In their Essay, Hoang Pham, Hannah Cha, and Rashon Poole argue that contemporary disputes over "AI bias" are best understood as normative di

When Derek Mobley was rejected from over one hundred jobs by Workday’s AI screening platform, his intentional discrimination claim struggled on a ba

In their Essay, Professor Andrea Roth and Professor Rebecca Wexler argue that existing attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine can protect

In his Essay, Professor Tyler Valeska examines how automated student monitoring implicates Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. Professor Valeska ar

In his essay, Cheng-chi (Kirin) Chang examines Mobley v. Workday, the most consequential AI-discrimination case currently in litigation, through the l

Law enforcement agencies have increasingly employed artificial intelligence (AI) in their investigatory methods and technology. This usage, however, r

In their Essay introducing the Special Collection on Technology, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of Civil Rights, Ralph Richard Banks, Guy-Uri

Could artificial intelligence (AI) make civil rights enforcement easier? Professor Yunsieg P. Kim & Professor Jacob Eisler argue that, compared to

The Stanford Law Review was organized in 1948. It is operated entirely by Stanford Law School students.

In Wolford v. Lopez, the Supreme Court will examine whether states can require property owners to consent before armed individuals enter publicly-acce

Justice Gorsuch on the day-drinking habits of the founders and why your evening gummy is totally fine.

In his Essay, Duncan Hosie identifies and theorizes “factual revisionism,” a method through which an appellate judge mischaracterizes a lower cour

In Wolford v. Lopez, the Supreme Court will examine whether states can require property owners to consent before armed individuals enter publicly-acce

Stanford Law Review Online supplements SLR's print editions with short (usually < 5,000 words) and timely pieces of legal scholarship.

The Stanford Law Review was organized in 1948. It is operated entirely by Stanford Law School students.

Terry v. Ohio’s flexible reasonable-suspicion rule is colliding with the post-Bruen expansion of public carry. In United States v. Wilson, the Fifth

Introduction This past June, in a decision already heralded as marking a “landmark shift in administrative law,” the Supreme Court in Trump v. CA

Many question the future of the right to contraception after Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, but Deborah Tuerkheimer argues that the m

Matthew J. Sanders explores the importance of procedure in the evolving environmental law landscape.