Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 7hthat reads to you (correctly) as them being unbelievably heinous i think to them, they're civil, respectable sorts *protecting* that circle of civil respectability against attack (these are very stupid people) 1310
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 7hless incestous, also more open to conflict: there's two teams and its expected to take shots at the other team in the uk everyone's chums, so when someone comes along who's not in the chums, or critical of the chums, they close ranks against them bsky.app/profile/flyi... 26613
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 7hrw us media does that too. what i would say is there is a progressive press in the us- it'snot the main faction, but there's plenty of (genuinely) progressive liberal outlets, then online, actual left-left ones in the uk, you're just taking hits with no ability to return fire 1440
Reposted by Toby BuckleBill @bill-of-lefts.bsky.social · 09/10/2026Reactionary centrists treat “Abolish ICE“ as a metaphysical question of whether immigration enforcement is ever justified. But it is really a practical question—how can you allow a fifth column paramilitary that wants to overthrow democracy to continue to exist in your government? 535794
Reposted by Toby BuckleTim™️ @dadsof3.bsky.social · 09/10/2026I think of your article A Disease of Affluence all the time. I know there’s more to a lot of this but so much ties back to this as well. www.liberalcurrents.com/a-disease-of...liberalcurrents.comA Disease of AffluenceTrump's supporters are not motivated by economic anxiety, but by its opposite. 191
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 09/10/2026less pattern recognition, more recognising there is a pattern 613833
Reposted by Toby BuckleMicah @rincewind.run · 08/10/2026the reason “AI will create so much abundance we will have a utopian society” rhetoric falls so flat is that the people building it will never, ever share their bounty unless it is taken from them and we all know it 96114362656
Reposted by Toby BuckleKevin Elliott @kjephd.bsky.social · 08/10/2026New combo of "would you rather face 100 duck sized horses or one horse size duck" & "Men think of Rome every day" just dropped 0366
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 08/10/2026for the rest of you: this is one of those 'if you know what i'm on about, log off' situations 1240
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 08/10/2026so, just to track this you're taking a male character from a notoriously transphobic author, presenting them as a woman, getting publicly horny about them, & then claiming this somehow refutes social liberalism? 1373
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 08/10/2026"ha, i bet you libs are really triggered by us making a gender-swapped, fan art version of the nazi-coded high school bully from harry potter & pretending she's our girlfriend" . . . you guys are doing what now? 6604
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 08/10/2026why, it's almost as if "immigration" is just a slightly dressed up way of talking about racial purity 824847
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 08/10/20261) once we're in the scenario, normal physics apply 2) both teams are highly motivated, but not totally suicidal (also the triremes (somehow) know what cannons are, so they're not gonna suddenly freak out, they just don't have any) bsky.app/profile/rene... 2100
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 08/10/2026maybe just like really sturdy built in ladders . . . . it seems like boarding is their only hope, the consensus seems to be that ramming it isn't really going to do anything 110
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 08/10/2026tho even with that, presumably a broadside just vaporises a trireme 120
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 08/10/2026we've refined the scenario a bit: the triremes cant have weapons/ tech fundamentally not of their time, but they know what they're up against and can plan for it so some sort of anti-SoLT corvus like thing is allowed if we think that would help bsky.app/profile/polp... 110
Reposted by Toby BuckleToby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026back of the envelope math: a ship of the line was 100 times* more expensive than a trireme leading to the obvious question, could 100 triremes take a ship of the line? 6932735
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026that's meant with no sarcasm whatsoever—this is a good & proper thing to have passionate opinions on 0160
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026& the detailed knowledge of naval history many are bringing to the comments 1170
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026i appreciate how strongly people feel on both sides of this 2290
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026i'm ignoring the cost of running the things, my 100 triremes would need 20k rowers minimum, the ship of the line is crewed by around 600 & to gain a 100:1 ratio against the british fleet napoleon would've needed thousands of triremes, so . . . 290
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026yes, which is why napoleon didn't try the 'classical backup' after trafalgar but just going by capital costs gives you 100:1 which makes an actually interesting matchup 120
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026idk if a trireme *could* ram a ship of the line, those things have like 2ft thick hardened oak sides designed to withstand cannon fire, does the bronze ram really do anything there? i think they have to board to win 270
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026let's see . . . british standard was 80 rounds a gun, so 6k for a 74 gun 3rd rate, we'll go with that depends on accuracy & how many hits we think it'd take to sink a punchy boy of course, but looking like an in principle yes bsky.app/profile/waxm... 4470
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026further specifications (people are taking this seriously): you can't give the triremes gunpowder weapons of any kind, nor do they have greek fire you can put as many heavy infantry on them as you think they'll take & you can equip them with a custom boarding bridge 6560
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026it's a shame you can't do poling a bsky, opinion seems reasonably divided based on comments 3520
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026i'm looking it up now & their top speeds are not that different (+ the ship of the line needs wind) its crewing them where this would fall down–100 triremes is like 20k rowers 160
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026important question, let's say napoleonic, 74 gun, that's where i got my figures from bsky.app/profile/scb2... 3731
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026man, that's not that far from the 100:1 ratio i gave 1240
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026might need @bretdevereaux.bsky.social to weigh in on this one 4610
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026that would even it considerably bsky.app/profile/polp... 020
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026although that's not including the cost of running either, the cost of running a trireme for a month was greater than the cost of making it but, putting that to one side, 100 ramy boys against a blasty boy, who wins? 81082
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026*going by the amount of labour (inclusive of generating raw materials) that went into making one, which feels like the more apples-to apples comparison rather than attempting a currency conversion trireme is like 15-20 skilled labour years, which is a lot, sotl is 1,500 to 2,000 41122
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026back of the envelope math: a ship of the line was 100 times* more expensive than a trireme leading to the obvious question, could 100 triremes take a ship of the line? 6932735
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026i want to say this is a joke one, but i've a sinking feeling its not 2421
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026obviously, tho any literary assessment is made difficult by the whiplash of going from viewing her project with nostalgia glasses to her becoming a vicious bigot 130
Toby Buckle @polphilpod.bsky.social · 07/10/2026i think rowling writes characters well & has good dialogue at points, she can't really do narrative & her world building is laughably stupid overall, mixed bag as a writer 110