Sign in

Max Taylor-Davies

@maxtaylordavies.bsky.social
169 followers 424 following 15 posts

phd student building computational models of social cognition + culture @ UoE 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 prev imperial, ucl, inria, vu maxtaylordavi.es

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Experimental Philosophy @xphilosopher.bsky.social · 24/09/2026
There hasn’t been enough discussion in philosophy of this wonderful research by April Bailey (@ahbailey.bsky.social) She provides a mountain of evidence for the claim that people see MEN as the prototype of the category of human beings www.researchgate.net/profile/Apri...
0238
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Dan Davies @dsquareddigest.bsky.social · 13/09/2026
Starting my new job tomorrow at the Anthropic Safety & Alignment Team. I'm going to be "head of making sure all the probabilities of scenarios add up to 1". tbh I'm already sensing some animosity in the company chat, almost like some people don't want me to be there.
613726
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Kunal Jha @kjha02.bsky.social · 11/09/2026
Can self-interested, self-improving, self-replicating agents learn to cooperate? Our new paper, Tapes Together Strong, shows they can: when social behavior, computation, and reproduction share one energy budget, cooperation evolves from scratch. arxiv.org/abs/2609.10817 🧵
48418
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Sun Woo Kim @sunwoopkim.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
Don't you hate trying to organise a 3-way meeting between academics that live in 3 different timezones? Well, I did. Here's a tool to visualise multiple timezones + dates at the same time (vibe-coded with lots torturing of LLM to get precisely what I wanted). sunwoo-kim.github.io/tools/timesy...
sunwoo-kim.github.io
timesync
162
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Jon Phillips @jowiph.bsky.social · 21/08/2026
Gad Saad isn't the worst of the race science crew in terms of how much harm he's managed to do, but he may well be the most personally loathsome
3215
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Rebecca Sear @rebeccasear.bsky.social · 14/08/2026
New paper in our special collection on scientific racism: Hereditarians consistently fail to engage with academic research, not just in genetics but also social science. @jonathanrgoodman.bsky.social explains how they largely ignore the social brain hypothesis for the evolution of intelligence
doi.org
How the social brain hypothesis undermines hereditarianism | Evolutionary Human Sciences | Cambridge Core
How the social brain hypothesis undermines hereditarianism
27849
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Kartik Chandra @kartikchandra.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
It's the Great Sally-Anne Test in the Sky
An infographic from the New York Times describing a security measure where the US president publicly boarded one plane and then was secretly moved to a second plane.
0111
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
lauren @lauren.rotatingsandwiches.com · 09/08/2026
if they're drinking nounwine it's fantasy. if they're snorting a verb it's sci fi
154128883254
Max Taylor-Davies @maxtaylordavies.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
🍄 New paper out in PLOS Computational Biology! 🍄 I, and others, have previously drawn a comparison between the classic “cost-avoidance” argument for social learning and the central idea of resource rationality... (1/8)
2177
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
tadegquillien.bsky.social @tadegquillien.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
You roll a fair die, hoping to get a 6. If you are successful, did you *intentionally* roll a 6? In a new paper, I explain why people hesitate to call lucky outcomes intentional:🧵 direct.mit.edu/opmi/article...
22213
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Open Mind @openmindjournal.bsky.social · 06/07/2026
Luck and Intentional Action: A Causal Account
direct.mit.edu
Luck and Intentional Action: A Causal Account
Abstract. Can you perform an action intentionally if there was only a small chance your action would succeed? Researchers studying the folk concept of intentional action have documented complex…
097
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Manikya Alister @manikyaalister.bsky.social · 09/06/2026
One of the first studies from my PhD is out now in JEP:G 🥳We tested whether people can infer the truth from teachers who were either helpful, misleading, or randomly sampling. With Keith Ransom and @perfors.net psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
Title of paper: When a Helpful Bias Is Unhelpful: Limitations in Reasoning
About Random and Deliberately Misleading Evidence
Abstract: Social information aids learning: By making assumptions about other people’s knowledge and intentions,
people can draw strong and accurate inferences from limited data. In this study, we systematically tested
people’s ability to reason from information providers with different intentions. The task was an adaptation of
Shafto et al.’s (2014) rectangle game, where learners guessed a rectangle’s size and location based on
provided clues. We examined reasoning based on information from four types of providers: a helpful
provider, a provider who sampled randomly, and two misleading providers (who could mislead but not lie).
We also varied whether people were given a cover story describing the provider in advance or whether they
could infer how helpful a provider was based on what the provider shared. Participants learned efficiently
from helpful providers, aligning closely with the predictions of a normative Bayesian model, even without a
cover story. However, while people usually recognized unhelpful providers, they struggled to identify and
respond appropriately to misleading strategies. Overall, our results suggest a helpful bias: In our task,
participants assumed helpful intent unless given explicit feedback, and even then, they did not fully adjust in
line with Bayesian predictions. People also struggled to overcome this bias when learning from randomly
sampled information, especially when they had experience being an information provider themselves
(Experiment 3).
1398
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Marius Mercier @mariusmercier.bsky.social · 04/06/2026
New paper accepted as a proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society: "Inferring arithmetic skills from speed and accuracy”! We tested whether people were optimal in their inference of others' math skills. doi.org/10.31234/osf...
22112
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Kale-ab Tessera @kale-ab.bsky.social · 25/05/2026
As we build more cooperative multi-agent envs, we should ask: are we really testing the properties that make Dec-POMDPs hard, partial observability and decentralised coordination, or can agents succeed via shortcuts? 🤔 Our #AAMAS2026 Oral probes this question 🔎🧵
3165
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Rebecca Sear @rebeccasear.bsky.social · 24/05/2026
Hey Claude, if you ever want to get into the academic publishing business, the Journal of Controversial Ideas and Theory & Society would LOVE to hear from you
0265
Max Taylor-Davies @maxtaylordavies.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
very happy that this is finally out!
020
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
tadegquillien.bsky.social @tadegquillien.bsky.social · 06/05/2026
Our new paper with @maxtaylordavies.bsky.social introduces a resource-rational model of Theory of Mind. The model can explain many of the successes and failures of mindreading in human adults and children, and non-human primates. 🧵 royalsocietypublishing.org/rspb/article...
royalsocietypublishing.org
Factive mindreading reflects the optimal use of limited cognitive resources
Abstract. The capacity to represent the mental states of other individuals, known as ‘mindreading’ or ‘theory of mind’, is key to successful social predict
24726
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Nate O @nateo.bsky.social · 30/04/2026
Will 100s of UK profs that signed statements supporting Stock due to the falsely claimed suppression of her speech by Sussex express outrage over being lied to in order to (1) further the career of Stock and (2) force unis to remove statements protecting trans faculty/students from harassment?
10389120
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Marius Mercier @mariusmercier.bsky.social · 30/03/2026
Thrilled to share that our new paper is now out in @cognitionjournal.bsky.social: "Who knows what? Bayesian Competence Inference guides Knowledge Attribution and Information Search," with @oliviermorin.bsky.social , @hugoreasoning.bsky.social & @tadegquillien.bsky.social! Link: tinyurl.com/ykyhxcc6
35825
Max Taylor-Davies @maxtaylordavies.bsky.social · 21/02/2026
Grateful to the CiCL folks for some super interesting discussion!
020
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Manikya Alister @manikyaalister.bsky.social · 20/01/2026
Most popular decision-making models assume that cognitive processes are static over time. In our new paper in Psych Review, we offer a simple extension to evidence accumulation models that lets researchers account for systematic changes in parameters across time 📈 psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/202...
1289
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Clément Moulin-Frier @clemmoulinfrier.bsky.social · 08/10/2025
3 papers from @flowersinria team are presented this week at the @alife2025.bsky.social , leveraging curiosity-driven AI to explore complex behaviors in #Lenia All first authors are attending the conference if you want to discuss with them. Link to interactive websites, papers and code below:
183
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Bonan Zhao (赵博囡) @bonan.bsky.social · 17/08/2025
My Lab at the University of Edinburgh🇬🇧 has funded PhD positions for this cycle! We study the computational principles of how people learn, reason, and communicate. It's a new lab, and you will be playing a big role in shaping its culture and foundations. Spread the words!
25721
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Jake Quilty-Dunn @quiltydunn.bsky.social · 10/08/2025
"the computational metaphor" in cognitive science is not a metaphor. computational processes are attributed to the mind/brain in the most dead-literal sense. one can disagree with it but (1) it's not as simple as discarding a metaphor and (2) boy is there a lot of data that has to be explained!
5528
Max Taylor-Davies @maxtaylordavies.bsky.social · 01/08/2025
At #CogSci2025 and curious about resource-rational models of social cognition? Come to Nob Hill A at 11:14 tomorrow to hear me talk about work with @tadegquillien.bsky.social where we use the information bottleneck to study stereotype use and the outgroup homogeneity bias!
1265
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Neil Bramley @neilbramley.bsky.social · 24/06/2025
Just out in Cognitive Psychology Lossy encoding of distributions in judgment under uncertainty By @tadegquillien.bsky.social , me & Chris Lucas www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... We find people's 'best guesses' sneakily encode distribution information that guesser & others can reconstruct later
sciencedirect.com
Lossy encoding of distributions in judgment under uncertainty
People often make judgments about uncertain facts and events, for example ‘Germany will win the world cup’. Judgment under uncertainty is often studie…
0317
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
tadegquillien.bsky.social @tadegquillien.bsky.social · 31/03/2025
Our new paper with Max Taylor-Davies introduces a resource-rational model of Theory of Mind. The model can explain many of the successes and failures of mindreading in human adults and children, and non-human primates. 🧵
26120
Reposted by Max Taylor-Davies
Clément Moulin-Frier @clemmoulinfrier.bsky.social · 12/05/2025
Very happy that our paper received both the EvoApps best paper and the EvoStar best student paper! Congrats team!! Emergent Kin Selection of Altruistic Feeding via Non-Episodic Neuroevolution arxiv.org/abs/2411.10536
arxiv.org
Emergent kin selection of altruistic feeding via non-episodic neuroevolution
Kin selection theory has proven to be a popular and widely accepted account of how altruistic behaviour can evolve under natural selection. Hamilton's rule, first published in 1964, has since been exp...
0104