Sign in

Gudrun Eisele

@gudruneisele.bsky.social
446 followers 268 following 19 posts

FWO postdoctoral research fellow @ Center for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven in Belgium. Interested in quality of self-report data in ESM/EMA studies and beyond & open science.

PostsRepliesMedia
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Egon Dejonckheere @dejonckheeregon.bsky.social · 14/01/2026
We’re launching a bi-weekly m-Path blog on #ESM / #EMA measurement, new papers & showcases. 🗓️ Every 2 weeks (Wed). First up: item quality. A paper by @gudruneisele.bsky.social introduces ESM-Q: a consensus checklist for good momentary items. 👉 Read the blog: blog.m-path.io/blog/our-blo...
blog.m-path.io
What makes a good ESM / EMA survey item?
0288
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Zachary Cohen @depressionlab.bsky.social · 17/12/2025
Nice writeup of our new study in @jamapsychiatry.com by Kyle Mittan, a colleague here at @uarizona.bsky.social news.arizona.edu/news/confuse...
news.arizona.edu
Confused by the doctor's questionnaire? U of A study suggests it's common
A new paper suggests that a widely used questionnaire for triaging mental health symptoms could be giving providers poor data to inform treatment – and that a fix could be as simple as rewriting some ...
0114
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Zachary Cohen @depressionlab.bsky.social · 17/12/2025
1/n Out today in @jamapsychiatry.com: Interpretation Issues With the Patient Health Questionnaire Instructions. We find troubling variability in whether people think they should respond based on the frequency of the Sx or the frequency of being bothered by the Sx. jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
jamanetwork.com
Interpretation Issues With the Patient Health Questionnaire Instructions
This survey study assesses whether responses to the Patient Health Questionnaire reflect symptom frequency and severity.
36826
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Milla Pihlajamäki @millapihlajamaki.bsky.social · 03/12/2025
The first preprint from the SHARE study is out! 🥳 We compared the effects of three different incentives (a bulk payment, a bulk payment with personalized feedback, and payment per beep) on data quantity, data quality, and participant experiences in a student sample.
2418
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Milla Pihlajamäki @millapihlajamaki.bsky.social · 03/10/2025
Had a great time at the ESM Expert Network Meeting in Rotterdam! I presented the first SHARE study results: we found that paying participants per beep boosts compliance as compared to bulk payment (with or without personalised feedback)—and without harming data quality. Poster: tinyurl.com/47asuaxj
3305
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Benjamin Kunc @benjaminkunc.bsky.social · 29/09/2025
Are you an ESM item measuring the quality of social experiences looking for validation? 👀 Because if you are, I've got some bad news for you. Our new preprint is out: osf.io/preprints/ps... @gudruneisele.bsky.social @ginettelafit.bsky.social @lisapeeters.bsky.social @oliviajkirtley.bsky.social
osf.io
OSF
265
Gudrun Eisele @gudruneisele.bsky.social · 24/09/2025
Interested in ESM/EMA research? Check out @lisapeeters.bsky.social's review of methodological variation in recent ESM studies. It provides detailed numbers on current practices across the entire research pipeline—from research questions and study design to reporting.
030
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Leonie Vogelsmeier @leonievogelsmeier.bsky.social · 22/09/2025
🚨 New preprint: We compared 13 methods for detecting momentary careless responding in the WARN-D data (206k+ obs.). Tutorials guide you through each method. The takeaway? Diverging results, inherent subjectivity (to varying degrees), and a clear need for further validation. osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io
OSF
35318
Gudrun Eisele @gudruneisele.bsky.social · 08/08/2025
New preprint! Does data quality drop when participants respond to #EMA / #ESM surveys in the presence of others? We explored this in a pooled analysis of 4 ESM studies and found (subtle) shifts in burden & response behavior depending on participants’ social context: doi.org/10.31234/osf...
doi.org
OSF
1206
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Omid V. Ebrahimi @omidvebrahimi.bsky.social · 07/08/2025
How Accurate & Consistent are Self-Report responses via Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) in Ecological Momentary Assessment & Digital Studies? Examined in a massive EMA study (N = 3,761), our new #OpenAccess piece on this is just out: online.ucpress.edu/collabra/art... #PsychSciSky #AcademicSky 🧵:
online.ucpress.edu
Accuracy and Consistency of Visual Analog Scales in Ecological Momentary Assessment and Digital Studies
The ubiquity of digital technologies has increased assessments of thoughts, behaviors, and experiences via electronic devices. Surveys on smartphones or laptops often implement Visual Analogue Scales ...
26429
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
PsyArXivBot @psyarxivbot.bsky.social · 22/07/2025
Experienced, bothered by, or both: People differ in how they understand the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) items: doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jcsq8_v1
0209
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Ruben C. Arslan @ruben.the100.ci · 13/06/2025
Our paper "A fragmented field" has just been accepted at AMPPS. We find it's not just you, psychology is really getting more confusing (construct and measure fragmentation is rising). We updated the preprint with the (substantial) revision, please check it out. osf.io/preprints/ps...
Treemap showing measurement fragmentation across subfields in psychology. Hill-Shannon Diversity 𝐷=1626.05How often measures in the APA PsycTESTS database are (re)used according to the APA PsycInfo database: rarely, the majority are never reused.Our fragmentation index (Hill-Shannon diversity) over time across subdisciplines shows fragmentation rising.
115461
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Jonas Dora @jonasdora.bsky.social · 27/05/2025
While I was unfortunately unable to travel to Belgium for the conference, I have uploaded the recording+slides+code for my #SAA2025 talk on multilevel multiple imputation for EMA research here: osf.io/xjg24/files/...
34314
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Olivia Kirtley @oliviajkirtley.bsky.social · 26/05/2025
Happening now at #SAA2025! @gudruneisele.bsky.social leading a symposium on ESM data quality & quantity. Kicking us off @ccp-kuleuven.bsky.social PhD student, @millapihlajamaki.bsky.social on careless responding. Preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps... #ProudSupervisor
03210
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
The ESM Item Repository @esmrepository.bsky.social · 21/05/2025
Do you like coffee ☕, ambulatory assessment 📱and #OpenScience 🔑? We are hosting a contributors’ café during lunch breaks & poster sessions @saa2025leuven.bsky.social. Come find the café to have a cup of coffee and contribute your items to the repository! #SAA2025 🧵 ⬇️ 1/4
esmitemrepositoryinfo.com
ESM Item Repository
1106
Gudrun Eisele @gudruneisele.bsky.social · 20/05/2025
Deviations from preregistrations seem to be the norm, not the exception. Great to see more guidance on how to navigate them thoughtfully. Emily Willroth and @oliviaatherton.bsky.social's paper is another helpful resource: doi.org/10.1177/2515...
doi.org
Best Laid Plans: A Guide to Reporting Preregistration Deviations - Emily C. Willroth, Olivia E. Atherton, 2024
Psychological scientists are increasingly using preregistration as a tool to increase the credibility of research findings. Many of the benefits of preregistrat...
040
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Leonie Vogelsmeier @leonievogelsmeier.bsky.social · 06/05/2025
New article in MBR⭐: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.... We show that latent Markov factor analysis (LMFA) can detect different types of careless responding in experience sampling data while also accounting for changes in attentive responding. With Esther Ulitzsch and @joranjongerling.bsky.social
tandfonline.com
Accounting for Measurement Invariance Violations in Careless Responding Detection in Intensive Longitudinal Data: Exploratory vs. Partially Constrained Latent Markov Factor Analysis
Intensive longitudinal data (ILD) collection methods like experience sampling methodology can place significant burdens on participants, potentially resulting in careless responding, such as random...
0175
Gudrun Eisele @gudruneisele.bsky.social · 18/03/2025
It was a pleasure to present some work on improving ESM/EMA assessments at the Center for Self-Report Science at USC yesterday. What a bunch of great people with so many interesting perspectives – I’ve already learned a ton!
071
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Olivia Kirtley @oliviajkirtley.bsky.social · 13/03/2025
Are you heading to @saa2025leuven.bsky.social? Fancy extending your stay in Leuven to learn more about #OpenScience for Experience Sampling Method research with @ginettelafit.bsky.social & I? We are running a one-day course after the conference! More info here: tinyurl.com/334rytta
096
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
The ESM Item Repository @esmrepository.bsky.social · 13/03/2025
📣 New blog post! What if ESM data grew on trees? 🌳 Read more about the EMOTE database in our latest blog by Imogen Smith, Pete Koval, @elisekalo.bsky.social, & Daniel Russo-Batterham! esmitemrepositoryinfo.com/blog-posts#E... #ESM #EMA #OpenScience
esmitemrepositoryinfo.com
Blog posts | ESM Item Repository
0167
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Milla Pihlajamäki @millapihlajamaki.bsky.social · 27/02/2025
The first preprint from my PhD is out: osf.io/preprints/ps...! 🥳 We explored the temporal dynamics of four careless responding indicators (response time, within-beep standard deviation, an inconsistency index, occasion-person correlation) in ESM data across different samples. Thread below🧵
osf.io
OSF
75115
Gudrun Eisele @gudruneisele.bsky.social · 21/02/2025
We applied mixture modeling of response times to existing experimental ESM data & found that higher sampling frequencies led to more careless responding, while longer questionnaires did not. Co-led by Esther Ulitzsch. Accepted at Psychol Assess, preprint: doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2s38a_v1
doi.org
OSF
192
Gudrun Eisele @gudruneisele.bsky.social · 18/02/2025
What makes a good ESM item? We asked 42 ESM/EMA experts this question in a Delphi study, and the result is the ESM-Q: A consensus-based quality assessment tool for ESM items. Now accepted at #psynomBRM. Updated preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps... Thread below.
doi.org
2248
Gudrun Eisele @gudruneisele.bsky.social · 02/09/2024
Well-deserved SIPS commendation for the ESM Preprocessing Gallery! Since many errors happen during preprocessing, we can't stress its importance enough! This excellent tool helps applied researchers navigate all the steps they have to take before analyzing their ESM/EMA data
121
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Leonie Vogelsmeier @leonievogelsmeier.bsky.social · 28/08/2024
🌟New preprint on using latent Markov factor analysis for detecting careless responding in intensive longitudinal data when the measurement model of the attentive responses is non-invariant. osf.io/preprints/ps... with @joranjongerling.bsky.social and Esther Ulitzsch
osf.io
OSF
052
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Olivia Kirtley @oliviajkirtley.bsky.social · 04/07/2024
Still time to apply for our #PhD vacancy!⏰ The project involves investigating suicidal thoughts & behaviours using experience sampling & epidemiological data, living in Belgium 🇧🇪 & Australia 🇦🇺, & working with me, Gudrun Eisele, @ginettelafit.bsky.social & Angela Clapperton. Please share!
031
Gudrun Eisele @gudruneisele.bsky.social · 19/06/2024
Ever wondered how anhedonia can be measured with experience sampling? Check out this systematic review of 102 ESM studies in anhedonia research led by Joanne Beames: osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io
OSF
000
Gudrun Eisele @gudruneisele.bsky.social · 19/06/2024
New PhD position at the Center for Contextual Psychiatry! With @oliviajkirtley.bsky.social & Ginette Lafit on developing personalised real-time models of suicide risk and protective factors www.kuleuven.be/personeel/jo...
kuleuven.be
PhD: Personalised Real-Time Models of Suicide Risk and Protective Factors
The Center for Contextual Psychiatry (CCP), within the Department of Neurosciences at KU Leuven, is offering one fully funded project on “Developing personalised, real-time, contextual models of risk ...
001
Gudrun Eisele @gudruneisele.bsky.social · 11/06/2024
Happy to share the result of our Delphi study with 40+ international ESM/EMA experts: ESM-Q: A Consensus-Based Quality Assessment Tool for Experience Sampling Method Items osf.io/preprints/ps... Part of the ESM item repository project (www.esmitemrepository.com) co-lead by Anu Hiekkaranta (1/4)
osf.io
OSF
12810
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Dominique Maciejewski 🟥 @domimaciejewski.bsky.social · 30/05/2024
Ever wondered how people choose numbers on emotion scales in #ESM studies and whether they stay consistent? 🤩 We just finished data collection for our study aimed to uncover response processes in emotion assessment (i.e., how participants interpret & respond to questions) (1/8)
1166
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Leonie Vogelsmeier @leonievogelsmeier.bsky.social · 03/05/2024
📐📏Happy to share that our article "Assessing and Accounting for Measurement in Intensive Longitudinal Studies: Current Practices, Considerations, and Avenues for Improvement" is accepted for publication (with @joranjongerling.bsky.social and E. Maassen) #teamscience #ESM osf.io/preprints/ps...
osf.io
OSF
042
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Ruben C. Arslan @ruben.the100.ci · 22/03/2024
New post at The 100% CI: Do we have a problem with construct and measure proliferation in psychology? It depends who you ask and it varies by subdiscipline. We respond to a recent piece by Iliescu et al. and try to find some common ground. www.the100.ci/2024/03/22/o...
Treemap of psychological measuresEntropy over time is fairly stagnant in psych disciplinesHow often measures are (re)used
11610
Reposted by Gudrun Eisele
Olivia Kirtley @oliviajkirtley.bsky.social · 06/12/2023
Would you like to get started in or learn more about #ExperienceSampling (ESM/EMA) research? Come and join us in Leuven next spring for our annual workshop! Info & reg here: www.kuleuven.be/samenwerking...
035