Sign in

Stanford Law School

@law.stanford.edu
726 followers 61 following 416 posts

One of the nation's leading institutions for legal scholarship and education. law.stanford.edu

PostsRepliesMedia
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 12h
Law & medicine are facing the same disruptions: AI, shifting markets, and a changing policy landscape. Join Stanford Law and @stanfordmedicine.bsky.social for a full-day symposium on the future of both professions. Oct. 26, Paul Brest Hall. Register: web.cvent.com/event/765587...
011
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 29/09/2026
SLS Prof. Julian Nyarko’s analysis found AI signals more often in law review main text and abstracts than in footnotes. The research cannot determine whether AI was used for editing, polishing or drafting. That distinction matters. Read more: reason.com/volokh/2026/...
reason.com
How Often Are Articles in Top Law Reviews Written In Part By AI?
A guest post from Julian Nyarko.
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 28/09/2026
Prof. Jack Balkin didn't come to SLS w/ an uplifting Constitution Day message. In a wide-ranging lecture, he argued that new tech is reshaping constitutional power, weakening democratic institutions, & accelerating what he calls “constitutional rot.” law.stanford.edu/press/techno...
law.stanford.edu
Technology, Power, and ‘Constitutional Rot’ | Stanford Law School
The federal government increasingly relies on private companies to govern: Palantir for foreign intelligence, Amazon for cloud computing, Starlink for
010
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 24/09/2026
When can states redraw congressional districts? Can the White House change mail voting rules through the Postal Service? Prof. Nate Persily talks to Stanford Legal discussing the legal battles over 2026 election rules—& what's at stake for democracy. law.stanford.edu/stanford-leg...
law.stanford.edu
U.S. Elections Under Pressure from White House | Stanford Law School
Nate Persily joins Pam Karlan to discuss efforts to change the rules governing the 2026 elections and the legal battles over how those changes would affect voting.
001
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 23/09/2026
On Sept. 28, SLS Professor Rabia Belt will explore how communities shaped mental competence and voting rights in 19th-century America at @ucberkeleylaw.bsky.social. Hosted by Berkeley Law Center for the Study of Law & Society | 12:15-2 p.m. RSVP: www.law.berkeley.edu/event/csls-s...
law.berkeley.edu
CSLS Speaker Series: “Mental Incompetence on the Ground: Community Construction of Disability in Democracy”
Featuring Rabia Belt, Professor of Law and Professor of History (by courtesy), Stanford Law School Abstract: Who was mentally competent to vote? Nineteenth-century American lawmakers often treated…
031
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 17/09/2026
"Stanford RegLab is proud to partner with the state to pioneer a framework to rigorously learn, evaluate, & improve such a system through rapid technological change," says Prof. Dan Ho, Director of Stanford RegLab. Take a look at the new AI-powered tool: www.gov.ca.gov/2026/09/09/g...
gov.ca.gov
Government, made easier. Governor Newsom introduces AskCA, a new AI-powered tool for Californians | Governor of California
Official website of the State of California
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 04/09/2026
Join us on Thursday, Sept. 17 at 5pm for our annual Constitution Day Lecture with Yale Law Professor Jack M. Balkin discussing "Technology and Constitutional Rot" and how the Algorithmic Society threatens democratic governance. RSVP: law.stanford.edu/event/consti...
law.stanford.edu
Constitution Day Lecture: Technology and Constitutional Rot | Stanford Law School
Technological change affects the Constitution not only by creating new problems of constitutional interpretation, but also by changing the distributio
044
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 04/09/2026
SLS’s Executive Education program is launching the Legal Engineering Academy, a first-of-its-kind, two-week residential program for attorneys, executives, and other leaders who want to move beyond talking about AI and start building with it. law.stanford.edu/press/the-ri...
law.stanford.edu
The Rise of Legal Engineering | Stanford Law School
A new kind of leader is emerging across the legal sector. These professionals combine legal expertise with an engineering mindset, helping shape how l
010
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 04/09/2026
Who runs a federal agency when the top position is vacant? Stanford Law's Anne Joseph O'Connell discusses the legal rules governing temporary officials and recent court decisions on the latest episode of Stanford Legal. 🎧Tune in: law.stanford.edu/stanford-leg...
law.stanford.edu
https://law.stanford.edu/stanford-legal/who-fills-in-when-federal-jobs-are-vacant/
001
Reposted by Stanford Law School
Stanford Law Review @stanlrev.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
Hoang Pham, Hannah Cha, and Rashon Poole argue that contemporary disputes over "AI bias" are best understood as normative disagreements about representation—whether AI systems should mirror the world or be designed to promote a more inclusive future. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/unpac...
stanfordlawreview.org
Unpacking AI Bias and the Antidiscrimination Law Dilemma | Stanford Law Review
In their Essay, Hoang Pham, Hannah Cha, and Rashon Poole argue that contemporary disputes over "AI bias" are best understood as normative di
022
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 03/09/2026
Congratulations to Promise Mabilo, winner of Stanford’s #2026BrightAward for Environmental Sustainability. A community organizer in Emalahleni, South Africa fighting fossil fuel pollution—learn more and register for her panel and reception: law.stanford.edu/press/promis...
law.stanford.edu
Promise Mabilo, South African Clean Air Activist, Wins Stanford Bright Award | Stanford Law School
Promise Mabilo does not need an air-quality monitor to know when the pollution in Emalahleni is especially bad. In the coal country of South Africa’
010
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 01/09/2026
The Supreme Court is disregarding factual evidence established by lower courts, raising concerns about judicial integrity. SLS's Duncan Hosie writes in @theatlantic.com about the Roberts Court's troubling departure from the "clear-error deference" standard. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0...
theatlantic.com
The Supreme Court Isn’t Interested in Facts
In decision after decision, the conservative justices are ignoring the evidentiary record that lower courts have worked hard to establish.
011
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 31/08/2026
Should courts use AI? SLS's Daniel E. Ho and Olivia Martin say the answer isn't banning—it's creating secure environments where judges can test models before deployment. Without this, courts risk falling behind litigants already using these tools. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/an-a...
lawfaremedia.org
An AI Playground for the Courts
Judges face an unsatisfactory menu of AI options. A secure, judiciary-controlled sandbox for testing frontier models is the better path.
010
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 27/08/2026
Looking for a good book or two to start before the end of summer? It's not too late! Take a look at the Stanford Law School Faculty Summer Reading List which offers up some of our professors’ favorite reads. law.stanford.edu/stanford-law...
law.stanford.edu
Stanford Law School’s 2026 Summer Faculty Reading List | Stanford Law School
Looking for a good book or two to dig into during the summer? The Stanford Law School Faculty Summer Reading List offers up some of our professors
001
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 26/08/2026
“The more daylight there is, the more trouble for Meta.” SLS's Nora Freeman Engstrom explains what’s at stake in the federal trial brought by state AGs over alleged harms to young users—and why its outcome could shape thousands of related cases. Read more: law.stanford.edu/2026/08/25/w...
law.stanford.edu
What’s at Stake in the Meta Trial | Stanford Law School
(Originally published by Stanford Report on August 25, 2026.) Four states kicked off a closely-watched trial against Meta last week, alleging that the
020
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 06/08/2026
500+ democracy scholars are urging Congress to adopt proportional representation to combat gerrymandering. SLS's Pam Karlan tells PBS: "Instead of voters being able to elect the candidates of their choice politicians are picking the voters of their choice." law.stanford.edu/stanford-law...
law.stanford.edu
Push for Voting Reform with Pam Karlan | Stanford Law School
(Click here or on image to view)
010
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 05/08/2026
During the 2025-26 academic year, SLS faculty and academic staff garnered an array of awards. Similarly, numerous SLS students were the recipients of awards and fellowships. See the full list: law.stanford.edu/press/sls-st...
law.stanford.edu
SLS Students and Faculty Honored with Awards, Fellowships | Stanford Law School
During the 2025-26 academic year, Stanford Law School faculty members and academic staff garnered an array of awards for their books, articles, teachi
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 04/08/2026
Stanford Law Professor Easha Anand elected to the American Law Institute, joining 27 other current or emeriti Stanford Law faculty in advancing ALI's mission to clarify, modernize, and improve American law. Read more:
law.stanford.edu
Stanford Law School Professor Easha Anand Elected to the American Law Institute | Stanford Law School
Stanford Law School Professor Easha Anand, co-director of the law school’s Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, has been elected to the American Law Ins
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 03/08/2026
Who's responsible when medical AI fails? Stanford Law's Michelle Mello, co-leader of the Healthcare Ethical Assessment Lab for AI, examines the urgent need for guardrails in healthcare technology. Listen to the @kff.org episode:
kff.org
Guardrails for AI in Health Care — How High? | KFF
AI is racing into everyday medicine. The rules of the road are still being written. Dr. Michelle Mello of Stanford, professor at both the Law School and the School of Medicine, and co-leader of its…
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 29/07/2026
Uber's new terms require users who sue the company to disclose litigation funding agreements and waive attorney-client privilege—but the requirements are "dubious at best," writes Rhode Center fellow Brianne Holland-Stergar. Read the full opinion:
news.bloomberglaw.com
Uber’s New Litigation Funding Terms Would Hinder Accountability
Opinion: Uber’s revised terms requiring access to documents exchanged with third-party litigation funders are likely unlawful but could effectively discourage lawsuits.
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 28/07/2026
"This is a direct example of how AI can benefit millions of people" says Stanford's Dan Ho on new research from @stanfordhai.bsky.social & Stanford RegLab using AI to identify outdated state regulations.
law.stanford.edu
How AI is Helping States Cut Through Decades of Red Tape | Stanford Law School
(Originally published by The Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI on July 23, 2026.) Bureaucracy moves slowly, and decades of outdated provisions
021
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 27/07/2026
Stanford Legal examines presidential war powers with international law expert Allen Weiner. The episode explores how the Iran war evolved beyond its nuclear proliferation goals—and what that means for U.S. foreign policy. Listen to the episode:
law.stanford.edu
The Iran War and the Limits of Presidential Power | Stanford Law School
Stanford’s Allen Weiner examines how the U.S. war with Iran raises questions about the president’s power to wage war and negotiate peace.
010
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 22/07/2026
Rachel George, PhD, a Legal Innovation & Policy Fellow at SLS warns AI-generated fake citations are undermining national security policies. Between May 2025 & April 2026 official documents from Europe, South Africa, & US cited research that didn't exist.
techpolicy.press
The Next National Security Challenge Is Research Integrity
In the age of AI, research integrity has become critical infrastructure, writes Stanford Law School's Rachel A. George.
010
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 21/07/2026
A new Rule of Law Teaching Hub from SLS’s Neukom Center brings together syllabi, readings, country case studies, and practical guidance to help instructors build and strengthen rule of law courses—and connect a dispersed community working in the field.
law.stanford.edu
Stanford Law School’s Neukom Center for the Rule of Law Launches New Teaching Hub | Stanford Law School
As legal and democratic institutions come under renewed strain around the world, interest in the rule of law as a field of study has grown. But profes
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 15/07/2026
How is the Supreme Court using history and tradition to reshape constitutional interpretation? Prof. Jeff Fisher examines pivotal 2026 rulings on birthright citizenship, voting rights, and agency independence in the latest Stanford Legal episode. Tune in:
law.stanford.edu
Inside the Supreme Court’s Key 2026 Decisions | Stanford Law School
Jeff Fisher discusses a term marked by major rulings across executive power, voting, and civil rights, and what they signal about the Court’s trajectory.
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 14/07/2026
"If an observer only looked at cases in which the Supreme Court explicitly overturned precedent ... you wouldn't see the degree to which precedent was discarded," said Duncan Hosie, a legal scholar at the Stanford Constitutional Law Center.
law.com
'Stealth Overrulings': Did the Supreme Court Overturn More Precedent Than It Claimed? | Law.com
Across several rulings, the U.S. Supreme Court's conservative majority either outright overruled, or else functionally gutted, several precedents this term.
010
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 13/07/2026
“The question right now is not whether transgender advocates should fight or not fight — it’s whether going to hostile courts is the most prudent move,” said Duncan Hosie, a fellow at the Stanford Constitutional Law Center via @washingtonpost.com:
010
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 13/07/2026
As the fragile U.S.-Iran cease-fire comes under renewed strain, Stanford Law student and @Knighthennessy scholar Josh Waldman turns his attention to sea mines—an old weapon with enormous consequences for global trade. Read more in Foreign Policy.
foreignpolicy.com
What Will Happen to Iran’s Sea Mines?
The overlooked technology wreaked havoc on the Strait of Hormuz—and global trade.
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 13/07/2026
For Brionna Bolanos & Dayle Chung the Bremond Fellowship was a chance to pursue racial justice work that was intellectually rigorous & connected to why they came to law school. Watch the Stanford Center for Racial Justice’s fellows discuss their research.
youtu.be
Stanford Center for Racial Justice | Bremond Fellows 2025-2026 Cohort
With continued generous support from the Wilson Sonsini Foundation, this prestigious fellowship honoring legendary Bay Area attorney Harry Bremond offers Stanford Law School 2L and 3L students a…
010
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 09/07/2026
Much of the debate over AI & jobs focuses on the work the tech could eliminate. In a @washingtonpost op-ed, SLS student Anna Pasnau, JD ’28, turns to a less-discussed challenge: the skilled labor needed to build the infrastructure powering the AI boom.
washingtonpost.com
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 09/07/2026
In a new JOTWELL essay, @stanfordclp.bsky.social researchers Nora Freeman Engstrom and Aviv Caspi examine research on AI and self-represented litigants. Will more filings translate into meaningful access to justice? Read more: legalpro.jotwell.com/opening-the-...
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 06/07/2026
A new idea for taxing AI: require top firms to transfer shares, not just cash — then hold them in a public trust. Stanford Legal explores how it might work, including governance and political insulation. 🎧Tune in:
law.stanford.edu
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 26/06/2026
Congrats to SLS RegLab and the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment on receiving an inaugural AI in Action Award from the Center for Civic Futures. Their AI tool helps unemployment adjudicators identify gaps and ask the right follow-up questions.
law.stanford.edu
Stanford RegLab and Colorado Labor Department Receive Award for AI Adjudication Tool | Stanford Law School
Resolving an unemployment claim often turns on asking the right questions. Adjudicators must determine which facts matter, identify what is missing or
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 25/06/2026
In the special 8 episode series, The Declaration at 250, Michael McConnell introduces former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and historian David Kennedy to ask a deceptively simple question: what does it actually take for democracy to work? Tune in:
law.stanford.edu
<i>The Declaration at 250</i>: The Declaration of Independence and Conditions for Democratic Flourishing | Stanford Law School
What does it actually take for democracy to work?
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 24/06/2026
AI is reshaping lawyering, not just tools, but core responsibilities. In Episode 1 of AI Sidebar, Irene Liu interviews SLS Dean George Triantis on how law schools should respond, with ethics, trust and “human in the loop” front and center. 🎧Tune in: ai-sidebar.simplecast.com/episodes/law...
000
Reposted by Stanford Law School
Jeanne Fromer @jeannefromer.bsky.social · 23/06/2026
“We propose that state supreme courts amend their rules of professional conduct to impose a uniform ‘hold open’ date for offers until Oct. 1 of students’ 2L year for 2L summer positions.” @marklemley.bsky.social & I have an op-ed in Bloomberg on early recruiting news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/...
news.bloomberglaw.com
State Supreme Courts Can Resolve Early Legal Recruiting Mess
Opinion: Imposing a uniform "hold open" date for job offers to law students would likely put much-needed brakes on accelerated recruiting.
54717
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 23/06/2026
Looking for a good book or two to dig into during the summer? The Stanford Law School Faculty Summer Reading List offers up some of our professors’ favorite reads.
law.stanford.edu
Stanford Law School’s 2026 Summer Faculty Reading List | Stanford Law School
Looking for a good book or two to dig into during the summer? The Stanford Law School Faculty Summer Reading List offers up some of our professors
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 22/06/2026
What new can be said about the Declaration of Independence today? Introducing The Declaration at 250—8 episodes exploring America's founding document with prominent scholars from across the ideological spectrum. Episode 1 out tomorrow on Stanford Legal: stanfordlegal.simplecast.com/episodes/dec...
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 19/06/2026
As the Class of 2026 gathered on June 13 speakers looked ahead to the graduates’ next chapters while returning often to family, friendship, gratitude, professional responsibility, and the enduring importance of community.
law.stanford.edu
For Stanford Law’s Class of 2026, a Commencement Message of Community and Purpose | Stanford Law School
The 2026 commencement ceremony at Stanford Law School was a celebration of 259 graduates and of the communities that carried them to the day. As the C
010
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 18/06/2026
In 1895, Wong Kim Ark was denied entry to the country where he was born. The landmark case that followed shaped U.S. birthright citizenship law. Stanford Center for Racial Justice students recently brought Wong’s story to life. Read more:
law.stanford.edu
Center for Racial Justice Students Help Illuminate Wong Kim Ark’s Enduring Legacy | Stanford Law School
In 1895, Wong Kim Ark returned by steamship to San Francisco, the city where he had been born to immigrants from China. He was denied entry. The Supre
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 17/06/2026
On Monday, June 22: The first episode of AI Sidebar with Irene Liu drops—featuring Stanford Law Dean George Triantis. A timely conversation on how AI is changing law, business, and society, and what lawyers need to be ready for next. Listen and subscribe:
ai-sidebar.simplecast.com
AI Sidebar
At the intersection of AI and law, the ground is shifting faster than almost anyone can keep up with. Hosted by Irene Liu of Stanford Law School’s AI Initiative, AI Sidebar brings together leading…
010
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 15/06/2026
Are personal injury lawyers frauds and scammers? SLS's Nora Freeman Engstrom, Co-Director of the @stanfordclp.bsky.social, was a guest on the No Such Thing podcast to discuss personal injury law firms. Listen here: law.stanford.edu/stanford-law...
010
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 15/06/2026
For nearly 50 years, Prof. Mark Kelman has helped shape the intellectual life of Stanford Law School. Colleagues, family, and fans recently gathered for a day-long festschrift honoring his extraordinary career and influence. Read more in #StanfordLawMag: law.stanford.edu/stanford-law...
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 11/06/2026
Many of the Trump administration’s most consequential immigration changes aren’t headline-grabbers. Lucas Guttentag explains how hundreds of directives and memos are quietly reshaping the system on the latest episode of Stanford Legal. Listen here:
law.stanford.edu
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 05/06/2026
Stanford Law Review Vol. 78, Issue 6: Assistant Professor of Law Matthew Sanders examines the administrative remand rule’s origins and modern applications — and calls for modest adjustments to improve consistency across circuits.
stanfordlawreview.org
Rethinking the Administrative Remand Rule | Stanford Law Review
With few exceptions, the federal courts of appeals have jurisdiction over—and only over—“final decisions” of the district courts. Yet there is a little-known but highly consequential rule, known as…
010
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 04/06/2026
"Congress could also reimpose caps on payments from the Judgment Fund or restrict the ability to distribute money through the separate commission that is being created to oversee the fund," said Duncan Hosie, an academic fellow at SLS's ConLaw Center.
washingtonpost.com
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 04/06/2026
“How could the delegates achieve the independence, vigor, secrecy and dispatch necessary for an effective executive without rendering him an elected monarch?” -@nytimes.com via Michael McConnell's book “The President Who Would Not Be King.”
nytimes.com
000
Reposted by Stanford Law School
Stanford PACS @stanfordpacs.bsky.social · 03/06/2026
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, Faculty Affiliate @persily.bsky.social joined the Stanford Legal podcast to discuss the decision and its implications for racial representation, partisan gerrymandering, and anti-discrimination law. Listen via @law.stanford.edu ⤵️
law.stanford.edu
Voting Rights at a Turning Point | Stanford Law School
011
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 02/06/2026
The FTCA is a powerful but underused tool for compensating victims of federal misconduct. A new 75-page field guide by Prof. Nora Freeman Engstrom and Malka Herman (@stanfordclp.bsky.social) tackles the statute’s complexities to help lawyers deploy it effectively.
law.stanford.edu
Holding Federal Officials Accountable: New Stanford Law School Field Guide says look to the FTCA | Stanford Law School
Attorneys throughout the country are looking for innovative ways to secure justice for victims of federal misconduct. In a new guide, Stanford Law Pro
000
Stanford Law School @law.stanford.edu · 01/06/2026
A new #StanfordLawMag story looks at how four Stanford Law classmates from the Class of 2007 reunited at Reach University to help working adults turn their jobs into degrees — and rethink what college can be.
law.stanford.edu
The Stanford Law Friends Who Are Reimagining Higher Education | Stanford Law School
By the time they graduated from Stanford Law School in 2007, Joe E. Ross, Afam Onyema, Ari Simon, and Melanie Wachtell Stinnett had formed a close bon
000