Sign in

Jens Friis Lund

@jenslund.bsky.social
773 followers 34 following 4 posts

Political ecologist. Interested in carbon removal, degrowth, justice.

PostsRepliesMedia
Jens Friis Lund @jenslund.bsky.social · 28/02/2024
Scholars and activists are invited to send short reflection pieces on political ecology in the run-up for POLLEN24 to JPE/Grassroots, Ecología Política, and the Journal of the Geographical Association of Tanzania (JGAT). More info here: grassrootsjpe.org/view/resourc...
grassrootsjpe.org
Grassroots JPE Resource
030
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
Glen Peters @glenpeters.bsky.social · 27/11/2023
Carbon, Capture, & Storage is not really something for oil & gas producers (other than storage infrastructure). The ones who need CCS the most, like cement, steel, waste, etc, are not the oil & gas industry (in case you had not noticed). www.iea.org/reports/the-...
163
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
Fredrik Eriksson @arpiegee.bsky.social · 16/11/2023
095
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 12/11/2023
This survey from 2009 is really a wild read. Most climate scientists surveyed thought 4-5C by end of century was the most likely, and that 2C was close to impossible to achieve. Imagine the results if you took this exact survey again today.... www.theguardian.com/environment/...
World will not meet 2C warming target, climate change experts agree
This article is more than 14 years old
Guardian poll reveals almost nine out of 10 climate experts do not believe current political efforts will keep warming below 2C
David Adam, environment correspondent
Tue 14 Apr 2009 01.01 CEST
145
Almost nine out of 10 climate scientists do not believe political efforts to restrict global warming to 2C will succeed, a Guardian poll reveals today. An average rise of 4-5C by the end of this century is more likely, they say, given soaring carbon emissions and political constraints.

Such a change would disrupt food and water supplies, exterminate thousands of species of plants and animals and trigger massive sea level rises that would swamp the homes of hundreds of millions of people.

The poll of those who follow global warming most closely exposes a widening gulf between political rhetoric and scientific opinions on climate change. While policymakers and campaigners focus on the 2C
55419
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
Will Yeates @wyeates.bsky.social · 08/11/2023
“Just five rich global north countries are responsible for the majority (51%) of planned new oil and gas extraction to 2050: the US, Canada, Australia, Norway and the UK. These countries have the responsibility to move first to phase out fossil fuel production.” www.theguardian.com/environment/...
theguardian.com
‘Insanity’: petrostates planning huge expansion of fossil fuels, says UN report
Plans by nations including Saudi Arabia, the US and UAE would blow climate targets and ‘throw humanity’s future into question’
13475345
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 06/11/2023
Impossible to describe these deals as anything other than extremely worrying www.middleeasteye.net/news/uae-ken...
middleeasteye.net
Kenya concedes 'millions of hectares' to UAE firm in latest carbon offset deal
Blue Carbon signs series of deals with African countries for carbon offset projects covering a total area of 24.5 million hectares
03611
Jens Friis Lund @jenslund.bsky.social · 03/11/2023
Highly recommend this👇
021
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
Rob @robertferry.bsky.social · 30/10/2023
How can we build a broad coalition for climate action and bring about the massive political movement needed? 1. Focus on planting a seed of desire for a post carbon world. 2. Avoid doom and fear narratives. 3. Avoid narratives of sacrifice or degrowth. 4. Avoid blaming, shaming, or finger pointing.
medium.com
Politically Effective Communications in the Era of Climate Despair
The strategy of climate apocalypse has lost its effectiveness and it’s time for something new.
011
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 01/11/2023
Just revisiting this interview with Dr Saleemul Huq, recorded in March 2022. I think he shows quite well how gross it can be sometimes when white people dismiss COP as a total irrelevancy, when it is still a valuable place to fight these battles on loss, damage, adaptation and accountability.
theclimatepod.libsyn.com
The Climate Pod: Climate Citizen: Addressing Loss And Damage
This is Part Three of our four-part series, Climate Citizen, in collaboration with This week, we look at the critical need to reckon with the loss and damage created by the climate crisis and hold ac...
1104
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
Kimberly Nicholas @kimberlynicholas.bsky.social · 01/11/2023
Just 1% of global population are regular flyers; they represent 50% of climate pollution from flights. (That was me until 2012!) For regular flyers, it's the biggest slice of your climate footprint. How to start flying less personally, at work, collectively: wecanfixit.substack.com/i/70289095/a... 🧪
wecanfixit.substack.com
How to fly less
Facts: Americans do care about climate; Feelings: Climate dissonance; Action: How to cut your own flying, and shift the system.
55933
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
Kate Mackenzie @katemac.bsky.social · 29/10/2023
“Nordhaus’s list of the indoor activities free of any effects from climate disruption include manufacturing, mining, transportation, communication, finance, insurance, real estate, trade, private sector services, and government services.” theintercept.com/2023/10/29/w...
theintercept.com
When Idiot Savants Do Climate Economics
How an elite clique of math-addled economists hijacked climate policy.
109849
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 28/10/2023
Probably the least surprising but perhaps still the most egregious / shameless is their net zero claims being 100% "net" and 0% "zero" All these offsets come from questionable projects, too - some worse than others. ketanjoshi.co/2023/10/28/n...
netflix offsets nearly all of their emissions
33711
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
Ketan Joshi @ketanjoshi.co · 26/10/2023
This is a tacit acknowledgement that offsets aren't a generous gift from corporations to climate action: they are a trade. The company pays a fee, and they get to scribble out as much of their climate responsibility as they please. www.marketwatch.com/story/whos-d...
The world is vastly off track for meeting essential climate goals, and in a worrying and unexpected plot twist, climate advocates are now careening toward a terrible mistake that could set back climate action by decades.

To win on climate, humanity must mobilize trillions of dollars in private green investment, particularly in emerging economies where greenhouse gas emissions are skyrocketing. Unfortunately, despite the urgency of the problem, some of the very groups seeking to accelerate climate action are poised to choke off one of the largest sources of climate finance for the developing world: the global voluntary carbon market (VCM).

The private sector is ready to do its part to finance climate action in the developing world. Over the past few years, thousands of global companies have voluntarily committed to achieve net-zero emissions by mid-century. Many companies are taking steps to meet their targets and are prepared to invest far more. 

Of course companies should deliver s
12512
Jens Friis Lund @jenslund.bsky.social · 23/10/2023
The POLLEN24 Conference CfP is out! Join us in Lima, Lund or Dodoma to discuss how political ecology can nurture plural and just socio-ecologial futures! Deadline: December 15th, 2023 // More info: pollen2024.brick.site/call #POLLEN24
010
Reposted by Jens Friis Lund
Wim Carton @wimcarton.bsky.social · 23/10/2023
Calling everyone working on political ecologies of carbon removal, carbon offsetting and net zero! We're now inviting abstracts for our CDR stream at POLLEN24. Deadline is 1 December, more details in the call text below. Join us in Lund next June! politicalecologynetwork.org/2023/10/23/p...
0109