iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 1h

Good grief It reads like legally illiterate gobbledegook, was this composed by AI?

Reposted by Ms Anfield Park

Prof Gavin Yamey MD MPH @gavinyamey.bsky.social · 11/10/2026

Read this thread & weep In our bioethics classes, we’re all going to be teaching our students about this grotesque RFK Jr-funded trial for decades to come White Danes flying in to Guinea-Bissau to withhold a proven intervention—the new Tuskegee And it’s happening in the year of our Lord 2026 🤯

6254128

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 14h

Yes. Clear equalities impacts, how justified? As well as likely in breach of unfair trading laws. But trading standards and traffic mgt teams are often eminations of same public body & you can’t enforce against yourself, hence “do as I say not as I do” can be the worst type of LA maladministration

000

Reposted by Ms Anfield Park

The Anfield Wrap @theanfieldwrap.bsky.social · 11/10/2026

All won without cheating

016343

Reposted by Ms Anfield Park

TheCenci @thecenci.bsky.social · 11/10/2026

‘So Lance, another Tour de France …’

0296

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 11/10/2026

I have a Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins picture on my wall. Cost me £3. It is one of my favourite things.

bsky.app

120

Reposted by Ms Anfield Park

Andrew Male @andrewmale.bsky.social · 10/10/2026

Back on Twitter, when autumn proper arrived I would always post the video someone made for Sandy Denny's No End (Demo) by holding a camera phone up against the train window. By popular request (well, from @robinallender.bsky.social) I'll start doing that here. youtu.be/o9sERw40Pes?...

youtu.be

Sandy Denny - No End (solo piano demo) - Heading south, winter 2009

YouTube video by other_pete

38129

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 10/10/2026

Growing up in 60’s Anfield we were forever being warned not to play in the “bombdies” Astonishing how much of the city featured gaps were houses once stood, or totally derelict buildings, simply not repaired or rebuilt after such heavy bombing.

190

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 10/10/2026

I hope you are feeling better very soon

000

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 09/10/2026

Double Bill, man!: The Elephant Man Inside Man The Third Man of Steel

110

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 09/10/2026

That’s a good point. We know dealing with these matters is often urgent work squeezed in to an already busy schedule. Given no scrutiny by suspect’s lawyer there’s an enormous responsibility on Applicant & Court, but the Court often knows the App. & sometimes may be too ready to accept submissions?

000

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 09/10/2026

Have you read it? For anybody interested in justice the fact the 2d Defendant (TVP) applied for a warrant they could not lawfully obtain, then had to concede that fact & will now spend public £££ on AMW’s costs, with resulting media access to material in a live investigation, is deeply troubling.

210

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 09/10/2026

First case I thought of when I saw this, for obvious reasons. Did not spot you were involved, what a great early career case.

110

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 09/10/2026

The Court issued a warrant under s8. The overreach occurred when the Police executed it If they did not read the warrant that had been issued, or did read it but did not understand it, that’s a Police cock up. If they deliberately went beyond it, that’s far worse. Either way, it’s on them.

4143

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 09/10/2026

surely knew *or ought to have known

000

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 09/10/2026

This was not a case for belt and braces “apply for ss8&9” approach as police/ & their lawyers surely knew they needed section 9. That’s on them. Once the Judge issued under s8 alone the Police executing the warrant surely knew its limits, so that’s on them too & they’ll have to deal with it in 2027

110

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

Wish we were there. Hope it’s being recorded

010

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 08/10/2026

I hoped it’d be Harry Hook you were referring to! I used this case to great effect when training elected politicians destined to serve on committees that conduct hearings, it illustrates so many aspects of the task as well as bringing a smile and sticking in the memory.

010

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

In France, where I am just now, this is a biscuit and thanks to this thread I felt bound to open the box and try one and can confirm they look and taste like a UK Jaffa cake, perhaps a tad smaller (but maybe that’s true of the Jaffacake now as I haven’t eaten any in years)

030

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

……enabling it to be consumed at a temperature above the ambient air temperature and, at the time of supply, is above that temperature, or (b)after it is supplied, may be heated on the premises for the purpose of enabling it to be consumed at a temperature above the ambient air temperature.

010

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

“Ambient” test for Licensing of late night refreshment houses, Sch2, LAct 2003: “2Food or drink supplied on or from any premises is “hot” for the purposes of this Schedule if the food or drink, or any part of it,- (a)before it is supplied, is heated on the premises or elsewhere for the purpose of..

110

Reposted by Ms Anfield Park

Hey Jude @judew.bsky.social · 06/10/2026

Please read this obit, it's so powerful 25 years later.

094

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 05/10/2026

The report tells us there’s a hearing, not the date the claim form was filed.

000

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 03/10/2026

If it’s a listed building, or (as seems likely?) part of the setting of a listed building you would probably find guidance by historic England regarding temporary structures instructive.

010

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 03/10/2026

You probably know you can check applications via the portal on local council websites just by inputting an address

210

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 03/10/2026

Don’t know enough to even guess - eg is it a listed building? Conservation area? Temporary? If yes, for how long? How and where is it affixed? Etc I have not read this but would hope it includes some guidance about public art and when consent is required. (Nowt came up on portal search for 16 HS)

westminster.gov.uk

110

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

“There is absolutely no reason to pay attention to these people. You won’t get my thoughts on this. I have little time in everyday life for idiocy – and even less on social media.”

010

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 01/10/2026

THE regime is HRA compliant given there’s a right to seek consent and a legal framework (esp s6 HRA, but also The EA2010) requiring Councils to consider requests in a manner that is compatible with conv & other rights. The failure to seek any consent should see this argument given short shrift IMV.

000

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

Yes I’ve had similar experiences. It can look like a bit of a signal to the court that one party is very worried indeed!

110

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

As a solicitor who shared her client’s fiduciary duty to local tax payers the option of an expensive star being the first thought was never open to me. Must be a very different mindset! But kudos to those silks who consistently ensured great value for money when we did instruct them.

110

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

I’m serious about this. If a plan, to obstruct fans’ enjoyment of 1 football game by switching off floodlights at a match for £ gain for self & others, sufficed to convict D of common law public nuisance & get a 4 year sentence, then on its face this clearly warrants police attention (RvOng CrA2001)

000

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

Fraudulent or not, I’d personally welcome a police investigation in to alleged public nuisance by systematic & long term obstruction of the right of millions of football fans & their clubs to enjoy football within the FFP rules, resulting in serious distress, annoyance & loss of amenity etc to many.

010

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

I say Common Law because any alleged public nuisance predates the statutory offence, but the wording of the statute is instructive and of course we know from R v Ong [2001] Cr App R (S) 117 that enjoyment of a football game is a right falling within scope of the offence of public nuisance

legislation.gov.uk

Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022

000

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

Agree, also with serious distress, annoyance, inconvenience & loss of amenity caused to a football loving public whose right to enjoy competitive games played by teams built in line with fair play rules will have been systematically obstructed on these findings looks a TWLB like (CL) public nuisance

100

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

At the very least, ideally accompanied by the government Minister who made what we can all see were empty promises to Parliament when proscribing Post mentions removal of his clothing, which is bad enough; but anybody who wears glasses will know how disorienting it is to suddenly be without them.

Yvette Cooper to House of Commons, 23 June 2025:
“It is vitally important that those seeking to protest peacefully, including pro-Palestinian groups, those opposing the actions of the Israeli Government, and those demanding changes in the UK's foreign policy, can continue to do so. The right to peaceful protest is a cornerstone of our democracy. Should Parliament vote to proscribe, that right will be unaffected.”

000

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

Ah, life as a working woman in the 70’s. At 18 I had been a Council officer for 2 years & was told I would not be getting promoted because, although I’d outperformed him, “xxxx just got engaged and they’ll be starting a family” Also at 16 had insurance co. job offer on basis I wldn’t get pregnant

010

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

(I’d just observe that local authority requirements to declare interests etc bringing potential to challenge flawed decisions via judicial review beat the practice of central government hands down. Many members of public still furious about covid contracts would like to see same transparency there)

021

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 30/09/2026

Agenda & minutes of meeting establishing appointment panel are here. Interesting question whether any councillor in receipt of such recent hospitality was required to declare a pecuniary interest & decline to participate & whether any failure(s) to do so impugn decisions subsequently made.

norfolkcc.cmis.uk.com

Meeting Details: Employment Committee Committee - 30 Jul 2026 - 14:00

View the meeting

220

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 29/09/2026

I thought the original problem was having abysmal state pensions compared to much of rest of Europe, so this intended as a fast way to catch up. Not there yet. As a PSL you probably know the impact of below inflation increases, which of course also impact value of certain future private pensions!

110

Ms Anfield Park @msanfieldpark.bsky.social · 29/09/2026

Surely it’s the 2.5% that would be dropped if moving to a double lock? Any freeze or slowdown in pay will prove very divisive in this scenario!

110