Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 28mFrom the standpoint of lobster behavior specifically, lobsters are mean old cusses that would *happily* eat a human if the size difference were reversed. 🤣 161
Reposted by Dr. Stephanieshauna @goldengateblond.bsky.social · 21hi especially love all the dopes saying “when the internet first went mainstream everyone hated it too” like it happened in the pioneer days so no one can dispute it, like mf’ers we were THERE 1213162249
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 2hThat was the really funny thing about the lobster lab, too - lobsters weren’t *my* project, and the jellies I worked on aren’t usefully edible. But the people working on the lobsters didn’t eat seafood… 140
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 5hTiredness level: “the bun I put my hair in to sleep last night probably looks fine, I can just leave it” 1190
Reposted by Dr. StephanieRebecca Solnit @rebeccasolnit.bsky.social · 01/10/2026Men Explain Rape to Me. 41771267
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 5hYou know, just once I’d like to start the week off NOT exhausted. *sounds of small dog throwing up* 1210
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 11hI used to work in a lobster lab. Those were the days…. 2180
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 15hFor me, it was that X-Files episode with the gorilla. 120
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 16hI remember these from when they showed up in a mail tray, and the covetousness in my heart did not go away. 🤣 010
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 16hI love the look of this, the asymmetry and that incredible onyx. And I also know that it would annoy me while I was typing and I’d take it off and lose it. Alas. (🚫) 030
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 20hOoh, can I ask what podcast? I could use a good new podcast. 100
Reposted by Dr. StephanieDavid Ho @davidho.bsky.social · 20hSmall victorynytimes.comAfter Outcry, Monitors the Trump Administration Tried to Scrap Return to Sea (Gift Article)Under pressure from Congress, a network of ocean monitors that provides vital data to meteorologists, climate scientists, oceanographers and the fishing industry is being restored. 527976
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 21hLet me know if either of you want a closer look or an id of anything. 😉 110
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 21hI love my spinies! I got these other two recently that I’ve yet to find a good home for display. 140
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 21hAh, that’s another sea biscuit - that one’s from Hawaii. It was actually octopus-predated - see those round holes in the top? 120
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 21hI need some whole new kind of furniture just to hold her murexes and pagoda shells. They’re too beautiful and delicate to put in a box. I did add the exceptional rose-branch murex (Chicoreus palmarosae) right now, because I can’t stop looking at it. 1221
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 21hInventory done, and the majority are still ones I collected - or at least someone I know did. Charlotte Noshpitz’s Pacific collection had *so* many stunning things in it, though. Even without putting them all out, I need to take some trips to catch up. 1100
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 22hThe one in blue actually has a bigger sibling standing up behind it - the biggest intact one I’ve ever found (snagged snorkeling, and I *still* screamed). 150
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 22hThe one in the red circle, or the one in blue? The red circle is a fat sea biscuit (Clypeaster rosaceus) from the Florida Keys - as if you blew a sand dollar up like a balloon. 140
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 23hFinally got some curation in after recent estate sales. 7724
Reposted by Dr. StephanieMovies Silently @moviessilently.bsky.social · 04/10/2026I would just like to say that when I started reviewing silent movies, the events were past tense and I liked them that way. It's extraordinarily rude of everyone to make this stuff current events. 411714
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 04/10/2026There is nothing in all the world like the high from a pit. 080
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 04/10/2026JOAN FUCKING BAEZ, now that’s more fucking like it! 1110
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Normally I’d say it’s disrespectful to be posting at a live show, but this dude is so fucking stoned that I doubt he’d notice if I danced naked. Dude is so stoned I’m fifty feet away and shocked I’m not getting a contact high. 020
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Drummers are also exempt from testing. I’m just tired of getting whacked in the head by someone going left a half beat off when everyone else is going right. 🤣 030
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Also an excellent waiver. Accepted. Dancing not required. 020
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 04/10/2026This is a 100% acceptable waiver, yes. Want to be on the testing team? You can have sticks. 220
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 04/10/2026The transition from Public Enemy to an acoustic Dave Matthews is a whiplash and I don’t care for it. 150
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Basic level: Tell people to clap their hands to a beat, and see how long they can keep to the beat. Alternately, tell them to watch someone waving their arms left and right, and match them. Advanced level: the beat is syncopated and/or changes. (The bar is LOW. Many people will still fail.) 230
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 04/10/2026New rule: there should be a mandatory “do you have rhythm” test for anyone who wants to stand in the front row at a show 1190
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 03/10/2026Between journalists treating conspiracy theorists as experts and treating actual experts so dishonestly that they’re going to stop giving interviews, this week is going just *ducky* for journalism. 0153
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 03/10/2026If it’s just about the numbers, this game is over and lost before we’ve even begun. 0102
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 03/10/2026The “point“ of a preprint has always been to engage your scientific community in conversation. It’s not just to drop results and run, or juice your H index, or whatever other thing people who are pumping it full of AI generated slop think they’re getting out of a preprint. 1133
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 03/10/2026And that’s fine for a quick social media post, or even a blog - half the point of social media is things barely above noise – but if you want to make it part of the fundamentally human endeavor that is the scientific process? Then you owe your colleagues your humanity. 2132
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 03/10/2026Yes,maybe it does mean that this piece wouldn’t have been published, but maybe that itself is an indicator. If you don’t care enough to put your human time into the writing, why do you care enough to say it at all? 2173
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 03/10/2026More to the point wrt Prachee’s piece, I specifically don’t care to engage with the AI rephrasing of my colleagues’ thoughts. I would much prefer to read the unfiltered ranty prompts that she put into Claude than the Claude-groomed output that she’s posted instead. 1161
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 03/10/2026I also think most of the edge cases Prachee uses to criticize arxiv’s approach are disingenuous at best. Oh, you have a bunch of experimental results to show at once? Put them all in one paper, and learn to tell the story of your research and YOUR THOUGHTS that got you to run all those experiments. 1112
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 03/10/2026At the same time, I *don’t* think AI automation and experimentation produce good science. It removes scientists from the data and data generation in a way I think is harmful to both high-quality data and high-quality thought. “Increasing productivity” is pointless if you’re just making more noise. 1143
Dr. Stephanie @punkrockscience.bsky.social · 03/10/2026I personally prefer biorxiv’s methods, because I *want* bans for abuse - for me, it’s about both deterrent effect for others *and* “fuck off, spammer” for the violating submitter. 2120