Implement the USPS Ballot-Mailing Rule for This Election
A broad range of views on democracy to help break the stalemate caused by partisan conflict.
0103
Reposted by Rick Pildes
NYU Law Democracy Project @democracyproject.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
From Faculty Director @rickpildes.bsky.social on "A Politically Realistic Approach to Fair Political Representation"
022
Reposted by Rick Pildes
NYU Law Democracy Project @democracyproject.bsky.social · 21/07/2026
Next up in our new series on Congress - an essay by Faculty Director @rickpildes.bsky.social on "A Politically Realistic Approach to Fair Political Representation" The Democracy Project features ideas & proposals from across the political spectrum Read here: democracyproject.org/posts/a-poli...
democracyproject.org
A Politically Realistic Approach to Fair Political Representation
A broad range of views on democracy to help break the stalemate caused by partisan conflict.
142
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 08/06/2026
Very sad news. He spent a semester at Michigan Law School, back when I was there, as a visiting professor. Apart from the enormous influence of his work, he was an intellectually lively, warm, engaging person.
000
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 20/05/2026
Safe seats mean incumbents only fear being primaried, typically these days from the ideological wings of the parties. Creating more competitive districts is one of a series of reforms I've advocated to combat extremism in our politics. scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol76/is...
scholarship.law.ufl.edu
Combatting Extremism
Few of us are happy with the state of American democracy. Our political institutions appear dysfunctional and our political culture more generally has become increasingly toxic and tribalistic. Our cu...
120
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 20/05/2026
I have long argued we should give more weight in redistricting reform to the importance of competitive districts. Maps can be fair in partisan terms, but with everyone in a safe seat. In a new article @profnickstephan.bsky.social and I demonstrate the possibilities for more comp. districts.
100
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 15/05/2026
Are party leaders going to have the power to construct these lists, as in most list PR systems? Or are voters going to be able to vote on which candidates appear on these lists and in what rank order?
111
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 13/05/2026
Some PR proponents seek fairness as between the major parties, which seems to motivate this thoughtful piece. But to the extent this would create a 5-6 party House, I think proposals have to contend with arguments I've laid out here. illinoislawreview.org/print/vol-20...
illinoislawreview.org
Skepticism About Proportional Representation for Congress
Recently, a number of political reform advocates and advocacy groups have proposed a form of proportional representation (“PR”) for the U.S. House. In the view of reform advocates, our system of s...
231
Reposted by Rick Pildes
David Froomkin @dfroomkin.bsky.social · 04/05/2026
Very interesting take from @rickpildes.bsky.social. I agree that the long-term equilibrium consequence of gutting the VRA is unclear. Unpacking highly-concentrated groups of Democrats could produce more competitive elections. But the short-term consequence is clearly to abet Republican gerrymanders.
144
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 02/05/2026
The only power states have over congressional districting is the enumerated power in the Elections Clause, Art. I sec. 4. A number of years ago I filed an amicus brief in the SCt arguing that this power should not be understood to include partisan GM....
110
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 02/05/2026
This was not meant as a criticism of those bringing these cases. It's a difficult strategic judgment call when you believe you have winning legal cases under current law on major issues and concern but uncertainty about exactly how the Supreme Court might ultimately respond.
242
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 01/05/2026
On the Supreme Court's Voting Rights Act decision, I've published this essay at Bloomberg Law: news.bloomberglaw.com/legal-exchan...
news.bloomberglaw.com
Supreme Court’s Gutting of Voting Provision Was Long Time Coming
Opinion: For many voting-rights scholars, a surprising aspect of this week's Voting Rights Acts decision is that the legal regime concerning racial representation lasted as long as it did, writes NYU ...
0122
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
Hadn't gotten around to posting this, but it was a pleasure to have the kind of extensive substantive discussion that is too rare these days. Blue Cities Blues is devoted to the problems of governance in blue cities.
021
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
When you blurb a book against self-interest...
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 31/03/2026
I've published this review essay, The Era of Democratic Dissatisfaction, of Skowronek's new book, The Adaptability Paradox: Political Inclusion and Constitutional Resilience. democracyproject.org/posts/the-er...
democracyproject.org
The Era of Democratic Dissatisfaction
A broad range of views on democracy to help break the stalemate caused by partisan conflict.
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 20/02/2026
I have always said that in any head-on confrontation with the President, the Court was on its strongest ground in the tariffs case. This is not a context in which presidential "defiance" of the Court's decision is possible.
110
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
On today's Supreme Court decision on standing in election law cases, here's my post at Election Law Blog: electionlawblog.org?p=153834
electionlawblog.org
Today's Decision on Standing in Election Cases, Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections #ELB
Back at the time the Court was asked to hear this case about when candidates have standing to challenge election laws in advance of an election, I supported on this blog the Court taking the case. I t...
030
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 30/12/2025
I don't think he's going to like @samuelmoyn.bsky.social's new book.
040
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 23/12/2025
The Court's action in the Chicago national guard case means that if a Pres. believes force is needed to protect federal personnel or property, he must use the US military rather than the national guard. In other words, the Court's opinion takes the national guard option off the table.
230
Reposted by Rick Pildes
Genevieve Lakier @genevievelakier.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
This is not to say that a win for the challengers in this case would be terrible. I am persuaded by @rickpildes.bsky.social and Bob Bauer's argument that, given the deregulation of everything else, further deregulation in this case might in fact have beneficial consequences bsky.app/profile/rick...
101
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
I've published this essay at Bloomberg Law on the Supreme Court's stay order in the Texas redistricting case Decision has troubling implications for federal court oversight of state law election changes more generally. news.bloomberglaw.com/legal-exchan...
news.bloomberglaw.com
Justices’ Texas Map Order May Spur Last-Minute Voting Law Tweaks
Opinion: NYU Law's Rick Pildes says the SCOTUS ruling that it’s too close to the 2026 elections for courts to weigh in on Texas’ new maps risks giving states too much latitude to change voting laws be...
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 09/12/2025
Today the Supreme Court is hearing a major case on the First Amendment rights of political parties and campaign finance Bob Bauer and I published this essay on the case, arguing that money flowing through the parties, rather than outside groups, is better for the democratic process Link in next post
120
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 06/12/2025
After Trump v. Slaughter, will there be any independent entities left other than the Federal Reserve? This post addresses Congress' critical effort to ensure the federal election commissions could not be captured by one political party. electionlawblog.org?p=153385
electionlawblog.org
After Trump v. Slaughter, Will There Be Independent Agencies Other than the Fed: The Case of the Federal Election Agencies #ELB
As the Supreme Court’s Monday argument approaches in Trump v. Slaughter on the unitary executive branch theory and independent agencies, two outcomes already seem foreordained. The Court is likely to ...
001
Reposted by Rick Pildes
David Cole @davidcole-gtown.bsky.social · 09/11/2025
I look forward to defending free speech from its progressive critics — and conservative assailants == as the Tanner Letures Nov. 12 and 13 @princeton.edu A timely topic, sadly lectures.princeton.edu/lectures/202...
lectures.princeton.edu
Tanner Lecture on Human Values: David D. Cole
Progressives have increasingly lost faith in the First Amendment—at least as it has been interpreted and applied by the Supreme Court.  They argue that free speech has been “weaponized” by big busines...
0118
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 10/11/2025
Just saw this, glad you enjoyed it.
120
Reposted by Rick Pildes
Lawfare @lawfaremedia.org · 04/11/2025
On Lawfare Daily, @klonick.bsky.social spoke to @rickpildes.bsky.social about his article, “Political Fragmentation in Democracies in the West,” the link between social media and threats to democracy, and the unique way this technology is now impacting the United States political system.
22110
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 29/10/2025
Hat tip to @martylederman.bsky.social
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 22/10/2025
Steve Skowronek has an essay today on "Authoritarianism Then and Now" at the NYU Democracy Project: democracyproject.org/posts/author...
democracyproject.org
Authoritarianism Then and Now
A broad range of views on democracy to help break the stalemate caused by partisan conflict.
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 14/10/2025
On fusion voting and the NJ Supreme Court: A new political party called the Moderate Party is challenging on state constitutional grounds NJ's ban on fusion voting. The court is considering whether to hear this challenge. I published an essay urging the court to take the case. More below..
120
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 09/10/2025
Here's an analogy. If the government imposes financial costs on you, you have standing. But if the government is beneficent and engages in spending you believe is illegal, it can be difficult to find anyone with standing to challenge.
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 09/10/2025
Marty does not understand what's at stake in this case. Political parties and voters have always had standing to challenge voting rules they allege violate their rights, by BURDENING their right to vote. That's the Crawford case...
100
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 08/10/2025
When legal populists of the right mean legal populists of the left. Today's essay in the NYU Democracy Project from Jonathan Mitchell: "Judicial Supremacy and American Democracy" democracyproject.org/posts/judici...
democracyproject.org
Judicial Supremacy and American Democracy
A broad range of views on democracy to help break the stalemate caused by partisan conflict.
000
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 08/10/2025
The Court heard oral argument today in an important election law standing case. I published in advance an essay on the case in Law 360, which is paywalled. The question is when candidates for federal office can challenge election laws prospectively. For my view, see next post
200
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 06/10/2025
Thanks for this comment, much appreciated.
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 04/10/2025
"Democracies in the Age of Fragmentation," my essay in NYU's Democracy Project series, was published this week. Link here, brief excerpts to follow. democracyproject.org/posts/democr...
democracyproject.org
Democracies in the Age of Fragmentation
A broad range of views on democracy to help break the stalemate caused by partisan conflict.
120
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 29/09/2025
At NYU's Democracy Project (more on that later), Prof. Caleb Nelson has a feature essay arguing that originalism does not support the unitary executive branch theory. Caleb is one of the country's leading originalist scholars, frequently cited by the Court. democracyproject.org/posts/must-a...
democracyproject.org
Special Feature: Must Administrative Officers Serve at the President’s Pleasure?
A broad range of views on democracy to help break the stalemate caused by partisan conflict.
75225
Reposted by Rick Pildes
Noah Rosenblum @narosenblum.bsky.social · 09/08/2025
Delighted to share my latest, History and Fetishism in the New Separation of Powers Formalism, now live in the Penn Law Review! The piece traces the emergence of the Supreme Court’s new approach to separation of powers law and argues that it is grounded in a set of basic mistakes. (1/3)

In the last few years, the Supreme Court has embraced a formalist approach to separation of powers law, allegedly justified by the Constitution's "original meaning." It is revolutionary, rapidly remaking the constitutional law of administration. But the Court's engagement with history is selective and idiosyncratic. In particular, it has largely ignored what we know of governmental practice in the early republic.
This Essay attacks the Court's use of history. It uses Jack Balkin's analysis of legal discourse in Memory and Authority to unpack the Court's reliance on historical arguments and to suggest avenues for critique. It draws on recent scholarship on Founding Era practice to show that eighteenth-century understandings of separation of powers were not formalist. And it argues for the restoration of Montesquieu to our constitutional memory. A key figure in the development of the Constitution, Montesquieu's understanding of separation of powers closely tracked early republic practice. He thus points the way towards an alternative interpretation of our constitutional tradition and a more pragmatic and historically accurate structural constitutionalism in place of the Court's growing formalist fetish.
816948
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
Cass Sunstein wrote an essay I found intriguing called "The Morality of Legality." We decided to do a short video discussing the ideas in it. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... @casssunstein.bsky.social www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqlH...
youtube.com
The Morality of Legality: A Conversation between Cass Sunstein and Richard Pildes
YouTube video by NYU School of Law
061
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 30/06/2025
The Supreme Court's decision in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management is going to make it harder to claim that the President can only remove for good cause commissioners of the federal election agencies, the FEC and EAC. I explain in this post: electionlawblog.org?p=150710
electionlawblog.org
How A Recent Supreme Court Decision Affects the President's Executive Orders Concerning the FEC and the ECA #ELB
Congress designed the Federal Election Commission and the Election Assistance Commission to be “independent agencies” in various respects. See, e.g., S. Rep. No. 93689, at 16 (1974) (emphasizing that ...
120
Reposted by Rick Pildes
Jamal Greene @jamalgreene.bsky.social · 30/06/2025
As @rickpildes.bsky.social and Bob Bauer discuss here, this issue challenges traditional campaign finance reform advocacy. There's a strong argument that leaving this in place while the rest of the law has been gutted weakens parties to the detriment of democracy. electionlawblog.org?p=150545
electionlawblog.org
The Supreme Court, The Political Parties, and the SuperPacs #ELB
This post is co-written with Bob Bauer, NYU Professor of Practice who formerly represented in private practice national and state Democratic Party committees: Later this week, the Supreme Court will c...
042
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 30/06/2025
Breaking news: the Supreme Court has granted cert on an important case raising issues about the role of political parties in the campaign finance system. Last week, Bob Bauer and I blogged about the issues in this case and their significance: electionlawblog.org?p=150545
electionlawblog.org
The Supreme Court, The Political Parties, and the SuperPacs #ELB
This post is co-written with Bob Bauer, NYU Professor of Practice who formerly represented in private practice national and state Democratic Party committees: Later this week, the Supreme Court will c...
010
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 24/06/2025
The Supreme Court is considering a case on whether current limits on the ability of political parties to coordinate with their candidates violate the First Amendment In this essay, Bob Bauer and I urge the Court to re-consider the role of parties in an age of SuperPacs electionlawblog.org?p=150545
electionlawblog.org
The Supreme Court, The Political Parties, and the SuperPacs #ELB
This post is co-written with Bob Bauer, who among other roles, served as former General Counsel to the Democratic National Committee: Later this week, the Supreme Court will consider hearing a case ne...
000
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 12/06/2025
On the Supreme Court's pending decision in the Louisiana redistricting case, LA v. Callais, I have three posts at Election Law Blog, including a new one today: electionlawblog.org?p=150341 electionlawblog.org?p=149861 electionlawblog.org?p=149170
electionlawblog.org
More on The LA Redistricting Case Pending Before the Supreme Court #ELB
In a couple of earlier posts, here and here, I explained the mix of politics and Voting Rights Act issues involved in the Louisiana v. Callais case. The specific issue is whether LA engaged in unconst...
000
Reposted by Rick Pildes
Walter Olson @walterolson.bsky.social · 03/06/2025
New 30-minute educational cut of Majority Rules, the documentary on ranked choice voting #RCV and how it changed voting and politics in Alaska. I hosted a screening of the longer version at @cato.org last year and it's good.
youtube.com
Majority Rules 101 (30 min cut)
YouTube video by Unite America
2103
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 03/06/2025
For #electionlaw folks, I published this analysis of the election-law case the Court granted cert. on yesterday, on standing to bring federal challenges to election laws in advance of an election. electionlawblog.org?p=150169
electionlawblog.org
The Court Rightly Granted Cert. in the Illinois Election Case #ELB
Bost v. Illinois State Board of Elections raises important questions about who, if anyone, has standing to bring federal challenges to certain types of election laws in advance of an election. These a...
000
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 29/05/2025
Over at X, I have a short thread on today's major Supreme Court decision on NEPA: x.com/RickPildes/s...
x.com
100
Rick Pildes @rickpildes.bsky.social · 12/05/2025
On the Louisiana race and redistricting case pending before the Supreme Court, I've posted this at Election Law Blog: electionlawblog.org?p=149861
electionlawblog.org
Who Wins or Loses in Louisiana if the Supreme Court Strikes Down LA's Congressional District as a Racial Gerrymander? #ELB
As a practical matter, the issue in Louisiana v. Callais is not whether LA will have a second Voting Rights Act (VRA) district, in which black voters will have an equal opportunity to elect their cand...
010