Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 46mI would have written a shorter letter, but did not have the time - Pascal 000
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 49mRecent math stuff -> prediction: the world will fill with wildly complicated apparatuses beyond any human comprehension, not because they couldn't be made simple enough for us to understand, but because they work and the robots get them just fine and the reduction is bottlenecked by human time 000
Reposted by DanFlo 🔶 @faz.ms · 15hThis goes surprisingly hard youtu.be/3TNpOD6bov8?...youtu.beLGTM (Looks Good to Me) - Claude Opus 5.5 music videoYouTube video by Degenerative Pixels 2263
Reposted by DanJohn David Pressman @jdp.extropian.net · 17hReading The Causal Angel and it frequently causes this feeling. I'm not even sure the problem is an inability to articulate so much as wondering whether there is any relevant audience for the thought. 1121
Reposted by Danmlf. ⎔ @mlf.one · 10/10/2026the older I get, the more my general ontology and metaphysics tend towards "there's just stuff, you know? it kinda does things. pretty cool tbh" 3331
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 10/10/2026I in fact had this and a few other variations I've seen before in mind when I posted this 010
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 05/10/2026There was that one writing app that offered reviews by simulations of famous scholars, which everyone found deeply tasteless and I haven't heard about in a while and can't remember the name of now 021
Reposted by DanKatherine Alejandra Cross @quinnae.com · 04/10/2026I see a commonly repeated sentiment on Bluesky, the website for 38 year olds, that says everyone was excited by the advent of the Internet in a way that far exceeds any excitement for gen AI/LLMs. The thing is, that's not strictly true. 1722028
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 04/10/2026I would avoid anything that didn't come out in the last year or so if you want it to call tools and be an agent at all 120
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 04/10/2026If it's low bandwidth you should be able to use remote models just fine, they're only streaming tiny amounts of text in and out. Droppy connections will suck though 020
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 04/10/2026What can one run there? Recently came into (via great personal expenditure) an M5 with 48GB 110
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Ooh yeah you probably can't get the context window too long either can you? 120
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Actually, you might want to check out OpenCode Zen in particular. They often/usually have one or two free models, frequently "stealth" ones with silly codenames, which are most often Chinese labs testing out new offerings before actually deploying them 120
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 04/10/2026You might have a better time if you look into running some of the open-weights models via e.g. OpenRouter, or OpenCode Zen. You shouldn't do this if you have concerns about sending data or money abroad. But, you can get lots of usage for dirt cheap compared to American frontier lab offerings 130
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 04/10/2026The RAM is a big limiter; if you have a 6B model quantized to 4 bits, that's 12GB just of weights already. But maybe there's some clever setup with expert cacheing that could work for you 130
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 04/10/2026That is indeed a nice laptop! But even smaller models are pretty heavyweight to run. If you want compute/memory intensive things to happen on the same machine as where you're running the model, it's probably not going to work very well, too much resource competition 130
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 04/10/2026I think you're going to have a hard time with that RAM running anything tremendously intelligent at a high token rate, but I might be wrong! Ironically, best way to get started is probably use Claude Code or Codex and get it to figure out what all needs to get done 150
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 04/10/2026I was very surprised in one of those recent scrape your neighborhood toys to find that there are people who post significantly more than you, but I forget who or whose scraper 120
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 04/10/2026? I think with causal attention, the usual way of doing things lets you reconstruct identical KV cache from just the tokens in context, so you get exact resumes with trivial storage. If you need to save the cache, your storage reqs go up a lot Probably fine if running it yourself but hard at scale 111
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 04/10/2026I refuse to accept that chartreuse is green. That's a red color's name 021
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 03/10/2026This would mean you can't resume state exactly without keeping the actual cache around, vs just the transcript 110
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 03/10/2026We are all trapped within/out this Klein bottle together (and also all the other ones) 010
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 03/10/2026Strictly speaking, because they are non-orientable, there is no sense of inside/outside of al Klein bottle 110
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 03/10/2026Updated opinion: torus and orb are slightly different games because on torus you have two distinct fronts that you sometimes need to switch back and forth between. Klein and torus still functionally the same, I think 110
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 03/10/2026I guess you could have non-planar adjacency graphs, which is what falls out naturally from higher-dimensional minesweeper, but that seems like a UI nightmare 110
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 03/10/2026Agreed. I think what functionally changes/improves this versus standard rectilinear minesweeper is that the local adjacency graph varies. I wonder if there's any other generalization that similarly makes it more interesting; different manifolds are fun but I don't think they're changing the game 220
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 03/10/2026Okay that actually made the game significantly easier, or at least feels easier to play even if my empirical win rate isn't going up Also: I'm not sure Klein and torus are functionally different games, now that I've played them each 110
Reposted by DanQuantian @quantian.bsky.social · 03/10/2026This was going around Twitter today, if you ask Claude “is X lat Y long land or water?” and plot the results, it has clearly embedded a map of the globe in its weights over time 512715
Reposted by DanMinor Mobius @minormobius.bsky.social · 02/10/2026double torus minesweeper live, only really usable in the hyperbolic map view 1141
Reposted by DanMinor Mobius @minormobius.bsky.social · 02/10/2026Torusweeper and Kleinsweeper are live. It only reeeeeally works if you fix perspective and slip the game over the surface 119611
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 02/10/2026How have you not asked for minesweeper on a time cool yet? Are you well 110
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 02/10/2026Careful; one is only really unambiguously inside the topology conference when all doors and windows are shut 053
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 02/10/2026As far as topology is concerned, everything is the same on either side of the process 120
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 02/10/2026I have no idea what you're talking about, but in response to earlier question: pants have two holes unless you unzip the fly, in which case they have three until you also unbutton the button 330
Dan @handackett.bsky.social · 02/10/2026Maybe: I can take some shape and draw a bunch of nodes on it and draw edges between them. This defines a minesweeper. Topology is invariant as long as I only stretch and squish the shape, and never cut and sew. So I don't have to break any of the edges, and the game doesn't change, either 000