James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 11/03/2026I agree - we have been trying to assess how different models do in a challenging DMS test case (+/- different inhibitors - pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...) - we use a very stringent test set that held out positions and residues, finding that most models do not perform well... 041
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 01/02/2026On the plus side - hallucination is dramatically lower now than a year ago. In the downside- peer review should be fun an a mental exercise (two things you should never outsource to AI) 010
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 07/01/2026from: hhmicdn.blob.core.windows.net/policies/Inv... "expanded phase out" of 5 years, rather than going through competitive renewal (7 years if successful and 2 years if not) 130
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 31/12/2025Nice to see an acknowledgement (and citation!) of our @prereview.bsky.social in the final version of this awesome paper (www.nature.com/articles/s41...) from @pilarcossio.bsky.social @sonyahanson.bsky.social investigating the promise and limitations of conformational heterogeneity analyses in CryoEM 1193
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 29/12/2025To push further, we analyzed three previously published prospective docking campaigns (AmpC, D4, σ2) from the Shoichet lab. Hundreds to >1,000 molecules synthesized and tested. Co-folding does not consistently improve separation vs docking alone. 140
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 29/12/2025Test 1: 557 ligand-protein complexes. More often than not, co-folding gets the pose right (AF3 > Chai > Boltz). Docking doesn’t do quite as well (~40%). This is judged by the 2Å standard, which I think is pretty generous. AF3 has a sizable sub-Å population, which is amazing! 132
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 29/12/2025There is also a feeling that the information within the various layers of the YAAFC architecture should reflect not only structure, but also affinity. This idea is reflected in the “affinity module” of Boltz-2, and likely other models to come... 121
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 29/12/2025A lot of the recent excitement around methods like AF3 (and followup methods which I often joking call YAAFCs: Yet Another Alpha Fold Clone) is the promise of modeling ligand-bound complexes from only a protein sequence + a small molecule SMILES string (movie from Charm Therapeutics) 132
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 12/09/2025it's not my style - but it does have a place for those in less protected positions. Luckily @prereview.bsky.social has a great mechanism for this! See the persistent pseudonyme option: 120
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 08/09/2025My view: posting a preprint is already an explicit invitation for community feedback. Authors shouldn’t have to opt in - especially to hear when ORCID-authenticated reviews are posted on some of their trusted partners that they include on their reviews and context side bar 2140
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 18/02/2025These results suggest that stabilizing Orf9b’s (lipid-bound) dimeric state could be a future therapeutic target. Disrupting lipid interactions might bias Orf9b towards a form that can’t bind Tom70, restoring immune activation. 151
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 18/02/2025CJ measured key rate constants that constrained a model to show how lipid binding shifts Orf9b’s equilibrium towards the homodimer, preventing Tom70 interaction. The lipid-free form comes to equilibrium in seconds, whereas the lipid-bound form takes hours-days! 100
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 18/02/2025Here, we developed a quantitative biophysical model to describe the coupled equilibria of Orf9b dimerization and Tom70 binding, revealing how lipid binding tunes the system. 111
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 18/02/2025We show that Orf9b exists in a dynamic equilibrium between a homodimeric and monomeric state. The monomer binds to the mitochondrial protein Tom70, suppressing immune responses. Lipid binding to Orf9b stabilizes the homodimer, acting as a switch to slow down Tom70 engagement. 121
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 05/02/2025New acknowledgement of @elife.bsky.social lack of Impact Factor in proofs... see response! 050
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 04/02/2025Continuing the ☘️🍪▶️📄. Yesterday I was EXTREMELY disappointed to only receive 6 preprints (🧵) for 18 Caramel deLites. We have "preprint hating cookie thieves" (great name for a rock band!) on the 4th floor! I'm trying again - this time with the innovation of Scotch tape attached to the cookie box! 2110
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 03/02/2025 Streptogramins are promising antibiotics for treating resistant bacterial infections, but their efficacy is threatened by Vat enzymes, which inactivate streptogramins by acetylation (blocking a key interaction with the ribosome). So we set out to block the blocker! 120
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 03/02/2025Our latest work on tackling streptogramin resistance in collaboration with the Seiple lab is now up as a preprint. We (led by Pooja Asthana) targeted a resistance enzyme, VatD, with fragment-based drug discovery! www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1... 1237
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 03/02/2025New strategy for discovering preprints. Cookies to Offline RSS feed! 🍪🍀 1181
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 31/01/2025Next, we took inspiration from more polar fragments binding lower in the original binding site and designed KABLE (Kemp eliminase ALBE). With a few additional mutations from a single round of screening it has a catalytic efficiency (600,000 M⁻¹s⁻¹) on par with the natural enzymes. 100
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 31/01/2025Yuda Chen noticed that some of the fragments resembled coumarins. So they redesigned the binding site and created FABLE (Fluorescent ABLE) —a protein that binds turn-on fluorophores. ABLE->FABLE generalist to a specialist sensor with 100-fold turn-on fluorescence enhancement! 110
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 31/01/2025Lena Bergmann and Galen Correy used X-ray crystallography as a binding assay. ABLE turned out to be a generalist, binding 43 fragments in two distinct conformations. (side note, Nick and Justin Biel started this as COVID hit... but it paused until Lena picked it back up!) 110
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 31/01/2025Thrilled to take a break from doom and gloom to share our latest work collaborating with the DeGrado lab! We took a de novo designed protein, screened it for ligand binding using X-rays, and used the hits to evolve two wildly different functions: fluorescent turn-on and Kemp elimination catalysis. 🧵 38320
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 23/01/2025I've had such a lucky life in science. From time to time my mind drifts and I think about my two greatest mentors passing away too young. It stops me cold in my tracks. I've been staring at this picture for 15 minutes... 2241
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 26/11/2024Treating myself to a visit to the synchrotron for Thanksgiving with Galen and Julius - Photons on! 💎💫 2362
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 18/11/2024I recall this used to be a problem for Science too - but they have a good solution (figure legend on right, scrollable!) @richardsever.bsky.social 110
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 18/11/2024Haven't complained about this in a while, but now that @biorxivpreprint.bsky.social has such a great full text view for web... I HATE how clicking on the image brings up a magnified image that gets covered dynamically with the figure legend when you mouse over it... SO ANNOYING!!!! 1120
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 16/11/2024Just added the @bsky.app logo and links to our lab website members page (fraserlab.com/members) - these types of links are a great feature (along with the timeline, cartoon, and easter 🥚 pictures)... thanks to @tomo.science for providing the foundation - (to copy: fraserlab.com/2020/05/03/C...) 1579
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 04/10/2023I see this all the time - you don't need to wait for a journal to ask you to review - JUST REVIEW THE PREPRINT and post your review! We do it all the time: fraserlab.com/reviews The majority of the time, a journal asks us to include the review in their process AFTER we post! 0137
James Fraser @fraserlab.com · 12/09/2023Loving the t-shirts for this year’s UCSF Tetrad Retreat! 1181