Sign in

Mads Andreas Elkjær

@madselk.bsky.social
446 followers 169 following 18 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Mads Andreas Elkjær
World Politics @worldpolitics.bsky.social · 22/04/2026
It's time for another Encode/Decode! @madselk.bsky.social, @benansell.bsky.social, Laure Bokobza, @aslicansunar.bsky.social, @mhaslberger.bsky.social, & @jacobnyrup.bsky.social use original #survey #data to explore #inheritance #taxation and its impact on #wealth #inequality: doi.org/10.1353/wp.2...
Marginal Inheritance Tax Rates by Multiple of GDP Per Capita in Eighteen Advanced Democracies
067
Reposted by Mads Andreas Elkjær
Lukas Haffert @lhaffert.bsky.social · 13/04/2026
I am looking for a postdoc to join my team at the University of Bremen. 5-year-contract, top-up to 100% possible for most of the contract period. Apply by 04 May 2026. If you have questions about the position, send me an email! www.uni-bremen.de/en/universit...
uni-bremen.de
Job Vacancies - Universität Bremen
Offene Stellen
07277
Reposted by Mads Andreas Elkjær
Nuffield College Library @nuffieldlibrary.bsky.social · 06/03/2026
Tax exposure and political preferences doi.org/10.1093/ser/... Paper in Socio-Economic Review by @nuffieldcollege.bsky.social Fellow @benansell.bsky.social, Asli Cansunar and Mads Andreas Elkjær
doi.org
Tax exposure and political preferences
Abstract. How do people form preferences over tax policy proposals? This article introduces the concept of tax exposure to explain the determinants of tax
043
Reposted by Mads Andreas Elkjær
Henning Finseraas @finseraas.bsky.social · 12/02/2026
We have a vacant position as Associate Professor in Political Science (International Relations). Deadline April 29. Please apply or distribute. www.jobbnorge.no/en/available...
jobbnorge.no
ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR IN POLITICAL SCIENCE (294884) | NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Job title: ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR IN POLITICAL SCIENCE (294884), Employer: NTNU - Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Deadline: Wednesday, April 29, 2026
01828
Reposted by Mads Andreas Elkjær
Matthias Haslberger @mhaslberger.bsky.social · 28/01/2026
Thrilled to see our paper (with @madselk.bsky.social and @benansell.bsky.social) out in West European Politics!
0123
Reposted by Mads Andreas Elkjær
Matthias Haslberger @mhaslberger.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
Just out in @wepsocial.bsky.social: how housing wealth shapes whether people feel heard. Together with @madselk.bsky.social and @benansell.bsky.social, I looked at a neglected determinant of political efficacy: homeownership. Read the #OA paper: doi.org/10.1080/0140... Quick overview below (1/5)
doi.org
Homeownership and political efficacy: how housing wealth shapes whether people feel heard
Why do some citizens feel that political institutions are responsive to people like them, while others do not? Existing research highlights the role of education and income in shaping external poli...
22611
Reposted by Mads Andreas Elkjær
Nuffield College Library @nuffieldlibrary.bsky.social · 26/01/2026
Homeownership and political efficacy: how housing wealth shapes whether people feel heard doi.org/10.1080/0140... Paper in @wepsocial.bsky.social by Associate Member @mhaslberger.bsky.social, @madselk.bsky.social and @nuffieldcollege.bsky.social Fellow @benansell.bsky.social
doi.org
Browse all journals
Browse all journals
043
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 09/09/2025
We've talked to the team at @worldpolitics.bsky.social about our recent paper on inheritance taxation. This is what came out of it. Have a look!
0155
Reposted by Mads Andreas Elkjær
World Politics @worldpolitics.bsky.social · 27/08/2025
Figure 3 from "Why is it so Hard to Counteract Wealth Inequality" illustrates how people with low #wealth are much less likely to have an opinion about #inheritance #taxation than people with high wealth @madselk.bsky.social @benansell.bsky.social @aslicansunar.bsky.social @mhaslberger.bsky.social
1156
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
@benansell.bsky.social @aslicansunar.bsky.social @mhaslberger.bsky.social @jacobnyrup.bsky.social
000
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
If anything, the electoral incentives point to further lowering a tax that is highly unpopular among those who hold opinions, families of homeowners. Countering wealth inequality through inheritance taxation is thus likely to be electorally very challenging for governments 13/13
130
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
Our findings help make sense of why governments don’t do more to address wealth inequality: since those who should be most supportive of inheritance taxation hold either no or ambivalent preferences, governments lack strong electoral incentives to implement higher taxes 12/n
110
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
And while information on how higher taxes can increase equality of opportunity had little impact, arguments that the inheritance tax is a 'death' or 'double' tax lowered support for higher taxes 11/n
100
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
These treatments lowered “don’t know” answers among low-wealth individuals and also affected support for inheritance taxation. Information that higher inheritance taxation could lead to lower income taxes or better public goods provisions increased support for the tax 10/n
100
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
In a follow-up survey, we therefore implemented much more direct treatments that informed respondents about some of the most popular arguments for and against inheritance taxation 9/n
100
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
First, we test the effect of statistical information about house prices. We find no effect of our treatments, suggesting that factual information about wealth inequality does address the root cause of why some respondents are unable to formulate views on inheritance taxation 8/n
100
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
In a second step, we assess whether different kinds of information can help low-wealth individuals to express an opinion consistent with their material interest in higher inheritance taxes 7/n
100
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
It helps explain why governments, despite high and rising levels of wealth inequality, have not done more to alleviate it: Public opinion is disproportionately driven by informed and mobilized families of homeowners, who support low inheritance taxes 6/n
121
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
Combined, these findings raise what we call "the paradox of inheritance taxation": the people who would stand to benefit the most from higher inheritance taxes are those least likely to be informed and hold an opinion on the issue 5/n
100
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
Whereas about only 2 in 5 low-wealth individuals expressed an opinion in our surverys, about 19 of 20 high-wealth individuals did. AND not only were respondents of high wealth more likely to express an opinion, they also supported lower inheritance taxes 4/n
100
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
Crucially for the electoral politics of inheritance taxation, individuals from families of low wealth (renters and their children) were much less likely to register an opinion compared to those from high-wealth families (homeowners and their children) 3/n
100
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
A core reason governments are reluctant to counteract wealth inequality through inheritance taxation, we argue, is that many people have never thought much about their views of the tax. In our surveys of the UK, about 40% answered “don’t know” to our questions about it 2/n
100
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 26/08/2025
Did you ever wonder why governments don’t do more to counteract wealth inequality? In our new @worldpolitics.bsky.social article, we seek to answer this question, studying the electoral politics of inheritance taxation muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/articl... 1/n
muse.jhu.edu
Project MUSE - Why is it so Hard to Counteract Wealth Inequality? Evidence from the United Kingdom
42212
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 17/07/2025
Our paper (w/ @cbwlezien.bsky.social) is now in print! Perhaps of interest to survey researchers contemplating whether/how to use the DK response option when measuring the public's policy preferences. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
cambridge.org
Estimating public opinion from surveys: the impact of including a “don't know” response option in policy preference questions | Political Science Research and Methods | Cambridge Core
Estimating public opinion from surveys: the impact of including a “don't know” response option in policy preference questions - Volume 13 Issue 3
073
Reposted by Mads Andreas Elkjær
Kevin Collins @kwcollins.bsky.social · 15/07/2025
Really fantastic contribution by @madselk.bsky.social and @cbwlezien.bsky.social for applied researchers thinking about how to write questions. Attentive to respondent user experience by specific mode, differences across topics, and implications for substantive research findings
1185
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 07/07/2025
Haha men lidt grotesk alligevel :)
000
Mads Andreas Elkjær @madselk.bsky.social · 07/07/2025
På trods af jeg underviser i statskundskab på KU og bedømmer dusinvis af opgaver hvert semester er jeg tilsyneladende ikke god nok til at blive en del af det danske censorkorps. Men jeg kan jo altid søge igen til februar 2029..
210