Reposted by Lars Henning
Specifically, we found that 1% of all Cochrane reviews cite a paper from authors with >24 entries for correction or retraction in the @retractionwatch.com database.
People like Boldt, Fujii, Asemi, etc.
This is not great.
80% gynecological oncologist Västerås 🇸🇪. 20% HTA-unit Camtö Örebro Hospital. Views my own. Too dumb and lazy for doing research but interested how to evaluate medical research&evidence. Words matter. Dislike lifscience like QoL&D engl, swed, germ