iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Governments don’t often set piece opportunities to reset their political and economic messaging. Labour had an opportunity last week. Instead, it reinforced concerns about its approach and comms.

000

The announcement was also overshadowed by the Government’s controversial benefits reforms, which shaped public perception. 58% of people believe the Spring Statement makes disabled people worse off, 50% lower income people worse off.

110

Even before the Spring Statement, polling showed that voters weren’t sure what the way forward is (spend more? less? who knows?). A lack of a clearly defined strategy has impacted the comms and it means voters feel economic policy is directionless.

100

The party promised no tax rises for working people but later pointed to a £22bn “black hole” to justify tax hikes and spending cuts. It just wasn't good enough and has left many voters uncertain about Labour’s economic approach.

100

Labour’s economic messaging has been unclear since taking office. While their 2024 election win was built on the Conservatives' damaged reputation, they have struggled to present a clear vision for recovery.

100

Badenoch’s challenge: Appeal to those sceptical of the 2050 target... without sounding like she’s giving up on Net Zero altogether, because the public are not ready for that (yet!).

000

Labour has a trust advantage on energy policy. If the Tories want to compete, they must offer a credible vision for the UK’s energy future.

100

If Badenoch wants to make serious political capital out of this issue, she needs to shift her emphasis. Less about abandoning Net Zero - more about making it workable.

100

But arguing that Net Zero will harm the economy is trickier. Only 29% agree, while many believe it will have no effect—or even a positive impact.

100

Our latest @opiniumresearch.bsky.social polling shows 57% of Brits (and 71% of Tories) think the 2050 Net Zero target is unachievable. That’s a huge political opening for the sort of thing Badenoch wants to say.

100

Calum Weir @cwp-weir.bsky.social · 27/03/2025

In her speech on the Policy Renewal Programme, Kemi Badenoch made two key claims: 1. The UK can’t reach Net Zero by 2050. 2. The drive for Net Zero will hurt the economy. One resonates strongly with voters. The other? Not so much.

100

Reposted by James Crouch

We are incredibly excited to be launching our 'Global Entrepreneurship Index' later on today in the House of Commons. Thanks to @chriscurtis94.bsky.social and Danielle Dunfield-Prayero - And congrats to @mrjcrouch.bsky.social for his stellar work! Have a nosey!: www.opinium.com/global-entre...

opinium.com

Global Entrepreneurship Index 2025 - Opinium

The Opinium Global Entrepreneurship Index is a annual report into the world’s most attractive markets for starting and growing a business. Covering 137 countries over a 15-year period, our index provi...

012

James Crouch @mrjcrouch.bsky.social · 24/03/2025

Bucatini is my new favourite. When I'm feeling like branching out I go in for radiatori.

210

Labour has already made life harder for itself with how it’s communicated fiscal policy since day one. Benefits reform doesn’t have to continue that pattern. But to turn this around, they need a more credible and politically smarter argument, and fast!

100

So what should Labour do? A few thoughts: > Stop pretending this is just about helping people. Voters expect cuts to be about money... so explain how those savings will be used for something good. > Don’t assume voters will buy the “we’re doing you a favour” argument. They won’t.

100

And politically? Labour is dividing its own side more than its opponents. Labour voters are more opposed to these changes than other groups. If Labour can’t justify the policy to its own supporters, it’s in for a rough ride.

100

For example: > 42% think qualifying for the LCWRA category is difficult. > 49% think qualifying for PIP is difficult. So there’s no real public appetite for making these benefits harder to get. That makes the actual changes a tough sell.

111

Labour is also running into another challenge: public attitudes toward disability benefits don’t create an easy runway for cuts. Many might assume the system is generous, but when we tested specific benefits, most people already think they’re hard to access.

100

That’s a big credibility issue. Labour is saying, “We’re doing this with the best intentions”, but voters see a dire fiscal situation & assume hard-nosed penny pinching. The better approach? Be upfront about the financial pressures & explain how the govt will help in other ways.

100

But here’s the problem: the public doesn’t believe them. We tested some of the rumoured changes with voters last month, and 55% think the main reason for the proposed changes is cost-cutting. Only 27% believe the reforms are genuinely about helping people into work.

100

Keir Starmer is making the moral case for welfare reform, arguing it will help people back into work. Emma Reynolds says the system is “failing young people” by giving them a binary choice: work or not work. Saying it is the right thing for the individuals involved.

100