Sign in

Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly

@innovation.bsky.social
3.2K followers 1.4K following 119 posts

Mostly on LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/misha-teplitskiy

PostsRepliesMedia
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 08/09/2026
How should we deter student from cheating?? Well, if history is any guide...
021
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 25/08/2026
One reason modern science ended up using external peer review is because refereeing lots of papers in-house kind of sucks for the editors
140
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Ethan Mollick @emollick.bsky.social · 24/07/2026
Unexpected finding from a study on ChatGPT's impact on college: "once the COVID-19 disruption is modeled separately, the introduction of ChatGPT had no detectable effect on grades.. course evaluations for subject understanding, interest, and relative workload show no change" arxiv.org/pdf/2607.21534
2607
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
Looks cool
021
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 01/07/2026
4. 🤔🤔🤔
020
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 29/06/2026
2. Do university presidents matter? Do they steer resources towards research fields they come from? Zerin Dong's paper suggests yes and yes
183
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 29/06/2026
Alright boys and girls, let's reboot this account and see what's going on over at #ICSSI2026! A thread 🧵... 1. Gross and Bergstrom with a deep slide: incentives for early stage evaluations (grants) different from late stage (papers)
0142
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 18/01/2026
A nice reminder that it's hard to know how often simultaneous discoveries happen in science. Any measures based on scholarly literature will be severe undercounts due to secrecy or simply unpublished work
080
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Eamon Duede @eduede.bsky.social · 14/11/2025
New piece w/ James Evans in Science explores what we call 'science after science', an era where our ability to control nature may exceed our ability to understand it; a new struggle to sustain curiosity & understanding under AI's predictive dominance. #ai #science www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
science.org
After science
Twenty-five years ago, Ted Chiang wrote a prescient science fiction short that began: “It has been 25 years since a report of original research was last submitted to our editors for publication, makin...
02911
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
James M. Zumel Dumlao @jamesmzd.bsky.social · 14/08/2025
Now published at PNAS ‼️ w/ @innovation.bsky.social How does peer reviewer diversity affect fairness in peer review and the direction of published science? We find a "geographical representation bias" in 60 STEM journals published by @ioppublishing.bsky.social. www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
Title and author info of PNAS paper linked
2236
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
SSRN @ssrn.bsky.social · 23/07/2025
This paper explores academic peer review as a source of knowledge transfer and learning for the reviewers themselves. spkl.io/63328A1crC @innovation.bsky.social @jamesmzd.bsky.social
Stack of papers and books
132
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Peter Eibich @peibich.bsky.social · 21/07/2025
Bad news for economists...
1649
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Kara Gavin @karagavin.bsky.social · 07/07/2025
Wow - an important read for #academicsky #scisky #medsky, about a study on professional social media activity by female scientists vs male, performed using @altmetric.com data from 2013-2018 (so, pre-Bluesky) Summary: news.umich.edu/fewer-women-... Paper: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
news.umich.edu
Fewer women amplify their scientific voices online
A new University of Michigan study finds that women are about 28% less likely than men to promote their scientific papers on X (formerly Twitter)—a seemingly minor digital decision that could have big...
511041
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Quentin André @quentinandre.bsky.social · 08/07/2025
Do you remember Francesca Gino's claim on her website that HBS analyzed the "wrong data file" in their investigation, and that a "real file" proved her innocence? HBS is now claiming that the "real file" was fabricated by Gino... and thus that Gino's claim was defamatory.
68116
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 07/07/2025
In 1981 NYT published a piece on the then-new citation index, and how it was being used "unintentionally" for performance evaluations
1105
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
James M. Zumel Dumlao @jamesmzd.bsky.social · 06/07/2025
🏮NEW WORKING PAPER ALERT🏮 Scientists collectively spend tens of millions of hours peer reviewing each year, mostly for no $$. Why?? In new work w/ Charles Ayoubi and @innovation.bsky.social, we observe a private benefit for participating in evaluation: 💡💡Learning💡💡
Title page of "Learning by Evaluating"Probability of citing manuscript within 3 years, by review status. Reviewers are more than twice as likely to cite reviewed paper in future work compared to invited reviewers who declined due to unavailability.
25012
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 05/07/2025
Why do we peer review? In a new paper, we establish a self-interested reason: learning. With a quasi-experimental design applied to admin data from 55 journals, we show reviewing a paper doubles chances of citing it in future work!
3385
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 01/07/2025
Men are much more likely to self-promote their papers on Twitter/X than women
281
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 22/06/2025
Seems relevant: politicians are more likely to vote for war when they don't have sons who would do the fighting www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...
journals.uchicago.edu
No Kin in the Game: Moral Hazard and War in the US Congress | Journal of Political Economy: Vol 131, No 9
We study agency frictions in the US Congress. We examine the long-standing hypothesis that political elites engage in conflict because they fail to internalize the associated costs. We compare the vot...
030
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 20/06/2025
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
jamanetwork.com
NIH Funding Has Stagnated Since 2003
This Viewpoint explores how funding has changed at the National Institutes of Health over time and discusses how continued investment is necessary to maintain the current level of biomedical research.
040
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 19/06/2025
First-ever ranking of journals by impact factor, published by Garfield in Science in 1972. Science is ranked #77, impact factor 2.99 Nature is #114, impact factor 2.34
1233
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Eugene Vinitsky 🍒 @eugenevinitsky.bsky.social · 19/05/2025
Going to the hospital because I broke my wrist smashing the endorse button: www.understandingai.org/p/i-got-fool...
understandingai.org
I got fooled by AI-for-science hype—here's what it taught me
I used AI in my plasma physics research and it didn’t go the way I expected.
611929
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 15/05/2025
Conventional wisdom says interdisciplinary research is valuable but harder to get through peer review (need to please diverse reviewers, etc). @sdxiang.bsky.social Daniel and I partnered with @ioppublishing.bsky.social to test this wisdom and add nuance
1219
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Sydney Gordon @sydneyg.bsky.social · 03/05/2025
Schism 2: electric boogaloo
031
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 02/05/2025
Periodic reminder that economists would sacrifice half a thumb for an AER pub
2114
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
Does professor quality matter for training the next generation of researchers? Or will good PhD students do good research either way? Quality matters
160
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
There used to be very little turnover in NIH sections, now there's a lot more
010
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 25/04/2025
Hmmm, maybe enforcing antitrust is a good idea 🤔
131
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Fredrik Jutfelt 🐠 @jutfelt.bsky.social · 22/04/2025
When you ask for the data
6384
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Noah Williams @bellmanequation.bsky.social · 22/04/2025
The academic job market has changed just a bit (from an interview with Robert Barro)
1829527
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 17/04/2025
Can we stop diffusion of particular AI technologies to countries we don't "like"? ChatGPT is useful case. OpenAI *still* prohibits access in major countries. But do these prohibitions actually work? New paper by @honglin-bao.bsky.social and @sunmengyi.bsky.social suggests they don't! 1/3
173
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Don Moynihan @donmoyn.bsky.social · 11/04/2025
Marc Andreessen really, really hates universities, which seems to be a pretty common sensibility from billionaires who have spent too much time online. www.nytimes.com/2025/03/18/o...
There is, Andreessen argued in a Jan. 28 exchange with Lex Fridman, a podcaster and research scientist at M.I.T.:

no way to fix American higher education without replacement, and there is no way to replace them without letting them fail. And in a sense, this is the most obvious conclusion of all time. What happens in the business world when a company does a bad job? It fails and another company takes its place. That’s how you get progress. Below this is the process of evolution.

These places have cut themselves off from evolution at the institutional level and at the individual level, which is shown by the widespread abuse of the tenure system. We have just stalled out. We have built an ossified system, an ossified, centralized, corrupt system.
1261268234
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 10/04/2025
Anecdotally, many advisors want their PhD students to go into academia and treat them worse if they want industry job. Does intention to go into industry *cause* less mentorship? Maybe confounded by something else? Inna, Austin, moi ran audit experiment to find out! (1/3)
182
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 03/04/2025
paying $250 for peer reviews didn't have much of an effect journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/f...
journals.lww.com
Effect of Monetary Incentives on Peer Review Acceptance and ... : Critical Care Medicine
tested the impact of providing cash incentives to complete peer review assignments at Critical Care Medicine. Design: Quasi-randomized, blinded, interventional study with an alternating treatment d...
070
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 02/04/2025
Scientists in industry are more likely to rely on the papers of other industrial scientists than similar papers by academics. Could be just an awareness issue, or maybe industrial papers are more credible?
281
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 01/04/2025
People don't like *micro* posts that much, they prefer slightly longer pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10....
081
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 31/03/2025
What may seem like round #1 of this fight is actually round #2 www.washingtonpost.com/national/hea...
010
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 31/03/2025
How do scientists choose which topic to study? Decades of studies on this, but they're dispersed across fields and not synthesized. Fortunately for us, Sidney @sdxiang.bsky.social has written a fantastic review of this literature, focusing on econ and soc lit! direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...
direct.mit.edu
Research Topic Choice: Motivations, Strategies, and Consequences
Abstract. Scientists’ choices of what research topics to pursue are highly consequential and have been the subject of many studies. However, these studies are dispersed across several fields and liter...
2266
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 29/03/2025
😳
040
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 28/03/2025
Twitter gets more engagement per science post, but in terms of number of science posts, Bluesky has almost caught up www.altmetric.com/blog/bluesky...
1287
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Nate Breznau @breznaunate.bsky.social · 24/03/2025
Good news. The file drawer problem, of insignificant results not getting written up and submitted, is shrinking. #openscience #reproducibility #NHST #metascience 🧪 www.pnas.org/doi/full/10....
pnas.org
The file drawer problem in social science survey experiments | PNAS
The file drawer problem—often operationalized in terms of statistically significant results being published and statistically insignificant not bei...
1112
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 24/03/2025
The prominent LLMs are almost surely trained on pirated content www.nber.org/papers/w33598
nber.org
Cloze Encounters: The Impact of Pirated Data Access on LLM Performance
Founded in 1920, the NBER is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to conducting economic research and to disseminating research findings among academics, public policy makers, an...
091
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 19/03/2025
"We measure VC narcissism based on the size of the signature... appointment of a highly narcissistic VC leads to an overall deterioration in research and teaching performance" www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
030
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 19/03/2025
Even JP Morgan Chase (!!!) thinks paying to publish is a scam
2551
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Dan Larremore @danlarremore.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
I look forward to citing this paper without reading it!
0302
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Hong Chen @hongch.bsky.social · 11/03/2025
How accurately do citations reflect the original research? Do authors truly engage with what they cite? In a new study, we analyze millions of citation sentence pairs to measure citation fidelity and how it varies depending on authors’ engagement with prior literature. arxiv.org/abs/2502.20581 ⬇️
56325
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 10/03/2025
journals.plos.org/plosone/arti...
040
Reposted by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly
Retraction Watch @retractionwatch.com · 10/03/2025
Guest post: Should Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment be retracted? asks Augustine Brannigan
retractionwatch.com
Guest post: Should Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment be retracted?
A prisoner and guard in the Stanford Prison Experiment. | PrisonExp.org Philip G. Zimbardo passed away in October 2024 at age 91. He enjoyed an illustrious career at Stanford University, where he t…
0207
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 07/03/2025
Does "spinning" null results to make them sound significant work? Yes. ascopubs.org/doi/full/10....
040
Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly @innovation.bsky.social · 25/02/2025
Some scientists who use ChatGPT for coding have... odd beliefs about how it works arxiv.org/abs/2502.17348
2133