Sign in

Red Team of Science

@redteamofsci.bsky.social
124 followers 167 following 59 posts

A newsletter dedicated to reforming the practice of science through rigorous debate. Metascience | open science | statistics Subscribe at redteamofscience.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 07/08/2026
"Last week, maybe the most prominent blogger to have touched the replication crisis, and author of one of its classics, Scott Alexander, wrote a piece that surprised some of his audience..." open.substack.com/pub/redteamo...
open.substack.com
Psychology is not mostly fine
Astral Codex endorses justice delayed on the replication crisis
000
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 17/03/2026
A poll finds that priming research might be bad enough to save science. #metasci www.redteamofscience.com/p/the-missin...
redteamofscience.com
The missing link
A poll finds that priming research might be bad enough to save science
001
Reposted by Red Team of Science
World Conferences on Research Integrity @wcrifoundation.bsky.social · 12/01/2026
Scientific sleuthing: a better evening in than watching Netflix? #ResearchIntegrity #Science #WCRI2026 #WCRI www.timeshighereducation.com/depth/scient...
timeshighereducation.com
Scientific sleuthing: a better evening in than watching Netflix?
The £2 million recently awarded to a whistleblower by a US court is a rare reward for the volunteers who trawl the scientific literature for error and fraud. Yet their numbers continue to grow. So wha...
011
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 30/12/2025
Koroshetz was adamant about improving science but his project to get schools to teach rigor has had mixed results. www.redteamofscience.com/p/nih-encour... www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Firing of neuroscience institute chief adds to NIH’s leadership vacuum
Trump administration declines to renew appointment of Walter Koroshetz, against NIH director’s wishes
000
Reposted by Red Team of Science
Charles Piller @charlespiller.bsky.social · 17/12/2025
Misconduct sleuth wins $2.63 million from major cancer institute in $15 million settlement | Science | AAAS www.science.org/content/arti...
science.org
Misconduct sleuth wins $2.63 million from major cancer institute in $15 million settlement
Data detectives see validation in deal with U.S. government that penalizes Dana-Farber Cancer Institute for misrepresenting data in NIH grant applications
073
Reposted by Red Team of Science
The New Yorker @newyorker.com · 08/12/2025
Rachel Aviv reviewed four decades’ worth of Oliver Sack’s journals—many of which had never been read before. What she found reveals how the neurologist’s own stories shaped the ones he told about his patients.
newyorker.com
Oliver Sacks Put Himself Into His Case Studies. What Was the Cost?
The scientist was famous for linking healing with storytelling. Sometimes that meant reshaping patients’ reality.
28024
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 08/12/2025
At least @physicsworld.bsky.social admits to using nonsense from the literature. YouTube "warriors for science" don't need to. #metasci www.redteamofscience.com/p/one-of-the...
redteamofscience.com
One of the most dangerous ideas in science was a misunderstanding
It's only getting more popular
000
Reposted by Red Team of Science
Peer Community In @peercommunityin.bsky.social · 02/12/2025
In case you have missed Simine Vazire's excellent webinar yesterday, here is the link to watch it online: youtu.be/_vb1CNwC3CM Thanks again @simine.com for staying up so late and thanks to the audience for the great questions!
youtu.be
PCI Webinar series #13 - Simine Vazire - Recognizing and responding to a replication crisis
14830
Reposted by Red Team of Science
ERROR @error.reviews · 24/11/2025
Congratulations to @simine.com for winning the Einstein Foundation Individual Award! 🎉 A well-deserved recognition for her seminal efforts to improve scientific rigor, which includes instituting detailed checks for errors and computational reproducibility at Psychological Science.
0216
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 24/11/2025
New data: Most psychologists believe crisis persists despite significant progress. Yet evidence suggests there's still an advantage to bending the rules. #metasci www.redteamofscience.com/p/psychologi...
redteamofscience.com
Psychologists think there's a crisis in psychology
Results from a new poll
020
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 18/11/2025
Among the references: Bik: The dark side of post-publication peer review. Ioannidis: A new era of hyper-skepticism in science. A former COPE council member apparently thought these were 1. not suspicious and 2. didn't click the links.
000
Reposted by Red Team of Science
Erik van Zwet @erik-van-zwet.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
I wrote something about publication bias at statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2025/11/14/t...
12810
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 12/11/2025
An outsider opened a box and broke the intentionality taboo in metascience. Revision is long overdue. www.redteamofscience.com/p/cognitive-...
redteamofscience.com
Cognitive dissonance and a truly impossible assumption
The many unopened boxes of psychology
120
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 06/11/2025
"The project also stands out for its innovative approach, which is pioneering in cosmology. RedH0T introduces the red-teaming method, inspired by cybersecurity."
010
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 03/11/2025
Counting hypotheses changed GWAS. Why not physics? The role of... insults. #metasci www.redteamofscience.com/p/physics-de...
redteamofscience.com
Physics defends itself
There's not as much math as you'd expect
010
Reposted by Red Team of Science
Dorothy Bishop @deevybee.bsky.social · 27/10/2025
New blogpost on @elife.bsky.social's new Replication study type deevybee.blogspot.com/2025/10/prob.... tldr = I think it's doomed. #Replication #Publishing #Reproducibility
deevybee.blogspot.com
Problems with ELife's new article type: Replication studies
I was interested to receive an email from eLife last week, telling me that "As part of our commitment to open science, scientific rigour ...
43020
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 22/10/2025
I think we're arguing about the reputation of physics. On that, the small amount of string theory is a good argument.
030
Reposted by Red Team of Science
C&EN (Chemical & Engineering News) @cenmag.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
More than 20% of chemistry researchers have deliberately added information they believe to be incorrect into their manuscripts during the peer review process, in order to get their papers published. cen.acs.org/policy/publi... #chemsky 🧪
cen.acs.org
1 in 5 chemists have deliberately added errors into their papers during peer review, study finds
Conclusion is one of many in a report about how chemists handle errors in manuscripts
2167
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 20/10/2025
Physics is the bedrock of science and may be the site of its worst case of base rate neglect. www.redteamofscience.com/p/physics-ha...
redteamofscience.com
Physics has all the ingredients for scientific crisis
It turns out all you need is money and a googol of hypotheses to write up
721
Reposted by Red Team of Science
arXiv cs.DL Digital Libraries @csdl-bot.bsky.social · 14/10/2025
Kazimier Smith, Yucheng Lu, Qiaochu Fan: From Funding to Findings (FIND): An Open Database of NSF Awards and Research Outputs arxiv.org/abs/2510.10336 arxiv.org/pdf/2510.10336 arxiv.org/html/2510.10336
001
Reposted by Red Team of Science
Retraction Watch @retractionwatch.com · 10/10/2025
Dr. Oransky warned of consequences for self-governance failure: "If you don't self-police, if you don't correct the record, if you don't sanction people who commit fraud, [...] someone else will come in and do that. And it very well could be a government that you don't like."
conexiant.com
Is Science Retracting Enough Papers?
As paper mills and fraud proliferate, experts warn the retraction rate should reach 2% of published literature—ten times current levels.
04515
Reposted by Red Team of Science
Paperstars @paperstarsorg.bsky.social · 09/10/2025
If science had star ratings like Goodreads, what paper in your field would be a 5/5 - and why?
001
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 07/10/2025
This is how far scientific critique lags behind science. We're just learning subtraction. www.timeshighereducation.com/world-univer...
timeshighereducation.com
Protecting the integrity of university rankings
Addressing rare cases of attempted manipulation is built into the DNA of THE’s rankings. But we will go further, says Phil Baty
000
Reposted by Red Team of Science
Charles Piller @charlespiller.bsky.social · 06/10/2025
I’m deeply honored to have been named as the recipient of the Victor Cohn Prize for Excellence in Medical Science Reporting from the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing. It recognizes my work on scientific integrity for Science Magazine over the last five years. 1/7 tinyurl.com/zz54fzyr
tinyurl.com
Charles Piller wins 2025 Victor Cohn Prize - CASW
3528
Reposted by Red Team of Science
Sabine Hossenfelder @hossenfelder.bsky.social · 17/09/2025
There more I think about this, the more disturbing it becomes www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZO5u...
youtube.com
I can't believe this really happened.
YouTube video by Sabine Hossenfelder
107420
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 30/09/2025
The way to increase trust in science is to stop making rules to benefit scientists. Making self-serving rules is so universal in science that the author calls transparency a paradox because it doesn't always help your reputation.
110
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 29/09/2025
Tylenol and autism. Why normal papers make history:
100
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 27/09/2025
This is a thorough and important paper. No attempts to replicate previous studies were found in a sample of 465 articles in physical therapy. Many fields have never measured these indicators and it takes a small number of authors to do it.
030
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 26/09/2025
"Harvard could embed metascience into General Education Courses, ensuring that they reach as many students as possible." Ambika Grover in @theharvardcrimson.bsky.social www.thecrimson.com/article/2025...
thecrimson.com
Can Harvard Cure Science’s Mistrust Epidemic? | Opinion | The Harvard Crimson
Harvard leads the world in science and in philosophizing on how to make the world a better place. It’s time to make metascience a bigger part of the conversation.
021
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 26/09/2025
Ivan Oransky of @retractionwatch.com on delayed scientific reform. "The problem when you don't self-regulate or self-police... when you don't do those things, other people will come in a do them. Probably in a way you don't like." www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQaZ...
youtube.com
Future Proof Your Research With Rigor
YouTube video by Community 4 Rigor
110
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 25/09/2025
"The NIH Common Fund has teamed up with NASA’s Tournament Lab to launch the Replication Prize, a competition to advance scientific research by collecting ideas and strategies to make important lines of biomedical research more replicable." commonfund.nih.gov/replication-...
commonfund.nih.gov
NIH Common Fund Launches Replication Prize | NIH Common Fund
The NIH Common Fund has teamed up with NASA’s Tournament Lab to launch the Replication Prize, a competition to advance scientific research by collecting ideas and strategies to make important lines of...
010
Reposted by Red Team of Science
Katie Corker @katiecorker.bsky.social · 25/09/2025
I want this kind of back and forth to be somewhere that everyone can see it and enjoy it, in perpetuity. What if peer review worked more like this, in the open?
1247
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
Evolution, and why science doesn't mind portraying itself as a bit shit sometimes. www.redteamofscience.com/p/science-ha...
redteamofscience.com
"Science has always been a bit shit"
It evolved that way
000
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 23/09/2025
"The question is not whether the factory’s settings are wrong but whether it should be a paper factory in the first place." www.nytimes.com/2025/09/22/o...
nytimes.com
Opinion | ‘The Power of Science to Solve Problems Is Almost Limitless’
000
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 22/09/2025
The Red Team of Science is on book leave. Subscribe for occasional science reform updates, paper reviews, and lesson plans. Like the site, the book is for professionals in healthcare, investment, journalism, and anyone learning scientific critique. (Taylor & Francis, 2026)
010
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
It's true metascience needs to prune nonsense or end up irrelevant and unscientific. An invitation to debate to three non-positivists in metascience got no reply. (The invitation stands, of course.) www.redteamofscience.com/p/i-believe-...
redteamofscience.com
A crossroads for metascience and positivism
Dare to say you believe some things are true
100
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 08/09/2025
Some excellent points from @stuartbuck.bsky.social including lack of transparency at NIH, dependency on amateur sleuths, and the need to fund post-publication review and replication. www.statnews.com/2025/09/08/n...
statnews.com
Reforming NIH: A blueprint for 21st century medical research
We all benefit from a well-functioning and well-funded NIH. But it needs reform, writes the Good Science Project’s Stuart Buck.
010
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 03/09/2025
Giving feedback to a scientific project continues to spiral out of control, and a FOIA mystery is solved thanks to @publiccitizen.bsky.social www.redteamofscience.com/p/watching-t...
redteamofscience.com
Watching the watchmen at NIH
A FOIA mystery is solved
010
Reposted by Red Team of Science
Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 27/08/2025
10 years ago?! Holy smokes.
56214
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 25/08/2025
One pattern we've seen in metascience is it tends to become more and more meta. The @comm4rigor.bsky.social saga has reached FOIA levels of meta. www.redteamofscience.com/p/a-document...
redteamofscience.com
A document request reveals NIH’s approach to the law
"The spirit of the FOIA"
000
Reposted by Red Team of Science
World Conferences on Research Integrity @wcrifoundation.bsky.social · 09/07/2025
"Bounty Hunters for Science" #ResearchIntegrity fas.org/publication/...
fas.org
Bounty Hunters for Science
The federal government should establish a system for awarding bounties to people who identify fraud in federally-funded research.
031
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
"It reinforces a model of publishing that continues to treat peer review as a consulting service for editors, rather than a scholarly contribution in its own right." blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci...
blogs.lse.ac.uk
Nature’s decision to publish positive peer review reports only gives half the picture - Impact of Social Sciences
As the journal Nature moves to publish peer review reports for accepted papers, Bodo Stern argues this partial openness falls short of true transparency.
020
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
The authors omit non-random, intentional errors. sensible-med.com was good enough to allow a reply on self-propagating errors in science. www.sensible-med.com/p/non-random...
sensible-med.com
Non-random and Intentional Errors in Science
A Sensible Medicine Guest Post
110
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 11/08/2025
The COVID origin debate and a simple argument on proximity: each market is safe. www.redteamofscience.com/p/covid-orig...
redteamofscience.com
COVID origin may be simple
Each market is safe
000
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 08/08/2025
Should scientists be self-critical "cautiously or privately to avoid alarming and arming others? Not at all." @briannosek.bsky.social journals.plos.org/plosbiology/...
journals.plos.org
Science becomes trustworthy by constantly questioning itself
What happens when the greatest strengths of science, such as openness, humility, self-criticism and self-correction, are exploited for political gain? This Perspective calls for scientists to affirm t...
100
Reposted by Red Team of Science
ReproducibiliTea @reproducibilitea.org · 08/08/2025
📚 Reflections on adversarial collaboration from the adversaries: was it worth it? link.springer.com/article/10.1...
link.springer.com
Reflections on adversarial collaboration from the adversaries: was it worth it? - Theory and Society
There is much enthusiasm, in principle, for adversarial collaborations (ACs), a scientific conflict resolution technique that encourages investigators with clashing models to collaborate in designing ...
053
Reposted by Red Team of Science
Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 07/08/2025
We found that the results of 42% of registered studies on the OSF are never publicly shared journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/.... Most common reasons are null results and bad logistics. Plan your studies carefully (equivalence testing and good time management) to prevent research waste!
1133
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 05/08/2025
Updates on older posts: COPE, COVID, C4R, and how some people behave decently. www.redteamofscience.com/p/updates-on...
redteamofscience.com
Updates on older posts
April to July 2025
000
Red Team of Science @redteamofsci.bsky.social · 31/07/2025
Newsletter at redteamofscience.com Or subscribe anonymously by adding redteamofscience.com/feed to your RSS reader.
000