Sign in

Network Law Review

@networklawreview.bsky.social
43 followers 1 following 58 posts

Dedicated to the complex science of markets & digital laws. www.networklawreview.org

PostsRepliesMedia
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Thibault Schrepel’s reading suggestions for September. What acquirers actually keep when they buy a startup, causation in monopolization cases, the economics of recursive self-improvement, why AI detection cannot work, and the university after AI. www.networklawreview.org/september-20...
networklawreview.org
Reading suggestions – September 2026 - Network Law Review
I share the papers and articles I enjoyed reading this month. This edition runs from what acquirers actually keep when they buy a startup to the causation element in monopolization cases, a practical ...
000
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 31/08/2026
Here are @profschrepel.bsky.social’s reading suggestions for August. Why breakup remedies rarely restore competition, confirmation bias in LLM pricing recommendations, whether Europe can scale, the wisdom of crowds in markets... www.networklawreview.org/august-2026/
021
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
July reading suggestions are out. This month: a large-scale evaluation of merger simulations, the fragility of AI agent collusion, statistically undetectable backdoors in neural networks, user innovation, and why the big AI labs are hiring philosophers. networklawreview.org/july-2026/
networklawreview.org
Reading suggestions – July 2026 - Network Law Review
Here are Thibault Schrepel’s monthly reading suggestions. Topics include the European Commission’s draft merger guidelines, how well merger simulations predict price changes, why data neutrality can s...
010
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
This month’s reading suggestions from @profschrepel.bsky.social are out. Inside: an LLM that predicts case outcomes, the fight over public ownership of the big AI labs, and whether you can tell when AI wrote the article. Plus Pinker on common knowledge. www.networklawreview.org/june-2026/
011
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
In memoriam: Marius Schwartz (Georgetown University) In tribute to Marius, we are republishing the article today. We extend our deepest condolences to his family, to Yongmin Chen, and to his many colleagues and friends. www.networklawreview.org/default-posi...
000
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
📚 April 2026 reading suggestions are out. AI agents meet complexity economics. The waterbed effect collapses. The AI moat wobbles. Europe drifts into American dependence. Hayek’s papers go online. Barabási on networks. By @profschrepel.bsky.social 👇 www.networklawreview.org/april-2026/
networklawreview.org
Reading suggestions – April 2026 - Network Law Review
Here are Thibault Schrepel’s monthly reading suggestions. Topics include AI agents and complexity economics in antitrust, the limits of the waterbed effect, Europe’s regulatory drift toward American d...
011
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 20/04/2026
✨New series✨ We introduce "Pott's of Arabia" wherein Jason Potts examines institutional market reforms toward innovation and competition in Saudi Arabia. First piece: a shift toward a dynamic competition paradigm. www.networklawreview.org/potts-arabia...
networklawreview.org
Introducing Dynamic Competition in the Middle East - Network Law Review
Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 is the most ambitious economic transformation program in the world today, yet it is widely misunderstood in the West. This article introduces a new analytical framework to e...
000
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 10/04/2026
New issue of Competition Stories is out, open access, as always. This one covers: parallel investigations in digital markets, tying doctrine under pressure, Android Auto ruling, the €2.95B Google AdTech fine... EU competition law moves fast. We track it. networklawreview.org/competition-stories-two/
000
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 31/03/2026
Here are @profschrepel.bsky.social's monthly reading suggestions. Topics include AI's reshaping of research and publishing, the economics of AI talent in universities, using AI to audit EU regulation, economic growth and the rise of large firms, and more... www.networklawreview.org/march-2026/
networklawreview.org
Reading suggestions – March 2026 - Network Law Review
Here are Thibault Schrepel's monthly reading suggestions. Topics include AI's reshaping of research and publishing, end-to-end automation of scientific inquiry, the economics of AI talent in universit...
011
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
Where else can you read Hovenkamp on monopoly power, Acemoglu on taxing digital ads, case-law analysis, and curated monthly readings designed to keep you up to date without the noise? Subscribe ➝ networklawreview.org/subscribe (it's free!)
021
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 26/03/2026
Is antitrust law about fairness? @sherman1890.bsky.social’s answer is clear: no, and it never was. In this piece, Prof. Hovenkamp dismantles the growing assumption in competition debates that antitrust should correct inequality or redistribute economic power. www.networklawreview.org/hovenkamp-fa...
networklawreview.org
Fairness and Redistribution in Antitrust Law - Network Law Review
Many parts of the legal system pursue “fair” distributions of wealth or economic status. Antitrust law does not. The antitrust statutes target practices that reduce output or threaten monopoly—measure...
012
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 23/03/2026
New on @networklawreview.bsky.social: Generative AI is increasing academic output. But when attention is scarce, output does not equal influence. The Matthew effect intensifies. Stratification follows www.networklawreview.org/matthew-effe...
networklawreview.org
The Matthew Effect at Scale: Attention Scarcity and the AI Output Explosion - Network Law Review
Generative AI is lowering the marginal cost of academic writing. A natural prediction is that this will allow more researchers to exercise scientific influence. This article argues that the effects ar...
000
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 03/03/2026
Here are Thibault Schrepel’s monthly reading suggestions. www.networklawreview.org/february-2026/ Topics include the constitutional limits of the Digital Markets Act, antitrust’s fixation on structural remedies, AI’s productivity impact on firms, generative AI in literature reviews and more!
000
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 30/01/2026
Here are @profschrepel.bsky.social's monthly reading suggestions. Topics include market power and competition regimes, the limits of AI scaling, the impact of large language models on scientific production, price discrimination, and more. www.networklawreview.org/january-2026/
networklawreview.org
Reading suggestions – January 2026 - Network Law Review
Here are Thibault Schrepel’s monthly reading suggestions. Topics include market power and competition regimes, the limits of AI scaling, the impact of large language models on scientific production, p...
020
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 02/01/2026
🚨 Just out: The world’s most downloaded antitrust articles of 2025 on SSRN 🚨 www.networklawreview.org/top-2025/
networklawreview.org
The world’s most downloaded antitrust articles of 2025 - Network Law Review
As for previous years, here are the world’s most downloaded antitrust and competition law articles posted on SSRN during 2025.
011
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 02/01/2026
Here are @profschrepel.bsky.social’s monthly reading suggestions. Topics include measure market power, nascent competition and killer acquisitions, the end of the Brussels effect, the welfare effect of price discrimination, great-powers competition, and more. www.networklawreview.org/december-2025/
networklawreview.org
Reading suggestions – December 2025 - Network Law Review
Here are Thibault Schrepel’s monthly reading suggestions. Topics include measure market power, nascent competition and killer acquisitions, the end of the Brussels effect, the welfare effect of price ...
021
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 12/12/2025
NEW: In this paper, William Lehr, Volker Stocker & Jason Whalley argue that EU digital sovereignty fails if it sacrifices intra-EU competition or confuses control with self-sufficiency, especially in the AI stack. www.networklawreview.org/lehr-stocker...
000
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 03/12/2025
What if antitrust’s obsession with consumer welfare is hurting US competitiveness? Jonathan Barnett shows how global power politics (especially China’s mercantilism) force a fundamental rethink of US antitrust. Essential reading. www.networklawreview.org/barnett-grea...
031
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 02/12/2025
Trade barriers can drive rivals like China to innovate, but true edge belongs to those plugged into global tech networks. The US-China chip conflict reveals the paradox of protectionism in industrial policy. 👉🏼 Read Dick Langlois on the subject: networklawreview.org/langlois-pro...
networklawreview.org
China and the Paradox of Protectionism? - Network Law Review
This special issue examines the coexistence of industrial and competition policy in a period of geopolitical rivalry and rapid technological change. The contributions analyze these tensions through th...
010
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 02/12/2025
What happens when data from one product quietly boosts a firm’s power in other markets? AI-era spillovers make leveraging strategies far more profitable, and far harder to evaluate. A must read, by Erik Hovenkamp (Cornell) networklawreview.org/hovenkamp-ai...
networklawreview.org
AI, Data, And Leveraging Strategies: Implications For Antitrust - Network Law Review
In product markets that rely heavily on artificial intelligence (AI), firms both use data and generate data. For a multiproduct firm, the data generated by one product will often have spillover benefi...
010
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 02/12/2025
Europe’s renewed push for industrial policy is a golden moment for antitrust agencies according to Frédéric Jenny (OECD). To stay relevant, he suggests they must embrace innovation, sustainability, resilience & growth. networklawreview.org/jenny-indust...
networklawreview.org
The Rise of Industrial Policy in Europe and the Search for Growth and Innovation: A Golden Opportunity for Competition Authorities - Network Law Review
This paper argues that the unintended and unanticipated costs of globalization revealed during the 2008 financial crisis and the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic have led to a renewed embrace of industrial poli...
020
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 02/12/2025
Here are @profschrepel.bsky.social's monthly reading suggestions about antitrust, AI, economics, and more: www.networklawreview.org/november-2025/
020
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 21/11/2025
Antitrust is no longer a domestic game. Daniel Crane (University of Michigan Law School) maps how Great Powers use antitrust law as a geopolitical lever across tech, culture, finance, and even wartime supply chains. Read here 👇 www.networklawreview.org/crane-great-...
021
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 17/11/2025
What happens when industrial policy moves from tariffs to invisible regulatory barriers? Daniel Spulber shows how non-tariff barriers distort trade & erode incentives to innovate. New in the NLR x ICLE special issue on competitiveness. 👉 networklawreview.org/spulber-indu...
011
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
Is “industrial policy” really back? Giovanni Dosi argues it’s mostly a dystopian reboot, more zero-sum than visionary-oriented strategy. Our new NLR–ICLE special issue starts with a bang. www.networklawreview.org/dosi-industr...
042
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 12/11/2025
Industrial policy is back in fashion. From AI to semiconductors, governments are rethinking the balance between intervention and competition. This new issue (with ICLE) explores this tension. Read the introduction 👉 www.networklawreview.org/special-issu...
010
Reposted by Network Law Review
CodeX Stanford @codexstanford.bsky.social · 16/10/2025
The EU's "future-proof" AI regulation is a fantasy. AI evolves through emergent properties—GPT-1 to GPT-4 was metamorphosis, not iteration. We need future-responsive regulation, not monuments By @profschrepel.bsky.social at @networklawreview.bsky.social www.networklawreview.org/schrepel-fut...
networklawreview.org
The Future-Proof Fantasy of AI Regulation - Network Law Review
The EU’s quest for “future-proof” AI regulation is a fantasy. AI evolves through emergent properties that defy prediction, yet Brussels continues to draft rules with an industrial, linear mindset. The...
023
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 07/10/2025
New Antitrust Antidote: Apple case moves ahead; per se tying theory on Hermès doesn’t fly; alleged algorithmic/benchmarking collusion suits stumble on pleadings... All you need to know about recent U.S. antitrust cases is here: www.networklawreview.org/antidote-7/
011
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 01/10/2025
Here are @profschrepel.bsky.social’s monthly reading suggestions: DMA & EU users, killer acquisitions, auditable AI, AI Act political economy, GenAI & democracy, AI agents in econ, adaptive regulation + a special issue on law, tech & econ of AI: www.networklawreview.org/september-20...
021
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 01/10/2025
The EU says its AI rules are “future proof.” They’re not, @profschrepel.bsky.social argues. Without adaptive regulation (modular rules, real-time monitoring, plural triggers, institutional memory) Brussels (and others!) will always be behind the curve. www.networklawreview.org/schrepel-fut...
010
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 26/09/2025
What if competition law had to be personalized, i.e., tailored to firms, sectors, even algorithms? Adrian Kuenzler (University of Hong Kong) argues AI forces us to abandon one-size-fits-all enforcement. The age of bespoke antitrust is here www.networklawreview.org/kuenzler-ai/
networklawreview.org
Personalized Competition Law: The New Frontier of AI Market Governance - Network Law Review
Artificial Intelligence technologies prompt several doctrinal shifts in competition law. For AI market governance, this means moving toward personalized enforcement. Rather than applying one-size-fits...
000
Reposted by Network Law Review
Stanford Tech Impact and Policy Center @techimpactpolicy.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
How can regulatory frameworks keep up in the age of #AI? New in @networklawreview.bsky.social, Visiting Professor @flogsell.bsky.social outlines how #GDPR provisions often fail to apply to AI systems, highlighting the need for more adaptive, flexible, and responsive regulatory approaches.
networklawreview.org
Statutory Obsolescence in the Age of Innovation: A Few Thoughts about GDPR - Network Law Review
This article examines the problem of statutory obsolescence in the regulation of rapidly evolving technologies, with a focus on GDPR and generative AI. It shows how core GDPR provisions on lawful proc...
022
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
How to implement the EU #AIAct without stifling innovation? Daniel Schnurr highlights 5 key challenges: risk mitigation, trade-offs, adaptability, value-chain responsibility & coherence with sectoral rules. www.networklawreview.org/schnurr-ai-a...
000
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 22/09/2025
NEW: Korea’s new AI regime shows both promise and peril of overlapping regulators, argues Yo Sop Choi. The 2023 Digital Bill of Rights aims for coherence, but real clarity will hinge on agency coordination: www.networklawreview.org/choi-ai/
020
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 19/09/2025
New @networklawreview.bsky.social piece by Kyohei Yamamoto & Yasunori Tabei summarizing Japan’s emerging AI regulation: a soft-law AI Bill, a JFTC market study on generative AI, and the new MSCA for mobile software www.networklawreview.org/yamamoto-tab....
networklawreview.org
Japanese AI Regulation and Competition Law - Network Law Review
The Network Law Review is pleased to present a special issue entitled “The Law & Technology & Economics of AI.” This issue brings together multiple disciplines around a central question: What kind of ...
000
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 17/09/2025
NEW article by Nuno Cunha Rodrigues, President of Portuguese Competition Authority. He argues that AI disruption demands a new regulatory ecosystem where competition law works hand in hand with other public policies www.networklawreview.org/cunha-rodrig...
011
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 15/09/2025
Generative AI exposes GDPR’s limits: consent at scale, accuracy of outputs, erasure in trained models. The fix isn’t more principles, says Florence G'sell (Stanford University), it’s adaptive institutions (EU AI Office, expert panels) and iterative rules. www.networklawreview.org/gsell-statut...
020
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 03/09/2025
NEW: Jin, Wagman & Zhong show how privacy, security & cross-border data laws overlap with AI policies. These overlaps create trade-offs: innovation vs. protection, competition vs. compliance costs. They call for internationally coordinated AI/data gov www.networklawreview.org/jin-wagman-z...
010
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 02/09/2025
NEW: @paulohm.bsky.social (Georgetown Law) argues that as AI drives the cost of compliance toward zero, debates on AI regulation should focus on its substance rather than its administrative burden www.networklawreview.org/ohm-ai-regul...
networklawreview.org
Toward Compliance Zero: AI and the Vanishing Costs of Regulatory Compliance - Network Law Review
AI systems now perform core compliance tasks once reserved for humans. Prof. Ohm argues that this will drive the marginal cost of regulatory compliance toward zero. The claim is grounded in the nature...
000
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 01/09/2025
Here are my @profschrepel.bsky.social reading suggestions. Topics include AI openness, how AI improves itself, the unintended consequences of privacy regulation (it’s bad...), vertical integration and consumer choice, classical liberalism, and more. www.networklawreview.org/august-2025/
networklawreview.org
Reading suggestions – August 2025 - Network Law Review
Here are Thibault Schrepel’s monthly reading suggestions. Topics include AI openness, how AI improves itself, the unintended consequences of privacy regulation (it's bad), vertical integration and con...
000
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 29/08/2025
The NLR is publishing a new special issue: “The Law & Technology & Economics of AI.” It brings law, economics, and computer science together to spark new ideas for AI governance. The introduction features all contributors and the titles of their pieces: networklawreview.org/law-tech-eco...
000
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 02/06/2025
Here are @profschrepel.bsky.social’s monthly reading suggestions. Topics include: the populist challenge to consumer welfare standards in antitrust, AI startup competition and technological sovereignty, Bitcoin reserve skepticism and internet culture shifts... www.networklawreview.org/may-2025/
011
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 02/05/2025
Here are @profschrepel.bsky.social’s monthly reading suggestions. Topics include: concentration in AI agents, #computationalantitrust, Lina Khan 2.0, GDPR ineffectiveness, democracies & capitalism, the network science of philosophy, and more. www.networklawreview.org/april-2025/
networklawreview.org
Reading suggestions – April 2025 - Network Law Review
Here are Thibault Schrepel’s monthly reading suggestions. Topics include: concentration in AI agents, computational antitrust, Lina Khan 2.0, AI liability, AI 2027, GDPR ineffectiveness, technological...
021
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 01/05/2025
In this new article, Raz Agranat and Michal Gal explore the competitive dynamics in emerging AI agent markets. They argue that positive feedback loops may enable dominant agents to outperform rivals by leveraging the advantages of scale & network effects www.networklawreview.org/ai-agents-ne....
networklawreview.org
Fueling Concentration: AI Agents and Network Effects - Network Law Review
Abstract: AI agents lie at the frontier of the evolving AI economy, functioning as applications that autonomously execute tasks on users’ behalf. While contemporary discourse on market concentration i...
010
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 05/03/2025
The EU AI Act is one of the first attempts to regulate AI. Given that previous European digital regulations, such as the GDPR, have influenced laws all over the world, can we expect to see the AI Act as a global standard? @marcoalmada.com waves in www.networklawreview.org/almada-ai-act/.
networklawreview.org
Will the EU AI Act Shape Global Regulation? - Network Law Review
The European Union’s AI Act is one of the first attempts to regulate artificial intelligence technologies. Given that previous European digital regulations, such as the GDPR, have influenced laws all ...
021
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 13/02/2025
NEW: "Rising Market Power: Evidence from Industry Studies" by Nathan Miller (Georgetown University McDonough School of Business) Key message: rising market power in the U.S. is largely driven by technological advances rather than weak antitrust enforcement. www.networklawreview.org/rising-marke...
networklawreview.org
Rising Market Power: Evidence from Industry Studies - Network Law Review
Rising market power in the U.S. is largely driven by technological advances rather than weak antitrust enforcement. Industry studies show that innovation has reduced costs, improved quality, and, in s...
010
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 02/01/2025
Here are the world’s most downloaded #antitrust and competition law articles posted on @ssrn.bsky.social during 2024: networklawreview.org/top-2024/.
networklawreview.org
The world’s most downloaded antitrust articles of 2024 - Network Law Review
As for previous years, here are the world’s most downloaded antitrust and competition law articles posted on SSRN during 2024.
021
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 27/12/2024
NEW: Catch up on everything that happened in U.S. antitrust over the past few months here: www.networklawreview.org/antidote-4/
011
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 23/12/2024
The 10 most-read articles on the Network Law Review in 2024 (a thread 🧶)
111
Network Law Review @networklawreview.bsky.social · 25/11/2024
Hello, digital, complex world.
041