Sign in

It’s airborne

@its-airborne.bsky.social
1.4K followers 107 following 36 posts

Keeping track of the airborne/aerosol Covid19 etc transmission facts so that the judicial inquiries can't ignore the fomites/droplets lies its-airborne.org

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by It’s airborne
David Osborn @safedavid3.bsky.social · 13/03/2026
CATA (Covid Airborne Transmission Alliance) has today issued this press release ahead of next Thursday's publication of the Inquiry's module 3 report: tinyurl.com/CATA-press-r...
tinyurl.com
18450
Reposted by It’s airborne
Mark Ungrin @mark-ungrin.bsky.social · 04/04/2025
Separate from the need to retract the study, please also look into why the poor quality of review #1 wasn't caught. It seems to have been written by an LLM, and if it's not then it's someone totally unqualified to review. Either way, not something you want the Springer-Nature brand associated with.
052
Reposted by It’s airborne
Mark Ungrin @mark-ungrin.bsky.social · 04/04/2025
Looking forward to seeing some action on it. The one good thing about this example is that there really is no way to justify how unserious it is. Particularly as the misinformation is a direct danger to human health, there's significant public interest in a thorough review and urgent retraction.
1292
Reposted by It’s airborne
Blake Murdoch @blakemurdoch.bsky.social · 10/03/2025
Hi, I have an important article out tomorrow, please stay tuned. Just getting my profile going on blue sky. Can you help amplify? @mark-ungrin.bsky.social @amandalhu.bsky.social @realnosferatu.bsky.social @dfisman.bsky.social @davidjoffe64.bsky.social @jvipondmd.bsky.social @barryhunt008.bsky.social
87437
It’s airborne @its-airborne.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
its-airborne.org/2020/March was updated to refer to the Petri dish visualizaion of droplet transmission of bacterial infections (@1goodtern.bsky.social insight)
110
It’s airborne @its-airborne.bsky.social · 21/02/2025
Yep, it is annoying that the A or B narrative today EXCLUDES keep schools open but urgently do improvised fresh air and air cleaning/filtration tricks until more permanent installations can make them safe long term.
020
It’s airborne @its-airborne.bsky.social · 17/02/2025
I asked claude.ai to come up with an reality tree for Tern's insightful understanding as to how pandemic handling went wrong and got this mermaid.live/edit#pako:eN...
121
Reposted by It’s airborne
Dr Satoshi Akima, FRACP @toshiakima.bsky.social · 04/11/2023
The Central Error of the Pandemic… Is that of running pandemic management by laissez-faire socioeconomic principles. If you grasp this, all the other errors fall into place as the inevitable consequence of following that line of thought. 🧵 1/x
18453161
It’s airborne @its-airborne.bsky.social · 12/12/2024
Grok2 on why the WHO lied
why did the WHO lie about the airborne nature of covid19?
15 posts
15 web pages
The World Health Organization (WHO) faced significant criticism and scrutiny regarding its initial stance on the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, particularly with respect to the airborne nature of the virus. Here are several key points that explain why the WHO's response might have been perceived as misleading or slow:

Historical Precedents and Paradigms: The reluctance to acknowledge airborne transmission can be traced back to historical paradigms in medicine. For much of the 20th century, there was resistance to the idea of airborne transmission due to the dominance of the droplet model, which was influenced by early 20th-century public health official Charles Chapin's views against miasma theory. This historical skepticism towards airborne pathogens as a primary transmission route led to a bias in how diseases were studied and understood.
Scientific Rigor and Evidence Gathering: The WHO initially required what they considered robust scientific evidence before officially recognizing a transmission mode like airborne transmission. This was partly because labeling a disease as "airborne" has specific implications for infection control, including the need for high-grade personal protective equipment (PPE) and specialized ventilation systems in healthcare settings. The lack of definitive evidence at the early stages of the pandemic, particularly in terms of viable virus detection in aerosols, contributed to the delay in acknowledgment.
121
It’s airborne @its-airborne.bsky.social · 12/12/2024
I asked grok2 about billionaire motivations for not doing ventilation and air-filter work
What is the billionaire rationale for not doing airborne mitigations to greatly slow covid transmission?  Why is mass disability and illness preferable to ventilation work and the additional air-filters/cleaners in businesses?
1 post
15 web pages
The rationale behind not implementing extensive airborne mitigations in commercial spaces by billionaires and corporations involves multiple economic, operational, and ideological considerations:

Economic Impact:
Cost-Benefit Analysis: The primary rationale often cited involves the cost of upgrading ventilation systems or installing advanced air filtration systems. These upgrades can be expensive, and some businesses might see the return on investment as low, especially if they perceive the direct threat of illness to their operations as diminished or under control. The financial burden of retrofitting existing buildings with better ventilation systems might not seem justified when weighed against perceived benefits, especially post-acute phases of pandemics.
131
It’s airborne @its-airborne.bsky.social · 09/12/2024
Any formula for average per infection QALY losses yet? Say, 1.5% loss at age 20 per infection rising to 8% at age 70? Is it QALYs or DALYS of something that conveys the message to ordinatly people? - including earlier death for some.
010
It’s airborne @its-airborne.bsky.social · 24/11/2024
ChatGPT doesn't think there are polarized positions around C19's mechanism of transmission, only severity/risk, public health measures, vaccination, trust in sci & authorities, and origin.
120
It’s airborne @its-airborne.bsky.social · 09/11/2024
Anyone interested in helping build NotMild.org. I was told the idea was to be able to: 1. verbally say "Not mild dot org has the details" 2. or print a card, telling a person to go to it 3. or link to it from social media. Cos social media should be all that we do.
notmild.org
130
It’s airborne @its-airborne.bsky.social · 08/11/2024
How far away is a treatment for active covid that's ubiquitous and wholly preventative of a) serious cardiovascular and cerebrovascular damage, b) hindering CD4/CD8 function for months, c) the 300 or so long covid symptoms? 1-5 years 5-10 10 +
100
It’s airborne @its-airborne.bsky.social · 10/10/2023
OK, v7. Groups #3 and #4 need snappy names. I need MD and medical science collaborators here. The reason this is important is that 'the unaware' think their risk of #1 and #2 is minimal. They've been persuaded their fitness will make their C19 infection mild and firmly in their past.
000
It’s airborne @its-airborne.bsky.social · 25/09/2023
Version 6. Groups #3 and #4 need names
020
Reposted by It’s airborne
The Vertlartnic @thev.bsky.social · 25/09/2023
UK Health Lead: The Next Time We Have A Pandemic, We’re Just Going To Let Everyone Die.
A middle aged woman squints at the sky in front of some big buildings.
Headline:
UK Health Lead: The Next Time We Have A Pandemic, We’re
Just Going To Let Everyone Die. 
Story by Si Coe and Harry Jennis
511840
It’s airborne @its-airborne.bsky.social · 24/09/2023
So good…
020
It’s airborne @its-airborne.bsky.social · 21/09/2023
Version 5 with new column "As it appears to others"
010
It’s airborne @its-airborne.bsky.social · 20/09/2023
An attempt to group Covid19 outcomes. Version 4, as it happens.
030