Sign in

Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly

@innovation.bsky.social
3.2K followers 1.4K following 119 posts

Mostly on LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/misha-teplitskiy

PostsRepliesMedia
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
How should we deter student from cheating?? Well, if history is any guide...
021
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
ethos.lps.library.cmu.edu/article/id/19/
ethos.lps.library.cmu.edu
Peer Review
000
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
One reason modern science ended up using external peer review is because refereeing lots of papers in-house kind of sucks for the editors
140
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Ethan Mollick @emollick.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
Unexpected finding from a study on ChatGPT's impact on college: "once the COVID-19 disruption is modeled separately, the introduction of ChatGPT had no detectable effect on grades.. course evaluations for subject understanding, interest, and relative workload show no change" arxiv.org/pdf/2607.21534
2607
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
Looks cool
021
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
4. 🤔🤔🤔
020
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 30/06/2026
3. Null results declining thanks to LLMs 🤔😭 (Via Honglin Bao)
060
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 29/06/2026
2. Do university presidents matter? Do they steer resources towards research fields they come from? Zerin Dong's paper suggests yes and yes
183
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 29/06/2026
Alright boys and girls, let's reboot this account and see what's going on over at #ICSSI2026! A thread 🧵... 1. Gross and Bergstrom with a deep slide: incentives for early stage evaluations (grants) different from late stage (papers)
0142
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 18/01/2026
A nice reminder that it's hard to know how often simultaneous discoveries happen in science. Any measures based on scholarly literature will be severe undercounts due to secrecy or simply unpublished work
080
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
New piece w/ James Evans in Science explores what we call 'science after science', an era where our ability to control nature may exceed our ability to understand it; a new struggle to sustain curiosity & understanding under AI's predictive dominance. #ai #science www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
science.org
After science
Twenty-five years ago, Ted Chiang wrote a prescient science fiction short that began: “It has been 25 years since a report of original research was last submitted to our editors for publication, makin...
03011
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
James M. Zumel Dumlao @jamesmzd.bsky.social · 14/08/2025
Now published at PNAS ‼️ w/ @innovation.bsky.social How does peer reviewer diversity affect fairness in peer review and the direction of published science? We find a "geographical representation bias" in 60 STEM journals published by @ioppublishing.bsky.social. www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Title and author info of PNAS paper linked
2236
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
SSRN @ssrn.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
This paper explores academic peer review as a source of knowledge transfer and learning for the reviewers themselves. spkl.io/63328A1crC @innovation.bsky.social @jamesmzd.bsky.social
Stack of papers and books
132
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Peter Eibich @peibich.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
Bad news for economists...
1649
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Kara Gavin @karagavin.bsky.social · 07/07/2025
Wow - an important read for #academicsky #scisky #medsky, about a study on professional social media activity by female scientists vs male, performed using @altmetric.com data from 2013-2018 (so, pre-Bluesky) Summary: news.umich.edu/fewer-women-... Paper: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
news.umich.edu
Fewer women amplify their scientific voices online
A new University of Michigan study finds that women are about 28% less likely than men to promote their scientific papers on X (formerly Twitter)—a seemingly minor digital decision that could have big...
511041
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Quentin André @quentinandre.bsky.social · 08/07/2025
Do you remember Francesca Gino's claim on her website that HBS analyzed the "wrong data file" in their investigation, and that a "real file" proved her innocence? HBS is now claiming that the "real file" was fabricated by Gino... and thus that Gino's claim was defamatory.
68116
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 07/07/2025
www.nytimes.com/1981/04/26/a...
nytimes.com
AN INDEX TO GETTING AHEAD (Published 1981)
010
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 07/07/2025
In 1981 NYT published a piece on the then-new citation index, and how it was being used "unintentionally" for performance evaluations
1105
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
James M. Zumel Dumlao @jamesmzd.bsky.social · 06/07/2025
🏮NEW WORKING PAPER ALERT🏮 Scientists collectively spend tens of millions of hours peer reviewing each year, mostly for no $$. Why?? In new work w/ Charles Ayoubi and @innovation.bsky.social, we observe a private benefit for participating in evaluation: 💡💡Learning💡💡
Title page of "Learning by Evaluating"Probability of citing manuscript within 3 years, by review status. Reviewers are more than twice as likely to cite reviewed paper in future work compared to invited reviewers who declined due to unavailability.
25012
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 06/07/2025
Interesting take. Thanks for linking
000
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 05/07/2025
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... @charles @jamesmzd.bsky.social
papers.ssrn.com
Learning by Evaluating: Evidence from Academic Peer Review
The evaluation of innovative projects is an essential task for scientific and business organizations alike. While prior work has focused on the quality of evalu
021
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 05/07/2025
Why do we peer review? In a new paper, we establish a self-interested reason: learning. With a quasi-experimental design applied to admin data from 55 journals, we show reviewing a paper doubles chances of citing it in future work!
3385
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 01/07/2025
😇
000
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 01/07/2025
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
nature.com
The gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on social media - Nature Communications
The study shows a significant gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on Twitter, finding that women are about 28% less likely to promote their own academic papers compared to men, a disparity which is...
001
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 01/07/2025
Men are much more likely to self-promote their papers on Twitter/X than women
281
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 22/06/2025
Seems relevant: politicians are more likely to vote for war when they don't have sons who would do the fighting www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...
journals.uchicago.edu
No Kin in the Game: Moral Hazard and War in the US Congress | Journal of Political Economy: Vol 131, No 9
We study agency frictions in the US Congress. We examine the long-standing hypothesis that political elites engage in conflict because they fail to internalize the associated costs. We compare the vot...
030
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 20/06/2025
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
jamanetwork.com
NIH Funding Has Stagnated Since 2003
This Viewpoint explores how funding has changed at the National Institutes of Health over time and discusses how continued investment is necessary to maintain the current level of biomedical research.
040
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 19/06/2025
www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1...
science.org
Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation
000
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 19/06/2025
First-ever ranking of journals by impact factor, published by Garfield in Science in 1972. Science is ranked #77, impact factor 2.99 Nature is #114, impact factor 2.34
1233
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Eugene Vinitsky 🍒 @eugenevinitsky.bsky.social · 19/05/2025
Going to the hospital because I broke my wrist smashing the endorse button: www.understandingai.org/p/i-got-fool...
understandingai.org
I got fooled by AI-for-science hype—here's what it taught me
I used AI in my plasma physics research and it didn’t go the way I expected.
611929
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 15/05/2025
No, I'd say conventional wisdom doesn't even conceptualize interdisc. as topic vs knowledgebase, it's usually just 1 dimensional. We see that conceptualization as one of our contributions.
010
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 15/05/2025
Feels reasonable to me too. But that's not quite the conventional wisdom 🤷
110
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 15/05/2025
Yup, you're right. Here's one study of grants: www.nature.com/articles/nat...
nature.com
Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success - Nature
The degree of interdisciplinarity in research proposals negatively correlates with funding success across a wide range of research fields.
140
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 15/05/2025
Tldr: conventional wisdom only partially true, depends on - which interdis. type we're talking about - how types align with each other and audience www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
161
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 15/05/2025
Conventional wisdom says interdisciplinary research is valuable but harder to get through peer review (need to please diverse reviewers, etc). @sdxiang.bsky.social Daniel and I partnered with @ioppublishing.bsky.social to test this wisdom and add nuance
1219
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Sydney Gordon @sydneyg.bsky.social · 03/05/2025
Schism 2: electric boogaloo
031
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 02/05/2025
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
YOUR RIGHT ARM FOR A PUBLICATION IN AER?
The time tradeoff (TTO) method is popular in medical decision making for valuing health states. We use it to elicit economists' preferences for publishing in top economic journals and for living with...
000
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 02/05/2025
Periodic reminder that economists would sacrifice half a thumb for an AER pub
2114
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...
journals.uchicago.edu
Quality Matters: The Expulsion of Professors and the Consequences for PhD Student Outcomes in Nazi Germany | Journal of Political Economy: Vol 118, No 4
I investigate the effect of faculty quality on PhD student outcomes. To address the endogeneity of faculty quality I use exogenous variation provided by the expulsion of mathematics professors in Nazi...
000
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
Does professor quality matter for training the next generation of researchers? Or will good PhD students do good research either way? Quality matters
160
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
There used to be very little turnover in NIH sections, now there's a lot more
010
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
papers.ssrn.com
Antitrust Enforcement Increases Economic Activity
We hand-collect and standardize information describing all 3,055 antitrust lawsuits brought by the Department of Justice (DOJ) between 1971 and 2018. Using rest
000
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
Hmmm, maybe enforcing antitrust is a good idea 🤔
131
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Fredrik Jutfelt 🐠 @jutfelt.bsky.social · 22/04/2025
When you ask for the data
6374
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Noah Williams @bellmanequation.bsky.social · 22/04/2025
The academic job market has changed just a bit (from an interview with Robert Barro)
1829527
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 17/04/2025
We find ChatGPT use in preprints was *higher* in countries where it was ostensibly prohibited! Open question why prohibition didn't work: maybe OpenAI didn't try hard enough? maybe the workarounds too good? Lots of limitations, details in the paper: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/... (3/3)
021
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 17/04/2025
We measure use of ChatGPT around the world in science, specifically preprints. We use insight from (Liang et al. 2024) that early versions of ChatGPT over- and under-represented certain words, and develop a classifier. Various tests shows it works quite well. (2/3)
110
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 17/04/2025
Can we stop diffusion of particular AI technologies to countries we don't "like"? ChatGPT is useful case. OpenAI *still* prohibits access in major countries. But do these prohibitions actually work? New paper by @honglin-bao.bsky.social and @sunmengyi.bsky.social suggests they don't! 1/3
173
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Don Moynihan @donmoyn.bsky.social · 11/04/2025
Marc Andreessen really, really hates universities, which seems to be a pretty common sensibility from billionaires who have spent too much time online. www.nytimes.com/2025/03/18/o...
There is, Andreessen argued in a Jan. 28 exchange with Lex Fridman, a podcaster and research scientist at M.I.T.:

no way to fix American higher education without replacement, and there is no way to replace them without letting them fail. And in a sense, this is the most obvious conclusion of all time. What happens in the business world when a company does a bad job? It fails and another company takes its place. That’s how you get progress. Below this is the process of evolution.

These places have cut themselves off from evolution at the institutional level and at the individual level, which is shown by the widespread abuse of the tenure system. We have just stalled out. We have built an ossified system, an ossified, centralized, corrupt system.
1261267234
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 10/04/2025
Although we don't find discrimination at *entry* into PhDs, we can't rule out it existing later on (or in other fields) Overall, with most PhDs going into industry, important to have some hard (and arguably positive) data about the modal path! www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... (3/3)
sciencedirect.com
The effect of trainee career intentions on mentor's interest in the trainee: Experimental evidence from academia
In many industries trainees often seek careers different from their mentors. For example, many PhD students seek non-academic careers. Anecdotally, me…
010