Here's a new paper (I am author 4 of 7) that challenges some common perceptions of what "smart" means when applied to an educational system. Spoiler: it's not the opposite of stupid. We actually pare it down to two distinct dimensions, one relating adaptivity (smartness), the other relating to the balance of benefit and harm. We call this combined pair of dimensions the "smupidity" of a system, and it gives us four general states to which an education system (from a lesson to a national education system) can be mapped: wise (adaptable and beneficial), benign (static and beneficial), inept (static and harmful) and pernicious (adaptable and harmful). We observe that different stakeholders will perceive the smupidity of a system differently: that the whole system, as enacted, very much including what a learner adds to make sense of it, is all that matters, not the adaptability or benefits of the parts.

Buckle up, we’re getting into the weeds on this one.

Alors que les discours politiques, médiatiques et économiques dominants tendent à présenter les IA génératives comme une fatalité voire une nécessité, il faut, pour mettre l'enseignement au service d…

Over the last decade or so, the tech industry has tried, and mostly failed, to make “smart glasses”—tech-infused glasses with cameras, AI, maps, displays, and more—a thing. But in the past year, produ...

Earlier this afternoon, my oldest boyhood friend, a distinguished international lawyer who received his doctorate at Cambridge, called me to share the tragic news that Jason Arday, the Black British a...

« La taille compte » (« size matters »). Cette allusion à la taille du sexe masculin est très fréquente dans les titres d’articles académiques aussi il semble intéressant de voir ce que ce fait nous …

Introducing a beta-version of our new research-focused social media platform

Bringing together the work of experts from diverse disciplinary backgrounds, this book provides the evidence and guidance required to improve feedback practices