Sign in

Mike Goldfien

@mikegoldfien.bsky.social
217 followers 199 following 21 posts

Political science & IR | Fomerly Yale, Stanford, Grinnell College | Views my own | mgoldfien.com

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Mike Goldfien
LSE US Politics and Policy blog - USAPP @lseusablog.bsky.social · 10/09/2026
Domestic policy choices can build trust between rival nations write @mikegoldfien.bsky.social , @profmickeyj.bsky.social and Roseanne McManus of @pennstateuniv.bsky.social blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/20...
blogs.lse.ac.uk
011
Reposted by Mike Goldfien
profmickeyj.bsky.social @profmickeyj.bsky.social · 09/06/2026
@monikanalepa.bsky.social was an amazing editor! @hongding-zhu.bsky.social, @soyounglee.bsky.social, @andrewkydd.bsky.social, @tjroehrig.bsky.social B Yoder, and C Glaser and the reviewers dramatically improved the paper! Thanks so much!
051
Mike Goldfien @mikegoldfien.bsky.social · 08/06/2026
Excited that my article with @profmickeyj.bsky.social and #Roseanne_McManus, “The Domestic Sources of International Trust,” is now published as FirstView in @apsrjournal.bsky.social! Here is a brief summary.
163
Reposted by Mike Goldfien
Drew Stommes @drewstommes.bsky.social · 27/01/2026
After years in academia, I’m exploring data science and research roles in industry. I'm a quant. social scientist (PhD Yale ’24, NYU) focused on causal inference, experiments, and large-scale data. Feel free to get in touch or share; all leads appreciated. dwstommes@gmail.com
03120
Reposted by Mike Goldfien
Jeff Colgan @jeffcolgan.bsky.social · 29/10/2025
Come work with me and the great climate community at Brown University, incl @jenniferhadden.bsky.social @timmonsroberts.bsky.social Please share widely! Deadline Jan 9, 2026.
01412
Mike Goldfien @mikegoldfien.bsky.social · 28/10/2025
Excited that my article, "To Agree or Not to Agree: Hawks, Doves, and Regime Type in International Rivalry and Rapprochement," is now out at International Security. @intsecurity.bsky.social @mitpress.bsky.social @belfercenter.bsky.social. direct.mit.edu/isec/article...
direct.mit.edu
To Agree or Not to Agree: Hawks, Doves, and Regime Type in International Rivalry and Rapprochement
Abstract. Existing scholarship emphasizes hawks’ advantages in making peace, but it is squarely focused on electorally accountable leaders, even though most international rivalries feature at least on...
2219
Reposted by Mike Goldfien
Amanda Pearson @pearson-edits.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
Fall 2025 issue preview @intsecurity.bsky.social! M. Trachtenberg | rules-based international order @aaronbateman.bsky.social | U.S. space power @ajmount.bsky.social | conventional deterrence of nuclear use DJ Kim | clients’ demand evasion @mikegoldfien.bsky.social | hawks, doves, & rapprochement
0165
Mike Goldfien @mikegoldfien.bsky.social · 21/10/2025
Thrilled to be part of such a great looking issue!
092
Mike Goldfien @mikegoldfien.bsky.social · 28/03/2024
Happy Opening Day!
010
Reposted by Mike Goldfien
Joshua Kertzer @jkertzer.bsky.social · 08/02/2024
New in @iojournal.bsky.social w Jost @ericmin.bsky.social & Schub: We combine computational methods with uniquely rich Cold War archival evidence to study how advisers matter in foreign policy. Where advisers stand doesn't just depend on where they sit. www.cambridge.org/core/journal... polisky
Do advisers affect foreign policy and, if so, how? Recent scholarship on
elite decision making prioritizes leaders and the institutions that surround them, rather than the dispositions of advisers themselves. We argue that despite the hierarchical nature of foreign policy decision making, advisers’ predispositions regarding the use of
force shape state behavior through the counsel advisers provide in deliberations. To test our argument, we introduce an original data set of 2,685 foreign policy deliberations between US presidents and their advisers from 1947 to 1988. Applying a novel machine learning approach to estimate the hawkishness of 1,134 Cold War–era
foreign policy decision makers, we show that adviser-level hawkishness affects both the counsel that advisers provide in deliberations and the decisions leaders make: conflictual policy choices grow more likely as hawks increasingly dominate the debate, even when accounting for leader dispositions...
35419
Mike Goldfien @mikegoldfien.bsky.social · 20/12/2023
Read it, cite it, love it!
010
Reposted by Mike Goldfien
Ariel Zellman @arielzellman.bsky.social · 20/12/2023
An outstanding piece of work by a brilliant young scholar. Everyone working on territorial politics should be paying close attention to @soyounglee.bsky.social!
121
Reposted by Mike Goldfien
Soyoung Lee @soyounglee.bsky.social · 20/12/2023
🥳Yay, this paper's now officially out! Available open access👇 cup.org/3GTQ99X #polisky, intsec, nationalisky
1308
Reposted by Mike Goldfien
Cleo O'Brien-Udry @cobrienudry.bsky.social · 13/12/2023
Two more days to submit proposals for SWIPE! When: April 12 Where: Penn What: Supporting Women in International Political Economy Who: Post-PhD, pre-tenure women Deadline: Dec 15 Apply: forms.gle/xw3CHfbP2yYo...
The one-day conference has three primary aims: 1) present innovative work on international
political economy, 2) create opportunities for networking and feedback within and across levels
of seniority, 3) provide space to articulate challenges (and strategies for addressing these
challenges) particular to women (and non-binary) scholars working in IPE. By connecting
women at different stages of their careers, the conference will help foster new connections
and conversations about career advancement and opportunities in the field of IPE.
The conference will feature panels of junior scholars with senior discussants, a roundtable
on academic careers in IPE, and happy hour and dinner for informal conversations.
Submissions: We are soliciting submissions on topics in international political economy
from junior (defined as post-PhD, pre-tenure) women and non-binary scholars. Submissions
may take the form of an extended abstract or full draft; preference will be given to full drafts.
0812
Mike Goldfien @mikegoldfien.bsky.social · 30/10/2023
Important statement from Amaney Jamal and Keren Yarhi-Milo: "Campuses must protect free speech, but equally advocate for mutually respectful dialogue...There is no better place for these discussions than a university campus. But sponsoring this kind of debate takes courage."
nytimes.com
Opinion | The Conversations About the War in Gaza We Ought to Be Having
Universities should not retreat into their ivory towers because the discourse has gotten toxic; a retreat into the ivory tower will encourage even more toxic discourse.
074
Reposted by Mike Goldfien
Sarah Bush @sarahbush.bsky.social · 27/10/2023
Polisky! With @danieladonno.bsky.social @parzetterberg.bsky.social, we are excited to share this new open access article in the American Political Science Review. Can autocrats burnish a reputation for democracy by advancing women’s rights? www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
cambridge.org
International Rewards for Gender Equality Reforms in Autocracies | American Political Science Review...
International Rewards for Gender Equality Reforms in Autocracies
27524
Mike Goldfien @mikegoldfien.bsky.social · 20/10/2023
Hey @profmusgrave.bsky.social could I please be added to the Polisky list? Thanks very much!
040
Reposted by Mike Goldfien
Good Authority @goodauth.bsky.social · 17/10/2023
We know you've heard "unprecedented" a lot the last few weeks. In this piece, @profsaunders.bsky.social goes long on how US President Biden's trip to Israel is -- in fact -- unprecedented, highlighting similar trips and also telling us why this one is so different. goodauthority.org/news/biden-w...
goodauthority.org
Biden will visit Israel during a war. That’s unprecedented.
President Joe Biden will visit Israel on Wednesday, Oct. 18, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced in remarks after nine hours of meetings and
22915
Reposted by Mike Goldfien
Theo Milonopoulos @theomilo.bsky.social · 12/10/2023
In Foreign Affairs, , I argue the Senate standoff over Defense Department nominations forces an overreliance on acting officials, politicizes the military promotions process, & threatens to undermine civilian control over the armed forces (1/12) www.foreignaffairs.com/united-state...
foreignaffairs.com
Paralysis in the Pentagon
A standoff in the Senate is undermining civilian control of the military.
32618
Reposted by Mike Goldfien
Jess Blankshain @profjessblankshain.bsky.social · 12/10/2023
In Foreign Affairs, @theomilo.bsky.social argues the Senate standoff over Defense Department nominations forces an overreliance on acting officials, politicizes the military promotions process, & threatens to undermine civilian control over the armed forces. www.foreignaffairs.com/united-state...
foreignaffairs.com
Paralysis in the Pentagon
A standoff in the Senate is undermining civilian control of the military.
044