Peer-reviewed research - Goals-based species selection process for connectivity modeling and planning

Peer-reviewed research - No coding, no problem: Revolutionizing scientific workflows through workflow-orchestrating AI

Peer-reviewed research - Red tree vole nest site characteristics and persistence in young and old Douglas-fir forests: implications for canopy-dependent species

Peer-reviewed research - Sex biases in ILC1 phenotypes do not alter immune control of cytomegalovirus

Peer-reviewed research - How to avoid the camera trap: the effect of camera settings on occupancy analysis and photo data workload

Peer-reviewed research - A path towards the conservation and recovery of Guloninae species worldwide

Peer-reviewed research - A path towards the conservation and recovery of Guloninae species worldwide

Peer-reviewed research - What is the future for The Martes Complex (Guloninae) in the face of climate change and ecological breakdown?

Peer-reviewed research - Genetic aspects of interspecies hybridization between sable and pine marten based on microsatellite loci data

Unite your community’s research with an eye-catching Special Issue

Peer-reviewed research - Using temperature loggers to monitor den box use by American martens, fishers, and tree squirrels

This Special Issue advances research and conservation efforts for fishers, martens, sables, tayras, and wolverines.

Peer-reviewed research - Reconstructing the history and demise of the red wolf in Alabama: Insights from examining historical records and cultural perspectives

This Special Issue advances research and conservation efforts for fishers, martens, sables, tayras, and wolverines.

Peer-reviewed research - Differentiation and adaptation among fishers in Western Canada: Evidence for validity of Pekania pennanti columbiana subspecies

We call on members of the worldwide scholarly communication community – researchers, policy-makers, scholarly societies, libraries, higher education and research institutions, publishers, funders, and...

Learn and collaborate with others in your field to create better science, together.

Teams of up to seven researchers are reviewing papers submitted to the Stacks Journal, which wants to bring evaluation of scientific work back from the brink.

Journal that is experimenting with peer reviewing but not accepting manuscripts could lose its impact factor

Teams of up to seven researchers are reviewing papers submitted to the Stacks Journal, which wants to bring evaluation of scientific work back from the brink.

Teams of up to seven researchers are reviewing papers submitted to the Stacks Journal, which wants to bring evaluation of scientific work back from the brink.

" + detail + "