Sign in

PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social

@patricktbrown31.bsky.social
339 followers 167 following 132 posts

Head of Climate Analytics, Trend Analytics / Interactive Brokers; Adjunct faculty (lecturer) in Energy Policy & Climate at Johns Hopkins; Sr. Fellow at The Breakthrough Institute.

PostsRepliesMedia
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 18/12/2025
It was a pleasure to be on the IBKR Cents of Security podcast today, discussing my favorite framework for thinking about the risks from extreme weather: Hazard × Exposure × Vulnerability. www.interactivebrokers.com/campus/podca...
131
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 10/11/2025
How prediction markets can help: www.interactivebrokers.com/campus/trade...
000
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 29/10/2025
ForecastEx Odds of a Major Hurricane Landfall Compared to Weather Models. By the afternoon of October 26th onward, ForecastEx odds were better than Google DeepMind’s at indicating a major hurricane landfall in Cuba. www.interactivebrokers.com/campus/trade...
010
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 28/10/2025
The storm didn't begin its northeastward progression as soon as some models anticipated. According to the HWRF model (00Z 10/28 run) Hurricane eye landfall times are: Jamaica: 10/28, 18:00 UTC or 2:00 PM ET Cuba: 10/29, 6:00 UTC or 2:00 AM ET The Bahamas: 10/29, 21:00 UTC or 5:00 PM ET.
000
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 27/10/2025
Hurricane Prediction Market Update [10/27/2025] www.interactivebrokers.com/campus/trade...
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 13/10/2025
I was recently on two episodes of the PBS show Energy Switch, hosted by Scott Tinker, alongside @revkin.bsky.social. The topic was extreme weather, disasters, and climate change.
111
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 27/08/2025
There’s a real possibility that Hurricane Erin may still be the only hurricane of the 2025 Atlantic season by the end of next week. As it stands, the market probabilities at ForecastEx appear to be overvaluing the odds of high activity. www.interactivebrokers.com/campus/trade...
010
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 21/08/2025
Do we still expect an active hurricane season? www.interactivebrokers.com/campus/trade...
010
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 16/08/2025
It is notable that Google DeepMind's ML Model foresaw Erin’s extreme rapid intensification as a real possibility as early as last Tuesday evening, while the traditionally most relied upon physical model, ECMWF-ENS, did not have Erin’s level of rapid intensification within its realm of possibility.
110
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 05/02/2025
We were also discussing this article internally.
230
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 29/01/2025
Using our attributions methods (adapted from the study below), we calculate that climate change enhanced wildfire intensity over the LA area by 6% between January 7th-11th. This is assuming a 10% difference in wind speed.
121
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 19/12/2024
This is a nice study, largely building on our 2021 work on wind and solar droughts (a main concern for renewable energy systems): Liu et al. (2024): Droughts in Wind and Solar Power: Assessing Climate Model Simulations for a Net‐Zero Energy Future agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/...
130
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
At this moment, I am encouraged to see signs that leadership is, in fact, going in this direction. doi.org/10.1126/scie...
000
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
Statements 1 and 2 are essentially narrow enough to be addressed by components of the scientific method, and the oft-quoted “97% to 99% scientific consensus on global warming” applies to these statements. youtu.be/7Csw2RY5Gy8
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
Claims in climate policy are on a spectrum from being quite amenable to the scientific method to being almost completely outside its realm. thebreakthrough.org/journal/clim...
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
This scientization and depoliticization is clear in U.S. Climate Envoy John Kerry’s justification of the political positions of the Biden Administration:
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
A result of all this is that trust in science has deteriorated, with about 1/4th of US adults and 1/3rd of self-identified Republicans now reporting that they have little or no confidence that scientists act in the best interest of the public.
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
This statement by Bari Weiss refers to the attitudes in elite left-of-center media, but it could just as easily have been said about attitudes in elite scientific and academic institutions.
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
Another particularly salient example was the letter from health experts in the middle of COVID-19, which abruptly reversed previous messaging and endorsed an exception for social gatherings, so long as it was for the progressive cause of the moment. cbc.ca/radio/asitha...
110
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
Prominent examples of this were the 2017 "The March for Science” and the world’s most prestigious scientific journal, Nature, officially endorsing Joe Biden for president in 2020 as well as Kamala Harris for President in 2024.
110
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 20/11/2024
In a 2nd Trump presidency, rather than doubling down on the misguided notion that science is an authority that can fully dictate policy, scientists should strive to delineate between strict scientific facts and their political preferences. t.co/napraOW9iY 🧵
130
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 13/11/2024
As Harry Saunders has shown, growth is not a tenet of capitalism in any formal mathematical sense, and in the real world, we observe that once societies reach a certain level of productivity, their growth rates actually begin to decline. thebreakthrough.org/journal/issu...
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 13/11/2024
Carbon Intensity of Energy has been decreasing globally. The environment in which this is fostered is summarized in More from Less as having the four elements of 1) capitalism, 2) technological progress, 3) an informed public, and 4) responsive government. andrewmcafee.org/books/more-f...
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 13/11/2024
These examples are representative of broader trends observable at the aggregate economic level. In the highest-income, most economically-free countries, we have seen peaks and subsequent decreases in energy consumption not only per unit of GDP, but also on a per-person basis.
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 13/11/2024
Population: As societies become materially better off, fertility rates tend to decline naturally. This phenomenon results from a multitude of factors, but it is the most free economies that tend to have the lowest fertility rates.
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 13/11/2024
Regarding mitigation, I use the terms of the Kaya Identity to argue that productivity in a capitalistic framework actually creates a downward push on at least three of four factors.
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 27/02/2024
Underemphasizing the importance of energy for human well-being causes a neglect of the fact that 3 billion people are still in extreme energy poverty and that this economic/energy inequality is the primary reason for different sensitivities to climate.
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 27/02/2024
I have documented some of the patterns that I am concerned about in Google Scholar’s top 50 climate change papers from Nature and Science journals.
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 27/02/2024
However, it is a widespread misunderstanding that policies like the 1.5°C limit are just “science-based policies.” There is substantial evidence that there is a lot of “policy-based science” being generated as well.
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 27/02/2024
Nature and Science have made it clear that they explicitly support policies like the temperature limits associated with the Paris Agreement and particular politicians like Joe Biden.
100
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 27/02/2024
I point out that publishing in high-impact journals like Nature and Science is desirable and that one strategy researchers can take to maximize their chances of publication is to align their research with the high-level messaging espoused by the leadership of the journals.
010
PatrickTBrown31.bsky.social @patricktbrown31.bsky.social · 27/02/2024
This piece stems from a frustration I feel about not being able to take the high-impact climate science literature at face value.
100