Reposted by Shilpa Jindia
Friendly reminder that @hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social thinks we should "turn the page" on these guys even though they're literally doing "show me your papers" shit after raiding the house of someone he works with. Every day. Who has the same job as him.
![MINUTE ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants shall respond to Plaintiffs' [25] Notice of Non-Compliance by 12:30 p.m. today, September 24, 2026. Signed by Judge Timothy J. Kelly on](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:vrmx2e5gsi23srsy2n7vljvb/bafkreierivrxs5mt3de3l3vgiirm7x6ieut74ojcrbk26nquy32xsrfm6m)
![The Court has considered the implication of both remedies and determined the best
course of action is to temporarily stay the policies. Although this Court has found that Venegas is likely to succeed on the merits, it also recognizes that “[a]n injunction is a drastic and
extraordinary remedy,” Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed Farms, 561 U.S. 139, 165, 130 S.Ct. 2743,
177 L.Ed.2d 461 (2010). In the Court’s opinion, staying the likely unlawful policies is a less drastic
remedy sufficient to redress Plaintiff’s alleged injury. See e.g., Kidd v. Mayorkas, 734 F.Supp.3d
967, 987 (S.D. Cal. May 15, 2024) (“the Court finds the less drastic remedy of vacatur to be
sufficient to redress the “Knock and Talk” Class's injury”). Accordingly, the Court will temporarily
stay the (1) Warrantless Entry Policy (permitting immigration officers to raid private construction
sites without a warrant or consent), (2) Preemptive Detention Policy (permitting immigration
officers to preemptively detain employees without a particularized suspicion that persons are
illegal immigrants), and (3) Continued Detention Policy (permitting immigration officers to
continue detaining workers even after they show evidence of citizenship or lawful presence.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:bbp2b224lro3bfnzcqwwnkfo/bafkreifdefmzqi4vpzv5ozneejjvagsljewyqbnabztledqeofczojrjmu)
