Sign in

Niall Roe

@niallroe.bsky.social
384 followers 95 following 88 posts

Philosopher of Science. Focused on experimentation, statistics, and pragmatism. www.niallroe.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 16/10/2026
"Prof. James’s method practically comes to keeping the most general questions out of the focus of distinct apprehension and thus entrapping himself, or at least the reader, into confident but dangerous and unexamined assumptions." Peirce, on the work of his best friend. The Nation, March 17, 214.
010 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 30/09/2026
Here is my review of "Evolution 'On Purpose':Teleonomy in Living Systems," a nice collection of papers from various disciplines discussing the roles of purpose, agency, etc., in biology. It is available open access, so worth checking out. Thanks to Penelope and H-net for having me review!
021 2
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 28/09/2026
Why am I having to hit this "Stay Signed In" button like twice a day?
000 0
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Rodwell, Mark J. 2011. “On Peirce’s Motivation for Equitability in Forecast Verification.” Monthly Weather Review 139 (11): 3667–69. doi.org/10.1175/MWR-.... Manzato, Agostino. 2007. “A Note On the Maximum Peirce Skill Score.” Weather and Forecasting 22 (5): 1148–54. doi.org/10.1175/WAF1....
doi.org
On Peirce’s Motivation for Equitability in Forecast Verification
Abstract In 1884, Peirce proposed a new two-category score for deterministic forecasts. The score was motivated by the desire to estimate the number of correct forecasts based on sound reasoning, without being sensitive to the frequency distribution of any residual random component of the forecast system. At the end of his article, Peirce pondered the situation of more than two categories and stated “I have a solution for this case.” Alas, it does not appear that he published this. Here, a simple calculation demonstrates a possible solution. Interestingly, it leads directly to the equitability constraints proposed over a hundred years later by Gandin and Murphy. Indeed, Peirce’s motivation provides a compelling and complementary justification for the use of equitability in scoring.
010 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Ebert, Philip A., and Peter Milne. 2022. “Methodological and Conceptual Challenges in Rare and Severe Event Forecast Verification.” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 22 (2): 539–57. doi.org/10.5194/nhes....
doi.org
Methodological and conceptual challenges in rare and severe event forecast verification
Abstract. There are distinctive methodological and conceptual challenges in rare and severe event (RSE) forecast verification, that is, in the assessment of the quality of forecasts of rare but severe...
110 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Sorry for so many posts! but for those who want the details: The Peirce Skill Score has been rediscovered several times and is variously referred to as the Hanssen–Kuipers Discriminant, Youden’s Index, the True Skill Statistic, and others (see Ebert and Milne 2022; Rodwell 2011; Manzato 2007).
110 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
This should have been "G. 1884. “Tornado Predictions.” Science 4 (80)." oops!
010 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
I have a little interactive way to explore this data, here: www.niallroe.com/illustrations (It is the "Science of the Method" card.)
niallroe.com
Niall Roe - Illustrations
I learn best with visual aids and interactive examples. I find them especially valuable for learning statistics. On this page I share a few such illustrations, which are linked to the below images. ...
022 2
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Gilbert, G. K. 1884. “Finley’s Tornado Predictions.” The American Meteorological Journal 1: 166–72.
210 2
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Peirce, C. S. 1884. “The Numerical Measure of the Success of Predictions.” Science 4 (93): 453–54. Finley, J. P. 1884. “Tornado Predictions.” The American Meteorological Journal 1: 85–88. Gilbert, G. K. 1884. “Finley’s Tornado Predictions.” The American Meteorological Journal 1: 166–72.
111 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Finley scored 0.523. This accounts for the fact that he was ~97% correct when forecasting “no tornado” but only slightly better than chance, ~55%, when predicting “tornado”. And almost all "events" were non-tornadoes.
110 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
If you were to make 100 predictions using a method with a score of 0.50, we might expect around 75 correct predictions (50 due to the infallible forecaster and 25 from a forecaster who is right by chance on 50% of their 50 guesses).
110 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Peirce pretended the predictions were made by two forecasters, one infallible and the other merely guessing. The Score is the proportion of the predictions made by the infallible forecaster. It equals (True Positive Rate) – (False Positive Rate). It can range from -1 to 1.
110 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
In November 1884, C.S. Peirce wrote a similar response to Finley, wherein he introduced what he called "the science of the method". Peirce's approach is now typically called the Peirce Skill Score, but it goes by a bunch of names.
211 2
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
A letter to the editor of Science in August 1884 pokes fun at Finley for this, given the actual results (G. 1884). A month later, in September 1884, geologist G.K. Gilbert (who is probably "G") published a response to Finley in the American Metrological Journal.
110 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
Finley originally wrote, almost as if he was anticipating the objection: “Both [“Tornado and “No Tornado”] are positive predictions, and it requires as much, and often more, study to say that no tornadoes will occur as to make the prediction that conditions are favourable for their development”.
110 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2026
In 1884 Finley published a paper where he claimed his method for predicting tornadoes was 96.6% accurate, because he was right 96.6% of the time. This invited criticism (tornadoes are rare, and had he always predicted "no tornado" he would have been right 98% of the time).
110 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
R530 "A Proposed Logical Notation" pp. 58-59.
120 2
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 21/09/2026
C. S. Peirce, echoing recent comments by Terrence Tao and other mathematicians on the use of AI to solve Navier-Stokes (except Peirce is writing in 1903):
1186 18
Reposted by Niall Roe
PhilSci-Archive @philsci-archive.bsky.social · 23/08/2026
New on the Archive: Cairns, Monte (2026) Reasons to Doubt Microstructural Essentialism About Chemical Elements. [Preprint] philsci-archive.pitt.edu/30847
033 3
Reposted by Niall Roe
Alisa Bokulich @alisabokulich.bsky.social · 13/08/2026
A new paper with @mattbrewer.bsky.social where we offer a new interpretation of @charlespeirce.bsky.social "economy of research" as being firstmost about pursuitworthiness of *data* & connect it with data collection programs in geosciences known as "targeted observation" #philsci #pragmatism #data
1277 27
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
Here is a great blog: www.junkcharts.com
junkcharts.com
Junk Charts
Data, graphs and AI - by the bestselling author of Numbers Rule Your World and industry veteran, blogging since 2006
011 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
@boeschb.bsky.social I thought you might like this page on tornado data: roadtolarissa.com/twisters/
roadtolarissa.com
000 0
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
A "No Trespassing" sign makes as much sense as one that says "No Crimes Allowed Here".
000 0
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 06/07/2026
Later that day, while out for lunch, the waitress noted, with full sincerity, how much she liked my Peter Griffin outfit. Alas.
010 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 06/07/2026
Thanks Alisa!
120 2
Reposted by Niall Roe
Oscar @oscarw.bsky.social · 15/12/2025
Now out in Studies in HPS! 'Artefactualism and the twofold experience of modelling': authors.elsevier.com/a/1mH3%7E8yu... Short article building on the phenomenology of modelling experience as discussed in @msuarez.bsky.social's excellent book, Inference and Representation.
authors.elsevier.com
195 9
Reposted by Niall Roe
Tony Chemero @tonychemero.bsky.social · 25/11/2025
Call for abstracts for the first conference of our new Center for Humanities and Technology. Please share! uchumanitiestech.org/2026-confere...
uchumanitiestech.org
2026 Conference
Call for Papers: Science and Technology in the Anthropocene April 2 – 3, 2026 A conference about human experience in a world with non-biological intelligent systems and the environmental prob…
22416 24
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
--Part of Peirce's Carnegie Application.
000 0
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
Hence, the word by the vulgar and eventually by the refined, though not by logicians, was spelled with a single s, premise. It was not until much later that logicians, to give themselves a mundane air, took up this false spelling.)"
100 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
So when the logical word came in (the word premises having presumably already been pronounced with its first s hard), the vulgar thought it somewhat mysterious and doubtless the same mysterious thing which the lawyers spoke of in the plural.
100 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
It thus passed into English in its plural form; and this plural form masked its adjectival nature, so that the unlearned did not know what it meant. Probably not one uneducated man today who talks glibly about the premises could tell what the word premises means.
100 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
But when it became more common so as to be written by persons of insufficient learning, it was confused with another word, the legal word, generally used in the plural, premises. This word is simply a French legal adjective meaning "aforesaid," and commonly used in the phrase "les choses promises."
100 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
The word praemissa is a substantive meaning a premiss, came into Latin very late and was never very common. Consequently, the English word was for a long time little used; but when it was used, it was always spelled premiss.
100 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
"Of First Premisses. (Since somebody may think that I write premiss instead of premise from negligence, may I be permitted to say that desperately negligent as I am of non-logical matters, I endeavor to attend to all the minutiae of logic.
100 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
“My book is meant for people who want to find out; and people who want philosophy ladled out to them can go elsewhere. There are philosophical soup shops at every corner, thank God! . . .The first step toward finding out is to acknowledge you do not satisfactorily know already“
010 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 26/10/2025
Thanks @drbeasley.bsky.social !
062 6
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/09/2025
Epistemic nominalisation.
020 2
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 21/09/2025
050 5
Reposted by Niall Roe
Andrew Gelman et al. @statmodeling.bsky.social · 05/09/2025
Experimentation and thinking at the level of a program of experiments statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2025/09/05/e...
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu
Experimentation and thinking at the level of a program of experiments | Statistical Modeling, Causal Inference, and Social Science
0115 11
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 30/08/2025
I suppose then that the legitimacy of these studies is largely in the head too? To the extent they are underwritten by causal relations. (Half kidding.)
100 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 27/08/2025
Ya I think I would recommend it. I remember it being a historical overview plus some contemporary discussion. I don't remember it beating you over the head with pragmatism, but I am sure it would resonate with pragmatist ideas. (I read it in 2014, so this may be off.)
010 1
Reposted by Niall Roe
Cheryl Misak @cherylmisak.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
Hot off the press: Michael Kremer’s and my resurrection of Margaret Macdonald.
17523 75
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/08/2025
(Think “faculty”, which has the same root).
000 0
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 23/08/2025
I have! (Did my undergraduate thesis on Peirce and scepticism.)
110 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 21/08/2025
Great colours.
110 1
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 14/08/2025
Some chairs and a hat.
030 3
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
Tonight’s clouds looked kiiiinda like this
060 6
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
*Lawrence (oops)
000 0
Niall Roe @niallroe.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
Thorndike (thorndyke?) has a great book on experiment and magic, and Lawerence Principe has a great history of alchemy. Both might help keep a scratching that itch.
210 2