Sign in

heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social

@heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
389 followers 1K following 315 posts
PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Micah @rincewind.run · 8h
Ossoff is one of the very few people adequately channeling Evelyn Normielib these days the base doesn't want to hear entreaties to our better natures, they don't want to go high while the other side goes low, they want someone to come on the TV and go "these people are garbage" he's good at it
502922400
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Ben Collins @bencollins.bsky.social · 6h
He’s mad our country is run by crooks and murderers and so am I. I’m no longer interested in negotiating with these people and neither is he.
853929459
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Preeti Chhibber @runwithskizzers.bsky.social · 6h
“Why is he effective” bc he is saying out loud what we all can see with our eyes!
014618
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Preeti Chhibber @runwithskizzers.bsky.social · 6h
Ossoff is hitting hard bc we are all furious and he knows it. The corporate press can elevate those loud, minority of voices praising what’s going on as much as they want, but most of us are angry and tired of being forced into living in pain.
1858114
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Ron Filipkowski @ronfilipkowski.bsky.social · 9h
Zelenskyy says Trump has betrayed Ukraine.
988108234016
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Katie Mack @astrokatie.com · 08/10/2026
Maybe not the main point here but it's ... interesting... that they're saying that remote school creates learning loss / loss of future GDP, but 80,000 more deaths (many of them likely the kids' relatives and teachers, killed by virus spread by kids) would have no impact whatsoever on those kids
1039426
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
HuffPost @huffpost.com · 08/10/2026
"Nearly 90 percent of the 2025 tariffs were passed through to U.S. import prices.”
huffpost.com
Trump Tariffs Directly Caused Inflation, NY Fed Concludes
Trump Tariffs Directly Caused Inflation, NY Fed Concludes
0115
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Stephanie Lamy @stephlamy.bsky.social · 08/10/2026
“I don’t understand why they tell us not to rebel when all we study are people who rebelled—Rimbaud, La Boétie…” ( @humanite.fr is doing some excellent live coverage of the student protests) www.humanite.fr/direct_conte...
423257
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Mike Boylan-Kolchin @mbkplus.bsky.social · 07/10/2026
Good news: in this case the newly elected House can meet at a convenient location of their choosing and vote on whether to expel Johnson as one of its first orders of business
421960340
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
ProPublica @propublica.org · 06/10/2026
14/ We sifted through social media, DHS statements, court records and local reports to find cases where citizens were held against their will for any amount of time. The courts consider someone detained if they aren’t free to leave. Full methodology: propub.li/4yoIKb7
How We Counted Incidents
We found and vetted cases from a number of sources, including English- and Spanish-language social media, DHS statements, court records and local news reports, in addition to our own reporting. We included an incident in our dataset only if we could find at least two sources for it. For additional details about the incident, like whether crowd control weapons were used, we accepted one source in some cases.

When DHS provided a response specific to an incident — including about whether it happened or the circumstances under which it happened — we noted that response in cases for which we offered detail beyond a simple count of detained citizens. DHS responses that generically denied ever detaining citizens or that are proven inaccurate by our reporting were not included.As with our count a year ago, most of the detained Americans on our list fell into two broad categories. The first is Americans who were held because agents questioned their citizenship. This time, we found more than a hundred such cases. The second category is Americans arrested by immigration agents after being accused of assaulting or impeding officers at protests or during immigration arrests of others. In that category, we tallied roughly 300 Americans. In many of these cases, the government accused but never charged these individuals with assault. Sometimes agents detained people because of questions about their citizenship but later accused them of crimes. While public attention often focuses on ICE, the immigration dragnet often relied on officers from agencies across the government.

Since the government itself does not track these cases, our list is almost certainly an undercount...
5549100
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
ProPublica @propublica.org · 06/10/2026
13/ Collectively, these cases show that as the administration has relentlessly pursued immigrants, federal agents have run roughshod over the constitutional rights of citizens too. Read our investigation:
projects.propublica.org
More Than 500 U.S. Citizens Have Been Detained, Including Handcuffed or Held at Gunpoint, in Trump’s Immigration Crackdown — ProPublica
The government doesn’t track how often immigration officers detain U.S. citizens. So ProPublica did. We’ve found more than 500 Americans who were held against their will during this Trump administrati...
4696224
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
ProPublica @propublica.org · 06/10/2026
12/ We spent months compiling every case we could find of immigration agents detaining Americans. We did it because the government hasn't. And now, we're sharing every one of those cases with you. Explore our database: propub.li/4egbSK2
Screenshot of database titled "Explore All Incidents Where Citizens Were Detained." Text below explains that this is every incident ProPublica could find in which one or more citizens were reportedly detained between January 2025 and September 2026. There are 506 citizens' cases in the database, and users can sort by what the incidents involve, where the incident is located, and the recency of the case.
4844368
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
ProPublica @propublica.org · 06/10/2026
11/ DHS also told us that racial profiling allegations were “disgusting, reckless and categorically FALSE” and “ICE does not zip tie or restrain children.”
549185
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
ProPublica @propublica.org · 06/10/2026
10/ We shared our findings and information on each case with the Department of Homeland Security. The department defended agents’ conduct. “DHS enforcement operations are highly targeted. We do our due diligence,” the agency said in a statement.
550488
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
ProPublica @propublica.org · 06/10/2026
9/ DHS said Trebach jumped in front of moving vehicles and hit a car with her signs and fists, which she disputes. No related federal charges were brought against Trebach, as far as ProPublica could find.
155394
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
ProPublica @propublica.org · 06/10/2026
8/ Amanda Trebach, a nurse and member of an immigrant advocacy group, was detained in California while filming and protesting immigration enforcement operations. Trebach says she was held for almost 36 hours without access to a phone call or a lawyer.
4749226
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
ProPublica @propublica.org · 06/10/2026
7/ Among the most jarring trends we found: 36 U.S. citizens were not allowed to contact their family or a lawyer.
36 U.S. citizens held for at least a day without being able to contact a lawyer or their family.
8937348
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
ProPublica @propublica.org · 06/10/2026
6/ Others were arrested while trying to protect colleagues. Quentin Williams, a staffer at Minneapolis' Roosevelt High, was trying to help a teacher when he was shoved by Greg Bovino and tackled by agents. He was charged with assault, but like others, his case was dismissed.
7859255
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
ProPublica @propublica.org · 06/10/2026
5/ Hundreds of Americans were also held while they were engaging in their First Amendment rights. 60+ were held while they were filming.
60+ U.S. citizens detained while recording
2808213
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
ProPublica @propublica.org · 06/10/2026
4/ Fernando Vasquez, an 18-year-old citizen, was on break from work when agents chased and handcuffed him, then put him in their truck. After realizing their mistake, the agents left the teen alone in the woods, with no way to get home. Then they threw his ID out of the truck.
6625511249
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
ProPublica @propublica.org · 06/10/2026
3/ 100+ Americans have been held after agents questioned their citizenship. Nearly all of them were people of color. They say they were profiled — detained because of their skin color, accents or jobs. “ICE isn’t looking for criminals. They’re looking for Latinos,” one said.
100+ U.S. citizens held after agents questioned their citizenship
6842266
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
ProPublica @propublica.org · 06/10/2026
2/ Federal agents have detained at least 70 children and teens who are American citizens. Some were handcuffed or zip-tied. In one instance, a 15-year-old with disabilities was handcuffed outside a school in Los Angeles when agents mistook him for an alleged gang member.
At least 70 U.S. citizen children detained, some of whom were handcuffed
7767261
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
ProPublica @propublica.org · 06/10/2026
The government *still* isn’t tracking how often immigration agents detain U.S. citizens. We are. 500+ Americans have been handcuffed, held at gunpoint or held against their will in Trump’s second term. Our tally is almost certainly an undercount. THREAD (content warning: violence) ⬇️
9660113440
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Dr. SkySkull @drskyskull.bsky.social · 06/10/2026
Looks like a villain who takes himself out with autoerotic asphyxiation before James Bond even gets a chance to meet him
1020916
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Lex McMenamin (they/them) @lexmcmenamin.com · 05/10/2026
it is interesting that I can't find any mainstream media coverage of Altman's sister Annie going viral on social media over the weekend for uploading footage of the first hour of her deposition in her lawsuit against him (one of two) in which she is alleging years of CSA
theguardian.com
Accept ‘bad things’ in return for benefits of AI, says Sam Altman
Boss of OpenAI calls for a regulatory light touch because of the ‘good stuff’ the technology can deliver
292084811
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
David Roberts @volts.wtf · 05/10/2026
Holy shit.
700260888608
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Anil Dash @anildash.com · 05/10/2026
Exactly this. And in fact, many models *have* been created this way, and decades of prior machine learning systems *were* created this way, consensually. These things are choices! People are STILL working this way! It’s not just that a better world is possible — it already EXISTS. We can nurture it.
171754473
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Jay Rosen @jayrosen.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
"Polarization Is Not the Problem." The paragraph below says more about "both sides" journalism than just about anything I have read. By @lilymasonphd.bsky.social It's starting to get attaction. So read the rest, and let me know what you think. muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/articl...
22361125
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Alex Ip 葉清霖 @alexip718.com · 04/10/2026
The biggest question that we must confront in Reconstruction 3.0 is, "how can we get a small-d democracy to function with one of the most functionally illiterate populations in the developed world?"
18011
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Mourning NAVALNY😢 @jan-readsalot.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
Just when we think it can’t get worse … it does.
1868114954430
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Professa Murray @kalimurray.bsky.social · 03/10/2026
The Democrats gotta stop thinking that impeachment is about *winning* a conviction. It is about stop the behavior: funny thing is Ukraine still gets the money!
348049
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Professa Murray @kalimurray.bsky.social · 03/10/2026
What is failure in impeachment? You know what Russ Vought can’t do when he is sitting an impeachment trial: f**k with the budget. He will busy being under the white hot lines of impeachment.
6878150
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Jacob T. Levy @jacobtlevy.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
Yes, everyone saying Vought is right. I had forgotten that he held an impeachable office at all. (I'm not sure Miller does, though.)
1459242
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Jacob T. Levy @jacobtlevy.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
Establish that violations of the Emoluments Clauses and the Establishment Clause are impeachable. Establish that war crimes are impeachable. None of these require the mens rea questions that so sidetracked the first two Trump impeachments. The facts are the facts.
7877121
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Jacob T. Levy @jacobtlevy.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
such that the impeachment votes could be held seriatim on day one of a new Congress. There could be fifty different charges against Trump. Let the Senate try ' em all. Establish that violations of the War Powers Act, the Budget and Impoundment Act, or the Antideficiency Act are impeachable.
2880113
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Jacob T. Levy @jacobtlevy.bsky.social · 04/10/2026
I'm not naive enough to actually believe this will happen, but Democrats could be preparing, right now, lists of impeachment charges against (at a bare minimum) Hegseth, Kennedy, Mullin, Patel, Blanche, & Trump, as well as Bondi, Bovino, & Noem (still worth doing!) that rely purely on public facts,
1013153643
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Acyn @acyn.bsky.social · 03/10/2026
Ossoff: The money that they took from you when they slashed Medicaid and defunded hospitals and nursing homes—They’re taking that money to buy corrupt, taxpayer-funded political ads on national television to try to promote the failed and broken president…
282169435876
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Kevin M. Kruse @kevinmkruse.bsky.social · 09/07/2026
Hey, fellas, before you write that white hot take about how rape is such a tricky thing and, I mean, who can really say what happened and, you know, maybe we should not be too judgmental, I'd like to remind you that instead you can simply shut the fuck up.
13275191179
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Helen Kennedy @helenkennedy.com · 02/10/2026
Candidate describes angrily throwing his child across the room onto a bed, terrifying him. Says that's when he realized he was "not normal or well." But that's "out of context"!
15716
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Kyle Clark @kylec.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
In 2014, Marx said there wouldn't be as much domestic violence if women would be happy with "where God has them." It appeared he was suggesting that women were too eager to be in relationships with abusers. Democratic nominee Phil Weiser condemned Marx's comments this week.
941084
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Kyle Clark @kylec.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Marx says "words and events can be taken out of context and presented in a way that creates a completely different impression." Here is an extended version of Marx speaking in 2022 about the time that he threw his toddler son across a room. Marx said the child was terrified.
530683
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Kyle Clark @kylec.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
Marx says the video is out of context. Here's a longer version of the 2021 clip where Marx laughs about slamming his wife Eileen into a door so hard that she cried. Marx says he was teaching her a lesson that she needed self-defense training. Marx says she learned her lesson.
2233894
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Kyle Clark @kylec.bsky.social · 01/10/2026
NEW: GOP Gov nominee Victor Marx says he'll respond today to domestic violence allegations - video/audio where he describes slamming his wife into a door and throwing his toddler across a room. Voters/reporters new to Marx may not realize he has a long history of justifying violence.
751160519
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Dev Petty @devpetty.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
A plea to all you wonderful folks who are thinking to adopt (not buy) a dog or cat… The shelters are FILLED with animals who’ve been surrendered. Yesterday they had a bed and a family and now they are confused and terrified through no fault of their own. Consider giving them a next chapter.
821982568
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Karen Attiah @karenattiah.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Today, 8 years ago, my friend, Saudi Journalist and Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi was murdered.
239102123243
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Dominique Baker @bakerdphd.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
I read the ending and I wanted to koolaid man through a wall!!
Screenshot of article which reads: To restore a functioning and 
pluralistic democracy in the United States, reversing over a decade of 
democratic backsliding in the world’s oldest democracy, the thing to 
“fix” is not polarization. Polarization is the country’s immune response 
to an unpopular, antidemocratic, and intentionally divisive faction grabbing for disproportionate power to the detriment of national success, 
reputation, and democratic self-government. Tamping down that immune response only allows this minority faction to have greater control.Screenshot of article which reads: But the fury of the argument shows the importance of the outcome. 
When we focus on polarization as the problem, the solution is for ev-
eryone to quiet down and be “civil”—an outcome that benefits those 
who are willing to grab as much power as they can without concern 
for legality or civility. When we see the problem for what it is, the 
solution is to defend the most robust social progress in American his-
tory—progress that has already been codified into law and enjoyed 
by everyone alike. U.S. democracy needs leaders who are willing to 
defend those rights and voters who are willing to hold accountable the 
leaders who will not defend them. It does not need everyone simply to calm down.
2537122
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Dominique Baker @bakerdphd.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
One more time for the cheap seats in the back!
Screenshot of article which reads:  Democrats 
and Republicans in the 1950s could agree on many things, as long as 
they also agreed that Jim Crow oppression in the American South was 
acceptable and that women belonged in the home. Once they started 
disagreeing about these things, and especially once they were no longer 
the only people allowed in the room, U.S. politics became significantly 
more contentious. Not everyone wanted to peacefully extend power to 
previously marginalized groups.
140484
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Dominique Baker @bakerdphd.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
Oh, was there conflict when people previously wanted civil rights extended to include them?
Screenshot of article which reads: As the electorate has grown 
to include men of color, women, and the poor, it has become more plural-
istic. Contemporary America, for all its flaws, has grown to be a diverse 
democracy that continually manages a vast array of opinions, identities, 
and cultures. That pluralism is a central reason for the vibrancy and in-
novation of American cultural, intellectual, and political power.
But each of these steps was the result of political and cultural con-
flict. As every new group of Americans was enfranchised, a powerful 
political movement opposed it. This opposition was often violent, com-
ing both from the state and from individual citizens who believed that 
the ascendant group needed to be put back in its place. Much of this vio-
lence endures today. When marginalized groups have spoken out (often 
in a nonviolent manner) against the violence perpetrated against them, 
they have often incurred further anger and violence.
139549
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Dominique Baker @bakerdphd.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
"The current level of political animosity is exactly what one would expect to see if an extremist faction attempted to rescind the hard-earned rights of the vast majority of the country’s citizens." There are not enough exclamation points to convey how I felt reading this paragraph
Screenshot of article which reads: From this perspective, the “both sides” frame falls apart. The prob-
lem is not that the parties are divided. The problem is the existential 
threat that a reempowered ethnonationalist strain poses to pluralistic 
U.S. democracy writ large. The current level of political animosity is 
exactly what one would expect to see if an extremist faction attempted 
to rescind the hard-earned rights of the vast majority of the country’s 
citizens. The only way to re-oppress most of a country is to use anti-
democratic and authoritarian tactics. And the only way to oppose those 
tactics is to push back as a population and clearly reject them. This is 
the argument happening in the United States, and its pathology is not 
anger—it is the movement to undermine a generation of rights.
31224490
Reposted by @heathermcgilvr1.bsky.social
Dominique Baker @bakerdphd.bsky.social · 02/10/2026
"In other words, the people who are the most 'polarized' in the U.S. electorate are those who are racist and sexist, and those who oppose racists and sexists."
Screenshot of article which reads: These numbers are relatively similar between Democrats and Repub-
licans, which often leads political pundits to claim this is more evidence 
of “polarization,” and that both sides are equally to blame. However, 
a closer look tells a more interesting story. The people who are most 
likely to vilify and dehumanize their partisan opponents are Republicans 
who are high in racism and sexism and Democrats who oppose racism 
and sexism. The people who are least likely to vilify and dehumanize 
their political opponents are Republicans who are low in racism and sex-
ism. One explanation for these patterns is that those Republicans who 
are racist and sexist vilify and dehumanize Democrats because they see 
the Democratic Party as a party of racial minorities and women; and 
Democrats who score low in racism and sexism will vilify and dehu-
manize Republicans because they consider Republicans to be racist and 
sexist. In other words, the people who are the most “polarized” in the 
U.S. electorate are those who are racist and sexist, and those who op-
pose racists and sexists.
2753204