skwawkbox.org
UN General Assembly votes overwhelmingly to move from NYC to Geneva after US bans Palestine reps
### 154-2 vote against US-Israeli arrogance
The ‘Judging Freedom’ podcast on the vote.
The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) has voted overwhelmingly to move its September session from New York City to Geneva after the US government refused entry visas to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and dozens of other senior Palestinian officials – a rare show of defiance to the US regime and its relentless support for genocidal Israel. The US State Department had claimed it had denied the visas for “national security,” and that the Palestinian Authority was “undermining peace efforts” because it had dared to appeal to the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice at the Hague against Israel’s genocide in Gaza.
The US ban is a clear violation of the 1947 UN Headquarters Agreement, which requires the host country to provide access for _all_ accredited delegations.
The vote carries echoes of the UN’s 1988 decision to move its session to Geneva when the US denied entry to then-Palestine Liberation Organisation head Yasser Arafat. The new move will help a segment dedicated to Palestinian rights, scheduled for 22 September, to proceed without interference and with the relevant representatives present. Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez described the US visa denial as “unjust”.
Only the US and Israel voted against the resolution. Britain abstained. The UK ‘mainstream’ media have largely ignored the vote.
### Share this:
* Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
* Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
* Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
* Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
* Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
* Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
*
### Like this:
Like Loading...
### _Related_
![English translation of the highlighted part:
The term ‘other technical solution’ should be understood broadly. The broad wording is intended to ensure that the proposed amendment covers any technical solution used to provide unauthorised access to media content.
[..]
For example, it will also be prohibited to use VPN connections to access media content that would otherwise not be available in Denmark, or to circumvent the blocking of illegal websites.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:liypjs65cx7yxniqsnn3vqmj/bafkreid7gd3g6r5b76jr7y6dgb54phd43c7pl73dtondbt2nbqhru7hcr4)
