Sign in

Janne Pölönen

@jpolonen.bsky.social
666 followers 577 following 37 posts

Secretary General for Publication Forum (JUFO) at Federation of Finnish Learned Societies | Helsinki Initiative on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication | CoARA Steering Board - WG on Multilingualism and Language Biases

PostsRepliesMedia
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
Legal culture clearly is one of the contextual factors affecting the practical implementation of RRA reform. Peruginelli, Faro, Pölönen, Pietilä & Melander (2026). See you in Court! Legal frameworks, judicial remedies and ombudsman systems in research career assessment. doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
011
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
European Diamond Capacity Hub @eudch.bsky.social · 06/07/2026
🌍 What role does #DiamondOA play in supporting multilingual #ScholarlyPublishing? @johanrooryck.bsky.social with @jpolonen.bsky.social discuss why #DiamondOA is key for multilingual scholarly communication and access to knowledge. 🔗 tinyurl.com/3w8we2bt @lseimpactblog.bsky.social
blogs.lse.ac.uk
If you want to publish papers in your own language, look to Diamond OA - LSE Impact
Diamond OA publications contain more work in languages other than English, Johan Rooryck & Janne Pölönen argue for more national & international co-ordination.
065
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
LSE Impact @lseimpactblog.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
💥New | If you want to publish papers in your own language, look to Diamond OA ✍️ @jpolonen.bsky.social & @johanrooryck.bsky.social #DiamondOA #AcademicPublishing #Bibliodiversity
blogs.lse.ac.uk
If you want to publish papers in your own language, look to Diamond OA - LSE Impact
Diamond OA publications contain more work in languages other than English, Johan Rooryck & Janne Pölönen argue for more national & international co-ordination.
01712
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Tracy Creagh @creaght.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
Exploring the diversity of multilingual and non-English #DiamondOA publications - @johanrooryck.bsky.social and @jpolonen.bsky.social @lseblogs.bsky.social blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsoci...
blogs.lse.ac.uk
If you want to publish papers in your own language, look to Diamond OA - LSE Impact
Diamond OA publications contain more work in languages other than English, Johan Rooryck & Janne Pölönen argue for more national & international co-ordination.
072
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
DORA @dorassessment.bsky.social · 13/05/2026
Rethinking assessment isn’t easy, especially in contexts shaped by global inequalities. In Uruguay, a growing movement is challenging metric‑driven systems and opening space for more inclusive and socially relevant research assessment. New blogpost by Natalia Gras & Judith Sutz 👉 bit.ly/RRA-Uruguay
Graphic announcing a new guest blog post on research evaluation reform in Uruguay, highlighting how metric-driven systems have shaped academic life and how collective efforts are creating change.Quote highlighting that, for the first time in Uruguay, universities, research institutes, and national organizations are collaborating to rethink research evaluation; guest blog post by Natalia Gras and Judith Sutz.Call-to-action graphic inviting readers to explore the full story and rethink what is valued in research, with link to the Uruguay research assessment blog post.
085
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
LucyCes @lucyces.bsky.social · 25/04/2026
Proud to have presented @reseaucirce.bsky.social's work about #openpeerreview in Canada at #RESSH2026. Report coming soon, so stay tuned! Research evaluation remains a critical lever of transformation for the scientific field. Thanks to colleagues and to our Firenze hosts for this inspiring event!
An academic conference presentation at the Rectorate of the University of Florence, Italy.An academic conference presentation at the Rectorate of the University of Florence, Italy.
1112
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 08/04/2026
Helsinki Initiative organizes 27 May 2026 15:00-16:30 CET a webinar on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication with three presentations by Carolina Pradier, @nalsi.bsky.social, and Ulla Sivunen (with comment by Tomasz Krawczyk).
Helsinki Initiative organizes a webinar series on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication with speakers representing different expert communities and strands of work. This event includes three presentations on global patterns of multilingualism in scholarly communication, language diversity of books collection of the Library of Congress, and signed language as language of scholarly and science communication.
021
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Yutong FEI 费钰童 @yutong-fei.bsky.social · 13/02/2026
Heureuse de partager mon dernier article : “Classification des contextes de citation : la dimension sémantique, entre enjeux de recherche d’information et stratégies industrielles. ”. Merci au comité éditorial de la revue et aux reviewers pour leurs travail. journals.openedition.org/edc/19293
journals.openedition.org
Classification des contextes de citation : la dimension sémantique,...
1. Une introduction à la citation et au contexte de citation La citation est un objet de recherche particulièrement intéressant car il a fédéré très tôt des travaux multidisciplinaires, théoriques ...
097
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Esa Väliverronen @esaval.bsky.social · 04/02/2026
Raporttini akateemisen vapauden tilasta Suomessa julkaistiin tänään. Se pohjautuu tutkijoille ja opettajille tehtyyn kyselyyn. Raportin loppuun kehittelin oman tulkintani siitä, mitkä kaikki tekijät vapautta uhkaavat. Tein siitä tällaisen kuvan. edition.fi/tsv/catalog/...
173
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
ALMASI project @almasiproject.bsky.social · 23/01/2026
New resources to advance #DiamondOA in Africa, Europe, and Latin America! ✅Scoping Report on Non-for-profit Publishing Ecosystems ✅Landscape Report on Diamond OA Publishing ✅Advocacy Materials: talking points, videoclips and organisation guide for online events. Find resources: u2l.fr/9qt8bo
01411
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Open Science NL @opensciencenl.bsky.social · 17/12/2025
Open Science NL is funding 27 replication studies with €5.2M. Projects will reanalyse data, repeat experiments, and explore variations across many fields. Read more 👉 www.openscience.nl/en/news/27-s...
openscience.nl
27 studies re-examined | Open Science NL
Open Science NL has awarded funding to 27 applicants to replicate earlier studies. They will reanalyse original data, repeat experiments, and replicate studies with slight variations to the original design. A total amount of 5.2 million euros was granted.
01711
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
ALMASI project @almasiproject.bsky.social · 11/12/2025
🎉The inaugural webinar of the Discussion Series on Scholar-led Publishing was today and it was perfect! 🙏Thank you to the 3 speakers and participants. 👀To see an overview of the presentations, expand the thread.
1105
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Public Knowledge Project @pkp.sfu.ca · 11/12/2025
Thank you @almasiproject.bsky.social for this webinar to connect with the ALMASI (Aligning and Mutualizing Nonprofit #OpenAccess Publishing Services Internationally) community and the discussion on why #DiamondOpenAccess matters for reclaiming knowledge! Learn more about ALMASI: almasiproject.org
almasiproject.org
Almasi – Aligning and Mutualizing Nonprofit Open Access Publishing Services Internationally
Aligning and Mutualizing Nonprofit Open Access Publishing Services Internationally
021
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Riitta Koikkalainen @riittakoikkalainen.bsky.social · 19/11/2025
Next on stage Milda Baltrimienė podering abt #multilingualism in research. #HelsinkiInitiative is one fine initiative, but it has some cons, too. Ahoy @jpolonen.bsky.social Milda's abstract: doi.org/10.7557/5.8164
222
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Mark A. Hanson @hansonmark.bsky.social · 11/11/2025
We wrote the Strain on scientific publishing to highlight the problems of time & trust. With a fantastic group of co-authors, we present The Drain of Scientific Publishing: a 🧵 1/n Drain: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820 Strain: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/... Oligopoly: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
A table showing profit margins of major publishers. A snippet of text related to this table is below.

1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.A figure detailing the drain on researcher time.

1. The four-fold drain

1.2 Time
The number of papers published each year is growing faster than the scientific workforce,
with the number of papers per researcher almost doubling between 1996 and 2022 (Figure
1A). This reflects the fact that publishers’ commercial desire to publish (sell) more material
has aligned well with the competitive prestige culture in which publications help secure jobs,
grants, promotions, and awards. To the extent that this growth is driven by a pressure for
profit, rather than scholarly imperatives, it distorts the way researchers spend their time.
The publishing system depends on unpaid reviewer labour, estimated to be over 130 million
unpaid hours annually in 2020 alone (9). Researchers have complained about the demands of
peer-review for decades, but the scale of the problem is now worse, with editors reporting
widespread difficulties recruiting reviewers. The growth in publications involves not only the
authors’ time, but that of academic editors and reviewers who are dealing with so many
review demands.
Even more seriously, the imperative to produce ever more articles reshapes the nature of
scientific inquiry. Evidence across multiple fields shows that more papers result in
‘ossification’, not new ideas (10). It may seem paradoxical that more papers can slow
progress until one considers how it affects researchers’ time. While rewards remain tied to
volume, prestige, and impact of publications, researchers will be nudged away from riskier,
local, interdisciplinary, and long-term work. The result is a treadmill of constant activity with
limited progress whereas core scholarly practices – such as reading, reflecting and engaging
with others’ contributions – is de-prioritized. What looks like productivity often masks
intellectual exhaustion built on a demoralizing, narrowing scientific vision.A table of profit margins across industries. The section of text related to this table is below:

1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.The costs of inaction are plain: wasted public funds, lost researcher time, compromised
scientific integrity and eroded public trust. Today, the system rewards commercial publishers
first, and science second. Without bold action from the funders we risk continuing to pour
resources into a system that prioritizes profit over the advancement of scientific knowledge.
8644453
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 03/11/2025
📢 Register for the 5th Helsinki Initiative webinar (8 December) on Multilingualism in Scholarly Communication with presentations by @tatsuya-amano.bsky.social, @karenstroobants.bsky.social and Andre Brasil! More information and registration: www.helsinki-initiative.org/en/events/5t...
074
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Janire Castellano Bueno, PhD @janirecas.bsky.social · 13/09/2025
🌍 Have you experienced language barriers at academic conferences, or not at all? We want to hear from everyone to better understand how language shapes participation and accessibility. 📝 Take our short survey and help make conferences more inclusive and multilingual: forms.gle/u8ESktcJP8Y6...
forms.gle
Amplifying global voices: Removing language barriers in academic conferences
We invite you to share your experiences with language barriers at academic conferences. Your insights will help shape more inclusive and multilingual events across disciplines and formats. This surve...
089
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
CWTS | Leiden University @cwts.nl · 22/10/2025
📣 Special seminar on 'Perspectives on the evaluation of science', with Emanuel Kulczycki, @alesiazuccala557.bsky.social, and Jochen Gläser. 🎧 Make sure to join! 📅 Friday, 31.10.2025 🕐 1:00-3:00 PM (CET) 📌 Online & at CWTS More information 👉 www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/events/20...
universiteitleiden.nl
Special Seminar: Perspectives on the evaluation of science
We are delighted to host a special seminar featuring the members of Eleonora Dagiene’s external PhD committee, held the day after her PhD defence. This session will bring together three distinguished ...
086
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
DOAJ @doaj.bsky.social · 13/10/2025
🌍💎 Bringing together #OpenAccess policymakers & funders across Africa, Europe, and Latin America is key to supporting #DiamondOA @almasiproject.bsky.social launches The Diamond OA Policy Forum on 29 October 2025, 15:00-16:30 UTC Register here: almasiproject.org/the-diamond-...
Visual image to promote the ALMASI Diamond OA Policy Forum Wednesday 29 October
054
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Andrey Lovakov @lovakov.bsky.social · 18/09/2025
"Across databases, delve (+1,500%), underscore (+1,000%), and intricate (+700%) had the largest increases between 2022 and 2024. Growth in LLM-term usage was much higher in STEM fields than in social sciences and arts and humanities" arxiv.org/abs/2509.09596
arxiv.org
How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis
This study investigates how Large Language Models (LLMs) are influencing the language of academic papers by tracking 12 LLM-associated terms across six major scholarly databases (Scopus, Web of Scienc...
022
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
European University Association (EUA) @eua.eu · 04/08/2025
Research assessment reform is essential to break the cycle of dependence on high-impact commercial journals and related metrics. ➡️ Reclaiming academic ownership of the #ScholarlyCommunication system buff.ly/0C0Wqfn #OpenScience
A promotional image featuring the logo of the European University Association for the briefing: "Reclaiming academic ownership of the scholarly communication system: Challenges and opportunities for universities." The background is a blue overlay.
022
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Érudit @erudit.org · 23/07/2025
→ Plaidoyer pour le multilinguisme en sciences 📚 Article à lire : @bowkerl.bsky.social, Mikael Laakso & @jpolonen.bsky.social explorent les risques liés au monolinguisme anglophone sur l’écosystème scientifique. 📌 L'article : id.erudit.org/iderudit/111... 📌 Résumé de l'article : shorturl.at/nKGgo
096
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
OpenCitations @opencitations.bsky.social · 17/07/2025
The July 2025 dump of OpenCitations Index is out! Now featuring 2.21 BILLION citations from 5 data sources. 👉 download.opencitations.net Ever wondered how these sources overlap? This chart shows where citations are shared and where they're unique:
053
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 15/07/2025
74.4% of the 21,886 WoS-indexed journals involve commercial professional publishers, 29% societies, and 27.8% research organisations as sole/co-publishers. Our paper co-authored with @zehrataskin.bsky.social, Emanuel Kulczycki & @mikaellaakso.bsky.social - now on QSS website: doi.org/10.1162/qss....
doi.org
Mapping the publisher types and collaborations behind Web of Science indexed journals
Abstract. Although the organisational aspects of scholarly journals—such as the types of organisations responsible for publishing individual journals, whether independently or in collaboration—have si...
0156
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 25/06/2025
Significant differences between European countries in the higher education institution's engagement with #CoARA, #HRS4R @dorassessment.bsky.social. This and other findings in my presentation at the CoARA General Assembly 23 June on CoARA Uptake across European HEIs: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
011
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 30/06/2025
Happy to announce the soft launch of DoLS - the Directory of Learned Societies, an open, growing database of learned societies and their journals worldwide, facilitating visibility, networking, and community-building! Explore #DoLS website: www.tsv.fi/en/services/...
397
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 25/06/2025
Significant differences between European countries in the higher education institution's engagement with #CoARA, #HRS4R @dorassessment.bsky.social. This and other findings in my presentation at the CoARA General Assembly 23 June on CoARA Uptake across European HEIs: doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
011
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Mark Huskisson @markhusk.bsky.social · 11/06/2025
This interesting new preprint on SocArXiv shows that "The landscape of academic journals is beyond the oligopoly: it is diverse and often grounded in public, academic-driven initiatives rather than market imperatives." osf.io/preprints/so...
1115
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 11/06/2025
📢 Our new study challenges the prevailing narrative that a few commercial publishers dominate global scholarly publishing! Read the preprint: Beyond the oligopoly: Scholarly journal publishing landscapes in Latin America and Europe. doi.org/10.31235/osf...
doi.org
OSF
01913
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Ludo Waltman @ludowaltman.bsky.social · 07/06/2025
Glad to see this report about 'reclaiming academic ownership of scholarly communication system'. I like presentation of diamond OA and publish-review-curate (PRC) as complementary approaches. Important to note that PRC is not only about reclaiming ownership but also about various other issues.
2105
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
European University Association (EUA) @eua.eu · 05/06/2025
📖 What are the main factors shaping the current academic publishing system? 🚧 What key challenges does the academic community face? 🔍 Are there opportunities for universities to reshape the future of #ScholarlyCommunication? 🔗 New EUA briefing buff.ly/0C0Wqfn #AcademicSky #EduSky
buff.ly
Reclaiming academic ownership of the scholarly communication system
EUA - European University Association
084
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
European University Association (EUA) @eua.eu · 06/06/2025
💎 📖 #Diamas project releases #DiamondOA Recommendations and Guidelines for Institutions, Funders, Sponsors, Donors, and Policymakers. ℹ️ buff.ly/bwSeFJL #OpenAccess #ScholarlyPublishing #OpenScience #SciencePolicy @eudch.bsky.social‬
buff.ly
DIAMAS releases Diamond Open Access Recommendations and Guidelines
EUA - European University Association
031
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
European University Association (EUA) @eua.eu · 04/06/2025
Universities and their communities play an essential role in protecting and promoting academic freedom. 🛡️ 🤲 They must commit to making academic freedom a lived and daily reality. Read EUA's position paper buff.ly/35qwaif #AcademicFreedom
buff.ly
How universities can protect and promote academic freedom
EUA - European University Association
021
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Daniel S. Katz @danielskatz.org · 28/05/2025
It's great to see that a national research evaluation organization, the Finnish Publication Forum (JUFO), has rated @joss-openjournals.bsky.social as level 1, recognizing its scholarly value Frankie Robertson helped make this happen, with Nordic-RSE, & wrote about it: nordic-rse.org/blog/joss-ju...
nordic-rse.org
JOSS re-evaluated as JUFO 1 in Finland, expands its definition - Nordic RSE
We bring together the community of people writing and contributing to research software from Nordic universities, research institutes, companies and other organizations to share knowledge, to organize...
075
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 29/05/2025
@polecopub.bsky.social presenting #Matilda as a new source for Open Citations at #WOOC2025 in Bologna
141
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 28/05/2025
📢 Webinaari 11.6. klo 10:00-11:30: Yliopistojen, AMKien ja tutkimuslaitosten näkemyksiä tutkimuksen yhteiskunnallisen vaikuttavuuden arvioinnista sekä Alankomaiden, Norjan, Puolan ja UK:n arviointijärjestelmien vertailu. Ilmoittautuminen ja lisätietoa: www.julkaisufoorumi.fi/fi/tapahtuma...
001
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Ludo Waltman @ludowaltman.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
Papers mills and other manipulative practices are major problem in scientific publishing system. Addressing this problem requires in-depth system-level understanding of dynamics leading to these practices. At @cwts.nl we have PhD position to work on this! www.universiteitleiden.nl/en/vacancies...
universiteitleiden.nl
PhD Paper Mills and Systematic Manipulation in Research Publishing
PhD candidate Paper Mills and Systematic Manipulation in Research PublishingThe past decade has seen the rise of distinct new challenges for research integrity in the context of scientific publishing....
11517
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 09/04/2025
Our paper "Learned societies in the academic landscape: challenges in identifying and categorizing organizations" was published today in Scientometrics: doi.org/10.1007/s111... Thank you Emanuel Kulczycki, @mikaellaakso.bsky.social and @zehrataskin.bsky.social for the great collaboration!
doi.org
Learned societies in the academic landscape: challenges in identifying and categorizing organizations - Scientometrics
This study explores ways of identifying learned societies within the Research Organization Registry (ROR), a type of organization that so far lacks its own category within the registry. Despite their ...
1112
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Samuel Moore @samuelmoore.org · 08/04/2025
Math journal editors resign to launch open-access title ‘free from pressure or influence’ retractionwatch.com/2025/04/07/m...
retractionwatch.com
Math journal editors resign to launch open-access title ‘free from pressure or influence’
The managing editors and entire editorial board of Mathematical Logic Quarterly, a Wiley title, have resigned, citing “unilateral decisions” by the publisher “that affected the editorial process.”&…
1177
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Matthieu Boisgontier @matthieuboisgontier.com · 08/04/2025
PeerJ is now part of a large for-profit commercial publisher. Sad 😶. peerj.com/blog/post/11...
073
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 03/04/2025
📢 The Draft Programme of the #RESSH2025 conference is published! 46 presentations, 5 posters, and a keynote by Toma Tasovac: "Reshaping Research Assessment: What Research Infrastructures Have Got to Do With It?" Info and registration: vastuullinentiede.fi/en/events/re...
vastuullinentiede.fi
RESSH2025 Conference
RESSH2025 conference of the international association ENRESSH (European Network for Research Evaluation in the SSH) is organized 19-21 May, 2025, in Helsinki, Finland. It brings together specialists o...
000
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 30/03/2025
📢Deadline for submissions to #STI2025 has been extended to 14 April 2025. The 29th Annual STI-ENID Conference will take place in Bristol from 3–5 September 2025. Submissions can be made via Oxford Abstracts, accessible through the conference website: www.stienid2025.org
stienid2025.org
Home | STIENID2025 Bristol
Official website of the 29th Annual STI ENID Conference 2025
010
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Johan Rooryck @johanrooryck.bsky.social · 27/03/2025
The European Diamond Capacity Hub (EDCH) is now on Bluesky! bsky.app/profile/eudc...
bsky.app
085
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Ludo Waltman @ludowaltman.bsky.social · 26/03/2025
I just published a blog post arguing that the reform movements for research assessment and scientific publishing need to better align their agendas. This is crucial for the success of both movements. www.leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/ass... @leidenmadtrics.bsky.social
leidenmadtrics.nl
Assessment reform and publishing reform need to go hand in hand
The need to reform research assessment and scientific publishing practices is widely recognized. However, Ludo Waltman argues that the assessment and publishing reform movements will be successful onl...
43531
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 26/03/2025
📢Registration is now open for the RESSH2025 conference 19-21 May 2025 in Helsinki, Finland! We look forward to 46 presentations, 5 posters, and a keynote by Toma Tasovac: "Reshaping Research Assessment: What Research Infrastructures Have Got to Do With It?": vastuullinentiede.fi/en/events/re...
vastuullinentiede.fi
RESSH2025 Conference
RESSH2025 conference of the international association ENRESSH (European Network for Research Evaluation in the SSH) is organized 19-21 May, 2025, in Helsinki, Finland. It brings together specialists o...
033
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Elizabeth Gadd @lizziegadd.bsky.social · 21/03/2025
Yay! You can now follow @coarassessment.bsky.social on Bluesky! 👇🏻
CoARA bluesky profile screenshot.
1158
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 19/03/2025
Tutkimuksen yhteiskunnallinen vaikuttavuus ja sen arviointi -raportin julkistamiswebinaari järjestetään tiistaina 8.4. klo 10—11.15. Tapahtuma on maksuton ja se järjestetään etänä (Zoom). Ilmoittautuneet saavat osallistumislinkin sähköpostiin: julkaisufoorumi.fi/fi/tapahtuma...
julkaisufoorumi.fi
Tutkimuksen yhteiskunnallinen vaikuttavuus ja sen arviointi- raportin julkistaminen
Tutkijat suhtautuvat myönteisesti tutkimuksen yhteiskunnallisen vuorovaikutuksen edistämiseen, mutta kokevat vaikuttavuuden arvioinnin haasteellisena. Raportin julkistamistilaisuudessa esitellään kyse...
010
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Sami Syrjämäki @samisyrjamaki.bsky.social · 17/03/2025
Linkkarissa minun ja @jpolonen.bsky.social kirjoitus kotimaisten tiedelehtien (ja kirjojen) merkityksestä: www.linkedin.com/feed/update/...
linkedin.com
Sami Syrjämäki on LinkedIn: Kotimaisten tiedelehtien palvelus yhteiskunnalle   Kuvittele, että…
Kotimaisten tiedelehtien palvelus yhteiskunnalle   Kuvittele, että käytössäsi ei olisi suomalaisia uutiskanavia. Suomea käsittelevät uutiset saat…
0257
Reposted by Janne Pölönen
Ludo Waltman @ludowaltman.bsky.social · 14/03/2025
Glad to see increasing interest in advancing objectives of Barcelona Declaration in discussions with publishers! Don't hesitate to reach out if you'd like to contribute to this. Several Barcelona Declaration working groups, one of which co-coordinated by me, are developing initiatives in this area.
012
Janne Pölönen @jpolonen.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
Tieteellisten seurain valtuuskunta (TSV) hakee toistaiseksi voimassa olevaan työsuhteeseen arvioinnin asiantuntijaa, jonka vastuulla on tieteellisten julkaisukanavien arvioinnin koordinointi ja kehittäminen. Hakuaika päättyy 7.4.2025. Lisätietoja hakuilmoituksessa: www.tsv.fi/fi/uutiset/t...
tsv.fi
Tieteellisten seurain valtuuskunta hakee asiantuntijaa
TSV hakee toistaiseksi voimassa olevaan työsuhteeseen arvioinnin asiantuntijaa, jonka vastuulla on tieteellisten julkaisukanavien arvioinnin koordinointi ja kehittäminen.
010