Sign in

Naomi Cunningham

@naomicunningham.bsky.social
2.8K followers 103 following 240 posts

Barrister | Member of Legal Feminist www.legalfeminist.org.uk | Chair of Sex Matters sex-matters.org "Hateful bigot with incredible institutional power, and connections to the current UK government" A man's a man for a' that.

PostsRepliesMedia
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 22/05/2026
Thread.
4110
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 14/05/2026
It would take a heart of stone...
0123
Reposted by Naomi Cunningham
Queer Truth @queertruth.bsky.social · 14/05/2026
Lee - this is not on point but you are an ally and I dont understand why no one is talking the Good Law Project having completely destroyed trans womens rights in the workplace!? This has been an absolute disaster and no one is holding anyone to account on it!?!? 😞 ❤️ 💙
321
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 08/05/2026
Allison Bailey v Stonewall is going to the Supreme Court. It will be fascinating to see whether @stonewalluk.bsky.social takes the opportunity to make sure that trans voices are heard in our apex court.
0102
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 24/04/2026
I'm very excited to be part of this. (If also slightly terrified to be Chair of such an alarmingly august committee.)
1132
Reposted by Naomi Cunningham
Akua Reindorf KC @akuareindorfkc.bsky.social · 24/04/2026
Calling all lawyers! FREE CPD! Inaugural event of SaGLA the brand new Sex and Gender Law Association Save the date: 4 June (other details TBC) Civil discussion of any and all views welcome & encouraged
41811
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
In truth, it's hard to be non-partisan in this debate, so I'd mistrust pretty much anyone who claimed not to have a position. It's not difficult. You pick which matters more: women's safety and dignity, or men's hurt feelings.
0142
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
What I take issue with is the DSKC's attempt to frame his analysis as non-partisan, combined with his unself-conscious use of partisan language; and what seem to me to be surprising distortions in his reasoning born of a hostility to the sex realist position and therefore FWS.
190
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
So I use language that reflects that. I analyse the law as fairly as I can, acknowledging the ever-present risk of motivated reasoning.
150
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
"Trans woman" is not a term in the EqA either: it is activist language intended to create the impression that a particular subcategory of men is a subcategory of women. And yes: in the blog, I say in terms I take the sex realist position.
160
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 25/03/2026
I listened to the usually excellent @11kbw.bsky.social employment law blog on the recent ET cases on single-sex spaces. www.legalfeminist.org.uk/2026/03/25/p...
legalfeminist.org.uk
Podcasting and partisanship -
I listened to the 11KBW Employment Podcast in which Katherine Taunton and Dan Stillitz KC discussed four recent cases on single-sex spaces: Peggie v NHS Fife and Beth Upton, Kelly v Leonardo UK Ltd, H...
3194
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
You can't disagree with him, can you? He may presently join the rest of us at WNTAELF.
010
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 26/02/2026
In the latest update to the Equal Treatment Bench Book, chapter 12, ¶48 is a breath of fresh air: '"Assigned at birth" is used by trans people (and others) instead of biological sex, but is not widely understood, and it is therefore to be avoided by judges.'
0140
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 18/02/2026
This.
0152
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 15/02/2026
Someone finally answered.
290
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 15/02/2026
Fascinating eye-witness account of Lynsay Watson/Alex Horwood's latest antics and his arrest last Thursday. Since he's been both camera-shy and menacing online towards many of those he disagrees with, it's also good to have an up-to-date photo of him. www.thehelenjoyce.com/p/lynsay-wat...
thehelenjoyce.com
Lynsay Watson: we meet at last
Unmasking the (trans-identifying) Man of Mystery
0378
Reposted by Naomi Cunningham
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 14/02/2026
The answer was no. No-one wanted to try to explain to me why men getting infants to suck on their nipples might (even sometimes) be ok. On balance I suppose I find that faintly reassuring, in a rather bleak way.
2342
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 14/02/2026
The answer was no. No-one wanted to try to explain to me why men getting infants to suck on their nipples might (even sometimes) be ok. On balance I suppose I find that faintly reassuring, in a rather bleak way.
2342
Reposted by Naomi Cunningham
Peter Daly @peterdaly.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
So depressing to see a Labour MP push misinformation like this. The judgment @kateosbornemp.bsky.social refers to is here: goodlawproject.org/wp-content/u.... Will she say which paragraph/s say “the EHRC’s draft code of practice got the law wrong”? No. Because none do. bsky.app/profile/kate...
goodlawproject.org
24322
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 14/02/2026
Michael Foran's excellent clear explainer of yesterday's GLP v EHRC judgment. knowingius.org/p/good-law-p...
knowingius.org
Good Law Project v EHRC
The High Court has dismissed a judicial review brought by the Good Law Project and three individuals challenging the lawfulness and accuracy of the Interim Update issued by the Equality and Human Righ...
24718
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
And I'm really sorry if being civil to me here earns you a load of abuse — that unfortunately was @swilkenkc.bsky.social's experience after an exchange with me about (of all things) costs as damages. Fingers crossed things have improved here since then.
100
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
Many thanks 😊
100
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
I'd really like to read it, please?
110
Reposted by Naomi Cunningham
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 11/02/2026
Ooh yes me too if you would be so kind? naomi.cunningham@outertemple.com
031
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 11/02/2026
Ooh yes me too if you would be so kind? naomi.cunningham@outertemple.com
031
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 22/12/2025
Anyone?
6505
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
It's awfully rude and unkind to draw attention to these kinds of risks, I know. But isn't that rather the point of safeguarding? Kindness is complicated.
1272
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
Bearing in mind what a very wicked world it is — and that autogynephilia is a thing, and some autogynephile men will fetishise pretty much any aspect of femaleness — are there any foreseeable risks in condoning male "breastfeeding"?
1201
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
But I'm by an order of magnitude more cautious (putting it mildly) about the impact on an infant of being "breastfed" by a male artificially induced to lactate. For whose benefit is this really done? And what is the nature of the "benefit"?
1251
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
I don't know the data on the respective merits of formula and wet-nursing, for an orphaned infant. If the actual mother is available, I'd be cautious about the impact of wet-nursing on the mother-infant bond, but that could be addressed by evidence.
1170
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
So we are presumably proceeding on the assumption that the female mother is dead, or can't breastfeed (perhaps a "trans man" who has had her breasts removed?), or is otherwise unavailable (a surrogate, maybe; another whole can of worms).
1160
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
Are you able to help my failing imagination here? The child must have had an actual female mother, who we presumably agree would be the best person to breastfeed her, if available?
2240
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
I am struggling to imagine circumstances in which it would be in the best interests of an infant to be "breastfed" by a male person who has been induced to lactate. I failed my maths degree, but some things stuck, including "confession of failure of the imagination does not amount to proof".
8468
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
We really need to start to face up to the implications of autogynephilia for the admission of men who say they are women to women-only spaces. www.youtube.com/watch?v=kC6M...
youtube.com
What Is Autogynephilia? | Helen Joyce
YouTube video by John Anderson Media
12310
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025
I re-read "That Hideous Strength" not long ago. The portrayal of the moral corruption of Mark Studdock by bureaucratic evil, using a combination of menace, flattery and calculated desensitisation to horror, had strong contemporary resonances for me.
031
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 18/06/2025
If you want to complain about me, I'm regulated by the Bar Standards Board www.barstandardsboard.org.uk
barstandardsboard.org.uk
The Bar Standards Board
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) regulates barristers and specialised legal services businesses in England and Wales in the public interest.
250
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 18/06/2025
A large white rabbit asks for the meta data NOW. (Hope that helps.)
0220
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 06/06/2025
I asked rhetorically, given the SC's judgment, what was the remaining point of medical transition. I don't think it is fair to characterise that as saying that that is the only point of all gender transition, do you?
063
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 11/05/2025
Oh fab, thank you so much! Especially for braving yet again the hordes of <checks notes> very kind people here.
120
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 11/05/2025
@swilkenkc.bsky.social I'm trying to find the case you mentioned to me about costs as damages, and which opened a whole world of pain for you on this lovely kind site... and I can't find it. Could you possibly remind me?
451
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
If my account here is still marked "intolerant"... well, in all honesty I'm feeling pretty intolerant right now.
5513
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
And quite a lot of "I'll piss where I like" including threats to piss on TERFs. Which as Richard Dawkins points out is classic male territory-marking behaviour.
2423
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
I think this reads "The Guv can suck my [?] girlie [?] dick" The handwriting is poor, so I'm not completely sure of the last two words.
192
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
"The only good TERF is a ____ one"
3153
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
The demo against the ruling of the Supreme Court in FWS v Scottish Ministers. The #BeKind people.
57016
Reposted by Naomi Cunningham
Scott Wortley @scottwortley.bsky.social · 19/04/2025
Jolyon Maugham KC has blocked me, but posted that the guardian article about Melanie Field shows UKSC in FWS v Scottish ministers is constitutionally wrong. For a KC to suggest something so legally illiterate in statutory interpretation is bizarre. My explanation why medium.com/@scott-wortl...
77117
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 18/04/2025
😀
6391
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 18/04/2025
Did she manage to say anything correct?
010
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 19/03/2025
Oh, so it is! It popped up somewhere for me as if new.
020