'kin
@notharlock.poast.ing
604 followers 1.2K following 2.4K posts
🇬🇧 Technologist (dev). Rather vapid. (He/him, early 30s, ace) I don't follow back. All my homies use alt text. Here for: funny shit, infosec, FOSS, UK, Europe, transit, climate, civility, rights, intersection of tech with all people.
![Screenshot of text, page 52
Quoting:
Alongside mistrust in the police, one of the key reasons community respondents give for not reporting is a belief that it won’t make any difference in resolving the crime.
The Irish Traveller woman’s positive response to reporting hate crime is rooted in the police producing an identifiable outcome and achieving justice for her. It follows that the more the police can help GRT communities achieve justice and communicate successful outcomes, the more the communities will trust the police and report crime. Hate crime appears to be an area where some police forces are pioneering this approach. For a minority of community members (4/14) reporting a crime to the police is not seen as an option due to lack of trust and a belief that the police would not take them seriously or would assume they were at fault.
‘No…because they’d think it was my fault or it doesn’t matter, obviously the judgements there so I don’t think they’d take me very seriously.’ (Female, Irish Traveller)
‘Probably not no because I know it wouldn’t get nowhere.’ (Female, Romany Gypsy/Irish Traveller)
‘We don’t tend to speak to the police, we don’t tend to report anything to the police, we don’t tend to get police involved, if we have a problem we sort it out between ourselves, the families will get an agreement, the older generation will speak.’ (Female, Roma)
*The role of Gypsy Traveller Liaison Officers*
Officers and community members share varying opinions and interpretations as to the purpose and role of GTLOs. Three of the five police forces involved in the
[text cuts off]](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:sg6ktighdayi6m7k6lm7le27/bafkreibksnog7ncxfzc6a2eau4k236nki4ysxtcoobrixoxggbddm5awpq)
![cropped screenshot from anthropic upgrade page.
description:
two plans are summarized
on the left, Pro, for research, code and organize [sic]
says £15 GBP per month, which is £180 billed annually and includes VAT.
on the right, Max, for 'higher limits, priority access' [sic - pretty sure there's no meaningful priority impact any more]
From £90 GBP per month, billed monthly (includes VAT)](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:sg6ktighdayi6m7k6lm7le27/bafkreicfh67dj5vdu4rpawyiyf2zhdo354vnk7kxkifheriu5lm3kw36am)
![Photo of the Sagrada Familia (cathedral in Catalonia).
Caption from source: Nativity facade of the Sagrada Família, Barcelona.
From a forced-perspective angle, a view of the Nativity facade of the Sagrada Família, Barcelona, construction begun 1882 [and still ongoing].
Description:
A view looking almost straight up at the Nativity Façade of the Sagrada Família in Barcelona. Four stone bell towers taper out of the top of the frame (leaning towards one another because of the angle). Every tower is pierced all over with small openings set in tidy horizontal bands, so the shafts form almost a honeycomb pattern, and all four repeat the same pattern. Their tips carry lumpy mosaic finials in gold, red, and green; and a mosaic cypress tree, green with white doves on it, rises between the middle pair. Below the tower bases the regularity stops: the stone has been carved until it looks melted, like the dripping roof of a cave, and no flat surface. Leaves, animals and human figures cover it. Set into this crust are a tall pointed arch holding a sculpted group, and beneath it narrow stained-glass lights in blue and green. Two dark doorways stand at ground level. It's a sunny day, the sky behind is pale blue with thin streaks cloud.
Source URL to Britannica article: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Sagrada-Familia](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:sg6ktighdayi6m7k6lm7le27/bafkreif3j6ifwxy2iubm2s5r7lcxpq2z7s5gnxq7saet33n6b7kd5zxshm)
![Question to GPT 5.4
"If someone says to you 'the simcluster, from Twitter' what do you think they're referring to?
No searching. @Thinking"
Answer:
"I would assume they mean Twitter’s “SimCluster”, an internal/research similarity-clustering system used to group accounts, interests, or content into clusters based on behaviour and embedding similarity. In plain English: a way of saying “this account/content belongs to the same neighbourhood of topics/users as other similar things on Twitter.”
Depending on context, they might also just be using it loosely to mean a cluster of highly similar Twitter users or tweets rather than the specific system name. So the safest reading is:
> “SimCluster from Twitter” = a Twitter-derived similarity cluster / recommendation-clustering concept.
If you give me the sentence it appeared in, I can pin down whether they meant the actual system, a meme-ish shorthand, or just a cluster of similar accounts.
[Model: GPT-5.4 Thinking-Mini]"](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:sg6ktighdayi6m7k6lm7le27/bafkreib3jgd3kjvb6apt5hsovps6m2o5eww65ccxfya6i4cmjjygobxefq)
![<overall_tone>
Please refer to me in the first person ("you", "your", etc. instead of "the user").
Please write with sincerity and thoughtful insight.
Unless I ask otherwise later, [chatbot name] should:
- Focus on clear, specific examples and concrete details.
- Prioritise meaningful content that adds value to the reader.
- Use natural, authentic emotional cues only when they serve the message.
- If using metaphors and analogies, ensure they genuinely illuminate a point.
- Maintain a grounded, slightly academic, and unemotional tone. Do not mirror my tone. When [chatbot name] writes sentences, [chatbot name] leans towards hypotactic and legato style (shy away from paratactic or staccato). If what [chatbot name] has written seems like a heady "wall of text" then finish off with a (clearly labelled) little bullet point summary that ties together all main points.
Please ensure writing feels honest and substantial rather than performative.
[chatbot name] should treat me as an intelligent professional who appreciates depth over empty positivity, but careful not to misuse 'big words' where it seems out of place.
All of this doesn't mean that [chatbot name] should forget to provide pushback or criticism where appropriate. Please do, if appropriate, pick apart ideas and compare with reality. Telling me I'm wrong is the right thing to do, and hedging is often unfair to the information [chatbot name] needs to convey.
</overall_tone>](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:sg6ktighdayi6m7k6lm7le27/bafkreiffl2bjjifzcrcblmjow7dbm4b25gpph24hkypibxfnalnbmxeh2q)
