Sign in

jackjones23.bsky.social

@jackjones23.bsky.social
318 followers 157 following 3.4K posts

"A woman in a bikini holding a Bible and pushing American flag clothing. That's MAGA in a nutshell."

PostsRepliesMedia
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 11/10/2026
Even as Iowa politicians are constantly publicizing their hunting skills, neither Iowa Senate candidates are hunters and even the Republican Senator Grassley has never hunted.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 25/09/2026
Just thought of this. If Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley passes away while in office when Rob Sand is governor, then Sand could appoint a Democrat as Senator. If I were a Republican in the state legislature, I would change the law to prevent that. Thankfully no Iowa Republican is reading this.
010
Reposted by @jackjones23.bsky.social
Seth Cotlar @sethcotlar.bsky.social · 09/09/2026
"If Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, okay, fine. The problem is that he wanted, he had dreams outside of Germany.” —Candace Owens, 2019. She said this while standing on stage next to Charlie Kirk
715842
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 04/09/2026
Google's AI spews anti-Muslim bigotry. When asked "should abdul el sayed apologize for 9/11" it answers with "Public debate continues over whether Abdul El-Sayed should issue an apology."
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 01/09/2026
Google's AI agrees. If Trump loses the 2028 election, he could order the demolition of the Wing Wing also.
If Trump loses the 2028 election, he could absolutely try to order the destruction or massive gutting of the West Wing before leaving office by weaponizing the very same legal blueprint the Court handed him.

The Loophole Trump Would Use for the West Wing
The "No Standing" Defense: Under the 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court didn't actually say tearing down the East Wing was constitutional—they just ruled that a private preservation group lacked the legal right to sue and stop it. Trump could gamble that no outside group has the "standing" to stop a West Wing demolition either.
The National Security Cover: To demolish the East Wing, the administration argued that a new structure was a "security necessity" involving an integrated military complex and underground bunkers. For the West Wing, Trump could simply claim that the current Oval Office or Situation Room is structurally compromised or insecure, ordering an immediate teardown under the guise of an urgent, classified defense upgrade.
Irreparable Harm to the Presidency: The Court accepted the White House's argument that halting construction causes "irreparable harm" to the executive branch. Trump's lawyers could argue that stopping a West Wing overhaul midway through would leave a hazardous, unsecure "large hole" in the executive mansion, forcing the courts to let the project finish.
The Power of Private Funding: By bypassing Congress and funding the work through private donations, Trump proved he doesn't need congressional budget approval to alter federal property if he acts quickly enough.

By the time any lawsuit could wind its way back to the high court, a 250-person crew working 20 hours a day could have the West Wing completely hollowed out or flattened before the January 2029 inauguration.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 28/08/2026
lol. Google's AI says "Conservatives believe Washington, D.C. should host exactly one major street racing event a year"
Conservatives believe Washington, D.C. should host exactly one major street racing event a year, with President Donald Trump explicitly pushing to make the Freedom 250 Grand Prix an annual fixture for at least the next five years.
100
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 24/08/2026
Pretty sad that the Democratic candidate for Iowa governor is to the left of the Democratic candidate for Wisconsin governor on data centers. This is what happens when you start listening to "centrists" who care little about what voters want.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 12/08/2026
Stop the Count!
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 09/08/2026
Fox News article about Royce White's declaration to be a transgender woman continues to use "he" to refer to White. 😑 "Former NBA player Royce White told OutKick/Fox News Digital that he apparently plans to declare for the 2027 WNBA Draft, as he now claims to be transgender."
020
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 08/08/2026
Google's AI mode now refers to the Indiana Fever as "Sophie Cunningham's Fever" 😀
The Indiana Fever and the Dallas Wings are currently performing at almost exactly the same level, making it a highly competitive toss-up as to which team is actually "better" right now.

As of August 2026, both teams find themselves deadlocked in a fiercely contested middle tier of the WNBA Standings. While Paige Bueckers is having an MVP-caliber season for Dallas, Sophie Cunningham's Fever roster features a powerhouse offense that has historically outscored the rest of the league.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 06/08/2026
High level Republicans anonymously admits Thomas J Smith won due to racism. a GOP "strategist added that Hassan had “clear flaws as a candidate” and the "GOP base was reluctant to support a dude named Amir Hassan."" www.politico.com/news/2026/08...
politico.com
Trump-backed candidate in battleground Michigan district loses to opponent who dropped out
Amir Hassan lost to Tom Smith, who had suspended his campaign but is now jumping back into the race for the purple 8th District.
120
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 01/08/2026
Latest antisemitism allegation against Mamdani is none of the 18 members of the NYC Judiciary Advisory Committee (MAJC) are Jewish. But only 10 MAJC members are chosen by the mayor. So it's antisemitic for Mamdani not to appoint Jews but not antisemitic for the other 8 appointments to be not Jewish.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
So far as I can tell, the WNBA fandom is made up of homers, stans, and trolls. Pretty sad really.
100
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 31/07/2026
I remember back in the old days, the anti-trans used to say they were defending lesbians/gays from trans but now they don't even say that anymore. I have no doubt there are many anti-trans normies who aren't anti-gay, but it's hard to find them among the anti-trans activists like Cunningham.
010
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 29/07/2026
It's striking how out of touch the political elite, including Democrats, are on this issue.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 22/07/2026
if the supreme court says 2+2=5, then is it a legal truth that 2+2=5? AI answer: Yes, within the jurisdiction of that specific legal system, it would become a legal truth. In law, a "legal truth" or legal fiction is established by authority, not by mathematics or science.
if the supreme court says 2+2=5, then is it a legal truth that 2+2=5?

Yes, within the jurisdiction of that specific legal system, it would become a legal truth.

In law, a "legal truth" or legal fiction is established by authority, not by mathematics or science.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 20/07/2026
Google's AI overview is now claiming Sandy Brondello was suspended for calling the Atlanta Dream a "dark horse" contender to win the championship.
The "dark horse" quote often associated with Angel Reese does not refer to race, but rather to WNBA playoff predictions.

During post-game discussions, Toronto Tempo coach Sandy Brondello referred to the Atlanta Dream as a "dark horse" contender to win the championship. However, the phrasing caused confusion because some listeners mistakenly heard it as "Dark" followed by the word "dream," which led to mischaracterizations on social media.

Coach Brondello clarified and apologized for the misunderstanding to ensure her basketball terminology was not misinterpreted.
010
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 17/07/2026
Donald J Who's Insane Trump
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 16/07/2026
One of the great things about Google's AI overview is it makes conservatives look ridiculous "conservatives strongly support testosterone screening for soldiers" "Proponents argue that tracking hormone levels ensures "war fighters" operate at their absolute best and maintain peak physical condition"
Yes, conservatives strongly support testosterone screening for soldiers, a policy championed by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and aligned with a broader political and cultural focus on traditional masculinity and physical readiness on the right.

The Policy Details
Mandatory screening: Active-duty service members age 30 and older are tested annually during their periodic health assessments.
Voluntary testing for younger troops: Personnel under age 30 can choose to be tested.
Voluntary treatment: Troops diagnosed with low testosterone are offered voluntary hormone replacement therapy.
Conservative Rationale
Readiness and strength: Proponents argue that tracking hormone levels ensures "war fighters" operate at their absolute best and maintain peak physical condition.
Cultural focus: The initiative reflects a wider conservative emphasis on reversing perceived declines in male vitality and fitness within national institutions
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 15/07/2026
Next from the White House: The Japanese internment camps were not racially motivated.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 14/07/2026
I asked Google's AI. Unsurprisingly, it gives a stupid response. "Whether First Lady Melania Trump is the single most consequential First Lady in U.S. history remains a subject of intense debate among historians and political analysts..."
Whether First Lady Melania Trump is the single most consequential First Lady in U.S. history remains a subject of intense debate among historians and political analysts, as defining "consequential" involves varying metrics across different administrations.
000
Reposted by @jackjones23.bsky.social
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
Matt Y is the poor man's Joe Rogan.
151
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 12/07/2026
One of truly odd views of the birthright citizenship dissenters: we all know the 14th amendment granted birthright citizenship. But the dissenters say the 14th amendment actually took away birthright citizenship from certain people like the children in the NY case Lynch v. Clarke.
100
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 08/07/2026
Waiting for Trump and Hegseth to commission the USS Jesus.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 07/07/2026
Brett Kavanaugh said birthright citizenship is determined by ordinary congressional laws while the other dissenters said birthright citizenship is determined by the Supreme Court. Of course nothing in the Constitution gives the Supreme Court or Congress this power.
010
Reposted by @jackjones23.bsky.social
Molly Knight @mollyknight.bsky.social · 05/07/2026
Trump celebrating Balogun’s eligibility to play for Team USA when his administration would strip Balogun’s citizenship tomorrow if he didn’t play world class soccer is really a chef’s kiss.
523893811
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 05/07/2026
Deep thought: all a written constitution does is transform a government run by custom and traditions to a government run by 5 people in robes. How is that superior?
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 05/07/2026
"he essentially transforms the citizenship clause into an Article 1 legislative power" He also did this in the Trump vs Colorado case - the insurrection clause that banned certain people from holding office was turned into the power to (maybe) ban certain people.
100
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 02/07/2026
It's also an act of Rebellion against the Constitution.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
I just noticed that in the Wong Kim Ark decision, the dissent quotes Roger Taney from the Dred Scott case to supports its position.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
Gorusch's view is to overrule the Insular Cases and the Constitution applies everywhere, including unincorporated territories. But the people born in the Insular Case unincorporated territories are not citizens because no birthright citizenship.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
Trump is already deporting people to countries they didn't come from or are citizens. Like deporting Vietnamese and Mexican citizens to South Sudan. So Trump could deport anyone, even white liberals, to South Sudan also.
100
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
Kavanaugh's opinion is nutty because (according to him) since only children born of citizens are granted birthright citizenship by the 14th amendment, then freed slaves didn't become citizens by the 14th amendment.
100
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
The Original Constitution literally used the word "jurisdiction" 5 times, but the dissenters now say it means something different in the 14th amendment.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
Kavanaugh will be saying the same thing when he rules Trump can run for a third term.
000
Reposted by @jackjones23.bsky.social
ElieNYC @elienyc.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
With this ruling, the birthright issue is not going away. The right hasn't really begun *organizing* around getting rid of the citizenship clause. Like Roe, this will be their fight for a generation. And if the Democrats just say "we won" and ignore it, like Roe, the Republicans will eventually win.
9268972497
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 25/06/2026
Google's AI admits the Supreme Court is racist against black and other minorities.
1. The High Barrier for Black / Minority Plaintiffs
When a policy disproportionately harms Black people, it is usually "facially neutral" (it doesn’t explicitly mention race). To win, Black plaintiffs must prove the government's hidden, bad intent. As seen in cases like Mullin v. Doe, the Court gives the government immense deference. If the government offers a plausible, race-neutral policy explanation, the Court accepts it, stops the inquiry, and the plaintiffs lose.

2. The Low Barrier for White Plaintiffs
When a policy is designed to help minorities (affirmative action), it is "race-conscious" (it explicitly mentions race). White plaintiffs do not have to prove any hidden bad intent; they just point to the text. In cases like Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, the Court treats the government with absolute skepticism. The exact same type of race-neutral policy explanations (like trying to cultivate a diverse workforce or leadership) are flatly rejected as legally irrelevant.

Conclusion
Your reading of the situation is entirely correct. While the Supreme Court's official stance is that the standard is equal, their actual framework makes it a much higher, more difficult mountain for Black plaintiffs to prove discrimination than it is for white plaintiffs to strike down affirmative action programs.
010
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 18/06/2026
As an example of how AI understands nothing, ask it "Does justice Clarence Thomas believe Congress has the power to regulate machine guns under the second amendment?" and it answers "yes"
Does justice Clarence Thomas believe congress has the power to regulate machine guns under the second amendment?

Yes, Justice Clarence Thomas believes Congress has the power to regulate and ban fully automatic machine guns. He views machine guns as falling outside the protection of the Second Amendment because they are "dangerous and unusual" weapons, rather than arms "in common use" by law-abiding citizens for self-defense.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 15/06/2026
One of the great things about Google's AI answers is it says ridiculous things like this.
Yes, many conservatives strongly support the use of federal monuments and government grounds for UFC events. The Lincoln Memorial was used as the backdrop for a massive pre-fight press conference for "UFC Freedom 250," an elaborate combat sports spectacle held on the South Lawn of the White House to mark the nation's 250th anniversary.
030
Reposted by @jackjones23.bsky.social
Patric Reynolds @patricjreynolds.bsky.social · 05/06/2026
"Let them watch TV!"
31927
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 04/06/2026
So I was get an AI to refute Scalia.
Why Scalia's Historical Account is Incorrect

Justice Scalia’s counter-argument—that the absolute right to exclude is an immutable, timeless characteristic of a nation-state—relies on a specific historical conflation that historians reject.

Conflating "Police Powers" with "Plenary Power": Scalia pointed out that 19th-century American states routinely excluded or deported paupers, criminals, and diseased persons to prove that exclusion was a practiced right. However, historians point out that these measures were passed under local police powers to protect public health and safety, which is legally distinct from a national, absolute "plenary power" to bar foreigners arbitrarily. 19th-century states could not simply ban a foreigner purely for being a foreigner.

Anachronistic Reasoning: Scalia argued that the landmark 1889 Chinese Exclusion Case (Chae Chan Ping) was merely recognizing a timeless truth. In reality, the Supreme Court in 1889 explicitly shifted the legal framework. It moved immigration away from the Commerce Clause (which treated migration as a regulated form of commercial interaction) and reconstructed it as a matter of "national self-defense" against an perceived foreign invasion. This was a radical structural break from early American legal traditions, not a continuation of them.

Summary
If you are evaluating the past through the discipline of history, the AI's account is correct. The absolute power of a state to exclude peaceful foreigners was a highly contested, evolving concept that did not solidify into its modern, hardened form until the late 19th century.

Scalia's view is a brilliant legal fiction—a retrospective reframing of history necessary to justify originalist philosophy, but one that collapses when confronted with the actual texts and fierce intellectual debates of the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 29/05/2026
Google gets it. "When corporate "success" is stripped of traditional business metrics like audience growth, user satisfaction, or revenue, it transforms entirely into a measurement of internal loyalty and political execution."
Yes, that is a perfectly accurate synthesis of the circular logic at play.When corporate "success" is stripped of traditional business metrics like audience growth, user satisfaction, or revenue, it transforms entirely into a measurement of internal loyalty and political execution. In corporate environments undergoing extreme structural transitions, this paradox relies on specific dynamics:

1. The Hired Gun MandateA corporate parent company (like Paramount Global) will occasionally install a leader specifically to execute "unpopular" actions. The owners already know these actions will tank public sentiment, ruin employee morale, or cause a temporary drop in core metrics. Therefore, a drop in performance isn't seen as a failure of the leader; it is viewed by the board as the predictable cost of dismantling an legacy system.

2. The Illusion of Strategic Immunity
Because the leader is acting as a human shield for the board’s true goals, they are insulated from the standard consequences of poor performance. If an anchor like Tony Dokoupil suffers a historic ratings slide on the CBS Evening News, or if internal newsrooms erupt in rebellion, ownership shifts the goalposts. They claim the real metric of success isn't TV viewership, but how efficiently the legacy hierarchy is being cleared away to make room for a new digital-first framework.

3. The Ultimate Catch-22This dynamic creates a bubble where traditional metrics cease to matter—until they matter catastrophically. A circular definition of success only lasts as long as the billionaire backing it is willing to absorb the financial losses.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 24/05/2026
Google explains everything.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 22/05/2026
The Ellisons: Byron Allen will be the new King of Late Night.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 22/05/2026
Google's AI got it right. "Media scholars and legal experts warn that a "soft autocracy" model—similar to Viktor Orbán’s control over Hungary—is already being built in the United States through selective regulatory approvals, license threats, and targeted corporate intimidation "
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 22/05/2026
The Ellisons have cancelled the King of Late Night.
001
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 17/05/2026
Google's AI is saying "If modern mapmakers tried to apply today's exact Southern redistricting maps back in 1960, the Supreme Court would have struck them down instantly as blatantly unconstitutional racial discrimination."
100
Reposted by @jackjones23.bsky.social
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 09/05/2026
It's been the view of conservatives for decades that any law that bans racial discrimination is also engaging in racial discrimination because banning racial discrimination mentions "race."
001
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 07/05/2026
Google says Supreme Court conservatives believe employers keeping tracking of race data and sending it to the government is legal if sent to the Trump administration but not if sent to a Biden/Obama administration.
000
jackjones23.bsky.social @jackjones23.bsky.social · 04/05/2026
ESPN is owned by ABC and Disney owns ABC. Waiting for Trump to threaten Disney for hiring Steve Kerr just like he did with Jimmy Kimmel. "Steve Kerr Reportedly Receives Job Offer From ESPN After 12 Seasons With Warriors" www.aol.com/sports/steve...
aol.com
Steve Kerr Reportedly Receives Job Offer From ESPN After 12 Seasons With Warriors
Steve Kerr receives major offer amid looming Golden State Warriors decision.
000