iiinova — where your digital self keeps evolving

Reposted by Mike Yeomans

Emily Hu @xehu.bsky.social · 26/07/2025

If you're at @aomconnect.bsky.social #AOM2025, come check out our panel on NLP in organizations, featuring @dholtz.bsky.social, Sameer Srivastava, @williambrady.bsky.social, @mikeyeomans.bsky.social & me! We'll explore topics including hiring, cooperation, agency, and moral outrage -- don't miss it!

022

Mike Yeomans @mikeyeomans.bsky.social · 25/11/2024

Emily Hu starting off the last session at #SJDM with a bang! Text analysis for JDM

041

Reposted by Mike Yeomans

Dan Goldstein @dggoldst.bsky.social · 15/10/2024

Judgment and Decision Making (JDM) starter pack Happy to add you go.bsky.app/8nDKmwG

11812853

Reposted by Mike Yeomans

simine vazire @simine.com · 09/10/2023

Here’s my vision statement from my application for Editor in Chief of Psychological Science. I wrote it before getting the position, my plans & goals are evolving now that I’m getting started. Look out for an opening editorial! sometimesimwrong.typepad.com/wrong/…

sometimesimwrong.typepad.com

my next chapter

i've been selected as the incoming editor in chief of Psychological Science. i am thrilled, humbled, and excited for this next chapter, and very grateful for all the people who invited, accompanied, a...

515958

Reposted by Mike Yeomans

Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 06/10/2023

On further reflection, the selection of @simine.com as Editor-in-Chief of Psychological Science is one of the most important milestones for the reform movement in psychology. There will be impact on the journal, sure. But more, selecting a committed, visible reformer illustrates its normalization.

28616

Reposted by Mike Yeomans

Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 04/10/2023

Open data sharing is a good thing; Protecting participant privacy is a good thing. Sometimes these two good things are in conflict. Our new preprint introduces a decision-making framework and open source tools to help share as openly as possible and as closed as necessary. osf.io/preprints/me...

26635

Reposted by Mike Yeomans

Brian Nosek @briannosek.bsky.social · 02/10/2023

Fraud cases may capture attention, but they remain the exception. The quieter attitudes and actions of the many are incrementally moving science toward greater integrity and rigor. The visibility of fraud and other antagonism-to-open may contribute to underestimating the support for open science.

28827

Mike Yeomans @mikeyeomans.bsky.social · 01/10/2023

IMO, reproducibility is an objective and uncontroversial benefit for everyone... and yes, Journals should require and confirm it. But authors must also invest more time making reproduction EASY for others (ie not just possible). We can't push all this work onto overworked journals.

050

Reposted by Mike Yeomans

Daniel Lakens @lakens.bsky.social · 01/10/2023

A plea from Steve Lindsay to psychology professional societies that publish journals: Assess computational reproducibility open.lnu.se/index.php/me...

1207