Sign in

Moritz Kriegleder

@mokriegleder.bsky.social
1.3K followers 1.2K following 231 posts

msc in physics & cognitive science, consciousness & neuroscience, PhD student at @univie.ac.at, my band: distrokid.com/hyperfollow/momoandde…

PostsRepliesMedia
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 05/10/2026
only 7 days to go!
010
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Zefan Zheng @zefanzheng.bsky.social · 14/08/2026
🚨 new paper alert Most consciousness theories are just a specific type of recurrent theory, from the implementation perspective. Out in Physics of Life Reviews: doi.org/10.1016/j.pl... Email me for interests in contributing commentaries (zefan.zheng@rub.de)!!! A 🧵
doi.org
Redirecting
1155
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Its a pleasure to contribute in making this Models of Consciousness conference the biggest edition yet!
2151
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Models of Consciousness @moc7.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Let us introduce ourselves! @wanjawiese.bsky.social, Jonathan Mason, and @mokriegleder.bsky.social make up the Communication Team behind this year's Models of Consciousness conference. By managing the website, social media, emails, and much more, we ensure that #MoC7 will be a success!
181
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
from: theconversation.com/an-ai-lab-sa... #neuroscience #neuroskyence #consci #philsci 🧪
theconversation.com
An AI lab says chatbots have what may be a key feature of consciousness. Are they right? And what now?
Anthropic says there is something lurking inside Claude that looks a lot like the ‘global workspace’ one influential theory of consciousness depends on.
032
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
@timbayne.bsky.social on point in the Claude Global Workspace debate:
130
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 10/07/2026
so evolution and string theory are also not science?
000
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 10/07/2026
yeah fortunately they have written on enough topics to provide an endless stream of reheatable ideas
110
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 10/07/2026
not sure i believe that the demarcation problem has a clear answer
000
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 10/07/2026
How to write a philosophy of neuroscience paper: 1. choose a narrow neuroscience definition 2. argue why the concept is much more complex 3. profit #neuroscience #neuroskyence #consci #philsci 🧪
2246
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 23/06/2026
i think its crucial to understand that any concept can be both underrated and overrated while not making it properly rated. Or as Tomas Nagel (1986) puts it:
020
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Models of Consciousness @moc7.bsky.social · 16/06/2026
Due to many requests, we have decided to extend the abstract submission deadline for #MoC7 to July 5th! This is shaping up to be our biggest conference yet, so submit your work and join us this year in Copenhagen. amcs-community.org/moc7-talk-ap... #neuroscience #neuroskyence #consci #philsci 🧪
Models of Consciousness Conference Overview
0104
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 09/06/2026
If you are in or around Vienna have a look at this amazing interdisciplinary student conference we are organizing this year for the 11th time! thinkcommunity.network/application-...
thinkcommunity.network
Applications 2026: THINK XI – THINK Conference
030
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 11/05/2026
i don't see any argument for scientism here or in his relational QM, but he hints at a neutral monism that could very well fit into dual-aspect view. just like with the measurement problem and wigners friend type experiment he discusses the limits of a 3rd person description without giving an answer
010
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 11/05/2026
I think the headline is overstating the argument, but Rovelli is very much in line with Varelas approach to the explanatory gap as relating to different levels of description and I am very sympathetic to not taking it as a metaphysical statement of substance dualism
100
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 09/05/2026
"The dualism between a first-person description of experience and a third-person (or scientific) account of the same is a normal perspectival difference: the same brain phenomenon as experienced by that same brain itself, or by another." @rovelli.bsky.social www.noemamag.com/there-is-no-...
noemamag.com
There Is No ‘Hard Problem Of Consciousness’ | NOEMA
Consciousness is not separate from the physical world — our “soul” is of the same nature as our body and any other phenomenon of the world.
091
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 09/05/2026
uhh i need to get a copy as well!
000
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
listen to anil!
0121
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 02/04/2026
cant wait to discuss conscious experience in such a stimulating space as the @louisianamuseum.bsky.social!
060
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 24/03/2026
will read it and get back to you!
010
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 23/03/2026
awesome, I was looking forward to that since the talk at ASSC!
110
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 20/03/2026
Excited to co-organize the next edition of @moc7.bsky.social in Denmark!
062
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 18/03/2026
Interesting lineup for the next ECogS conference in Okinawa! www.oist.jp/conference/e...
oist.jp
ECogS 2026
What does embodied cognitive science have to say about recent developments in AI, and what might these developments reveal about the nature and limits of embodied cognition? Under the theme “From Embo...
010
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 09/03/2026
taking the simulation hypothesis seriously is just creationism for tech people.
0103
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 06/02/2026
awesome, will use that for a new draft on indeterminism in LLMs!
111
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Olivia Guest · Ολίβια Γκεστ @olivia.science · 04/10/2025
Third, the peculiar idea that somehow we don't need to read, write, or perform literature reviews anymore; popping up like a satanic mushroom in almost all so-called OK uses of LLMs. Companies writing our papers via their chatbots is not scientific at all. See section 5: doi.org/10.31234/osf... 7/
table 1 extract from Guest, O., & van Rooij, I. (2025, October 4). Critical Artificial Intelligence Literacy for Psychologists. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dkrgj_v15 Ghostwriter in the Machine
A unique selling point of these systems is conversing and writing in a human-like way. This is imminently understandable, although wrong-headed, when one realises these are systems that
essentially function as lossy2
content-addressable memory: when
input is given, the output generated by the model is text that
stochastically matches the input text. The reason text at the output looks novel is because by design the AI product performs
an automated version of what is known as mosaic or patchwork
plagiarism (Baždarić, 2013) — due to the nature of input masking and next token prediction, the output essentially uses similar words in similar orders to what it has been exposed to. This
makes the automated flagging of plagiarism unlikely, which is
also true when students or colleagues perform this type of copypaste and then thesaurus trick, and true when so-called AI plagiarism detectors falsely claim to detect AI-produced text (Edwards, 2023a). This aspect of LLM-based AI products can be
seen as an automation of plagiarism and especially of the research paper mill (Guest, 2025; Guest, Suarez, et al., 2025; van
Rooij, 2022): the “churn[ing] out [of] fake or poor-quality journal papers” (Sanderson, 2024; Committee on Publication Ethics,In addition, who is held accountable if nobody with intent
authored the text? Because while the original data fed into the
system is certainly written with goals, messages, and audiences in
mind jumbling this into ad-libbed word salad removes authorial
intent (Bender et al., 2021). So do the companies who own the
chatbot own the text or do the original authors? These questions
denote legal battles, which are being currently fought in the public eye and which affect all of us in all roles, not just as academics
(Creamer, 2025; Knibbs, 2024; Reuters, 2025). Either way, even if
the courts decide in the favour of companies, we should not allow
these companies with vested interests to write our papers (Fisher
et al., 2025), or to filter what we include in our papers. Because
it is not the case that we only operate based on legal precedents,
but also on our own ethical values and scientific integrity codes
(ALLEA, 2023; KNAW et al., 2018), and we have a direct duty to
protect, as with previous crises and in general, the literature from
pollution. In other words, the same issues as in previous sections
play out here, where essentially now every paper produced using
chatbot output must declare a conflict of interest, since the output text can be biased in subtle or direct ways by the company
who owns the bot (see Table 2).
Seen in the right light — AI products understood as contentaddressable systems — we see that framing the user, the academic
in this case, as the creator of the bot’s output is misplaced. The
input does not cause the output in an authorial sense, much like
input to a library search engine does not cause relevant articles
and books to be written (Guest, 2025). The respective authors
wrote those, not the search query!
213937
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 21/01/2026
but I was asking for other approaches that use POMDPs
000
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 13/01/2026
Mazviita chirimuuta in an interview on her book the brain abstracted outsidecolour.net/wp-content/u...
outsidecolour.net
021
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 13/01/2026
"The more important issue [...] is not that physics is more ‘mature’ but that it deals with inherently simpler objects. [...] the brain and nervous system are exquisitely sensitive to surroundings – as they must be, for without this we could not perceive and respond to the world around us."
172
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 13/01/2026
i love reading open peer review of papers. its like getting a deep dive into methodological issues in the format of academia gossip.
020
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 12/01/2026
how is that connected to my question?
100
Reposted by Moritz Kriegleder
Complexity Cat 🐱 @amahury.bsky.social · 22/12/2025
Happy to share my new paper w/ @cgershen.bsky.social, just published at @royalsocietypublishing.org Interface! Open Access🔓: royalsocietypublishing.org/rsif/article... Instead of proposing a new theory, we offer a synthesis in theoretical biology. Want to know more? Read the full thread./1 👇🧵
royalsocietypublishing.org
Closing the loop: how semantic closure enables open-ended evolution?
Abstract. This study explores the evolutionary emergence of semantic closure—the self-referential mechanism through which symbols actively construct and in
12512
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 23/12/2025
super interesting stuff, you should discuss it with @yoginho.spore.social.ap.brid.gy !
110
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 15/12/2025
you can check out the full comment and the target article here: authors.elsevier.com/a/1mDV85bD-s...
authors.elsevier.com
030
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 15/12/2025
new commentary on embodiment in information systems with Tom Froese! we discuss Pitti et al.'s framework to formalise the embodied mind with information theory and sketch a way to cover the complementary perspective of the lived body and subjective experience as well
2111
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 28/11/2025
i know a couple of people working on AI coding interview data. do you think this could help with the criticism of interviewer bias? i am bit afraid that this will just introduce unexplainable LLM bias
130
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 28/11/2025
could point me to some intro to neuroanthropology? sounds interesting!
120
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 28/11/2025
yes, the seizure studies also got me interested in the methods at first. I think its a good motivation and I don't think we should adapt it to neuroscience, but a methodological pluralism can only be productive when there is some cross-perspectival assessment.
110
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 27/11/2025
I think a way to get them to move beyond simple questionnaires would be a clear example of how it could be useful to them. do you have any favorite studies that used micropheno that could convince them to do the work?
310
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 27/11/2025
i am very interested in experimental phenomenological methods but i am not sure what it takes to convince neuroscientists to pick it up. most neuroscientists i talked to seem to be strong reductionists that stick to exclusively third person methods
110
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 27/11/2025
yeah but since varelas proposal 30 years ago not many neuroscientists have picked them up
110
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 27/11/2025
great intersection, a while ago I shared a plot of how interest in phenomenology soared over the last two decades. we finally need that convergence of neuro and pheno methods!
130
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 27/11/2025
you had good intuition as well ;)
010
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
from the amazing neuroscience database of @thetransmitter.bsky.social stateofneuroscience.thetransmitter.org/map/
stateofneuroscience.thetransmitter.org
Map — State of Neuroscience 2025: Trends & Breakthroughs | The Transmitter
A comprehensive look at major trends shaping the neuroscience landscape in 2025
050
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 26/11/2025
I started my PhD on the philosophy and neuroscience of consciousness in 2022. Even though people advised against it, I think it was good timing.
3191
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 25/11/2025
imagine there would be a way to experimentally study subjective qualities 🤔
020
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 19/11/2025
important point! that criticism applies to a lot of neuroscience of consciousness, most of the theories are more bundles of untested hypotheses
031
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 06/11/2025
oh awesome, I have enough caffeinated drinks to keep me awake so please ask a question!
010
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 06/11/2025
its about integrating incompatible models in climate science and consciousness research in case you want something fun in the night!
100
Moritz Kriegleder @mokriegleder.bsky.social · 06/11/2025
giving a talk at 2 am my time at the @philsci.bsky.social around the world online conference. japan time is the best...
140