Reposted by Naomi CunninghamQueer Truth @queertruth.bsky.social · 14/05/2026Lee - this is not on point but you are an ally and I dont understand why no one is talking the Good Law Project having completely destroyed trans womens rights in the workplace!? This has been an absolute disaster and no one is holding anyone to account on it!?!? 😞 ❤️ 💙 321
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 08/05/2026Allison Bailey v Stonewall is going to the Supreme Court. It will be fascinating to see whether @stonewalluk.bsky.social takes the opportunity to make sure that trans voices are heard in our apex court. 0102
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 24/04/2026I'm very excited to be part of this. (If also slightly terrified to be Chair of such an alarmingly august committee.) 1132
Reposted by Naomi CunninghamAkua Reindorf KC @akuareindorfkc.bsky.social · 24/04/2026Calling all lawyers! FREE CPD! Inaugural event of SaGLA the brand new Sex and Gender Law Association Save the date: 4 June (other details TBC) Civil discussion of any and all views welcome & encouraged 41811
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 08/04/2026In truth, it's hard to be non-partisan in this debate, so I'd mistrust pretty much anyone who claimed not to have a position. It's not difficult. You pick which matters more: women's safety and dignity, or men's hurt feelings. 0142
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 08/04/2026What I take issue with is the DSKC's attempt to frame his analysis as non-partisan, combined with his unself-conscious use of partisan language; and what seem to me to be surprising distortions in his reasoning born of a hostility to the sex realist position and therefore FWS. 190
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 08/04/2026So I use language that reflects that. I analyse the law as fairly as I can, acknowledging the ever-present risk of motivated reasoning. 150
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 08/04/2026"Trans woman" is not a term in the EqA either: it is activist language intended to create the impression that a particular subcategory of men is a subcategory of women. And yes: in the blog, I say in terms I take the sex realist position. 160
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 25/03/2026I listened to the usually excellent @11kbw.bsky.social employment law blog on the recent ET cases on single-sex spaces. www.legalfeminist.org.uk/2026/03/25/p...legalfeminist.org.ukPodcasting and partisanship -I listened to the 11KBW Employment Podcast in which Katherine Taunton and Dan Stillitz KC discussed four recent cases on single-sex spaces: Peggie v NHS Fife and Beth Upton, Kelly v Leonardo UK Ltd, H... 3194
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 26/02/2026You can't disagree with him, can you? He may presently join the rest of us at WNTAELF. 010
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 26/02/2026In the latest update to the Equal Treatment Bench Book, chapter 12, ¶48 is a breath of fresh air: '"Assigned at birth" is used by trans people (and others) instead of biological sex, but is not widely understood, and it is therefore to be avoided by judges.' 0140
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 15/02/2026Fascinating eye-witness account of Lynsay Watson/Alex Horwood's latest antics and his arrest last Thursday. Since he's been both camera-shy and menacing online towards many of those he disagrees with, it's also good to have an up-to-date photo of him. www.thehelenjoyce.com/p/lynsay-wat...thehelenjoyce.comLynsay Watson: we meet at lastUnmasking the (trans-identifying) Man of Mystery 0378
Reposted by Naomi CunninghamNaomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 14/02/2026The answer was no. No-one wanted to try to explain to me why men getting infants to suck on their nipples might (even sometimes) be ok. On balance I suppose I find that faintly reassuring, in a rather bleak way. 2342
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 14/02/2026The answer was no. No-one wanted to try to explain to me why men getting infants to suck on their nipples might (even sometimes) be ok. On balance I suppose I find that faintly reassuring, in a rather bleak way. 2342
Reposted by Naomi CunninghamPeter Daly @peterdaly.bsky.social · 13/02/2026So depressing to see a Labour MP push misinformation like this. The judgment @kateosbornemp.bsky.social refers to is here: goodlawproject.org/wp-content/u.... Will she say which paragraph/s say “the EHRC’s draft code of practice got the law wrong”? No. Because none do. bsky.app/profile/kate...goodlawproject.org 24322
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 14/02/2026Michael Foran's excellent clear explainer of yesterday's GLP v EHRC judgment. knowingius.org/p/good-law-p...knowingius.orgGood Law Project v EHRCThe High Court has dismissed a judicial review brought by the Good Law Project and three individuals challenging the lawfulness and accuracy of the Interim Update issued by the Equality and Human Righ... 24718
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 13/02/2026And I'm really sorry if being civil to me here earns you a load of abuse — that unfortunately was @swilkenkc.bsky.social's experience after an exchange with me about (of all things) costs as damages. Fingers crossed things have improved here since then. 100
Reposted by Naomi CunninghamNaomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 11/02/2026Ooh yes me too if you would be so kind? naomi.cunningham@outertemple.com 031
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 11/02/2026Ooh yes me too if you would be so kind? naomi.cunningham@outertemple.com 031
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025It's awfully rude and unkind to draw attention to these kinds of risks, I know. But isn't that rather the point of safeguarding? Kindness is complicated. 1272
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025Bearing in mind what a very wicked world it is — and that autogynephilia is a thing, and some autogynephile men will fetishise pretty much any aspect of femaleness — are there any foreseeable risks in condoning male "breastfeeding"? 1201
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025But I'm by an order of magnitude more cautious (putting it mildly) about the impact on an infant of being "breastfed" by a male artificially induced to lactate. For whose benefit is this really done? And what is the nature of the "benefit"? 1251
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025I don't know the data on the respective merits of formula and wet-nursing, for an orphaned infant. If the actual mother is available, I'd be cautious about the impact of wet-nursing on the mother-infant bond, but that could be addressed by evidence. 1170
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025So we are presumably proceeding on the assumption that the female mother is dead, or can't breastfeed (perhaps a "trans man" who has had her breasts removed?), or is otherwise unavailable (a surrogate, maybe; another whole can of worms). 1160
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025Are you able to help my failing imagination here? The child must have had an actual female mother, who we presumably agree would be the best person to breastfeed her, if available? 2240
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025I am struggling to imagine circumstances in which it would be in the best interests of an infant to be "breastfed" by a male person who has been induced to lactate. I failed my maths degree, but some things stuck, including "confession of failure of the imagination does not amount to proof". 8468
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025We really need to start to face up to the implications of autogynephilia for the admission of men who say they are women to women-only spaces. www.youtube.com/watch?v=kC6M...youtube.comWhat Is Autogynephilia? | Helen JoyceYouTube video by John Anderson Media 12310
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 16/12/2025I re-read "That Hideous Strength" not long ago. The portrayal of the moral corruption of Mark Studdock by bureaucratic evil, using a combination of menace, flattery and calculated desensitisation to horror, had strong contemporary resonances for me. 031
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 18/06/2025If you want to complain about me, I'm regulated by the Bar Standards Board www.barstandardsboard.org.ukbarstandardsboard.org.ukThe Bar Standards BoardThe Bar Standards Board (BSB) regulates barristers and specialised legal services businesses in England and Wales in the public interest. 250
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 06/06/2025I asked rhetorically, given the SC's judgment, what was the remaining point of medical transition. I don't think it is fair to characterise that as saying that that is the only point of all gender transition, do you? 063
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 11/05/2025Oh fab, thank you so much! Especially for braving yet again the hordes of <checks notes> very kind people here. 120
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 11/05/2025@swilkenkc.bsky.social I'm trying to find the case you mentioned to me about costs as damages, and which opened a whole world of pain for you on this lovely kind site... and I can't find it. Could you possibly remind me? 451
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 21/04/2025If my account here is still marked "intolerant"... well, in all honesty I'm feeling pretty intolerant right now. 5513
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 21/04/2025And quite a lot of "I'll piss where I like" including threats to piss on TERFs. Which as Richard Dawkins points out is classic male territory-marking behaviour. 2423
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 21/04/2025I think this reads "The Guv can suck my [?] girlie [?] dick" The handwriting is poor, so I'm not completely sure of the last two words. 192
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 21/04/2025The demo against the ruling of the Supreme Court in FWS v Scottish Ministers. The #BeKind people. 57016
Reposted by Naomi CunninghamScott Wortley @scottwortley.bsky.social · 19/04/2025Jolyon Maugham KC has blocked me, but posted that the guardian article about Melanie Field shows UKSC in FWS v Scottish ministers is constitutionally wrong. For a KC to suggest something so legally illiterate in statutory interpretation is bizarre. My explanation why medium.com/@scott-wortl... 77117
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 18/04/2025Did she manage to say anything correct? 010
Naomi Cunningham @naomicunningham.bsky.social · 19/03/2025Oh, so it is! It popped up somewhere for me as if new. 020