Sign in

Lily Marino

@lilymarino.bsky.social
67 followers 105 following 7 posts

Psychology PhD student studying how the body and the environment shape our everyday experiences 🫀🫁🧠🌤️🗺️🤳🏡 @northeasternu.bsky.social affective-science.org orcid.org/0000-0002-3851-6438

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Lily Marino
Dr. Robin Tanamachi 🌪️ @tornatrix.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
You might be thinking, “Wait, didn’t we just close a public comment period on this same OMB rule back on 14 July?” Yes, we did. They’re trying to make an end run around the process and sneaking it in through another mechanism. Dust off your previous comment and resubmit it!
13530
Reposted by Lily Marino
Zoe Kross @zoekross.bsky.social · 27/07/2026
Had a lovely time talking about @lilymarino.bsky.social and I’s new NU scicomm blog, PsychPress, at @comscicon.bsky.social! We are currently looking to feature submissions for our pre-graduate series, aimed at making grad school materials + prep more accessible as we approach the 2027 app cycle.
272
Lily Marino @lilymarino.bsky.social · 12/06/2026
Sharing a recent blog post on how PhD students can make a difference in the fight to defend American science. Hosted on PsychPress, a blog from Northeastern Psych PhD students created by me and @zoekross.bsky.social. psychpress.sites.northeastern.edu/2026/06/12/s...
psychpress.sites.northeastern.edu
Saving Federal Funding: How PhD Students Can (and Should) Take Action in Summer 2026 – PsychPress: Graduate Voices in Science
055
Reposted by Lily Marino
Stand Up for Science! @standupforscience.net · 06/06/2026
Our official guide to help you write a public comment on the OMB-2026-0034 is here: zurl.co/XgyzA Submit your comment and take additional actions here: zurl.co/RiDuv #StandUpForScience #OMB #Vought #SaveScience #FundScience
The graphic displays an image of the SUFS Foundation logo, a hand holding pen, and hands over a type writer. The graphic reads: "The SUFS Guide to Writing Public Comments, Written by: Cole Donovan, Director of Policy and Advocacy and Colette Delawalla, PhD, CEO. BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT: This is an opportunity to tell YOUR government that the OMB-2026-0034 "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance" is wrong. https://zurl.co/XgyzA "
9175133
Reposted by Lily Marino
Joshua Weitz @joshuasweitz.bsky.social · 05/06/2026
Written by early career scientists from @snapcoalition.org who understand precisely what is at stake if politicians decide what and who gets funded. If this group of MS & PhD candidates (and a few recent PhD grads) can speak up publicly... then so can *you*. sciencepolitics.org/2026/06/05/w...
sciencepolitics.org
What Happens to the Next Generation of Scientists if Politicians, Not Peers, Determine Research Funding - Science Politics
Fewer trainees today will mean fewer scientific discoveries tomorrow.
25133
Reposted by Lily Marino
Association for Psychological Science @psychscience.bsky.social · 05/06/2026
A proposed OMB rule would let political appointees terminate active grants and override peer review. The comment deadline is July 13 — visit our Act Now page to learn more and make your voice heard. psychologicalscience.org/act-now
psychologicalscience.org
Act Now: Share your Concerns With Your Representative and Senators
It does not matter whether your Representative or Senators agree with you. They must hear from you to understand how federal policy changes are influencing the people they were elected to represent.
074
Reposted by Lily Marino
Stand Up for Science! @standupforscience.net · 01/06/2026
What does the new OMB proposal mean for science? How can we STOP VOUGHT and SAVE SCIENCE together? All of these questions and more to be discussed at the Emergency Science Meeting on June 2nd, 4PM ET, hosted by Stand Up for Science! Register at the link in our bio, or go here: zurl.co/oCIDw #OMB
The graphic contains a photo of the White House, the red Stand Up for Science logo, and a news clipping reading: "White House proposes new rules giving political appointees final approval on research grants. These proposed Office of Management and Budget regulations would render the federal research grant review process opaque". The graphic reads: "TOMORROW 4PM ET/1PM PT, All welcome for the SUFS, EMERGENCY SCIENCE MEETING, VIRTUAL AND ACCESSIBLE, What does the new OMB proposal mean for science? How can we STOP VOUGHT and SAVE SCIENCE together? REGISTER HERE: https://zurl.co/oCIDw OR LINK IN BIO".
05128
Reposted by Lily Marino
Jordan Theriault-Brown @jtheriault.bsky.social · 27/05/2026
We are looking for a research assistant to help with scanning an ongoing R01 project at MGH. The project involves working with older adults, and physio/fMRI data collection. Please send interested recent grads our way! northeastern.wd1.myworkdayjobs.com/careers/job/...
northeastern.wd1.myworkdayjobs.com
Research Technician - Interdisciplinary Affective Science Laboratory
About the Opportunity Job Summary The Interdisciplinary Affective Science Laboratory (IASL) within the College of Science is seeking a full-time Research Technician for an NIH-funded, multidisciplinar...
045
Reposted by Lily Marino
Nature Reviews Neuroscience @natrevneuro.nature.com · 13/04/2026
Categorization is ‘baked’ into the brain — a Perspective by Lisa Feldman Barrett & Earl K. Miller @lisafeldmanbarrett.com @earlkmiller.bsky.social #neuroscience #neuroskyence www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
Categorization is ‘baked’ into the brain - Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Categorization, the grouping of objects, living organisms, actions or events into equivalence clusters, is fundamental to adaptive behaviour. In this Perspective, Barrett and Miller discuss evidence t...
78633
Reposted by Lily Marino
Scientist Network for Advancing Policy @snapcoalition.org · 17/03/2026
It’s #blog post day! SNAP members Brendon Davis (@bdavisbio.bsky.social) & Becca Blyn talk about the 🧪🔬 science programs 🔭🛰️ most impacted by the rollercoaster 🎢 of #FederalFunding in 2026, and wonder what awaits us in 2027. 🤔 Give it a read on Medium: medium.com/science-poli...
medium.com
The Appropriations Rollercoaster: Which Sciences Won and Lost?
Written by SNAP members Brendon Davis and Becca Blyn
0109
Lily Marino @lilymarino.bsky.social · 12/03/2026
Beyond excited to have talked about our lab's method for using the body to trigger experience sampling prompts at a Construction Retreat, in lead-up to #SAS2026 ! Excited to continue the good conversation at the conference @affectscience.bsky.social !
1263
Reposted by Lily Marino
Noam Ross @noamross.net · 02/02/2026
NSF GRFP applicants (and mentors): Was your application Returned Without Review and deemed ineligible despite fitting in the allowed topics? 1) Write NSF 2) Write your Congressperson 3) CC us at grfp@grant-witness.us so we can compile + follow up Details and template at grant-witness.us/grfp-letter
6165200
Lily Marino @lilymarino.bsky.social · 16/10/2025
Super excited to share my work at #2025SPR later today on emotional granularity and cardiovascular physiology @therealspr.bsky.social! Virtual poster link here: tinyurl.com/MarinoSPR2025
1190
Reposted by Lily Marino
Phil Deming @phildeming.bsky.social · 13/08/2025
Some scientists think emotions are sharply-defined types - each moment of joy is similar to the next, but different from moments of anger. We found evidence for a different view: the lines between emotions are more blurry. 1/ tinyurl.com/2pmdwty2
tinyurl.com
OSF
3198