Sign in

Maddy Jalbert

@maddyjalbert.bsky.social
4K followers 134 following 32 posts

Assistant Professor @WWU. I study misinformation correction and how people make judgments of truth. Otherwise probably in the mountains. She/her

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Maddy Jalbert
Center for an Informed Public @cip.uw.edu · 11/08/2025
Check out "The persuasive potential of AI-paraphrased information at scale," an open-access article exploring "AIPasta," written by a team of @cip.uw.edu researchers led by @dashsaloni.bsky.social with co-authors @yiweixu.bsky.social, @maddyjalbert.bsky.social and @emmaspiro.bsky.social ⤵️
099
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
I think perceptions of how common the behavior is is part of the mechanism proposed in the original paper but really need to go back in and do a closer read of it! Definitely agree that they’re connected judgments though.
010
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 12/08/2025
The repetition/moral condemnation work is nice. Recommend the original Effron & Raj (2020) piece and this Pillai et al (2023) extension - note that it’s following up on the finding for judgments of the news itself, not sharing pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37428445/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Repeatedly Encountered Descriptions of Wrongdoing Seem More True but Less Unethical: Evidence in a Naturalistic Setting - PubMed
When news about moral transgressions goes viral on social media, the same person may repeatedly encounter identical reports about a wrongdoing. In a longitudinal experiment (<i>N</i> = 607 U.S. adults...
120
Reposted by Maddy Jalbert
Saloni Dash @dashsaloni.bsky.social · 24/07/2025
Excited to announce that my paper "The persuasive potential of AI-paraphrased information at scale" with my wonderful collaborators @yiweixu.bsky.social, @maddyjalbert.bsky.social, and @emmaspiro.bsky.social has been published at PNAS Nexus! Link: academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/ar...
academic.oup.com
The persuasive potential of AI-paraphrased information at scale
Abstract. In this article, we study how AI-paraphrased messages have the potential to amplify the persuasive impact and scale of information campaigns. Bui
1249
Reposted by Maddy Jalbert
Ayanna Kim Thomas @ayannakim.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
Hi friends, the Spark Society's NSF funding has been terminated. We are dedicated to continuing our work and hope we can rely on you for support.
03928
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 21/04/2025
Ugh, I’m so sorry. It’s wild :(. You’re not paid direct, are you? If you are, we should dm to coordinate as it’s unclear to me how to navigate the finances regarding the stipend now and I’m hopefully talking to my PO tomorrow.
000
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 19/04/2025
The email I received for my termination is not even specific to my funding as it includes details that aren’t consistent with how my grant operates.
5946
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 19/04/2025
This funding is my sole source of income (as per my agreement with NSF, you are not allowed to take on other work). Additionally, because I am paid directly by the NSF, my university does not consider me to be an employee so I don’t have the same protections as other employed postdocs.
817448
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 19/04/2025
I got an email yesterday afternoon that my NSF SPRF Postdoctoral Fellowship was terminated. My grant focused on testing interventions to address online misinformation and I was 8 months into a two year appointment.
701038460
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 19/02/2025
Well last time he wore the glasses he got more attention so 🤷🏻‍♀️
020
Reposted by Maddy Jalbert
Dan Garisto @dangaristo.bsky.social · 03/02/2025
NEW: We obtained the directions NSF program officers are following to review all grants for compliance with the Trump EOs and the turmoil it has created in an agency mandated to broaden STEM participation. Our story: www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
Exclusive: how NSF is scouring research grants for violations of Trump’s orders
The US National Science Foundation has unfrozen grant funding, but it continues to scrutinize research projects, sowing turmoil.
12302261
Reposted by Maddy Jalbert
Eric Boodman @ericboodman.bsky.social · 02/02/2025
NSF froze payments to researchers. State AGs said it was unconstitutional for exec branch to pause congressionally mandated funds. Judge issued restraining order. Payments resumed. But some inconsistencies in what the NSF has said (thread): www.statnews.com/2025/02/02/n...
statnews.com
National Science Foundation restores payments after five-day pause, but worries over science funding persist
The NSF said on Sunday that its payment system was back on line, after it froze out researchers and sparked financial worries.
24324
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 31/01/2025
UAW 4121 is organizing and we had a great phone banking session today with unions across the country! Having their backing is the best.
0311
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 31/01/2025
(I called it a salary in my main post but technically it’s a stipend)
140
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 31/01/2025
have employee protections or benefits. The stipend I receive is also lower than the minimum established by my university for postdocs who are considered employees 🙃. So it’s prestigious but (at least at my university) a much more vulnerable position to be in.
2132
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 31/01/2025
(I called it a “salary” in the main post but technically it’s a stipend - there is no paycheck)
010
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 31/01/2025
NSF Fellows are in a unique situation. The funds are distributed directly from NSF and are available for me to withdraw on a disbursement schedule. Technically I’m not employed by either the NSF or my university. I have an appointment at my university but am not considered an employee so I don’t
1112
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 31/01/2025
are due for payment sooner or may not have withdrawn their full stipend upfront. It’s unclear at what point taking on other funding would be allowed.
1121
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 31/01/2025
The situation is confusing as, per the contract with NSF, you’re not allowed to take on outside work from your university and I’m not technically a university employee. You can withdraw your stipend on a dispersement schedule so I’m technically paid until Feb 15th, but some postdocs
1143
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 31/01/2025
Calling reps and Senators is great. I would also recommend connecting with local postdoc/student worker unions to see if there are any actions you can get involved in – there’s some great work going on there.
1112
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 31/01/2025
I am one of these NSF postdocs. NSF has frozen everyone’s access to their salaries and research stipends (that were already awarded) with no information about when they might be expected to be unfrozen. It still appears like we are expected to continue doing our work though.
361366582
Reposted by Maddy Jalbert
Katie Mack @astrokatie.com · 30/01/2025
Apparently all the PhD researchers holding prestigious NSF-funded research fellowships are having their salaries withheld until some unspecified time when the leadership figures out how to eliminate any grant funding that doesn’t align with the president’s political ideology.
12442861805
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 30/01/2025
Fingers crossed for you too! Terrible and devastating in so many ways.
010
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 30/01/2025
What I don’t know is what happens if you’re employed by your university and they don’t have the funds. Your own HR is probably the place to go!
100
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 30/01/2025
I had already withdrawn what was available to me for the current period. I have more funds available mid-February so if things are still paused at that point, that’s when I’ll be impacted.
200
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 30/01/2025
For example, every three months I get more funding available to withdraw. Your university may have already received funds it needs to cover salaries on the grant for a while or they may be expecting it soon. So a pause right now might not have any effect or it could be a problem immediately.
200
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 30/01/2025
It’s complicated and my guess is also that it’s university/grant/contract dependent. Access to the funds are currently just on pause. Each grant has a dispersement schedule where a certain amount of funds are available at a certain date (when your university can then request them).
210
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 30/01/2025
Very scary. I’m an NSF postdoc fellow who is paid directly from NSF (vs. the funds going through an institution first). All postdocs in my position are now blocked out of accessing our stipends and research funds.
031
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 29/01/2025
Yes, this is the case - you cannot withdraw funds that have already been awarded with ACM$ down and all pending requests are being canceled.
110
Reposted by Maddy Jalbert
UW Human Centered Design & Engineering @hcde.uw.edu · 16/01/2025
Join us in congratulating HCDE Professor Kate Starbird on receiving the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). This prestigious honor recognizes her groundbreaking research on the dynamics of misinformation and disinformation online.
hcde.washington.edu
HCDE Professor Kate Starbird awarded Presidential Early Career Award
HCDE Professor Kate Starbird is among a distinguished group of scientists and engineers across the country honored with a 2025 Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) fro...
513621
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 18/12/2024
The piece led by @malar0ne.bsky.social that inspired this work: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38328781/
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Perceived experts are prevalent and influential within an antivaccine community on Twitter - PubMed
Perceived experts (i.e. medical professionals and biomedical scientists) are trusted sources of medical information who are especially effective at encouraging vaccine uptake. The role of perceived ex...
051
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 18/12/2024
The effect was robust across unvaccinated, vaccine-hesitant, and conservative individuals. Our findings are support observations by Harris et al. (2023) that biomedical credentials may be leveraged by both pro- and anti-vaccine communities to increase perceived credibility and message reach.
140
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 18/12/2024
Excited this piece with @malar0ne.bsky.social and Luke Williams is now out! In this work, we find that the presence of biomedical credentials (e.g. Dr., MD., scientist, nurse) in a user's social media profile increases perceptions that the user has expertise on the topic of COVID-19 vaccination.
1115
Reposted by Maddy Jalbert
Ira Hyman @irahyman.bsky.social · 23/11/2024
A Just Asking Questions Effect for spreading false information. This thread is an overview of my lab’s research that I presented at Psychonomics this morning. #psynow24 TLDR: Getting people to generate their own false answers leads them to believe that info. 1/
Just Asking Questions: Can an Implication Generate an Illusory Truth Effect?
Ira E. Hyman, Jr., Jasmine Balmelli-Morales, Macallan Enns-Ford, Annika Fiala, Zoe Gadbow, Macy Kneipp, Isabel Nguyen, Gwen Pane
Western Washington University

Madeline Jalbert
University of Washington
1216766
Reposted by Maddy Jalbert
Kate Starbird @katestarbird.bsky.social · 22/10/2024
Just published a Nature comment highlighting a few of the rumors our UW team expects to see going into the Nov 5 election — from rumors that falsely frame election errors as impactful and intentional to rumors about "non citizen voters" and "suspicious behaviors". www.nature.com/articles/d41...
nature.com
I’ve been studying misinformation for a decade — here are the rumours to watch out for on US election day
We can anticipate many false claims, including alleged mass voting by non-citizens or ‘suspicious vans’ outside polling booths. We should quickly counter them.
12394215
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 19/10/2024
We observed this effect across two different consensus estimates: How many others would believe that information (Exp. 1) and how many others already know it (Exp. 2). These findings have important implications for how our information environments may contribute to (mis)perceptions of consensus.
050
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 19/10/2024
In a new article now out in Collabora: Psychology, @rmpillai.bsky.social and I find that the mere repetition of information increases estimates of its consensus, a finding we refer to as an “illusory consensus effect.”
online.ucpress.edu
An Illusory Consensus Effect: The Mere Repetition of Information Increases Estimates That Others Would Believe or Already Know It
How do people estimate the prevalence of beliefs and knowledge among others? Here, we examine the hypothesis that mere repetition of information increases such perceptions of consensus — an “illusory ...
25628
Reposted by Maddy Jalbert
Association for Psychological Science @psychscience.bsky.social · 16/10/2024
TODAY at 3PM ET! Join @lkfazio.bsky.social, Mubashir Sultan, and @maddyjalbert.bsky.social as they discuss the latest research on #misinformation during our Science for Society webinar. Register: member.psychologicalscience.org/events/event...
173
Reposted by Maddy Jalbert
Association for Psychological Science @psychscience.bsky.social · 26/09/2024
NEW Science for Society on October 16! Lisa Fazio @lkfazio.bsky.social, Mubashir Sultan, and Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social will review the current research on #misinformation, how it is spread, and how to reduce its impact. member.psychologicalscience.org/events/event...
064
Reposted by Maddy Jalbert
Ira Hyman @irahyman.bsky.social · 30/08/2024
If you’re interested in why weird works, but would rather listen than read? Well, @maddyjalbert.bsky.social and I were interviewed for the Sound Politics podcast. www.npr.org/podcasts/125...
npr.org
011
Reposted by Maddy Jalbert
Norbert Schwarz @nschwarz.bsky.social · 15/08/2024
A special collection of Perspectives on Psychological Science, addressing lessons from the covid pandemic. It was a pleasure to co-edit this with Dolores Albarracin.
084
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 13/08/2024
I have a new post out with @irahyman.bsky.social discussing the connection between the new political “weird” discourse (which we’re referring to as “weird-checking”, aka fact-checking but for weirdness instead of truth) and social psychology principles of social norms and consensus.
24115
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 21/03/2024
Actually, I just looked at a map - those are way further apart than I pictured in my head 😂. Might be tricky - I’ll see if there’s something that makes sense though…
120
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 21/03/2024
It’s my Great Aunt’s 91st birthday / a mini family reunion on Bowen Island those same days. That’s close to UVic so I need figure out if the logistics will work for me to come to some of it!
100
Maddy Jalbert @maddyjalbert.bsky.social · 21/03/2024
NOWCAM is a fabulous conference and reason to visit! 10/10 Ira, I chatted with Kiran today about her presenting our work there :)
120
Reposted by Maddy Jalbert
Kai Ruggeri @ruggeri.bsky.social · 13/12/2023
Behavioral science policy recommendations early in the pandemic were *largely correct*. Our global collaboration of 80+ experts covers 747 studies (average sample size over 16,000!) & supports 16 of 19 claims. Many lessons for science & policy. Out today in Nature: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
39249