enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 08/10/2026Yes but the uptick in submissions in the last 18 months or so is noticeable and I can’t think of another explanation 000
Reposted by enzo rossiJacob T. Levy @jacobtlevy.bsky.social · 04/10/2026Establish that violations of the Emoluments Clauses and the Establishment Clause are impeachable. Establish that war crimes are impeachable. None of these require the mens rea questions that so sidetracked the first two Trump impeachments. The facts are the facts. 7879121
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 04/10/2026If journal submissions are going up, ppl are using AI wrong. By all means use it to stress-test your arguments. Publish fewer, better things. Sloppy substantially AI-generated research papers will soon lose most of their value anyway. Quantity-heavy CVs will be suspect. Citations metrics will change 1102
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 01/10/2026Academics! Suppose several people for whom you are a reference—not your students—want to apply for the same job. You don’t have to choose, right? My letters stay the same, and the search committee can make up its mind, I would’ve thought. Am I doing this wrong? 030
Reposted by enzo rossiJonathan Floyd @jonathanfloyd.bsky.social · 28/09/2026Hi folks. You now have until November 4th to submit a paper/panel to the 'political philosophy' section at the biennial IPSA conference in Rome (07/27). We're trying to make it the biggest ever pol-phi IPSA conference, and already have lots of fun things planned... wc2027.ipsa.org/wc/submit-pa...wc2027.ipsa.orgSubmit a PaperCovered in this section: Key Dates Rules for Participation Guidelines for paper proposals Submit or revise a paper proposal Guidelines for full papers Paper Proposal Key Dates 08 SEP 2026 Call for Pap... 144
Reposted by enzo rossiJonathan Floyd @jonathanfloyd.bsky.social · 12/09/2026So folks, will we see you next year in Barcelona? After all, LaSagradaFamila is FINALLY finished, so maybe book your ticket already now? @psapolthought.bsky.social @biapt.bsky.social @jamespattison.bsky.social @adrianblau.bsky.social @enzoreds.bsky.social @rebeccabuxton.bsky.social 141
Reposted by enzo rossiJonathan Floyd @jonathanfloyd.bsky.social · 18/09/2026Do have you a political theory/philosophy book manuscript? Would you like a one-day workshop dedicated to it in Spring 2027? If so, Bristol is here for you, and as promised a while ago, here's the very short form you need to fill in between now and roughly 4 weeks time: forms.gle/uCvi7sMMT7kW...forms.gleThe Bristol Political Philosophy Manuscript Workshop 2027The Bristol Political Philosophy group will be hosting its first manuscript workshop in 2027. This will give scholars who are currently preparing a book manuscript a chance to engage in a day-long wor... 11918
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 15/09/2026The AI lords don’t want to slow down to regulate the tech. They want to make sure they control what ‘regulation’ means. 082
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 11/09/2026I think human extinction is a morally neutral outcome per se. But the likely pathways there are morally catastrophic in terms of the suffering involved. So, if AI promises to kill us all in our sleep in one fell swoop, I’m OK with the risk. Pinky promise? 020
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 09/09/2026Because his smarts are extremely domain-bound, with trade-offs to boot 030
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 09/09/2026Next month at Edinburgh Uni - 'Conflict on Campus': www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/conflict-o... 031
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 09/09/2026Kinda cute how we’re debating writing nerdy papers with AI when the main purpose of the technology is making autonomous doomsday machines. 170
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 06/09/2026More grist to my mill: did that stop the rise of their party? 100
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 04/09/2026What are the odds that the AI Amish (c) will manage to drag the world back to 2022 and keep it there? 020
Reposted by enzo rossiJonathan Floyd @jonathanfloyd.bsky.social · 01/09/2026It's now 10 days until the pol-theory plenary I'm chairing @ecpr.bsky.social in Krakow. Here you will get, not just a star-studded roundtable on the horrible/hopeful future of democracy, but also the official announcement of our 1st ever Onora O'Neill book prize winner! ecpr.eu/Events/Event...ecpr.euIf democracy is dying, isn't it time political theorists thought of something else?European Consortium for Political Research 165
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 02/09/2026Friday at ALTR: www.altrlab.org/latest/strat...altrlab.orgStrategy workshop on direct action — AMSTERDAM LAB FOR TRANSFORMATIVE RESEARCHWorshop on 4 September 000
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 01/09/2026What do liberalism and fascism have in common? The view that ideas and sheer political will--not material factors--are the key forces shaping history. Hilariously, this is most evident in liberals' panicked writings about fascism. 130
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 01/09/2026The Arday affair is a lot like the Dreyfus affair—except Dreyfus was innocent. 200
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 29/08/2026I honestly don’t think Singer or Minerva are racists. In principle I oppose sacking people for their views. In the Cofnas case—now there’s a racist—there is the complication that, given his views on academic freedom, it may not be the best cause to actively support. 100
Reposted by enzo rossigordon-arlen.bsky.social @gordon-arlen.bsky.social · 27/08/2026Thrilled to organize, plan, and host a 3 day early career researcher (ECR) conference at the University of Melbourne (August 18-20). Theme was "Political Theory in Oligarchic Times." Keynote from Enzo Rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social. 15 participants. Great panels on diverse topics. A career highlight. 251
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 27/08/2026Grrr... I am going to write to him again. And I will ask him who these alleged other people who compiled the Gdoc are. 110
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 27/08/2026If I get a public apology from them you still won't remove the file, for the reason you just stated, I presume. So you see the problem for my reputation. I posted a comment on your site, which I guess is better than nothing. But I still don't know why you'd host a misleading document. Your call ofc. 100
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 27/08/2026A small silver lining might be that the relatively multiracial GOP '24 coalition seems unlikely to survive something of this magnitude into the midterms 000
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 27/08/2026Well, yes, but maybe if that file has names on it that shoudn't be, best to remove it from your site also? 100
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 26/08/2026Just from my convos on here 5 mins ago (Josef is a friend and a wise person and philosopher, but also representative of this common German view): bsky.app/profile/frue... 010
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 26/08/2026Inference to the best explanation as to why those restrictions are there. The claim is at least that they would help prevent it. A comparative perspective seems to point in the other direction. Also, ever talked to a German about this? They overwhelmingly buy some version of the Popper argument. 200
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 26/08/2026Ikr Add to the image what “SS” stands for and it’s even subtler 010
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 26/08/2026This is good. “Viewpoint diversity” is not really about improving how we pursue epistemic aims, or not significantly. It is more of a power grab. So it’s no better than the left-leaning activist scholarship its proponents despise. www.aaup.org/academe/issu...aaup.orgSeven Theses Against Viewpoint DiversityDemands for “viewpoint diversity,” a pillar of the Right’s strategy to remake higher education, collide with the pursuit of truth. 002
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 26/08/2026Re: how restrictions fare, just look at the rise of the AfD, sigh 000
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 26/08/2026Why? It’s a standard, textbook distinction: incompatibility between propositions vs lack of rational support across propositions. 100
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 26/08/2026A claim pointing to evidence about the lack of a causal effect the proponents of restrictions hypothesised 100
Reposted by enzo rossiThe Björnen formerly known as Beelzebjörn @beelzebjorn.bsky.social · 26/08/2026Sitting in a country where the ruling right-wing coalition are propped up on support from a party literally founded by an SS-volunteer, and the parties of that coalition are STILL referred to as centre-right. Meanwhile when someone says "from the river to the sea" all Hell breaks loose. 173
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 26/08/2026Though not inconsistent it may however be incoherent on some construals, which is why I didn’t sign 100
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 26/08/2026The thought that principled stands on academic freedom trump any other consideration 110
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 26/08/2026Perhaps. But if that was actionable it wasn't about speech anyway 110
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 26/08/2026Speech restrictions are at best useless. Germany has some of the strictest anti-hate speech laws, and yet this thinly-veiled Nazi-lite party continues to rise and rise. 2135
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 26/08/2026One thing to remember about Cofnas is that he’s against other people’s academic freedom. That’s why I’m not signing the letter defending him on those grounds. 1195
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 25/08/2026Which is what a lot of 100% certified organic human research is anyway 100
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 25/08/2026I’d have to look up the whole thing. As it happens I want to put together a grant appl on university governance and related issues so I will revisit this 020
enzo rossi @enzoreds.bsky.social · 25/08/2026Judging from what ‘readings’ one sees around (present company excluded!), I’m confident they’re mostly staring. But seriously, this idea that PT is *fundamentally* about reading texts, come on, it needs to end. It’s dooming the subfield, for one thing. 000