Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 2mTired: K01 and AHA Career Development Award plus groveling to industry and/or philanthropy. Wired: I submit 2–3 long-shot parlays every week on Kalshi, hoping that something hits. Wonder where the odds are more favorable 010
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 4mThis is how I plan on telling prospective employers that I will fund my research. 100
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 30/09/2026Here’s a gift link too! Lot of great anecdotes in here from @sherylnyt.bsky.social The officials who were supposed to attend who last minute were not there is also interesting… www.nytimes.com/2026/09/29/h...nytimes.comA.I. Is ‘Better Informed’ Than Doctors, Kennedy Tells Industry-Backed MAHA Summit (Gift Article)The health secretary, Vice President JD Vance and other top officials addressed a conference sponsored by corporations, including A.I. companies and others with business before the government. 121
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 30/09/2026Meanwhile most people I know are more worried about access, not “tyranny” 061
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 30/09/2026Free people from “medical tyranny” certainly is an interesting message… Medicine is classically a field that is only bound by information. I’m sure “super intelligence” in its current form will save us! 284
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 30/09/2026Other thing that’s insane about this stuff is “protecting” girls doesn’t involve things like I dunno… Pay equity and investment in women’s sports, services at school, supporting their tired parents, etc. Exhausting rhetoric! 110
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 30/09/2026At this point gotta just write a strong proposal and shrug your shoulders 010
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 29/09/2026We can bring Midwest slander into the convo to further my East Coast supremacy agenda. 100
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 29/09/2026I’m turning this into East Coast v. West Coast beef on purpose 🦹🏾♂️🦹🏾♂️🦹🏾♂️ 130
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 29/09/2026Man what do yall got going on over on the West coast?? 1126
Reposted by Michael D. Green, PhDSheryl Gay Stolberg @sherylnyt.bsky.social · 29/09/2026BIG MAHA SUMMIT today at Waldorf-Astoria. Vance and RFK Jr. will speak. I was denied a press credential due to. “limited space. “Here I am getting turned away. I’m 5 feet tall. I don’t take up that much space. 511023
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 28/09/2026are patients going to see enough positive benefits from layering this stuff on a broken system? Are the increased costs worth the results? www.notbeinggreen.com/p/curing-all... 050
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 28/09/2026Tooting my own horn here, this is what I was getting at in my essay from last month. Yes, there’s a lot of cool ~theoretical~ applications of AI in healthcare. Long term I’m sure many of those could be great. In the interim…open.substack.comCuring all diseases does not mean all people will get carePeople are using AI for medical advice, but are AI companies ready to accept our messy healthcare reality? 140
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 28/09/2026Study from Blue Cross Blue Shield indicates that using AI is increasing billing for hospital systems. Most of those costs are coming from increased secondary diagnosis. Costs going up for patients and consumers, not exactly what people were looking for! www.bcbs.com/about-us/ass... 160
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 27/09/2026This is on me for believing again, this game is COOKED 010
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 27/09/2026I’m begging the Chargers offense to wake up. BEGGING 000
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 27/09/2026I was lying 🙈🙈🙈. Looks like they are gonna make me quit again though 010
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 27/09/2026Justin Herbert please save us offense once again 100
Reposted by Michael D. Green, PhDMathew Kiang @mathewkiang.com · 26/09/2026Ooof—I'm not even getting invited to the fake societies... 041
Reposted by Michael D. Green, PhDDrishti Pillai, PhD, MPH @drishp.bsky.social · 26/09/2026New brief by @kff.org discusses how changes to demographic data collection proposed in the decennial census could impact federal funding, research on health disparities, and lead to shifts in political representation. www.kff.org/racial-equit...kff.orgProposed Changes to Demographic Data Collection in the Census Could Impact Efforts to Address Health and Health Care Disparities | KFFThis issue brief provides an overview of the decennial census and discusses potential implications of the changes outlined in a September 2026 proposed rule to prohibit the collection of race and ethn... 221
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 26/09/2026Lmao no, it’s people who are just copy-pasting thoughts from AI to others. Simply a vessel to spew AI slop out into the world with no original thoughts. 110
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 26/09/2026those people in that camp (ppl who are against AI use because they have a strong conviction about how they describe their reasoning) to be more involved in the convo. Similarly I’m happy you shared your experience of where AI is clearly helping your work while not flooding the world with slop. 000
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 26/09/2026The anti-AI folks (I think) have a pocket of the group who will be big winners. Especially students. This is mainly b/c I’m skeptical that “AI-native training” is a thing that translates well across a lot of disciplines. I trust people who are great thinkers to pick up AI later. Wld luv 2 see… 100
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 26/09/2026please please please please do not be a meat proxy. I have more lenience with students and trainees around this because they are figuring out things. For established folks, do you really think that offloading your thinking to whatever version of Claude or ChatGPT we are on is sustainable? 120
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 26/09/2026imo debates around AI use are often not nuanced. Usually 2 diametrically opposed views in a standoff as we all navigate our slop filled world. I also find myself reading less because of the sheer volume of nonsense I come across. Incentives and culture around this need to change. @stephenturner.us 271
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 26/09/2026Gain-of-function research alarmists are still quite silent on the whole AI companies letting their software terrorize the internet thing… 031
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 25/09/2026“If he’s a good researcher why can’t he ask good questions” Like the approach! Congrats on the future championship 000
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 25/09/2026Wonder what’s the right way to realign incentives to stop this (especially in medicine)? Ppl are still evaluating students, job candidates, etc. by output volume and journal “quality”. Personally don’t think it’s gonna change until there’s a push for evaluating ppl on a very narrow output. 100
Reposted by Michael D. Green, PhDPrasad Jallepalli, MD, PhD @prasad.bsky.social · 24/09/2026“1st, rather than cut NIH by nearly 40 percent, as the OMB proposed last year, we should double its $48 billion budget within five years. These are big numbers, but if they yield discoveries that trim the nation’s $5.3 trillion health bill by just 1 percent, they will more than pay for themselves.” 12514
Reposted by Michael D. Green, PhDAlexander Tsai, MD @drdrtsai.bsky.social · 23/09/2026"The reason I serve [on review panels] is that the act of reviewing the proposed work of peers defines what kind of system we would like to build and transform. The system is imperfect, but it has at its core something non-negotiable - the involvement of independent scientists as essential..." 052
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 22/09/2026People who never filed a claim, famously the group of people you least want enrolled in your health insurance plan. 👍👍👍👍 081
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 21/09/2026Hmmm so now the WH (known truth tellers) are saying this dispute did not happen, and JB + NIH folks don’t have comments to provide. When there’s smoke there’s fire! 284
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 21/09/2026More ppl joining the fight against the dismantling of the NIH I see. Welcome aboard! 1308
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 21/09/2026Seeing the ship is sinking in September 2026, opposed to I dunno March 2026 like the vast majority of us is… Idk, I guess you only get a few chances to hitch your credibility to something you perceive as powerful. It didn’t need to happen like this though! Especially b/c the plans were telegraphed! 110
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 21/09/2026I will be checking out on my team until they show me a reason I should believe in them again ✌🏽✌🏽. Relegating them to a quad box without sound on my Sunday multiview (I’ve watched every game the past ~8 years). 000
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 20/09/2026One of my largest gripes with leaders in this moment is where is the evidence that supports claims around the “war on science” subsiding? You tell your students, staff, and faculty to put their heads down and stay the course as the future of their field and work are being undermined. Maddening! 15112
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 20/09/2026Major credit to @sherylnyt.bsky.social and team at @nytimes.com for the reporting here! 030
Michael D. Green, PhD @michaeldgreen.phd · 20/09/2026Bare minimum for leading the NIH imo, but I’ll take it… 010